Abstract
The results of a long-term program aimed at discovering the hidden potential and genetic variation of sunflower accessions in a germplasm collection and the creation of a set of homozygous lines are presented. A genetic collection has different levels of development:
Level 1–homozygous lines with morphological characters are created;
Level 2–genetic control of the characters and segregation visually estimated under field conditions are studied;
Level 3–selection of lines homozygous for genes controlling biochemical characters; and
Level 4–the identification of characters using DNA markers is envisaged.
Introduction
N.I. Vavilov recommended the use of self-pollination for revealing the hidden potential of variation in a wide range of diverse crops. He regarded inbreeding as an efficient method for analyzing polymorphism in cross-pollinated plants. Inbreeding in rye has helped to find new forms that had never been discovered, even in the major centers of rye diversity in Southwestern Asia (Vavilov, 1931). This method was used quite successfully during Vavilov’ lifetime by Antropov and Antropova (1929) to reveal recessive mutations in rye. In the 1930s, a series of lines with modified morphological characters were produced by Plachek (1936) through self-pollination of a sunflower cultivar. Unfortunately, the majority of these lines have not survived. During the 1970s, the creation of a collection of sunflower inbred lines was started at VIR under the guidance of Anashchenko, A.V.
Production of homozygous inbred lines with certain characters has led to the establishment of genetic collections. According to Smirnov, V.G.: “A genetic collection is a collection of forms of the studied species which stably differ from the standard (wild) type in terms of manifestation of one or several characters” (Smirnov, 2005).
Intensive development of molecular-genetic mapping has demonstrated the importance of homozygous lines with characters of interest and their genetic control, adding to their value. A comparison of the data from crosses and analysis of segregation in F2 hybrids (classical genetic analysis) with the data on molecular identification of genes yields additional information about the genetic control of a character. On the other hand, it is difficult and sometimes impossible to interpret results of sequencing or of molecular mapping when genetically uncharacterized material is used.
Genetic collections are not identical to character collections. The latter are composed of forms with continuous variation which is determined by genes for quantitative traits (Merezhko, 1994). The collection of 62 sunflower lines with tolerance to Phomopsis helianthi can be regarded only as a character collection at the present time due to the state of our knowledge. The existing assumptions concerning the mechanisms of resistance include, for instance, those that influence such factors as thickening of the cell wall, or pubescence of the stem and petiole (Antonova, 1999), or the influence of the duration of the vegetation period (Fick and Miller, 1997). Obviously, resistance to Phomopsis is controlled by several genetic systems and also depends on weather conditions during the period of infection spread and development.
The major method that we have employed in developing genetic characters has been by self-pollination of individuals. We have not used mutagens to develop any genetic characters. Sunflower accessions were screened for combining ability and self-fertility with the desired morphological and economically important characteristics. Individuals were self-pollinated no less than six generations. After that, both line multiplication and further inbreeding were performed. It was established that some seemingly homozygous lines can suddenly segregate new forms in the 5th, 6th, or even the 18th inbred generation. cms lines were produced by means of repeatedly backcrossing seven or eight times to a cms source received directly from Leclerq (1969). Landrace-based self-pollinated lines were used as pollinators. Fertility restorer lines were produced in three different ways:
introducing Rf genes into self-fertile lines;
extracting lines from commercial hybrids by self-pollination; and
selections of progenies from self-pollination of interspecific hybrids (Rozhkova and Anashchenko, 1977; Gavrilova et al., 2000).
Lines with uniform morphological characters
The sunflower collection at VIR totals 2,780 accessions that include 2,230 accessions of cultivated (Helianthus annuus L.) and 550 of wild sunflower accessions belonging to 24 species (5 annual and 19 perennial).
The cultivated sunflower collection is represented by local varieties, landraces, and cultivars of national and foreign breeding programs, as well as populations collected during explorations. It also includes the first cms-based hybrids which are preserved as hybrid populations and lines. The collection is composed of lines developed as a result of studying interspecific hybrids, varietal diversity, and repeated self-pollination, or interspecific hybridization. The genetic collection includes 189 lines with different morphological characters; 120 fertility restorer lines; 20 cms lines and their fertile analogs; 46 lines with genes for resistance to races 330, 710, and 730 of downy mildew (Plasmopara halstedii (Farl.) Berl. and de Toni); and 90 of the 362 lines have seed storage protein markers for polymorphic variants.
Lines that show no segregation of morphological characters in several subsequent generations
We have obtained a series of natural mutants with different expressions of one and the same character. For example, some lines differ in terms of intensity of anthocyanin coloration of vegetative and generative organs exhibited by only one line, VIR 364. The most numerous is the group of lines with upper branching. Branches form in the upper third of the stem and may be short like in VIR 397, or long as in VIR 721. Lines also exist that branch throughout the stem which may be compact (VIR 636) or spreading (VIR 702). Although genetic control of branching has been repeatedly investigated by several researchers (Putt, 1964; Kovačik and Škaloud, 1986; Miller and Fick, 1997; Gavrilova and Anisimova, 2003; Gavrilova et al., 2005), there does not seem to be a consensus of the gene control for the different branching types. This character is important in restoration lines for restoring pollen fertility in cms forms, as branching lines flower longer and produce more pollen, thus facilitating a longer period of cms pollination for commercial hybrid seed production. Some lines have very short petioles (VIR 708), or a very long reflected petiole (VIR 746), or no petiole at all (KG 49). Both plant habit and cultivation techniques depend on the petiole shape, especially at early stages of cultivar or hybrid development. Data on both recessive and dominant inheritance of Mendelian genes for the erect leaf character have been discussed by Gavrilova and Anisimova (2003).
The practical use of morphological characters with known genetic control such as the dark-green (Gr) and pale-green (gr) leaf color, white seed color, indentation and strong venation (vs) of the leaf blade, leaf blade knobbiness and asymmetry (As), erect petiole (Er), anthocyanin color (A), lemon (l) and orange (la) ray flower color are used as markers in heterotic breeding and for controlling line purity when they are maintained and multiplied for seed increase or during seed production (Gavrilova and Anisimova, 2003). The heterotic effects in commercial hybrid sunflower express itself in both seed yield and plant height. In order to produce hybrids with the optimal plant height (150–180 cm), dwarf lines can be used. A genetic analysis of the material obtained by crossing dwarf lines between themselves and a tall cv. Peredovik has identified three types of dwarfness. The first type is VIR 272 that acts in such a way that plant height is reduced due to the significant shortening of internodes, as well as increased internode number, hence extending the vegetation period (Table 1).
Dwarf lines from the VIR collection at the Kuban Experiment Station of VIR, Krasnodar Territory, 1995
| Line | Plant height (cm) | Internode length (cm) | Vegetation period duration (days) |
| VIR 501 | 60±0.6 | 2.9±0.03 | 80 |
| VIR 272 | 62±1.8 | 1.4±0.04 | 108 |
| VIR 648 | 66±0.7 | 2.8±0.03 | 82 |
| VIR 328 | 68±0.9 | 2.4±0.04 | 90 |
| VIR 319 | 75±1.4 | 2.9±0.07 | 90 |
| VIR 253 | 82±0.7 | 2.9±0.03 | 88 |
| VIR 500 | 105±1.0 | 3.4±0.05 | 90 |
| VIR 649 | 106±1.3 | 5.7±0.07 | 92 |
| Peredovik | 200±2.0 | 6.3±0.07 | 94 |
Dwarfness in VIR 272 is determined by the dw1 dw 2 genes with intermediate inheritance and recessive epistatic interaction (Yesaev, 1998; Gavrilova et al., 1999). A decreased internode length is due to the reduced cell size (Yakovleva, 2006). The average number of leaves in VIR 272 is 41 for about a 60-cm tall plant. The same number of leaves has been recorded for the tall cv. Gigant with plant height over 3.5 m. The second type of dwarfness is determined by the additive interaction of alleles of no less than three short stem genes (sht1 sht2 sht3) in VIR 319 and VIR 328. The third type of dwarfness is illustrated in VIR 253, VIR 500, VIR 501, and VIR 648. Control of this character is based on the polygenic action of no less than three semi-dwarf genes with intermediate inheritance (sd1 sd2 sd3). Triple and even larger stem shortening in the standard cv. Peredovik occurs at the expense of significant internode shortening. In this case, the number of leaves may be reduced to 15–17 (compare with 35–37 in cv. Peredovik) (Yesaev, 1998; Gavrilova et al., 1999). The number of leaves and hence the number of internodes determines the duration of the “germination-to-flowering” phenophase, since formation of a larger number of leaves requires more time. Therefore, the lines with a large number of leaves have a longer vegetation period. All dwarf lines have smaller achene and root system than those in cv. Peredovik. However, the head size is not related to dwarfness, since the lines studied included VIR 319, VIR 328, and VIR 648 with a fairly large head (18–20 cm in diameter). The smallest head recorded was 8–10 cm for VIR 501.
The genetic collection of more advanced generation germplasm includes sunflower lines from the 5th–27th generation with all possible mutations of all morphological characters. As a result of our genetic analysis, 33 genes have been identified (Table 2) with genetic control of 16 morphological characters discovered in 18 lines from the collection (Gavrilova and Anisimova, 2003; Gavrilova et al., 2005).
Sunflower lines with genes identified by classical genetic analysis
| No. | Line | VIR Catalog No. | Genotype |
| 1 | VIR 272 | 3515 | dw1 dw2 |
| 2 | VIR 319 | 3417 | sht1 sht2 sht3 |
| 3 | VIR 328 | 3475 | sht1 sht2 sht3 |
| 4 | VIR 253 | 3315 | sd1 sd2 sd3 |
| 5 | VIR 501 | 3508 | sd1 sd2 sd3 Wr1 Wr2 Gr3 |
| 6 | VIR 648 | 3420 | sd1 sd2 sd3 Gr1 Gr2 as1 as2 |
| 7 | VIR 340 | 3513 | gr1 gr2 gr3 a1 a2 p Vs |
| 8 | VIR 130 | 2530 | P Br4Br5Br6 f1 f2 f3 vs |
| 9 | VIR 448 | 3487 | A1 A2 ll pl |
| 10 | VIR 536 | – | bl |
| 11 | VIR 546 | – | a1 a2 LL LaLa |
| 12 | VIR 729 | 3509 | Rfr1 Rfr2 Rfr3 |
| 13 | VIR 160 | 3220 | Rf1 Rf2 Rf3 |
| 14 | VIR 104 | 2504 | HelCa |
| 15 | SM 144 | 2299 | HelCb |
| 16 | VIR 131 | 2536 | HelAb |
| 17 | VIR 302 | 3325 | HelAb |
| 18 | VIR 708 | 3494 | Er |
In order to determine the degree of resistance to new downy mildew races in sunflower lines in the VIR collection, genotypes resistant to this pathogen have been selected in the field based on observations performed over several years. They were tested in the immunity laboratory of the Pustovoit All-Russian Research Institute of Oil Crops (VNIIMK) for resistance to races 330, 710, and 730 which have spread in the Krasnodar Territory and Rostov Province in recent years (Antonova et al., 2011). Forty-three lines were found to be resistant to race 330, 13 lines showed simultaneous resistance to two races, and 12 lines demonstrated resistance to three downy mildew races (Table 3). In addition to resistance to three downy mildew races and Phomopsis, VIR 249 can also restore fertility of the cms РЕТ1 cytoplasm as a male parent when used for breeding commercial sunflower hybrids.
Sunflower geneticlines with resistance to downy mildew races 330, 710, and 730
| No. | Catalog No. | Line | Origin |
| 1 | 2793 | VIR 172 | Russia |
| 2 | 3314 | VIR 247 | Russia |
| 3 | 3338 | VIR 387 | Russia |
| 4 | 3362 | НА R4 | Australia |
| 5 | 3381 | VIR 581 | Russia |
| 6 | 3497 | VIR 702 | Russia |
| 7 | 3532 | НА 89 | USA |
| 8 | 3623 | RHA 278 | USA |
| 9 | 3635 | VIR 632 | Russia |
| 10 | 3467 | VIR 435 | Russia |
| 11 | 3570 | VIR 800 | Russia |
| 12 | 3469 | VIR 249 | Russia |
Lines with certain uniform biochemical characters showing no segregation for several generations
The sunflower seed protein fraction includes two main components, namely the salt-soluble protein 11S globulin (helianthinin) and the water-soluble 2S albumins which differ by their molecular mass, amino acid composition, and physicochemical properties. The majority of lines in the genetic collection have been analyzed using 11S globulin enzyme electrophoretic banding pattern (Anisimova et al., 1991; Anashchenko et al., 1992; Anisimova et al., 2004). Polymorphism of seed 2S albumins has been thoroughly studied in seven lines using a complex of biochemical methods (Anisimova et al., 1995), polymorphism of SFA7 and SFA8 proteins, the main methionine-rich components of the albumin fraction investigated in 100 lines (Anisimova et al., 2003), and polymorphism of proteolytic enzyme inhibitors studied in 70 lines (Konarev et al., 2000).
The analysis of segregation in F2 and Fa (Fa is F1×Parents=Fb) populations from crosses of inbred lines differing in helianthinin composition has shown that polymorphism is determined by the allelic variation in at least three loci: HelA, HelB, and HelC (Table 2). The hybridological analysis identified polymorphic alleles in each of these loci (Table 4). It has been shown by dihybrid crosses that the HelA locus is inherited independently from HelB and HelC, while HelB and HelC demonstrated a linkage: the frequency of recombination in F2 from two different cross combinations did not exceed 24%, while in the test cross [(VIR 130×VIR 104)×VIR 130], the value was 19%. It confirms the localization of both genes in the same linkage group. In many cases, the presence of these alleles was associated with the line origin (Table 2). For instance, the presence of HelCc or HelCb alleles indicated, as a rule, the presence of genetic material from wild forms. Such lines include VIR 104, HA61, RHA273, and RHA274. The HelВb allele, which is characteristic of helianthinin from the accession k-2266, was also found in the inbred lines created from it (Anisimova et al., 2004).
Polymorphism of storage proteins in lines from thesunflower genetic collection
| Line | Presence of polymorphic protein polypeptidesa | ||||||||
| 9 | 11 | 12 | 29 | 30 | 33 | 34 | SEA8n | SFA8v | |
| VIR 104 | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | – |
| VIR 122 | – | – | + | – | + | + | – | + | – |
| VIR 130 | – | – | + | + | – | + | – | – | + |
| VIR 131 | – | – | + | – | + | – | + | + | – |
| VIR 302 | – | – | + | – | + | – | + | + | – |
| VIR 369 | – | – | + | – | + | + | – | + | – |
| SM44 | – | + | – | – | + | + | – | + | – |
| i-469802 | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | – |
Ninety inbred lines out of 188 analyzed possessed the characteristic helianthinin polypeptides. Besides the above allelic helianthinin variants, other electrophoretic variants were observed. Line VIR 387 lacked the major polypeptide band 10, while lines VIR 130, VIR 649, and VIR 302 lacked variant 4 in the helianthinin banding patterns.
The electrophoretic variant of the SFA8 protein was found in five lines (VIR 130, VIR 365, VIR 666, VIR 676, and VIR 262) which differed from the variants present in all other lines by its PAG mobility (Tris–Tricine–SDS electrophoretic buffer, рН 8.8) and isoelectric point mobility (Anisimova et al., 2003). Codominant inheritance was observed in the F1 from the cross VIR 130 × VIR 104, which was characterized by different variants of SFA8, while segregation in the F2 showed that the normal and variant SFA8 were encoded by alleles at the same locus (Table 4).
The mutation that led to the appearance of the SFA8 protein variant has been identified. A comparative analysis of SFA encoding nucleotide sequences revealed that the protein is encoded by a small multigenic family. A single nucleotide substitution in the encoding region of the gene was found in the lines possessing the SFA8 variant. Such a substitution changes the molecule conformation, isoelectric point value, and, consequently, electrophoretic PAG mobility (Anisimova et al., 2010).
Two types of inhibitors, trypsin (TI), and bifunctional inhibitors of trypsin/subtilisin (T/Sl) have been found in sunflower seeds (Konarev et al., 2000). Inhibitor bands were found to be polymorphic in different inbred lines. The F2 from a cross between VIR 670 × VIR 648 differed by the presence/absence of three different variants (a–c) of trypsin/subtilisin inhibitors (based on isoelectric focusing) has been analyzed regarding segregation at their encoding loci, i.e. T/Sla, T/Slb, and T/Slc. According to the results of hybridological analysis, all three loci are localized in one linkage group. The distance between T/Sla and T/Slb loci was 32% (in recombination units), while 23% between T/Slb and T/Slc.
Lines homozygous for phenotypical manifestation of certain characters and molecularly marked lines
Seventeen VIR cms lines have been produced from hybrids between a single source, H. petiolaris L. (cms PET1) obtained by Leclercq, P. in 1968 (Leclercq, 1969), and an unknown pedigree, H. annuus L. (Table 5). For instance, VIR 114 was produced by crossing VIR 104 (cms РЕТ) with cv. Sputnik (bred at the Armavir Station). Parental forms of VIR 104 are the cms source from Leclercq and cv. Armavirsky 1813. VIR 116 was created from an American line cms НА 234, which in turn had been obtained from a hybrid between a cms source from a wild sunflower from Texas and cv. Smena (bred at VNIIMK). The Vympel cultivar was used as the paternal parent for VIR 116. Pedigrees of both lines feature a cms source obtained from an interspecific hybrid between the wild annual and cultivated sunflower and also a Russian variety. The НА 89 line was from the USA, while VK-2086 was from VNIIMK.
Characteristics of fertile analogs of cms lines in the VIR collection, Kuban Station of VIR, Krasnodar Territory, 2012
| Line | Catalog No. | Pedigree | Sprouting-to-flowering (days) | Sprouting-to-ripening (days) | Phomopsis infestation (%) | Productivity (g/plant) |
| Master (control) | 3553 | VNIIMK, Russia | 60 | 101 | 8 | 71 |
| VIR100 | 3443 | cv. Armavirsky 1813, Russia | 54 | 100 | 0 | 19 |
| VIR101 | 3445 | cv. Armavirsky 1813, Russia | 57 | 99 | 0 | 30 |
| VIR106 | 3447 | cv. Armavirsky 1813, Russia | 56 | 91 | 0 | 20 |
| VIR109 | 2509 | hybrid HS 52, Romania | 62 | 110 | 69 | 19 |
| VIR110 | 3449 | hybrid HS 52, Romania | 57 | 93 | 10 | 23 |
| VIR111 | 3451 | VNIIMK No 309 | 53 | 91 | 12 | 30 |
| VIR114 | 3453 | cv. Sputnik, Russia | 48 | 84 | 0 | – |
| VIR116 | 3455 | cv. Vympel, Russia | 55 | 90 | 8 | 26 |
| VIR117 | 2517 | cv. G-22, Russia | 51 | 96 | 0 | 53 |
| VIR129 | 2310 | ZhS-17, Russia | 54 | 91 | 0 | 54 |
| VIR130 | 3595 | k-2266, Germany | 58 | 97 | 0 | 40 |
| VIR137 | 3459 | cv. Sputnik, Russia | 52 | 92 | 0 | – |
| VIR138 | 3461 | cv. Vympel, Russia | 51 | 90 | 44 | 16 |
| VIR151 | 3463 | k-2184, South Africa | 55 | 96 | 0 | 16 |
| VIR172 | 2793 | k-705, Uzbekistan | 50 | 88 | 16 | 30 |
| VIR205 | 3465 | Open pollinated population | 57 | 97 | 0 | 38 |
| VIR215 | 3295 | VIR 111 × k-2266, Russia | 56 | 95 | 7 | 10 |
| VIR229 | 3304 | hybrid VPBS-211, Yugoslavia | 46 | 84 | 11 | 31 |
| VIR340 | 3513 | k-1933, Hungary | 62 | 109 | 33 | 30 |
| VIR434 | 3515 | HA 378, USA | 63 | 110 | 0 | – |
| VIR435 | 3467 | HA 335, USA | 56 | 97 | 0 | 32 |
| VIR436 | 3653 | HA 336,USA | 61 | 102 | 0 | 30 |
| НА-89 | 2396 | USA | 60 | 96 | 0 | 17 |
| VK-2086 | 3657 | VNIIMK, Russia | 60 | 98 | 5 | 19 |
The VIR genetic collection includes two other types of cms, RIG0 obtained from a perennial wild species, H. pauciflorus Nutt. (rigidus) (Cass.) Desf., and PEF based on H. petiolaris Nutt. ssp. fallax Heiser. Sterile analogs of VIR109 and VIR151 have been created based on cms РЕТ1 and RIG0 (Gavrilova et al., 2005).
The VIR collection contains 120 fertility restorer lines obtained using three different methods. In the first, lines were obtained through backcrossing self-fertile lines with a source of Rf genes and subsequent control of the progeny using paired crossings. The second and most common way of producing such lines is by extraction from commercial hybrids (Rozhkova and Anashchenko, 1997). Since commercial hybrids are produced based on cms, all fertile progeny have Rf genes and sterile cytoplasms (Table 6). The third method is from interspecific hybrid lines. As a general rule, interspecific hybrids are produced using sterile maternal lines of cultivated sunflower (Table 7). Therefore, that fertility restorer lines from interspecific hybrids also have a sterile cytoplasm.
cms РЕТ1 pollen fertility restorer lines in the VIR collection
| No. | Line | Catalog No. | Origin | Branching |
| 1 | VIR 183 | 3280 | i-473670, Argentina | No |
| 2 | VIR 185 | 3285 | k-2222, Armenia (local variety) | No |
| 3 | VIR 196 | 3286 | SL 3376, Bulgaria | No |
| 4 | VIR 218 | 3297 | VIR 113 (VIR 113 from Sputnik), Russia | No |
| 5 | VIR 220 | 3299 | Yugoslavia, VPBS-211 (1981) | Lower |
| 6 | VIR 249 | 3469 | Progress, Russia | No |
| 7 | VIR 260 | 3318 | VIR 113, Russia | No |
| 8 | VIR 343 | 3477 | ZhS-17 M, Russia | No |
| 9 | VIR 349 | 3503 | VIR 113, Russia | Upper |
| 10 | VIR 358 | 3504 | ZhS-17, Russia | Entire stem |
| 11 | VIR 364 | 3480 | VIR 161, Russia | From mid-stem |
| 12 | VIR 365 | 3326 | Progress х k-2699, Russia | No |
| 13 | VIR 376 | 3331 | VIR 104, from Armavirsky 1813, Russia | Lower arched |
| 14 | VIR 377 | 3332 | VIR 104 (from Armavirsky 1813), Russia | Lower |
| 15 | VIR 378 | 3333 | VIR 104 (from Armavirsky 1813), Russia | Entire stem, compact |
| 16 | VIR 394 | 3481 | Unknown | No |
| 17 | VIR 449 | 3527 | Romania, possibly a hybrid | No |
| 18 | VIR 450 | 3434 | RHA-271, USA | Entire stem, compact |
| 19 | VIR 558 | 3504 | i-459886, Australia | Entire stem |
| 20 | VIR 580 | 3380 | i-546502, hybrid | Lower |
| 21 | VIR 581 | 3381 | RHA 278, USA | Entire stem, compact |
| 22 | VIR 582 | 3382 | i-546513 hybrid, USA | Entire stem |
| 23 | VIR 583 | 3383 | i-545789 RHA 340. USA | No |
| 24 | VIR 584 | 3384 | i-548680, CM 611, Canada | Entire stem, compact |
| 25 | VIR 630 | 3437 | SUNBREOL 265 hybrid, France | Entire stem |
| 26 | VIR 631 | 3440 | SUNBREOL 265 hybrid, France | Entire stem, compact |
| 27 | VIR 636 | 3441 | SW509 × W 637 hybrid, France | Entire stem, compact, thin |
| 28 | VIR 641 | 3419 | VIR 160, Russia | Upper |
| 29 | VIR 650 | 3385 | i-535131, VIDEO hybrid, France | Entire stem, compact |
| 30 | VIR 651 | 3386 | i-546504, USA | Upper |
| 31 | VIR 652 | USA, RHA 265, i-546501 | Entire stem, compact | |
| 32 | VIR 653 | 3388 | USA, i-545794 | Entire stem |
| 33 | VIR 655 | 3422 | SW509 × W 637 hybrid, France | Upper |
| 34 | VIR 656 | 3423 | i-473692, Argentina | Entire stem |
| 35 | VIR 658 | 3424 | i-441354 (from a wild population) ВС3, USA | Entire stem |
| 36 | VIR 681 | 3505 | VIR 160 × к 2266, Russia | Entire stem |
| 37 | VIR 699 | 3506 | i-467063, USA | Entire stem, compact thin |
| 38 | VIR 700 | 3507 | SW536 × W 635 hybrid, France | Upper |
| 49 | VIR 740 | 3528 | Unknown | Upper |
| 40 | VIR 800 | 3570 | k-3411, Finland, hybrid | Entire stem |
| 41 | VIR 801 | 3571 | k-1039, Italy | Entire stem, spreading |
Pollen fertility restorer lines from the VIR collection obtained byinterspecific hybridization
| No. | Line | Catalog No. | Origin | Branching |
| 1 | VIR 756 | 3566 | HA 232 × H. × laetiflorus | Upper |
| 2 | VIR 758 | 3554 | VIR 129 × H. floridanus | Entire stem, compact |
| 3 | VIR 759 | 3555 | HA 232 × H. maximiliani | Entire stem, compact |
| 4 | 3557 | HA 232 × H. strumosus | Upper | |
| 5 | VIR 767 | 3560 | VIR 151 × H. trachelifolius | Lower |
| 6 | 3561 | HA 232 × H. mollis | Upper | |
| 7 | VIR 768 | 3568 | VIR 151 × H. maximiliani | Entire stem, compact |
| 8 | VIR 770 | 3564 | VIR 114 × H. tomentosus | No |
| 9 | VIR 777 | 3557 | HA 232 × H. strumosus | No |
| 10 | VIR 800 | 3570 | VIR 114 × H. giganteus | Upper |
| 11 | RIL 80 | 3598 | 83 HR4 × RHA345 | Entire stem, spreading |
| 12 | RIL 130 | 3599 | 83 HR4 × RHA345 | Entire stem, spreading |
The collection at the fourth level is represented by lines with cms and pollen fertility restoration genes (Table 8). The atp9 and orfH522 molecular markers (Schnabel et al., 2008), which are specific for the mitochondrial genes associated with cms PET1, have been used to differentiate between the lines with fertile and sterile cytoplasm, as well as the difference between lines with cms PET1 (e.g. VIR 109, VIR 114, VIR 116, VIR 151, etc.) from cms of other types (Anisimova et al., 2011). It has been established that many pollen fertility restorer lines with Rf genes have sterile cytoplasm (VIR 364, VIR 365, and VIR 558, Table 8), since they have been produced through self-pollination of commercial F1 hybrids (Table 8). Sterile cytoplasm makes it possible to control the Rf genes when reproducing the line without additional crosses. Pollen fertility restorer lines, based on self-fertile lines (VIR 740 and others) through backcrossing with the restorer lines and the further testing of Rf genes in paired crosses, have fertile cytoplasm (Anisimova et al., 2011).
Sunflower lines characterized using DNA markers associated with cms-Rf genetic system
| No. | Line | VIR Catalog No. | Capacity to restore pollen fertility | Rf1 gene markers (Horn et al., 2003)a | Cytoplasm | |
| HRG01_454 | HRG02_740 | |||||
| 1 | VIR 101 PET1 | 3444 | No | – | – | РЕТ1 |
| 2 | VIR 109 PET1 | 2509 | No | – | – | РЕТ1 |
| 3 | VIR 109 RIG0 | 3648 | No | – | – | X |
| 4 | VIR 114 PET1 | 3452 | No | – | – | РЕТ1 |
| 5 | VIR 116 PET1 | 3454 | No | – | – | РЕТ1 |
| 6 | VIR 151 PET1 | 3462 | No | – | – | РЕТ1 |
| 7 | VIR 151 RIG0 | 3632 | No | – | – | X |
| 8 | VIR 196 | 3286 | Yes | + | + | РЕТ1 |
| 9 | VIR 249 | 3469 | Yes | + | + | РЕТ1 |
| 10 | VIR 364 | 3480 | Yes | – | – | РЕТ1 |
| 11 | VIR 365 | 3326 | Yes | – | – | РЕТ1 |
| 12 | VIR 394 | 3481 | Yes | + | + | РЕТ1 |
| 13 | VIR 558 | 3504 | Yes | + | + | РЕТ1 |
| 14 | VIR 581 | 3381 | Yes | + | + | РЕТ1 |
| 15 | VIR 637 | 3490 | Yes | + | + | РЕТ1 |
| 16 | VIR 700 | 3507 | Yes | + | + | РЕТ1 |
| 17 | VIR 740 | 3528 | Yes | + | + | Х or N |
Most lines restoring pollen fertility of cms have molecular markers (Horn et al., 2003) for the Rf1 gene. However, two lines (VIR364 and VIR 365), which restore pollen fertility in F1 hybrids quite well, have been found during field testing that do not have molecular markers for Rf1. The absence of markers for these lines and the molecular-genetic analysis data on other Rf1 donor lines allows one to speculate that other genes control pollen fertility restoration in genotypes of VIR 364 and VIR 365.
It has been observed that of the 38 analyzed Rf1 gene donors, 4 are fertile based, 22 based on PET1, and 13 have sterile cytoplasm differing from PET1 (Table 8). All the mentioned lines restore pollen fertility in F1 of hybrids with cms PET.
Conclusions
The aim of the present work was to create a genetic collection of sunflower that would include lines with identified inherited genes controlling a variety of phenotypic traits. Such a collection could be used as a reference when identifying the newly discovered genes. It is especially important that the VIR collection be actively maintained and used for genetic studies, gene mapping, as well as for creating cultivars and breeding lines to diversify the genetic base of cultivated sunflower.
Acknowledgments
The present research was partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project Nos 08-04-90112 and 12-04-00329).
References
Anashchenko, A.V., Gavrilova, V.A., Anisimova, I.N., Rozhkova, V.T., Smirnova, N.G., 1992. Self-Pollinated Marked Sunflower Lines, Catalogue of the World Collection of VIR, St. Petersburg, pp. 1–26.Search in Google Scholar
Anisimova, I.N., Alpatyeva, N.V., Gavrilova, V.A., 2010. Genotypic variation of the unique, methionine-rich protein SFA8 in sunflower. Genetics and biotechnology at the turn of millennia. In: Proc of the International Science Conference, October 25–29, Minsk, Belorussia, p. 6.Search in Google Scholar
Anisimova, I.N., Fido, R.J., Tatham, A.S., Shewry, P.R., 1995. Genotypic variation and polymorphism of 2S albumins of sunflower. Euphytica83(1): 15–23.10.1007/BF01677856Search in Google Scholar
Anisimova, I.N., Gavriljuk, I.P., Konarev, V.G., 1991. Identification of sunflower lines and varieties by helianthinin electrophoresis. Plant Varieties and Seeds4: 133–141.Search in Google Scholar
Anisimova, I.N., Gavrilova, V.A., Alpatyeva, N.V., Ryabova, D.N., Rozhkova, V.T., 2011. Polymorphism of the PPR-PFL-genes homologous sequences in sunflower genome. Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding168: 64–79.Search in Google Scholar
Anisimova, I.N., Gavrilova, V.A., Loskutov, A.V., Rozhkova, V.T., Tolmachev, V.V., 2004. Polymorphism and inheritance of seed storage protein in sunflower. Russian Journal of Genetics40(9): 1215–1223.10.1023/B:RUGE.0000041378.51180.0bSearch in Google Scholar
Anisimova, I.N., Konarev, A.V., Gavrilova, V.A., Rozhkova, V.T., Fido, R.J., Tatham, A.S., Shewry, P.R., 2003. Polymorphism and inheritance of methionine-rich 2S albumins in sunflower. Euphytica129(1): 99–107.10.1023/A:1021562712945Search in Google Scholar
Antonova, T.S., 1999. Peculiarities of evaluation and selection of material for breeding for resistance to the main pathogens depending on the sunflower defense response. Senior doctoral dissertation (Biol.) author’s abstract, Krasnodar, pp. 1–51.Search in Google Scholar
Antonova, T.S., Ivebor, M.V., Rozhkova, V.T., Araslanova, N.P., Gavrilova, V.A., 2011. Results of evaluation of accessions from the VIR sunflower collection for resistance to downy mildew strains spread in the Krasnodar Territory. Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding167: 90–95.Search in Google Scholar
Antropov, V.I., Antropova, V.F., 1929. Rye in the USSR and neighbouring countries. Appendix No. 36 to the Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding, pp. 1–365.Search in Google Scholar
Fick, G.N., Miller, J.F., 1997. Sunflower Breeding. Sunflower Technology and Production. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, USA, pp. 395–440.10.2134/agronmonogr35.c8Search in Google Scholar
Gavrilova, V.A., Anisimova, I.N., 2003. Genetics of Cultivated Plants. Sunflower, VIR, St. Petersburg, pp. 1–197.Search in Google Scholar
GavrilovaV.A., Nizova, N.K., Tolstaya, T.T., Achtulova, A.M., Slyusar, E.L., 2000. Production, study and utilization of sunflower interspecific hybrid. In: Proc 15th International Sunflower Conference, Toulouse, France, Vol. 2, pp. 7–12.Search in Google Scholar
Gavrilova, V.A., Rozhkova, V.T., Yesaev, A.L., 2005. Genetic Collection of Major Agricultural Crops. Sunflower. Identified Plant Diversity and Breeding, VIR, St. Petersburg, pp. 873–880.Search in Google Scholar
Gavrilova, V.A., Yesaev, A.L., Rozhkova, V.T., 1999. Dwarf lines in the VIR collection. Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding156: 14–25.Search in Google Scholar
Horn, R., Kusterer, B., Lazarescu, E., Prufe, M., Friedt, W., 2003. Molecular mapping of the Rf1 gene restoring fertility in PET 1-based F1 hybrids in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics106: 599–606.10.1007/s00122-002-1078-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Konarev, A.V., Anisimova, I.N., Gavrilova, V.A., Shewry, P.R., 2000. Novel proteinase inhibitors in seeds of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.): Polymorphism, inheritance and properties. Theoretical and Applied Genetics100(1): 82–88.10.1007/s001220050012Search in Google Scholar
Kovačik, A., Škaloud, V., 1986. Collection of sunflower marker genes available for genetic studies. Helia3: 27–28.10.1080/07266472.1986.11733450Search in Google Scholar
Leclerq,P., 1969. Une sterilite cytoplasmique chez le tournesol. Annales de Amelioration de Plantes 19: 99–106.Search in Google Scholar
Merezhko, A.F., 1994. The Problem of Donors in Plant Breeding, VIR, St. Petersburg, pp. 1–128.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, J.F., Fick,G.N., 1997. Genetics of Sunflower, Sunflower Technology and Production. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, USA, pp. 441–495.10.2134/agronmonogr35.c9Search in Google Scholar
Plachek, E.M., 1936. Sunflower breeding. Plant Breeding and Seed Production8: 12–22.Search in Google Scholar
Putt, E.D., 1964. Recessive branching in sunflower. Crop Science4: 444–445.10.2135/cropsci1964.0011183X000400040042xSearch in Google Scholar
Rozhkova, V.T., Anashchenko, A.V., 1977. Creation of self-pollinated lines and heterotic hybrids of sunflower on the basis of the global collection. Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding69: 53–55.Search in Google Scholar
Schnabel, U., Engelmann, U., Horn, R., 2008. Development of markers for the use of the PEF1 cytoplasm in sunflower hybrid breeding. Plant Breeding6: 541–652.10.1111/j.1439-0523.2008.01516.xSearch in Google Scholar
Smirnov, V.G., 2005. Importance of Genetic Collections for Fundamental Research and Genetic Programs. Identified Plant Diversity and Breeding, VIR, St. Petersburg, pp. 783–806.Search in Google Scholar
Vavilov, N.I., 1931. Linnaean species as a system. Moscow-Leningrad, Selkolkhozizdat, pp. 1–32.Search in Google Scholar
Yakovleva, Е.А., 2006. Morpho-anatomical peculiarities of stem in dwarf sunflower forms (Helianthus annuus L.). Ph.D. dissertation author’s abstract, VIR, St. Petersburg, pp. 1–19.Search in Google Scholar
Yesaev, A.L., 1998. Genetic control of short stem character in some inbred lines of cultivated sunflower: Ph.D. dissertation author’s abstract, VIR, St. Petersburg, pp. 1–21.Search in Google Scholar
©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Sunflower Genetic Collection at the Vavilov Institute of Plant Industry
- Application of Method Embryo Culture in Combination with Gamma Irradiation and Ultra Sonic (Part II)
- Response of Sunflower Cultivars to Deficit Irrigation
- Hydrothermal Variability and Sunflower Seed Yield in the Humid Tropical Region
- Influence of Subsurface Drip Irrigation System on Growth and Yield of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in Scarce Rainfall Zone of Andhra Pradesh in Subtropical India
- Heat Tolerance and Adaptability to Drought in Sunflower Can Be Influenced by Pollen Selection
- Use of Protein Spectra in Increasing the Genetic Homogenous Traits of the Parental Lines of Sunflower
- Dynamics of Hybrid Sunflower Disease Resistance
- Quantification of Inulin Content in Selected Accessions of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.)
- Quality Characteristics of High-Oleic Sunflower Oil Extracted from Some Hybrids Cultivated under Egyptian Conditions
- Obituary
- An Obituary Notice – Prof. Alexandru Viorel Vranceanu, PhD 1927–2014
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Sunflower Genetic Collection at the Vavilov Institute of Plant Industry
- Application of Method Embryo Culture in Combination with Gamma Irradiation and Ultra Sonic (Part II)
- Response of Sunflower Cultivars to Deficit Irrigation
- Hydrothermal Variability and Sunflower Seed Yield in the Humid Tropical Region
- Influence of Subsurface Drip Irrigation System on Growth and Yield of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in Scarce Rainfall Zone of Andhra Pradesh in Subtropical India
- Heat Tolerance and Adaptability to Drought in Sunflower Can Be Influenced by Pollen Selection
- Use of Protein Spectra in Increasing the Genetic Homogenous Traits of the Parental Lines of Sunflower
- Dynamics of Hybrid Sunflower Disease Resistance
- Quantification of Inulin Content in Selected Accessions of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.)
- Quality Characteristics of High-Oleic Sunflower Oil Extracted from Some Hybrids Cultivated under Egyptian Conditions
- Obituary
- An Obituary Notice – Prof. Alexandru Viorel Vranceanu, PhD 1927–2014