Home Life Sciences Sunflower Genetic Collection at the Vavilov Institute of Plant Industry
Article Open Access

Sunflower Genetic Collection at the Vavilov Institute of Plant Industry

  • V.A. Gavrilova EMAIL logo , V.T. Rozhkova and I.N. Anisimova
Published/Copyright: July 1, 2014
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The results of a long-term program aimed at discovering the hidden potential and genetic variation of sunflower accessions in a germplasm collection and the creation of a set of homozygous lines are presented. A genetic collection has different levels of development:

  • Level 1–homozygous lines with morphological characters are created;

  • Level 2–genetic control of the characters and segregation visually estimated under field conditions are studied;

  • Level 3–selection of lines homozygous for genes controlling biochemical characters; and

  • Level 4–the identification of characters using DNA markers is envisaged.

It is especially important that the VIR collection be actively maintained and used for genetic studies, gene mapping, as well as for creating cultivars and breeding lines to diversify the genetic base of cultivated sunflower.

Introduction

N.I. Vavilov recommended the use of self-pollination for revealing the hidden potential of variation in a wide range of diverse crops. He regarded inbreeding as an efficient method for analyzing polymorphism in cross-pollinated plants. Inbreeding in rye has helped to find new forms that had never been discovered, even in the major centers of rye diversity in Southwestern Asia (Vavilov, 1931). This method was used quite successfully during Vavilov’ lifetime by Antropov and Antropova (1929) to reveal recessive mutations in rye. In the 1930s, a series of lines with modified morphological characters were produced by Plachek (1936) through self-pollination of a sunflower cultivar. Unfortunately, the majority of these lines have not survived. During the 1970s, the creation of a collection of sunflower inbred lines was started at VIR under the guidance of Anashchenko, A.V.

Production of homozygous inbred lines with certain characters has led to the establishment of genetic collections. According to Smirnov, V.G.: “A genetic collection is a collection of forms of the studied species which stably differ from the standard (wild) type in terms of manifestation of one or several characters” (Smirnov, 2005).

Intensive development of molecular-genetic mapping has demonstrated the importance of homozygous lines with characters of interest and their genetic control, adding to their value. A comparison of the data from crosses and analysis of segregation in F2 hybrids (classical genetic analysis) with the data on molecular identification of genes yields additional information about the genetic control of a character. On the other hand, it is difficult and sometimes impossible to interpret results of sequencing or of molecular mapping when genetically uncharacterized material is used.

Genetic collections are not identical to character collections. The latter are composed of forms with continuous variation which is determined by genes for quantitative traits (Merezhko, 1994). The collection of 62 sunflower lines with tolerance to Phomopsis helianthi can be regarded only as a character collection at the present time due to the state of our knowledge. The existing assumptions concerning the mechanisms of resistance include, for instance, those that influence such factors as thickening of the cell wall, or pubescence of the stem and petiole (Antonova, 1999), or the influence of the duration of the vegetation period (Fick and Miller, 1997). Obviously, resistance to Phomopsis is controlled by several genetic systems and also depends on weather conditions during the period of infection spread and development.

The major method that we have employed in developing genetic characters has been by self-pollination of individuals. We have not used mutagens to develop any genetic characters. Sunflower accessions were screened for combining ability and self-fertility with the desired morphological and economically important characteristics. Individuals were self-pollinated no less than six generations. After that, both line multiplication and further inbreeding were performed. It was established that some seemingly homozygous lines can suddenly segregate new forms in the 5th, 6th, or even the 18th inbred generation. cms lines were produced by means of repeatedly backcrossing seven or eight times to a cms source received directly from Leclerq (1969). Landrace-based self-pollinated lines were used as pollinators. Fertility restorer lines were produced in three different ways:

  1. introducing Rf genes into self-fertile lines;

  2. extracting lines from commercial hybrids by self-pollination; and

  3. selections of progenies from self-pollination of interspecific hybrids (Rozhkova and Anashchenko, 1977; Gavrilova et al., 2000).

Besides the materials resulting from own research, the genetic collection of VIR includes sunflower lines with information about genetic control of characters (supplied by Tolmachev, V.V. from the Ukrainian Institute of Oil Crops), as well as recombinant inbred lines (RILs) resulting from interspecific hybrids produced in France (INRA) and sent to VIR in the framework of GRESO (Groupe de recherche Est-Ouest sur le Tournesol; EWERG –East-West Research Group on Sunflower).

Lines with uniform morphological characters

The sunflower collection at VIR totals 2,780 accessions that include 2,230 accessions of cultivated (Helianthus annuus L.) and 550 of wild sunflower accessions belonging to 24 species (5 annual and 19 perennial).

The cultivated sunflower collection is represented by local varieties, landraces, and cultivars of national and foreign breeding programs, as well as populations collected during explorations. It also includes the first cms-based hybrids which are preserved as hybrid populations and lines. The collection is composed of lines developed as a result of studying interspecific hybrids, varietal diversity, and repeated self-pollination, or interspecific hybridization. The genetic collection includes 189 lines with different morphological characters; 120 fertility restorer lines; 20 cms lines and their fertile analogs; 46 lines with genes for resistance to races 330, 710, and 730 of downy mildew (Plasmopara halstedii (Farl.) Berl. and de Toni); and 90 of the 362 lines have seed storage protein markers for polymorphic variants.

Lines that show no segregation of morphological characters in several subsequent generations

We have obtained a series of natural mutants with different expressions of one and the same character. For example, some lines differ in terms of intensity of anthocyanin coloration of vegetative and generative organs exhibited by only one line, VIR 364. The most numerous is the group of lines with upper branching. Branches form in the upper third of the stem and may be short like in VIR 397, or long as in VIR 721. Lines also exist that branch throughout the stem which may be compact (VIR 636) or spreading (VIR 702). Although genetic control of branching has been repeatedly investigated by several researchers (Putt, 1964; Kovačik and Škaloud, 1986; Miller and Fick, 1997; Gavrilova and Anisimova, 2003; Gavrilova et al., 2005), there does not seem to be a consensus of the gene control for the different branching types. This character is important in restoration lines for restoring pollen fertility in cms forms, as branching lines flower longer and produce more pollen, thus facilitating a longer period of cms pollination for commercial hybrid seed production. Some lines have very short petioles (VIR 708), or a very long reflected petiole (VIR 746), or no petiole at all (KG 49). Both plant habit and cultivation techniques depend on the petiole shape, especially at early stages of cultivar or hybrid development. Data on both recessive and dominant inheritance of Mendelian genes for the erect leaf character have been discussed by Gavrilova and Anisimova (2003).

The practical use of morphological characters with known genetic control such as the dark-green (Gr) and pale-green (gr) leaf color, white seed color, indentation and strong venation (vs) of the leaf blade, leaf blade knobbiness and asymmetry (As), erect petiole (Er), anthocyanin color (A), lemon (l) and orange (la) ray flower color are used as markers in heterotic breeding and for controlling line purity when they are maintained and multiplied for seed increase or during seed production (Gavrilova and Anisimova, 2003). The heterotic effects in commercial hybrid sunflower express itself in both seed yield and plant height. In order to produce hybrids with the optimal plant height (150–180 cm), dwarf lines can be used. A genetic analysis of the material obtained by crossing dwarf lines between themselves and a tall cv. Peredovik has identified three types of dwarfness. The first type is VIR 272 that acts in such a way that plant height is reduced due to the significant shortening of internodes, as well as increased internode number, hence extending the vegetation period (Table 1).

Table 1:

Dwarf lines from the VIR collection at the Kuban Experiment Station of VIR, Krasnodar Territory, 1995

LinePlant height (cm)Internode length (cm)Vegetation period duration (days)
VIR 50160±0.62.9±0.0380
VIR 27262±1.81.4±0.04108
VIR 64866±0.72.8±0.0382
VIR 32868±0.92.4±0.0490
VIR 31975±1.42.9±0.0790
VIR 25382±0.72.9±0.0388
VIR 500105±1.03.4±0.0590
VIR 649106±1.35.7±0.0792
Peredovik200±2.06.3±0.0794

Dwarfness in VIR 272 is determined by the dw1 dw 2 genes with intermediate inheritance and recessive epistatic interaction (Yesaev, 1998; Gavrilova et al., 1999). A decreased internode length is due to the reduced cell size (Yakovleva, 2006). The average number of leaves in VIR 272 is 41 for about a 60-cm tall plant. The same number of leaves has been recorded for the tall cv. Gigant with plant height over 3.5 m. The second type of dwarfness is determined by the additive interaction of alleles of no less than three short stem genes (sht1 sht2 sht3) in VIR 319 and VIR 328. The third type of dwarfness is illustrated in VIR 253, VIR 500, VIR 501, and VIR 648. Control of this character is based on the polygenic action of no less than three semi-dwarf genes with intermediate inheritance (sd1 sd2 sd3). Triple and even larger stem shortening in the standard cv. Peredovik occurs at the expense of significant internode shortening. In this case, the number of leaves may be reduced to 15–17 (compare with 35–37 in cv. Peredovik) (Yesaev, 1998; Gavrilova et al., 1999). The number of leaves and hence the number of internodes determines the duration of the “germination-to-flowering” phenophase, since formation of a larger number of leaves requires more time. Therefore, the lines with a large number of leaves have a longer vegetation period. All dwarf lines have smaller achene and root system than those in cv. Peredovik. However, the head size is not related to dwarfness, since the lines studied included VIR 319, VIR 328, and VIR 648 with a fairly large head (18–20 cm in diameter). The smallest head recorded was 8–10 cm for VIR 501.

The genetic collection of more advanced generation germplasm includes sunflower lines from the 5th–27th generation with all possible mutations of all morphological characters. As a result of our genetic analysis, 33 genes have been identified (Table 2) with genetic control of 16 morphological characters discovered in 18 lines from the collection (Gavrilova and Anisimova, 2003; Gavrilova et al., 2005).

Table 2:

Sunflower lines with genes identified by classical genetic analysis

No.LineVIR Catalog No.Genotype
1VIR 2723515dw1 dw2
2VIR 3193417sht1 sht2 sht3
3VIR 3283475sht1 sht2 sht3
4VIR 2533315sd1 sd2 sd3
5VIR 5013508sd1 sd2 sd3 Wr1 Wr2 Gr3
6VIR 6483420sd1 sd2 sd3 Gr1 Gr2 as1 as2
7VIR 3403513gr1 gr2 gr3 a1 a2 p Vs
8VIR 1302530P Br4Br5Br6 f1 f2 f3 vs
9VIR 4483487A1 A2 ll pl
10VIR 536bl
11VIR 546a1 a2 LL LaLa
12VIR 7293509Rfr1 Rfr2 Rfr3
13VIR 1603220Rf1 Rf2 Rf3
14VIR 1042504HelCa
15SM 1442299HelCb
16VIR 1312536HelAb
17VIR 3023325HelAb
18VIR 7083494Er

In order to determine the degree of resistance to new downy mildew races in sunflower lines in the VIR collection, genotypes resistant to this pathogen have been selected in the field based on observations performed over several years. They were tested in the immunity laboratory of the Pustovoit All-Russian Research Institute of Oil Crops (VNIIMK) for resistance to races 330, 710, and 730 which have spread in the Krasnodar Territory and Rostov Province in recent years (Antonova et al., 2011). Forty-three lines were found to be resistant to race 330, 13 lines showed simultaneous resistance to two races, and 12 lines demonstrated resistance to three downy mildew races (Table 3). In addition to resistance to three downy mildew races and Phomopsis, VIR 249 can also restore fertility of the cms РЕТ1 cytoplasm as a male parent when used for breeding commercial sunflower hybrids.

Table 3:

Sunflower geneticlines with resistance to downy mildew races 330, 710, and 730

No.Catalog No.LineOrigin
12793VIR 172Russia
23314VIR 247Russia
33338VIR 387Russia
43362НА R4Australia
53381VIR 581Russia
63497VIR 702Russia
73532НА 89USA
83623RHA 278USA
93635VIR 632Russia
103467VIR 435Russia
113570VIR 800Russia
123469VIR 249Russia

Lines with certain uniform biochemical characters showing no segregation for several generations

The sunflower seed protein fraction includes two main components, namely the salt-soluble protein 11S globulin (helianthinin) and the water-soluble 2S albumins which differ by their molecular mass, amino acid composition, and physicochemical properties. The majority of lines in the genetic collection have been analyzed using 11S globulin enzyme electrophoretic banding pattern (Anisimova et al., 1991; Anashchenko et al., 1992; Anisimova et al., 2004). Polymorphism of seed 2S albumins has been thoroughly studied in seven lines using a complex of biochemical methods (Anisimova et al., 1995), polymorphism of SFA7 and SFA8 proteins, the main methionine-rich components of the albumin fraction investigated in 100 lines (Anisimova et al., 2003), and polymorphism of proteolytic enzyme inhibitors studied in 70 lines (Konarev et al., 2000).

The analysis of segregation in F2 and Fa (Fa is F1×Parents=Fb) populations from crosses of inbred lines differing in helianthinin composition has shown that polymorphism is determined by the allelic variation in at least three loci: HelA, HelB, and HelC (Table 2). The hybridological analysis identified polymorphic alleles in each of these loci (Table 4). It has been shown by dihybrid crosses that the HelA locus is inherited independently from HelB and HelC, while HelB and HelC demonstrated a linkage: the frequency of recombination in F2 from two different cross combinations did not exceed 24%, while in the test cross [(VIR 130×VIR 104)×VIR 130], the value was 19%. It confirms the localization of both genes in the same linkage group. In many cases, the presence of these alleles was associated with the line origin (Table 2). For instance, the presence of HelCc or HelCb alleles indicated, as a rule, the presence of genetic material from wild forms. Such lines include VIR 104, HA61, RHA273, and RHA274. The HelВb allele, which is characteristic of helianthinin from the accession k-2266, was also found in the inbred lines created from it (Anisimova et al., 2004).

Table 4:

Polymorphism of storage proteins in lines from thesunflower genetic collection

LinePresence of polymorphic protein polypeptidesa
9111229303334SEA8nSFA8v
VIR 104++++
VIR 122++++
VIR 130++++
VIR 131++++
VIR 302++++
VIR 369++++
SM44++++
i-469802+++

Ninety inbred lines out of 188 analyzed possessed the characteristic helianthinin polypeptides. Besides the above allelic helianthinin variants, other electrophoretic variants were observed. Line VIR 387 lacked the major polypeptide band 10, while lines VIR 130, VIR 649, and VIR 302 lacked variant 4 in the helianthinin banding patterns.

The electrophoretic variant of the SFA8 protein was found in five lines (VIR 130, VIR 365, VIR 666, VIR 676, and VIR 262) which differed from the variants present in all other lines by its PAG mobility (Tris–Tricine–SDS electrophoretic buffer, рН 8.8) and isoelectric point mobility (Anisimova et al., 2003). Codominant inheritance was observed in the F1 from the cross VIR 130 × VIR 104, which was characterized by different variants of SFA8, while segregation in the F2 showed that the normal and variant SFA8 were encoded by alleles at the same locus (Table 4).

The mutation that led to the appearance of the SFA8 protein variant has been identified. A comparative analysis of SFA encoding nucleotide sequences revealed that the protein is encoded by a small multigenic family. A single nucleotide substitution in the encoding region of the gene was found in the lines possessing the SFA8 variant. Such a substitution changes the molecule conformation, isoelectric point value, and, consequently, electrophoretic PAG mobility (Anisimova et al., 2010).

Two types of inhibitors, trypsin (TI), and bifunctional inhibitors of trypsin/subtilisin (T/Sl) have been found in sunflower seeds (Konarev et al., 2000). Inhibitor bands were found to be polymorphic in different inbred lines. The F2 from a cross between VIR 670 × VIR 648 differed by the presence/absence of three different variants (a–c) of trypsin/subtilisin inhibitors (based on isoelectric focusing) has been analyzed regarding segregation at their encoding loci, i.e. T/Sla, T/Slb, and T/Slc. According to the results of hybridological analysis, all three loci are localized in one linkage group. The distance between T/Sla and T/Slb loci was 32% (in recombination units), while 23% between T/Slb and T/Slc.

Lines homozygous for phenotypical manifestation of certain characters and molecularly marked lines

Seventeen VIR cms lines have been produced from hybrids between a single source, H. petiolaris L. (cms PET1) obtained by Leclercq, P. in 1968 (Leclercq, 1969), and an unknown pedigree, H. annuus L. (Table 5). For instance, VIR 114 was produced by crossing VIR 104 (cms РЕТ) with cv. Sputnik (bred at the Armavir Station). Parental forms of VIR 104 are the cms source from Leclercq and cv. Armavirsky 1813. VIR 116 was created from an American line cms НА 234, which in turn had been obtained from a hybrid between a cms source from a wild sunflower from Texas and cv. Smena (bred at VNIIMK). The Vympel cultivar was used as the paternal parent for VIR 116. Pedigrees of both lines feature a cms source obtained from an interspecific hybrid between the wild annual and cultivated sunflower and also a Russian variety. The НА 89 line was from the USA, while VK-2086 was from VNIIMK.

Table 5:

Characteristics of fertile analogs of cms lines in the VIR collection, Kuban Station of VIR, Krasnodar Territory, 2012

LineCatalog No.PedigreeSprouting-to-flowering (days)Sprouting-to-ripening (days)Phomopsis infestation (%)Productivity (g/plant)
Master (control)3553VNIIMK, Russia60101871
VIR1003443cv. Armavirsky 1813, Russia54100019
VIR1013445cv. Armavirsky 1813, Russia5799030
VIR1063447cv. Armavirsky 1813, Russia5691020
VIR1092509hybrid HS 52, Romania621106919
VIR1103449hybrid HS 52, Romania57931023
VIR1113451VNIIMK No 30953911230
VIR1143453cv. Sputnik, Russia48840
VIR1163455cv. Vympel, Russia5590826
VIR1172517cv. G-22, Russia5196053
VIR1292310ZhS-17, Russia5491054
VIR1303595k-2266, Germany5897040
VIR1373459cv. Sputnik, Russia52920
VIR1383461cv. Vympel, Russia51904416
VIR1513463k-2184, South Africa5596016
VIR1722793k-705, Uzbekistan50881630
VIR2053465Open pollinated population5797038
VIR2153295VIR 111 × k-2266, Russia5695710
VIR2293304hybrid VPBS-211, Yugoslavia46841131
VIR3403513k-1933, Hungary621093330
VIR4343515HA 378, USA631100
VIR4353467HA 335, USA5697032
VIR4363653HA 336,USA61102030
НА-892396USA6096017
VK-20863657VNIIMK, Russia6098519

The VIR genetic collection includes two other types of cms, RIG0 obtained from a perennial wild species, H. pauciflorus Nutt. (rigidus) (Cass.) Desf., and PEF based on H. petiolaris Nutt. ssp. fallax Heiser. Sterile analogs of VIR109 and VIR151 have been created based on cms РЕТ1 and RIG0 (Gavrilova et al., 2005).

The VIR collection contains 120 fertility restorer lines obtained using three different methods. In the first, lines were obtained through backcrossing self-fertile lines with a source of Rf genes and subsequent control of the progeny using paired crossings. The second and most common way of producing such lines is by extraction from commercial hybrids (Rozhkova and Anashchenko, 1997). Since commercial hybrids are produced based on cms, all fertile progeny have Rf genes and sterile cytoplasms (Table 6). The third method is from interspecific hybrid lines. As a general rule, interspecific hybrids are produced using sterile maternal lines of cultivated sunflower (Table 7). Therefore, that fertility restorer lines from interspecific hybrids also have a sterile cytoplasm.

Table 6:

cms РЕТ1 pollen fertility restorer lines in the VIR collection

No.LineCatalog No.OriginBranching
1VIR 1833280i-473670, ArgentinaNo
2VIR 1853285k-2222, Armenia (local variety)No
3VIR 1963286SL 3376, BulgariaNo
4VIR 2183297VIR 113 (VIR 113 from Sputnik), RussiaNo
5VIR 2203299Yugoslavia, VPBS-211 (1981)Lower
6VIR 2493469Progress, RussiaNo
7VIR 2603318VIR 113, RussiaNo
8VIR 3433477ZhS-17 M, RussiaNo
9VIR 3493503VIR 113, RussiaUpper
10VIR 3583504ZhS-17, RussiaEntire stem
11VIR 3643480VIR 161, RussiaFrom mid-stem
12VIR 3653326Progress х k-2699, RussiaNo
13VIR 3763331VIR 104, from Armavirsky 1813, RussiaLower arched
14VIR 3773332VIR 104 (from Armavirsky 1813), RussiaLower
15VIR 3783333VIR 104 (from Armavirsky 1813), RussiaEntire stem, compact
16VIR 3943481UnknownNo
17VIR 4493527Romania, possibly a hybridNo
18VIR 4503434RHA-271, USAEntire stem, compact
19VIR 5583504i-459886, AustraliaEntire stem
20VIR 5803380i-546502, hybridLower
21VIR 5813381RHA 278, USAEntire stem, compact
22VIR 5823382i-546513 hybrid, USAEntire stem
23VIR 5833383i-545789 RHA 340. USANo
24VIR 5843384i-548680, CM 611, CanadaEntire stem, compact
25VIR 6303437SUNBREOL 265 hybrid, FranceEntire stem
26VIR 6313440SUNBREOL 265 hybrid, FranceEntire stem, compact
27VIR 6363441SW509 × W 637 hybrid, FranceEntire stem, compact, thin
28VIR 6413419VIR 160, RussiaUpper
29VIR 6503385i-535131, VIDEO hybrid, FranceEntire stem, compact
30VIR 6513386i-546504, USAUpper
31VIR 652USA, RHA 265, i-546501Entire stem, compact
32VIR 6533388USA, i-545794Entire stem
33VIR 6553422SW509 × W 637 hybrid, FranceUpper
34VIR 6563423i-473692, ArgentinaEntire stem
35VIR 6583424i-441354 (from a wild population) ВС3, USAEntire stem
36VIR 6813505VIR 160 × к 2266, RussiaEntire stem
37VIR 6993506i-467063, USAEntire stem, compact thin
38VIR 7003507SW536 × W 635 hybrid, FranceUpper
49VIR 7403528UnknownUpper
40VIR 8003570k-3411, Finland, hybridEntire stem
41VIR 8013571k-1039, ItalyEntire stem, spreading
Table 7:

Pollen fertility restorer lines from the VIR collection obtained byinterspecific hybridization

No.LineCatalog No.OriginBranching
1VIR 7563566HA 232 × H. × laetiflorusUpper
2VIR 7583554VIR 129 × H. floridanusEntire stem, compact
3VIR 7593555HA 232 × H. maximilianiEntire stem, compact
43557HA 232 × H. strumosusUpper
5VIR 7673560VIR 151 × H. trachelifoliusLower
63561HA 232 × H. mollisUpper
7VIR 7683568VIR 151 × H. maximilianiEntire stem, compact
8VIR 7703564VIR 114 × H. tomentosusNo
9VIR 7773557HA 232 × H. strumosusNo
10VIR 8003570VIR 114 × H. giganteusUpper
11RIL 80359883 HR4 × RHA345Entire stem, spreading
12RIL 130359983 HR4 × RHA345Entire stem, spreading

The collection at the fourth level is represented by lines with cms and pollen fertility restoration genes (Table 8). The atp9 and orfH522 molecular markers (Schnabel et al., 2008), which are specific for the mitochondrial genes associated with cms PET1, have been used to differentiate between the lines with fertile and sterile cytoplasm, as well as the difference between lines with cms PET1 (e.g. VIR 109, VIR 114, VIR 116, VIR 151, etc.) from cms of other types (Anisimova et al., 2011). It has been established that many pollen fertility restorer lines with Rf genes have sterile cytoplasm (VIR 364, VIR 365, and VIR 558, Table 8), since they have been produced through self-pollination of commercial F1 hybrids (Table 8). Sterile cytoplasm makes it possible to control the Rf genes when reproducing the line without additional crosses. Pollen fertility restorer lines, based on self-fertile lines (VIR 740 and others) through backcrossing with the restorer lines and the further testing of Rf genes in paired crosses, have fertile cytoplasm (Anisimova et al., 2011).

Table 8:

Sunflower lines characterized using DNA markers associated with cms-Rf genetic system

No.LineVIR Catalog No.Capacity to restore pollen fertilityRf1 gene markers (Horn et al., 2003)aCytoplasm
HRG01_454HRG02_740
1VIR 101 PET13444NoРЕТ1
2VIR 109 PET12509NoРЕТ1
3VIR 109 RIG03648NoX
4VIR 114 PET13452NoРЕТ1
5VIR 116 PET13454NoРЕТ1
6VIR 151 PET13462NoРЕТ1
7VIR 151 RIG03632NoX
8VIR 1963286Yes++РЕТ1
9VIR 2493469Yes++РЕТ1
10VIR 3643480YesРЕТ1
11VIR 3653326YesРЕТ1
12VIR 3943481Yes++РЕТ1
13VIR 5583504Yes++РЕТ1
14VIR 5813381Yes++РЕТ1
15VIR 6373490Yes++РЕТ1
16VIR 7003507Yes++РЕТ1
17VIR 7403528Yes++Х or N

Most lines restoring pollen fertility of cms have molecular markers (Horn et al., 2003) for the Rf1 gene. However, two lines (VIR364 and VIR 365), which restore pollen fertility in F1 hybrids quite well, have been found during field testing that do not have molecular markers for Rf1. The absence of markers for these lines and the molecular-genetic analysis data on other Rf1 donor lines allows one to speculate that other genes control pollen fertility restoration in genotypes of VIR 364 and VIR 365.

It has been observed that of the 38 analyzed Rf1 gene donors, 4 are fertile based, 22 based on PET1, and 13 have sterile cytoplasm differing from PET1 (Table 8). All the mentioned lines restore pollen fertility in F1 of hybrids with cms PET.

Conclusions

The aim of the present work was to create a genetic collection of sunflower that would include lines with identified inherited genes controlling a variety of phenotypic traits. Such a collection could be used as a reference when identifying the newly discovered genes. It is especially important that the VIR collection be actively maintained and used for genetic studies, gene mapping, as well as for creating cultivars and breeding lines to diversify the genetic base of cultivated sunflower.

Acknowledgments

The present research was partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project Nos 08-04-90112 and 12-04-00329).

References

Anashchenko, A.V., Gavrilova, V.A., Anisimova, I.N., Rozhkova, V.T., Smirnova, N.G., 1992. Self-Pollinated Marked Sunflower Lines, Catalogue of the World Collection of VIR, St. Petersburg, pp. 126.Search in Google Scholar

Anisimova, I.N., Alpatyeva, N.V., Gavrilova, V.A., 2010. Genotypic variation of the unique, methionine-rich protein SFA8 in sunflower. Genetics and biotechnology at the turn of millennia. In: Proc of the International Science Conference, October 25–29, Minsk, Belorussia, p. 6.Search in Google Scholar

Anisimova, I.N., Fido, R.J., Tatham, A.S., Shewry, P.R., 1995. Genotypic variation and polymorphism of 2S albumins of sunflower. Euphytica83(1): 1523.10.1007/BF01677856Search in Google Scholar

Anisimova, I.N., Gavriljuk, I.P., Konarev, V.G., 1991. Identification of sunflower lines and varieties by helianthinin electrophoresis. Plant Varieties and Seeds4: 133141.Search in Google Scholar

Anisimova, I.N., Gavrilova, V.A., Alpatyeva, N.V., Ryabova, D.N., Rozhkova, V.T., 2011. Polymorphism of the PPR-PFL-genes homologous sequences in sunflower genome. Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding168: 6479.Search in Google Scholar

Anisimova, I.N., Gavrilova, V.A., Loskutov, A.V., Rozhkova, V.T., Tolmachev, V.V., 2004. Polymorphism and inheritance of seed storage protein in sunflower. Russian Journal of Genetics40(9): 12151223.10.1023/B:RUGE.0000041378.51180.0bSearch in Google Scholar

Anisimova, I.N., Konarev, A.V., Gavrilova, V.A., Rozhkova, V.T., Fido, R.J., Tatham, A.S., Shewry, P.R., 2003. Polymorphism and inheritance of methionine-rich 2S albumins in sunflower. Euphytica129(1): 99107.10.1023/A:1021562712945Search in Google Scholar

Antonova, T.S., 1999. Peculiarities of evaluation and selection of material for breeding for resistance to the main pathogens depending on the sunflower defense response. Senior doctoral dissertation (Biol.) author’s abstract, Krasnodar, pp. 151.Search in Google Scholar

Antonova, T.S., Ivebor, M.V., Rozhkova, V.T., Araslanova, N.P., Gavrilova, V.A., 2011. Results of evaluation of accessions from the VIR sunflower collection for resistance to downy mildew strains spread in the Krasnodar Territory. Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding167: 9095.Search in Google Scholar

Antropov, V.I., Antropova, V.F., 1929. Rye in the USSR and neighbouring countries. Appendix No. 36 to the Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding, pp. 1365.Search in Google Scholar

Fick, G.N., Miller, J.F., 1997. Sunflower Breeding. Sunflower Technology and Production. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, USA, pp. 395440.10.2134/agronmonogr35.c8Search in Google Scholar

Gavrilova, V.A., Anisimova, I.N., 2003. Genetics of Cultivated Plants. Sunflower, VIR, St. Petersburg, pp. 1197.Search in Google Scholar

GavrilovaV.A., Nizova, N.K., Tolstaya, T.T., Achtulova, A.M., Slyusar, E.L., 2000. Production, study and utilization of sunflower interspecific hybrid. In: Proc 15th International Sunflower Conference, Toulouse, France, Vol. 2, pp. 712.Search in Google Scholar

Gavrilova, V.A., Rozhkova, V.T., Yesaev, A.L., 2005. Genetic Collection of Major Agricultural Crops. Sunflower. Identified Plant Diversity and Breeding, VIR, St. Petersburg, pp. 873880.Search in Google Scholar

Gavrilova, V.A., Yesaev, A.L., Rozhkova, V.T., 1999. Dwarf lines in the VIR collection. Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding156: 1425.Search in Google Scholar

Horn, R., Kusterer, B., Lazarescu, E., Prufe, M., Friedt, W., 2003. Molecular mapping of the Rf1 gene restoring fertility in PET 1-based F1 hybrids in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics106: 599606.10.1007/s00122-002-1078-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Konarev, A.V., Anisimova, I.N., Gavrilova, V.A., Shewry, P.R., 2000. Novel proteinase inhibitors in seeds of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.): Polymorphism, inheritance and properties. Theoretical and Applied Genetics100(1): 8288.10.1007/s001220050012Search in Google Scholar

Kovačik, A., Škaloud, V., 1986. Collection of sunflower marker genes available for genetic studies. Helia3: 2728.10.1080/07266472.1986.11733450Search in Google Scholar

Leclerq,P., 1969. Une sterilite cytoplasmique chez le tournesol. Annales de Amelioration de Plantes 19: 99106.Search in Google Scholar

Merezhko, A.F., 1994. The Problem of Donors in Plant Breeding, VIR, St. Petersburg, pp. 1128.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, J.F., Fick,G.N., 1997. Genetics of Sunflower, Sunflower Technology and Production. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, USA, pp. 441495.10.2134/agronmonogr35.c9Search in Google Scholar

Plachek, E.M., 1936. Sunflower breeding. Plant Breeding and Seed Production8: 1222.Search in Google Scholar

Putt, E.D., 1964. Recessive branching in sunflower. Crop Science4: 444445.10.2135/cropsci1964.0011183X000400040042xSearch in Google Scholar

Rozhkova, V.T., Anashchenko, A.V., 1977. Creation of self-pollinated lines and heterotic hybrids of sunflower on the basis of the global collection. Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding69: 5355.Search in Google Scholar

Schnabel, U., Engelmann, U., Horn, R., 2008. Development of markers for the use of the PEF1 cytoplasm in sunflower hybrid breeding. Plant Breeding6: 541652.10.1111/j.1439-0523.2008.01516.xSearch in Google Scholar

Smirnov, V.G., 2005. Importance of Genetic Collections for Fundamental Research and Genetic Programs. Identified Plant Diversity and Breeding, VIR, St. Petersburg, pp. 783806.Search in Google Scholar

Vavilov, N.I., 1931. Linnaean species as a system. Moscow-Leningrad, Selkolkhozizdat, pp. 132.Search in Google Scholar

Yakovleva, Е.А., 2006. Morpho-anatomical peculiarities of stem in dwarf sunflower forms (Helianthus annuus L.). Ph.D. dissertation author’s abstract, VIR, St. Petersburg, pp. 119.Search in Google Scholar

Yesaev, A.L., 1998. Genetic control of short stem character in some inbred lines of cultivated sunflower: Ph.D. dissertation author’s abstract, VIR, St. Petersburg, pp. 121.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-4-12
Accepted: 2014-5-20
Published Online: 2014-7-1
Published in Print: 2014-7-1

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 12.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/helia-2014-0001/html
Scroll to top button