Home Design and synthesis of a novel rhodamine-based chemosensor and recognition study to Fe3+
Article Open Access

Design and synthesis of a novel rhodamine-based chemosensor and recognition study to Fe3+

  • Feifei Zhang , Qi Gao , Junxia Zhao , Man Ge and Yinjuan Bai EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 12, 2016

Abstract

A fluorescent and colorimetric chemosensor Rh1 for Fe3+ was synthesized by condensation reaction of rhodamine B hydrochloride and 2-aminothiazole, and its structure was confirmed by NMR, IR, HRMS and crystal data. Upon coordination with Fe3+ in CH3CN-H2O (1:1, v/v) solution, the spirolactam of Rh1 is opened, which results in a dramatic enhancement of fluorescence intensity as well as the color change of the solution. Most importantly, other metal ions show no obvious interference with the detection of Fe3+. Under the optimum conditions described, the fluorescence intensity is linearly proportional to the concentration of Fe3+ in the range of 2 μm ~ 7 μm. The Job’s plot indicates a 1:1 binding stoichiometry between Rh1 and Fe3+. The association constant (Ka) is 2.26 × 104m-1.

Introduction

Iron is one of the most essential trace elements in biological systems being involved in enzymatic reactions, muscle contraction, nerve conduction, electron transfer and transport of oxygen through heme [1–3]. Iron can also promote the process of cellular metabolism and the synthesis of DNA and RNA [4–6]. There are many evidences indicating that either deficiency or overload of Fe3+ can induce biological disorders in living body. For example, lack of iron in the blood can cause serious anemia. On the other hand, overload of iron ion has also been associated with certain cancers and dysfunction of liver, heart and nervous system [7, 8]. Thus far, many methods such as atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) [9, 10], inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) [11, 12], voltammetry [13] and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) [14] have been used to determinate Fe3+. Although these methods are both quantitative and highly-sensitive, they are not suitable for using in real-time and on-site detection of Fe3+. Fluorescent methods have gained much attention of researchers due to their good selectivity and recognition, rapid response and application in the environment of organisms [15–17]. Many excellent fluorescent chemosensors for Fe3+ have been reported in the past few years [18–23]. Although most of them have superior detection performance, some of them suffer drawbacks including low tolerance of Cu2+ and Cr3+, low sensitivity and inconspicuous change in color, which restrict the application of these sensors in biological systems. Additionally, many Fe3+-selective fluorescent probes are usually based on fluorescence quenching mechanism [24–26]. These probes are easily influenced by background and other factors. Therefore, it is important to design ‘off-on’ fluorescent chemosensors for Fe3+ with color and fluorescence changes in aqueous solution.

Rhodamine skeleton, which has excellent photophysical properties like long absorption and emission wavelength, high fluorescence quantum yield, high molar extinction coefficient and good photostability, has attracted great interest. More importantly, rhodamine derivatives exist in a spirolactam form with weak fluorescence under the neutral or alkaline conditions but can undergo ring opening in the presence of certain metal ions, and the opened form is strongly fluorescent. Therefore, rhodamine framework has become an ideal model to construct ‘off-on’ fluorescent chemosensors. Furthermore, electron donors (such as N, S) are usually introduced to the probes to improve the chelator’s affinity toward metal ions [27]. Thiazoles and their derivatives have been considered as an important class of S and N-containing heterocycles [28]. They can form bi- or multinuclear complexes with transition metal ions [29]. Herein, on the basis of the photo-induced electron transfer (PET) mechanism, we designed a new fluorescent chemosensor Rh1 by using rhodamine B as a fluorophore and an aminothiazole moiety as a Fe3+ chelator (Scheme 1). The structure of Rh1 was confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analysis in addition to NMR data. The sensitive chemosensor Rh1 can selectively detect Fe3+ in CH3CN-H2O (1:1, v/v) solution and can be used in the presence of Cr3+ and Cu2+.

Scheme 1 Synthesis of Rh1.
Scheme 1

Synthesis of Rh1.

Results and discussion

The given structure of Rh1 was confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analysis (Figure 1). White single crystal of Rh1 was obtained by slow concentration at room temperature of the dichloromethane–acetonitrile solution. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction structural analysis indicates that Rh1 crystallizes in orthorhombic system and the space group is Pbca without a symmetric center. Two spiro planes of the rhodamine frame-work are coordinated in mutually vertical positions. Additional crystallographic data and structural refinements for Rh1 are shown in the Supporting Information.

Figure 1 Crystal structure of sensor Rh1.
Figure 1

Crystal structure of sensor Rh1.

In order to examine the selectivity of Rh1, spectroscopic studies in the presence of various metal cations were conducted in CH3CN-H2O (1:1, v/v) solution. As shown in Figure 2, in the absence of Fe3+ ion, the sensor Rh1 (20 μm) shows a very weak fluorescence which can be ascribed to the probe mainly existing in the form of spirolactam. Upon binding with Fe3+, Rh1 exhibits an intense fluorescent emission at 580 nm. Moreover, the colorless solution develops a pink color (Figure 3). Under similar conditions, the addition of other metal ions including K+, Na+, Li+, Ag+, Ca2+, Ba2+, Mg2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Mn2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Hg2+, Fe2+, Al3+ and Cr3+ does not induce any visible fluorescence or color changes in the absence of ferric ion. This specific feature demonstrates that probe Rh1 shows excellent recognition toward Fe3+ ion in the presence of other cations and can be used for naked-eye detection. In addition, the interference experiments of Rh1 were also conducted (Figure S4 in the Supporting Information). In these experiments, the fluorescence changes of Rh1 in CH3CN-H2O (1:1, v/v) solution were measured by the treatment of 20 μm Fe3+ ion in the presence of 100 equiv. of other cations. In the presence of other metal ions, the fluorescence intensity of the Rh1- Fe3+ complex had no significant variation regardless of whether there were other metal ions.

Figure 2 Fluorescence response of probe Rh1 (20 μmol/L) to different metal ions (20 μmol/L).
Figure 2

Fluorescence response of probe Rh1 (20 μmol/L) to different metal ions (20 μmol/L).

Figure 3 The colorimetric (top) and fluorometric (bottom) changes of Rh1 (20 μm) upon addition of Fe3+ and other cations in CH3CN-H2O (1:1, v/v) solution (20 μm for Fe3+ and other cations). The two photos were obtained in sunlight (top) and upon irradiation with a 365-nm UV lamp (bottom).
Figure 3

The colorimetric (top) and fluorometric (bottom) changes of Rh1 (20 μm) upon addition of Fe3+ and other cations in CH3CN-H2O (1:1, v/v) solution (20 μm for Fe3+ and other cations). The two photos were obtained in sunlight (top) and upon irradiation with a 365-nm UV lamp (bottom).

To further investigate the influence of Fe3+ on Rh1, a fluorescence titration experiment at different Fe3+ concentrations was carried out. As shown in Figure 4, free Rh1 exhibits a very slight fluorescence, which is due to the efficient photoinduced electron transfer (PET) process from the electron-rich receptor aminothiazole moiety to the excited rhodamine fluorophore. Upon addition of Fe3+, the PET mechanism is quenched and, as a result, the fluorescent emission peak at 580 nm increases in intensity. The increase of fluorescent emission becomes saturated in the presence of 1.5 equiv. of Fe3+. Moreover, a good linear relationship between the fluorescence emission intensity of Rh1 and the concentration of Fe3+ in the range of 2 μm ~ 7 μm can be noted (Figure S5). The regression equation is Y = 2264.8X - 92.075, R2 = 0.9978. Based on the expression 3 × δblank/k (where δblank is the standard deviation of the blank solution and k is the slope of the calibration curve), the limit of detection was calculated to be 2.43 × 10-8m. A Job’s plot for the fluorescent was applied at room temperature to determine the stoichiometry of Rh1 and Fe3+. Keeping the sum of the initial concentration of Fe3+ and Rh1 at 20 μm, the molar ratio of Fe3+ was varied from 0 to 1. As shown in Figure 5, the maximum emission intensity is obtained at a molar ratio of 0.5. This indicated that Rh1 chelates Fe3+ with a 1:1 stoichiometry. The association constant (Ka) for Rh1 and Fe3+ was also measured using the Benesi–Hildebrand method (Figure 6). The estimated Ka value is 2.26 × 104m-1.

Figure 4 Fluorescence emission spectra of Rh1 (20 μm) in the presence of increasing concentrations of Fe3+. The inset shows emission intensity at λem = 580 nm as a function of Fe3+ concentration (λex = 545 nm).
Figure 4

Fluorescence emission spectra of Rh1 (20 μm) in the presence of increasing concentrations of Fe3+. The inset shows emission intensity at λem = 580 nm as a function of Fe3+ concentration (λex = 545 nm).

Figure 5 Job’s plot of probe Rh1 and Fe3+.
Figure 5

Job’s plot of probe Rh1 and Fe3+.

Figure 6 Benesi-Hildebrand plot of Rh1 assuming 1:1 binding stoichiometry with Fe3+ (λex = 545 nm, λem = 580 nm).
Figure 6

Benesi-Hildebrand plot of Rh1 assuming 1:1 binding stoichiometry with Fe3+ex = 545 nm, λem = 580 nm).

Besides, it was interesting to investigate the reversible binding nature of the sensor (Figure 7). Upon addition of ethylenediamine (20 μm) to the solution of Rh1 (20 μm) and Fe3+ (20 μm), the fluorescence intensity at 580 nm decreased (A→B) due to the competitive binding of Fe3+ from Rh1 by ethylenediamine and formation of the spirolactam. The strong fluorescence was observed again (B→C) upon further addition of 20 equiv. Fe3+. As can be seen, this sequence was followed five times without any change in intensity. This results shows that complexation of Rh1 with Fe3+ is chemically reversible.

Figure 7 Fluorescence intensity of the system Rh1 + Fe3+ as a function of NH(CH2CH3)2 concentration in CH3CN-H2O (1:1, v/v) solution. Inset shows reversible complexation/decomplexation cycles carried out with Rh1 and Fe3+ (λex = 545 nm, λem = 580 nm).
Figure 7

Fluorescence intensity of the system Rh1 + Fe3+ as a function of NH(CH2CH3)2 concentration in CH3CN-H2O (1:1, v/v) solution. Inset shows reversible complexation/decomplexation cycles carried out with Rh1 and Fe3+ex = 545 nm, λem = 580 nm).

To understand the structural change of Rh1 upon the complexation with ferric ion, molecular modeling was performed using DFT calculations at B3LYP/6-31G level with the Gaussian 09 program [30, 31] (Figure 8). Combined with Figure 8 and PET mechanism [32], it can concluded that in the absence of Fe3+, the HOMO of the electron-rich receptor aminothiazole moiety has a higher energy than the half-filled HOMO of the excited rhodamine fluorophore. This energy difference drives a rapid electron transfer from the aminothiazole moiety to the excited-state rhodamine fluorophore, which inhibits the intrinsic fluorescence of the rhodamine and, as a result, the probe exhibits a weak fluorescence. Upon addition of Fe3+, this cation interacts with the lone-pair electrons on the nitrogen atoms of the aminothiazole moiety and the rhodamine fluorophore undergoes opening of the spiro-ring. The energy level of the aminothiazole moiety is lower than that of the HOMO of the excited rhodamine fluorophore, and the electron delocalization is not energetically favored. The exited electron of rhodamine fluorophore is returned to the stationary state and the fluorescence is ‘switched on’.

Figure 8 The energy-minimized structure of free Rh1 molecule (A) and the Rh1-Fe3+ complex (B).
Figure 8

The energy-minimized structure of free Rh1 molecule (A) and the Rh1-Fe3+ complex (B).

Conclusion

An ‘off-on’ fluorescent chemosensor based on rhodamine has been synthesized. It exhibits an excellent selectivity and a high sensitivity to the detection of Fe3+ in CH3CN-H2O (1:1, v/v) solution. The sensor is also suitable for visual detection of ferric ion. The fluorescence intensity and the concentration of Fe3+ have a linear relationship in the range of 2 μm ~ 7 μm. The detection limit is 2.43 × 10-8m and the association constant (Ka) for Rh1 and Fe3+ is 2.26 × 104m-1.

Experimental

The fluorescent spectra were recorded on a HITACHI F-4500 fluorescence spectrophotometer. X-ray crystal data were collected on Bruker Smart APEX II CCD diffractometer. All solvents and reagents (analytical grade) were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. Double distilled water was used. The solutions of metal ions were prepared from corresponding nitrate and chloride salts. Stock solutions of Rh1 (1 mm) were prepared in acetonitrile. Stock solutions of the metal ions (10 mm) were prepared in double distilled water with the metal salts KCl, NaCl, LiCl, MgCl2, BaCl2, AgCl, CaCl2, ZnCl2, CdCl2, Cu(NO)3, MnCl2, CoCl2, NiCl2, FeCl2, Al(NO)3, FeCl3, HgCl2 and CrCl3.

Synthesis of Rh1

To a stirred solution of rhodamine B hydrochloride (1.92 g, 4 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (20 mL), 3 mL phosphorus oxychloride was added. The solution was heated under reflux for 6 h and then concentrated. The resultant crude acid chloride was dissolved in 10 mL acetonitrile and the solution was treated dropwise with a solution of 2-aminothiazole (4 mmol) and triethylamine (1 mL) in acetonitrile (10 mL). The mixture was heated under reflux for 5 h, cooled to room temperature and poured into 50 mL cold water. After extraction with dichloromethane, the extract was washed with saturated aqueous NaCl solution, dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography eluting with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (1:5, v/v) to give 0.71 g white powder: yield 35%; mp 238–240°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3Cl): 1.14 (t, 12H, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.29 (q, 8H, J = 7.2 Hz), 6.15 (dd, 2H, J1 = 8.8 Hz, J2 = 2.4 Hz), 6.38 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 6.42 (d, 2H, J = 2.8 Hz), 6.80 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz), 7.18 (d, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.25 (d, 1H, J = 3.8 Hz), 7.48–7.58 (m, 2H), 8.03 (d, 1H, J = 6.8 Hz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3Cl): 11.6, 43.2, 66.5, 96.4, 105.3, 106.2, 111.4, 122.3, 123.6, 126.9, 127.5, 127.8, 133.1, 137.5, 147.7, 152.7, 152.8, 154.1, 165.5; IR (KBr): 3440, 3106, 3098, 2971, 1933, 1702, 1612, 1542, 1513, 1461, 1330, 1224, 1186, 1120, 831, 777, 696 cm-1. ESI-HR-MS. Calcd for (M+H+): m/z 525.2319. Found: m/z 525.2312.

X-ray crystal structure determination of compound Rh1

The crystal data has been collected at 296 K by using Mo Ka radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) in the θ range of 2.10°–25.10°, a scan mode and collection for Lorentz and polarization effect (SADABS). The structure was solved using the direct method and refined by full-matrix least-squares fitting on F2 by SHELX-97. Crystallographic data have been deposited to the Cambridge Crystallography Data Center with deposition number of 1403579 for compound Rh1.

Supporting information

Online-only supplementary data include fluorescence spectra for Rh1.


Corresponding author: Yinjuan Bai, Key Laboratory of Synthetic and Natural Functional Molecule Chemistry of Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Northwest University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710127, PR China, e-mail:

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21042002).

References

[1] Papanikolaou, G.; Pantopoulos, K. Iron metabolism and toxicity Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.2005, 202, 199–211.10.1016/j.taap.2004.06.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] D’Autreáux, B.; Tucker, N. P.; Dixon, R.; Spiro, S.A. Non-heam iron centre in the transcription factor NorR senses nitric oxide. Nature2005, 437, 769–772.10.1038/nature03953Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Wessling-Resnick, M. Biochemistry of iron uptake. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1999, 34, 285–314.10.1080/10409239991209318Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Weizman, H.; Ardon, O.; Mester, B.; Libman, J.; Dwir, O.; Hadar, Y.; Chen, Y.; Shanzer, A. Fluorescently-labeled ferrichrome analogs as probes for receptor-mediated, microbial iron uptake. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 12368–12375.10.1021/ja9610646Search in Google Scholar

[5] Sumner, J. P.; Kopelman, R. Alexa Fluor 488 as an iron sensing molecule and itsapplication in PEBBLE nanosensors. Analyst2005, 130, 528–533.10.1039/b414189jSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Dornelles, A. S.; Garcia, V. A.; de Lima, M. N.; Vedana, G.; Alcalde, L. A.; Bogo, M. R.; Schroeder, N. mRNA expression of proteins involved in iron homeostasis in brainregions is altered by age and by iron overloading in the neonatal period. Neurochem. Res. 2010, 35, 564–571.10.1007/s11064-009-0100-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Kozlowski, H. A.; Janicka-Klos, J.; Brasun, E.; Gaggelli, D.; Valensin, G. Valensin copper, iron, and zinc ions homeostasis and their role in neurodegenerative disorders (metal uptake, transport, distribution and regulation). Coord. Chem. Rev. 2009, 253, 2665–2685.10.1016/j.ccr.2009.05.011Search in Google Scholar

[8] Crichton, R. R.; Dexter, D. T.; Ward, R. J. Metal based neurodegenerative diseases–from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2008, 252, 1189–1199.10.1016/j.ccr.2007.10.019Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kobayashi, H.; Ogawa, M.; Alford, R.; Choyke, P. L.; Urano, Y. New strategies for fluorescent probe design in medical diagnostic imaging. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 2620–2640.10.1021/cr900263jSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Singh, A.; Sinha, S.; Kaur, R.; Kaur, N.; Singh, N. Rhodamine based organic nanoparticles for sensing of Fe3+ with high selectivity in aqueous medium: application to iron supplement analysis. Sens. Actuators, B.2014, 204, 617–621.10.1016/j.snb.2014.08.028Search in Google Scholar

[11] Pomazal, K.; Prohaska, C.; Steffan, I.; Reich, G.; Huber, J. F. K. Determination of Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn in blood fractions by SEC-HPLC-ICP-AES coupling. Anal.1999, 124, 657–663.10.1039/a809688kSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Wang, J.; Zhang, D.; Liu, Y.; Ding, P.; Wang, C.; Yea, Y.; Zhao, Y. F. A N-stablization rhodamine-based fluorescent chemosensor for Fe3+ in aqueous solution and its application in bioimaging. Sens. Actuators, B. 2014, 191, 344–350.10.1016/j.snb.2013.10.018Search in Google Scholar

[13] Lunvongsa, S.; Oshima, M.; Motomizu, S. Determination of total and dissolved amount of iron in water samples using catalytic spectrophotometric flow injection analysis. Talanta2006, 68, 969–973.10.1016/j.talanta.2005.06.067Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Dadfarnia, S.; Haji Shabani, A. M.; Gohari, M. Trace enrichment and determination of silver by immobilized DDTC microcolumn and flow injection atomic absorption spectrometry. Talanta2004, 64, 682–687.10.1016/j.talanta.2004.03.039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Bhalla, V.; Sharma, N.; Kumar, N.; Kumar, M. Rhodamine based fluorescence turn-on chemosensor for nanomolar detection of Fe3+ ions. Sens. Actuators, B. 2013, 178, 228–232.10.1016/j.snb.2012.12.066Search in Google Scholar

[16] van den Berg, C. M. G. Chemical speciation of iron in seawater by cathodic stripping voltammetry with dihydroxynaphthalene. Anal. Chem.2006, 78, 156–163.10.1021/ac051441+Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Wei, Y.; Qin, G.; Wang, W.; Bian, W.; Shuang, S.; Dong, C. Development of fluorescent Fe(III) sensor. J. Lumin.2011, 131, 1672–1676.10.1016/j.jlumin.2011.03.062Search in Google Scholar

[18] Du, J. J.; Fan, J. L.; Peng, X. J.; Sun, P. P.; Wang, J. Y.; Li, H. L.; Sun, S. G. A new fluorescent chemodosimeter for Hg2+: selectivity, sensitivity, and resistance to Cys and GSH. Org. Lett.2010, 12, 476–479.10.1021/ol902590gSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Lee, M. H.; Giap, T. V.; Kim, S. H.; Lee, Y. H.; Kang, C.; Kim, J. S. A novel strategy to selectively detect Fe(III) in aqueous media driven by hydrolysis of a rhodamine 6G Schiff base. Chem. Commun.2010, 46, 1407–1409.10.1039/B921526CSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Xi, P.; Dou, J.; Huang, L.; Xu, M.; Chen, F. J.; Wu, Y.; Bai, D.; Li, W.; Zeng, Z. Z. A selective turn-on fluorescent sensor for Cu(II) and its application in imaging in living cells. Sens. Actuators B.2010, 148, 337–341.10.1016/j.snb.2010.05.004Search in Google Scholar

[21] Bordini, J.; Calandreli, I.; Silva, G. O.; Ferreira, K. Q.; Leitão-Mazzi; D. P. S.; Espreafico, E. M.; Tfoun, E. A rhodamine-B-based turn-on fluorescent sensor for biological iron(III). Inorg. Chem. Commun.2013, 35, 255–259.10.1016/j.inoche.2013.06.017Search in Google Scholar

[22] Fegade, U.; Singh, A.; Chaitanya, G. K.; Singh, N.; Attarde, S.; Kuwar, A. Highly selective and sensitive receptor for Fe3+ probing. Spectr. Acta A.2014, 121, 569–574.10.1016/j.saa.2013.11.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Wang, S. X.; Meng, X. M.; Zhu, M. Z. A naked-eye rhodamine-based fluorescent probe for Fe(III) and its application in living cells. Tetrahedron Lett.2011, 52, 2840–2843.10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.03.104Search in Google Scholar

[24] Bricks, J. L.; Kovalchuk, A.; Trieflinger, C.; Nofz, M.; Bueschel, M.; Tolmachev, A. I.; Daub, J.; Rurack, K. On the development of sensor molecules that display FeIII-amplified fluorescence. J. Am. Chem. Soc.2005, 127, 13522–13529.10.1021/ja050652tSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Xiang, Y.; Tong, A. J. A new rhodamine-based chemosensor exhibiting selective FeIII-amplified fluorescence. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1549–1552.10.1021/ol060001hSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Fan, L. J.; Zhang, Y.; Jones, W. E. Design and synthesis of fluorescence “Turn-on” chemosensors based on photoinduced electron transfer in conjugated polymers. Macromolecules2005, 38, 2844–2849.10.1021/ma047983vSearch in Google Scholar

[27] Li, J.; Zhang, C. F.; Ming, Z. Z.; Hao, G. F.; Yang, W. C.; Yang, G. F. Coumarin-based novel fluorescent zinc ion probe in aqueous solution. Tetrahedron2013,69, 4743–4748.10.1016/j.tet.2013.03.032Search in Google Scholar

[28] Livingstone, S. E. Other Sulfur-Containing Ligands. In Ligands, Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry. Wilkinson, G., Gillard, R. D., McCleverty, J. A. Eds. Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1987; Vol. 2.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Kuang, S. M.; Zhang, Z. Z.; Xue, F.; Mak, T. C. W. Directional Fe–C/O···S intermolecular interaction leading to chain-like crystal packing in binuclear Fe(0)-M(II) (M=Hg, Cd) complexes with 2-(diphenylphosphino)thiazole. J. Organomet. Chem.1999, 575, 51–56.10.1016/S0022-328X(98)00952-8Search in Google Scholar

[30] Shields, Z. P.; Murray, J. S.; Politzer, P. Directional tendencies of halogen and hydrogen bonds. Int. J. Quantum Chem.2010, 110, 2823–2832.10.1002/qua.22787Search in Google Scholar

[31] Becke, A. D. Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys. Rev. A. 1988, 38, 3098.10.1103/PhysRevA.38.3098Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Valeur, B.; Leray, I. Design principles of fluorescent molecular sensors for cation recognition. Coord.Chem. Rev.2000, 205, 3–40.10.1016/S0010-8545(00)00246-0Search in Google Scholar


Supplemental Material

The online version of this article (DOI: 10.1515/hc-2015-0139) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.


Received: 2015-7-7
Accepted: 2015-9-19
Published Online: 2016-1-12
Published in Print: 2016-2-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/hc-2015-0139/html
Scroll to top button