Home Gender Equality and Decent Work Environment in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review and Future Agenda towards Sustainable Development
Article Open Access

Gender Equality and Decent Work Environment in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review and Future Agenda towards Sustainable Development

  • Genevieve Ataa Fordjour ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Peter Amoah and Cecilia Lai Wan Chan
Published/Copyright: July 3, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This study reviews recent empirical research on gender equality and decent work environments in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), highlighting their vital role in sustainable development. The scoping review encompasses studies published from 2018 to 2024 and credible international reports to depict the current state of SSA. The findings indicate modest advancements in gender equality and decent work in SSA, notably through increased educational opportunities, women’s labor force participation, and legal reforms. For example, gender pay equity in SSA improved slightly, with women earning 40–46 % less than men, and a parity score of 68.4 % in 2024, marking a 0.4 % increase from 2023 and a total improvement of five-percentage-point since 2006. However, challenges persist, such as wage disparities and higher unemployment among young women (27 %) compared to young men (16.9 %). The Gender Inequality Index reflects uneven progress across the region, with some countries like Cabo Verde and Mauritius achieving higher rankings in gender equality, while others, such as Nigeria and Somalia, face systemic barriers such as structural inequalities, weak policy enforcement, and cultural discrimination. Implementation of decent work principles including fair wages, safe working conditions, and social protections also remains inconsistent across SSA. Challenges such as inadequate social protections and limited equitable employment opportunities, hinder socioeconomic development. The study recommends a coordinated approach among governments, organizations, and stakeholders to align SSA’s progress with global gender equity and decent work standards, thereby advancing sustainable development.

1 Introduction

Gender equality and decent work environment are fundamental to achieving global sustainable development, embodying the key principles central to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The pursuits of Gender Equality (SDG 5), and Decent Work and Economic Growth (SDG 8) are essential for eliminating poverty, safeguarding the planet, and securing peace and prosperity for everyone by 2030 (SDG Report 2024). In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), gender equality and decent work environments are critical drivers of fostering an equitable, prosperous, and sustainable future (Moen et al. 2019). Gender equality entails equal access to education, healthcare, economic opportunities, and political participation for all genders, as well as the elimination of violence and discrimination (Alwago 2024). A decent work environment guarantees safe working conditions, equal employment opportunities, equitable salaries, job security, social protection, and the rights of all employees regardless of gender or social standing (Ayentimi, Ali Abadi, and Burgess 2022).

The synergy between gender equality and decent work environment is undeniable. Gender equality is central to the International Labour Organization’s (ILO’s) Decent Work Agenda, which defines decent work as “productive work for women and men in conditions of freedom, equity, security, and human dignity.” Advancements in gender equality have often led to improved work conditions, fostering overall social and economic progress (Beulahbel 2018; Wu and Cheng 2016). Gender equality, particularly in terms of education and employment, contributes to higher human capital and better macroeconomic outcomes (Kolovich et al. 2020). Strengthening women’s economic security through decent work is crucial for reducing poverty and promoting gender equality (Mhlanga et al. 2023; Beghini, Cattaneo, and Pozzan 2022). However, despite the recognized importance of these goals, SSA faces persistent challenges in actualizing them, with gender inequality and poor working conditions prevalent in many sectors (Hakura et al. 2016; Ntuli and Kwenda 2019). These issues are often interconnected and present complex challenges that require multifaceted solutions. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated challenges related to gender inequality and poor working conditions in SSA. The closure of schools during the pandemic disproportionately impacted girls, leading to higher dropout rates and undermining previous educational gains. Marginalized girls from Africa were particularly affected, being substantially more likely than boys to permanently leave school, a situation worsened by increased child labor, incidents of violence, and teenage pregnancies during this period (World Bank Group 2022; Onyeaka et al. 2023). Additionally, the economic fallout from the pandemic severely affected women working predominantly in informal and low-wage sectors, resulting in substantial job losses and income reductions. A notable survey highlighted that 41 % of women-owned businesses in SSA were forced to close during the pandemic, compared to 34 % of businesses owned by men (Suubi et al. 2022). These closures and job losses further compounded the economic vulnerabilities faced by women in SSA, leading to increased household responsibilities for women, which further limited their ability to engage in paid employment (Ahinkorah et al. 2021). Addressing these issues necessitates a comprehensive approach that considers the region’s unique cultural norms, economic structures, and policy frameworks.

Despite the existing knowledge on gender equality and decent work environments in SSA, there is a lack of research examining their interconnections and their impact on sustainable development. Further research is needed to explore how gender inequality and poor working conditions reinforce each other in SSA countries. Understanding these interconnections could provide valuable insights for policymakers and organizations working to address both issues simultaneously. Additionally, investigating successful case studies of initiatives that have effectively improved gender equality and working conditions in the region could offer practical guidance for future intervention. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by reviewing the literature on gender equality and decent work environments in SSA, identifying research gaps, and outlining a future research agenda for sustainable development. The guiding research questions are:

  1. What is the current state of gender equality and decent work in SSA?

  2. Which policies or initiatives have proven effective in advancing these goals in the region?

  3. What are the key priority areas for future research?

1.1 The Context: Sub-Saharan Africa

SSA spans approximately 23.6 million km2 and encompasses a variety of landscapes, including savannas, rainforests, deserts, and coastlines. Key geographical features include the Sahel, the Congo Basin, and the Great Rift Valley (Collins and Burns 2013; Møller and Roberts 2021). With a population exceeding 1 billion and a median age of around 19 years, the SSA region is marked by rapid population growth (World Bank 2024; Onu et al. 2024). Kenya, Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe are the most populous countries, accounting for 37 % of the population in SSA (Aina 2018). It is noteworthy that SSA is a non-standardized geographical entity, with the number of countries included varying from 46 to 48 depending on criteria from organizations such as the United Nations (UN) and the World Bank. Meanwhile, the African Union (AU) recognizes all 55 African states, categorizing them into five regions: North, West, East, Central, and Southern Africa (Wikipedia Contributors 2024). For the purposes of this study, we use the UN definition of SSA, which encompasses 46 countries (UN Development Programme 2020).

The region is home to thousands of ethnic groups and languages, showcasing a rich tapestry of cultural and religious diversity, which includes Christianity, Islam, and traditional beliefs (May and Turbat 2017). Economically, SSA is diverse, with agriculture dominating as a primary source of income and informal economies playing a significant role. Agriculture accounted for approximately 42 % of total employment in SSA as of 2022, and contributed 17 % to the region’s GDP in 2023, underscoring its importance for rural livelihoods and economic activities (Galal 2024; World Bank 2024). Informal economies are equally significant, comprising about 85 % of total employment and contributing an average of 28.5 % to GDP in 2019, though this share is expected to decline slightly to 26.7 % by 2043 (Galal 2024). Urban centers increasingly foster trade and innovation, with ‘second cities’ emerging as hubs of resilience and opportunity, playing a vital role in economic growth across the region (International Growth Centre 2023). Despite being rich in natural resources, the region faces significant economic challenges, including poverty, inequality, and informal economies (Morozenskaya 2023; Amponsah, Agbola, and Mahmood 2023). SSA is renowned for its biodiversity, prompting conservation efforts to protect endangered species and habitats (Mohammed 2020). Politically, the region encompasses a wide range of governance systems, from democracies to authoritarian regimes, shaped by post-colonial histories (Norman 2022). Regional organizations such as AU, play critical roles in overcoming developmental obstacles such as improving education, healthcare, and infrastructure, and in addressing gender inequality and climate change (Gasparatos et al. 2020; Juju et al. 2020). Thus, SSA’s complexity is underscored by diverse, linguistic, and ethnic backgrounds, coupled with challenges of gender inequality and indecent work environments.

2 Methodology

This study adopts a scoping review framework to systematically explore and analyze empirical research on gender equality and decent work environments in SSA, with the aim of enhancing the future agenda for sustainable development. The empirical studies targeted span from 2018 to 2024 and encompass journal articles and data from key reports by major global organizations. The timeframe was chosen to capture significant developments following the 2015 implementation of the SDGs. This approach enables a review of recent changes in policies, practices, and outcomes related to gender equality and decent work in SSA, reflecting ongoing impacts and adjustments since the SDGs were enacted.

Our methodology follows the Arksey and O’Malley (2005) framework, enhanced by Levac, Colquhoun, and Kelly (2010), and adheres to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines (Tricco et al. 2018). It includes steps such as searching databases for relevant studies, selecting studies for inclusion, charting the data, and reporting the results. These steps are organized into two main stages: literature search, and qualitative analysis and reporting.

2.1 Stage 1: Literature Search

2.1.1 Identifying Relevant Studies

Our systematic search encompassed databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and African Journals Online (AJOL) using key terms related to gender equality, decent work, and SSA. For instance, our search strategy in Scopus involved the query: (TITLE-ABS-KEY (“gender equality” OR “gender inequality” OR “gendered-base” OR “gender”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“decent work”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (“sub-Saharan Africa”)) AND PUBYEAR > 2017 AND (LIMIT-TO (DOCTYPE, “ar”)) AND (LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE, “English”)). Similar key terms and constraints were applied in searches conducted on PubMed, and AJOL.

2.1.2 Study Selection

To ensure a focused review, strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied.

2.1.2.1 Inclusion Criteria

  1. Geographical Focus: Studies must be conducted within one or more of the 46 SSA countries as classified by the United Nations.

  2. Type of Publication: Peer-reviewed empirical research articles, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research, along with evidence-based reports from reputable international organizations.

  3. Subject Matter: Only studies and reports explicitly addressing gender equality and decent work environments in SSA were included.

  4. Time Frame: Publications must be from 2018 to 2024 to capture recent and relevant data.

  5. Language: Only publications published in English were included.

2.1.2.2 Exclusion Criteria

  1. Outside Geographical Scope: Studies focusing on countries outside the 46 SSA nations were excluded.

  2. Non-empirical studies or nonrandomized sources: Theoretical papers, opinion pieces, and non-empirical reviews were excluded.

  3. Irrelevant Topics: Studies not specifically addressing gender equality or decent work environments were excluded. Additionally, studies examining these topics without incorporating intersectional perspectives such as the influence of race, ethnicity, age, or socioeconomic status were also excluded.

  4. Language Limitations: Articles published in languages other than English were excluded.

  5. Older Publications: Studies or reports published before 2018 were excluded to ensure the timeliness and relevance of the data reviewed.

These criteria refine and focus the search process, ensuring that the collected data are relevant and directly applicable to the themes of gender equality and decent work environments in SSA. By adhering to these criteria, this review aims to provide comprehensive insights into the region’s current status and progress toward sustainable development goals.

2.1.3 Quality Assurance Measures

To ensure the reliability and validity of this review, study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers, and discrepancies were resolved through consensus or arbitration by a third party. Additional rigor was ensured by peer-reviewing the search strategy using the PRESS (Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies) checklist (McGowan et al. 2016), confirming the relevance and quality of both academic and report-based sources included in the scoping review. The quality appraisal tool developed by Hawker et al. (2002) was employed to evaluate the risk of bias and assess the overall quality of the studies included in this systematic review. This established tool enabled a thorough assessment of key study components, including study design, sample size justification, data collection methods, analysis techniques, result presentation, potential biases, and overall reporting quality. Nine quality appraisal questions, such as “Did they provide a clear description of the study?” and “Was there a good background and clear statement of the aims of the research?” guided the evaluation. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale: Good (3), Fair (2), Poor (1), and Very Poor (0). The maximum total quality score for each study is 27. Studies scoring 0–7 are considered low quality, 8–14 average quality, 15–21 good quality, and 22–27 high quality (Hawker et al. 2002).

To mitigate potential biases related to language and publication year limitations we implemented several strategies to enhance the reliability of our findings. While our scope was restricted to English-language studies published between 2018 and 2024, we prioritized well-regarded reports from prominent international organizations, such as the 2024 reports from the UN Statistics Division, UNDP, ILO statistical reports, and the World Economic Forum. These reports often synthesize and cite a variety of secondary materials, including studies in non-English languages, thereby broadening the scope of insights and contextual understanding beyond the limitations of only including English-language publications. Additionally, the deliberate exclusion of older publications was intended to ensure the timeliness of our data, under the assumption that recent studies would more accurately reflect current practices and contextual changes. Nevertheless, we actively sought out reports and research articles that included historical context and longitudinal data to provide a comprehensive framework for understanding progress over time within the SSA region. These efforts collectively aim to ensure that our review offers a well-rounded synthesis that, despite its limitations, reliably guides actionable steps toward achieving gender equity and decent work standards in SSA.

2.2 Search Results

The final literature search, conducted on 30 September 2024, included peer-reviewed articles and prestigious international reports, to ensure a comprehensive overview of the research landscape.

Figure 1 presents the systematic literature search procedure of articles. As shown in Figure 1, initially, 6,658 articles were identified through the search of three databases. Four international organizational reports were included in the review. After removing duplicates, the total number of articles was reduced to 4,661. These articles were screened by their titles, resulting in the exclusion of 3,479 articles deemed irrelevant to the research topic. A total of 78 articles were excluded based on their abstracts, as they were not conducted in SSA countries and did not directly address the subject matter, which was a specific inclusion criterion of this study. Finally, 55 articles and 4 international reports were selected for inclusion in the analysis. The 4 international reports included the 2024 reports from the UN Statistics Division, UNDP, ILO statistical reports, and the World Economic Forum. Table 1 presents an overview of these 55 included journal articles, detailing the authors’ names and year of publication.

Figure 1: 
The search process.
Figure 1:

The search process.

Table 1:

List of included journal articles.

Studies on gender equality
No. Authors Year
1 Dim E.E. 2024
2 Eke P., Firth J., and Anosike P. 2024
3 Perelli C., Cacchiarelli L., Peveri V., and Branca G. 2024
4 Alwago W. O. 2024
5 Van Den Broeck G., Kilic T. and Pieters, J. 2023
6 Mbodji Y. C. 2023
7 Delprato M. 2022
8 Ahinkorah B., Hagan J., Ameyaw E., Seidu A., and Schack T. 2021
9 Baten J., de Haas M., Kempter E., and Meier zu Selhausen F. 2021
10 Doğan N. and Kirikkaleli D. 2021
11 Skagerlind Helena H. 2021
12 Melesse D. Y., Mutua M., Choudhury A., Wado Y., Faye C., Neal S., and Boerma, T. 2020
13 Adekunle I., Kalejaiye T. G., Ayomide O. O., Ogede J., and Soyemi C. 2020
14 Asongu S., Nnanna J., and Acha-Anyi P. 2020
15 Bataka H. 2020
16 Workneh M. A. 2020
17 Collins C. Ngwakwe 2020
18 Ntuli M. and Kwenda P. 2019
19 Forkuor J. B., Buari M. A. and Agbenyo Aheto C. K. 2019
20 Agholor A. I. 2019
21 Koissy-Kpein S. 2019
22 Kyoore J.E. and Sulemana I. 2019
23 Moyo T., and Dhliwayo R. 2019
24 Tayal D. 2019
25 Blankenship J. and Kubice P. 2018
26 Gaddis I., Lahoti R., and Li W. 2018
27 Elu J. 2018
28 Burnett C. 2018
Studies on decent work
No. Authors Year
29 Asongu S.A.; Zogo T.E.; Mete M.C.N.; Mensah B.D. 2024
30 Amponsah-Tawiah K., Mensah J., Boakyewaa R., and Asare, G. 2023
31 Chigbu B. I. and Nekhwevha F. 2023
32 Wignall R., Piquard B., and Joel E. 2023
33 Ayentimi D. T., Abadi H. A., and Burgess J. 2022
34 Dery F. and Bisung E. 2022
35 Joseph T., Nevo C., and Nwolisa C. 2022
36 Olabiyi O. J. 2022
37 Sanhokwe H. and Takawira S. 2022
38 Sibiya W. and du Toit D. 2022
39 Rossier J. and Ouedraogo A. 2021
40 Atitsogbe K.A., Kossi E.Y., Pari P., and Rossier J. 2021
41 Chungu C. and Kalula E. 2021
42 Cieslik K., Banya R., and Vira B. 2021
43 Cieslik K., Barford A., and Vira B. 2021
44 Danquah M., Schotte S., and Sen K. 2021
45 Mokofe W. 2021
46 Davies J., Corrie H., Guido Z., Zimmer A., McCann L., Battersby J., and Evans T. 2020
47 Bhorat H. 2020
48 Ludwig C. and Webster E. 2020
49 Maphiri M., Matasane M., and Mudimu, G. 2021
50 Mramba N. and Mhando N. 2020
51 Gasparatos A., Ahmed A., Naidoo M., Karanja A., Saito O., Fukushi K., and Takeuchi K. 2020
52 Mohammed J. 2020
53 Moen B., Nyarubeli I. P., Tungu A., Ngowi A. V., Kumie A., Deressa W., and Mamuya, S. 2019
54 Kayode G. and Agboola B. G. 2019
55 Abdychev A., Alonso C., Alper E., Desruelle D., Kothari S., Liu Y., Perinet M., Rehman S., Schimmelpfennig A., and Sharma P. 2018

2.2.1 Stage 2: Qualitative Analysis and Reporting

The review systematically collated, summarized, and synthesized findings from the 55 peer-reviewed literature and 4 selected international reports, highlighting emerging patterns and assessing the effectiveness of documented policies. The quality assessment results revealed that these studies and reports had good to high-quality scores, ranging from 21 to 26 out of a total score of 27, ensuring a reliable and credible foundation for the analysis. Special attention was given to empirical data, examining how these reports complement academic research and contribute to understanding the progress and challenges in achieving gender equality and decent work environments in SSA. A detailed data extraction form was used to chart key information from the selected studies and reports, focusing on methodologies, key findings, recommendations, and impacts on policy or practice related to SSA. This approach ensures a robust synthesis of both academic and practical insights.

3 Discussion

3.1 Review of Empirical Studies on Gender Equality in SSA

This literature review synthesizes findings from various studies that shed light on the complexities and challenges of achieving gender equality in the SSA region. It explores how gender inequality impacts different aspects of society and highlights key areas for intervention.

3.1.1 Educational Disparities and Gender Equality

Education is a critical driver of gender equality. Baten et al. (2021) identified significant challenges the SSA region faces in closing educational gender gaps such as low secondary school enrollment (less than 15 % of girls complete lower secondary education in Chad and South Sudan), and lower tertiary education gender parity (only 65 women graduating for every 100 men). These disparities have persisted over historical periods, placing SSA behind other regions globally. In their study Southern African countries stood out in the SSA region for maintaining more gender-equal education systems throughout the 20th century. Expanding on this, Baten et al. (2021) introduced the “educational gender Kuznets curve,” which illustrates how urbanization and historical factors influence trajectories of gender equality in education. This framework underscores the complex interplay between societal development and educational equity. Increased public education expenditures have been shown to positively impact gender equality, as noted by Mbodji (2023). However, complicating factors such as remittances and population growth can dilute these effects. Higher educational attainment fosters progressive attitudes toward gender equality, as highlighted by Kyoore and Sulemana (2019), further emphasizing education’s transformative role in achieving parity.

Education also intersects with broader sustainability goals. Doğan and Kirikkaleli (2021) emphasized the connection between educational progress and environmental sustainability efforts, while Delprato (2022) underscored the importance of empowering mothers to enhance children’s educational outcomes and address intergenerational disparities (Delprato 2022). However, significant challenges persist in addressing educational disparities and gender inequality in SSA. For example, in rural areas, girls often face barriers such as long travel distances to school and traditional gender roles that prioritize household responsibilities over education (Elu 2018). Secondary school enrollment remains low at just 43.6 %, with stark disparities in completion rates across countries like Chad and South Sudan (Sage 2022). SSA also continues to lag globally in tertiary education gender parity, although projections suggest that parity could be achieved by 2034 (Yeboua and Cilliers 2025). These findings highlight the urgent need for targeted interventions to address structural barriers and promote equal access to education across the region.

3.1.2 Healthcare Disparities and Gender Equality

Gender inequalities in healthcare remain a pressing concern in SSA, particularly in adolescent sexual and reproductive health. Chandra-Mouli, Neal, and Moller (2021) emphasized the need for multi-sectoral approaches to address these disparities effectively. Reproductive health issues disproportionately affect women (Melesse et al. 2020), with Tayal (2019) linking these challenges to heightened food insecurity among women in the region. Social norms and limited autonomy further restrict women’s ability to make decisions about their health and economic activities, as highlighted by Abreha and Zereyesus (2020). Decision-making power, a common measure of empowerment in studies, has been empirically linked to improved child health outcomes, such as reduced infant mortality and enhanced nutrition (Abreha and Zereyesus 2020). The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated existing inequalities, threatening progress in women’s leadership roles, particularly in Nigeria (Eke, Firth, and Anosike 2024). Eke, Firth, and Anosike (2024) called for organizational restructuring to recognize and amplify women’s contributions during crises. These findings underscore the interconnectedness of healthcare disparities, social norms, and structural barriers to gender equality.

3.1.3 Political Participation and Governance

Despite some progress in countries like Rwanda and South Africa, women remain significantly underrepresented in political leadership across Africa, holding only 21 % of council positions (Yeboua 2024). This underrepresentation limits their influence on policymaking processes that could address gender disparities. Moyo and Dhliwayo (2019) proposed affirmative action measures such as quotas to enhance women’s representation in decision-making roles. They also advocated for equal access to education, support for women in STEM fields, and gender-sensitive curricula to dismantle systemic barriers. Empowering women politically requires more than representation; it also demands financial resources, training, and mentorship to support leadership and entrepreneurship roles (Moyo and Dhliwayo 2019). Dim (2024) found that female heads of government allocate more women-focused foreign aid than their male counterparts in SSA. Interestingly, right-wing leaders contribute more to such initiatives than left-wing leaders, suggesting that political ideology influences gender equality efforts. Workneh (2020) echoed this sentiment by arguing that good governance is essential for poverty reduction, particularly as gender inequality exacerbates poverty in SSA.

However, democratization alone does not guarantee progress in gender equality. Blankenship and Kubicek (2018) highlighted the lack of a clear connection between democratization and improvements in gender equality. Instead, broader governance structures play a critical role in shaping outcomes. The interplay between governance, political ideology, and gender equality significantly influences women’s empowerment and societal progress across SSA.

3.1.4 Gender Gaps in Property Ownership

Broader societal and structural inequalities, as highlighted by Koissy-Kpein (2019) and Burnett (2018), continue to pose significant challenges to gender equality in SSA. One critical area is unequal property rights, particularly concerning land, livestock, and savings assets, which contribute significantly to regional gender inequality (Koissy-Kpein 2019; Burnett 2018). Gaddis, Lahoti, and Li (2018) emphasize the importance of securing women’s property rights to enhance their economic opportunities and decision-making power within households. Women in SSA face significant challenges in accessing agricultural resources due to customary laws and socio-cultural norms (Alwago 2024). These norms also create gender-specific constraints in agricultural decision-making, hindering the adoption of climate-smart practices (Perelli et al. 2024). Addressing these constraints through gender-sensitive rural advisory services can close these gaps and enhance women’s contributions to agricultural productivity in SSA (Agholor 2019). Empowering rural women and marginalized groups is vital for enhancing technological adoption and addressing SDGs related to gender equality, climate action, and hunger reduction (Davies et al. 2020).

3.1.5 Socioeconomic Consequences of Gender Inequality

Gender disparities persist in education and employment, with women facing obstacles in accessing equal opportunities. Van Den Broeck, Kilic, and Pieters (2023) highlight that disparities in education, occupation, and sector significantly contribute to the gender pay gap, impeding progress and hindering poverty alleviation efforts, as Collins (2020) underscores. Addressing these gaps through inclusive policies is crucial for achieving SDGs. Collins (2020) also notes that enhancing women’s economic participation, education, and political leadership are key pathways for reducing extreme poverty in the region. Similarly, Bataka (2020) highlights how globalization offers opportunities for reducing gender inequality by fostering inclusivity and economic participation. Studies suggest that reducing gender inequalities could significantly boost economic growth, particularly in sectors like services (Forkuor, Buari, and Agbenyo Aheto 2019; Ntuli and Kwenda 2019). Projections indicate that closing gender gaps could lead to substantial gains in Africa’s development prospects by 2043 (Yeboua 2024). Macroeconomic policies have also been recognized as crucial factors for achieving gender equality in SSA (Skagerlind 2021). Adekunle et al. (2020) revealed that balancing fiscal and monetary policies contributes to sustainable approaches that promote collective prosperity and support the advancement of regional gender equality. Asongu, Nnanna, and Acha-Anyi (2020) emphasized the critical role of financial access in moderating the effects of inequality on gender economic inclusion.

3.1.6 Summary of Findings

The reviewed studies collectively highlight the multifaceted challenges of achieving gender equality in SSA. While progress has been made in areas such as legal reforms and education access, significant challenges persist across educational, economic, healthcare, and political dimensions. Addressing structural barriers through targeted policies remains crucial for sustainable development in the region. Ensuring equal participation across all aspects of society is vital for sustainable development and inclusive growth in the region. To promote women’s empowerment, integrated strategies are essential. These strategies must address systemic barriers across educational, economic, healthcare, political, and environmental dimensions. By adopting a holistic approach, SSA can move closer to realizing gender equality and unlocking the full potential of its population.

3.2 Review of Empirical Studies on Decent Work in SSA

Recent research highlights the complex landscape of decent work in SSA, illustrating both challenges and opportunities. Studies focus on various aspects, including health and compensation, poverty alleviation, youth employment challenges, the gig economy, domestic work, gender disparities, informal employment, and policy reform.

3.2.1 Foundations of Decent Work: Health, Compensation, and ILO Standards

Research on decent work in SSA underscores the need to consider various factors, including, compensation, and alignment with International Labour Organization (ILO) standards. In this region, the unique socioeconomic context requires tailored approaches to ensure effective labor policies and practices (Chungu and Kalula 2021). Amponsah-Tawiah et al. (2023) highlighted the positive relationship between decent work conditions, such as access to healthcare and adequate compensation, and employee mental health in Ghana’s mining industry. Similarly, Atitsogbe et al. (2020) found that in SSA, safe working conditions were related to job satisfaction, while life satisfaction was linked to factors benefiting workers’ families, such as access to health care, adequate compensation, free time, and shared values. These findings support the Psychology of Working Theory and have implications for labor policy, individual and employer practices, and counselling (Atitsogbe et al. 2020). Olabiyi (2022) assesses decent employment’s vital role in poverty alleviation in South Africa, emphasizing the need for alignment with ILO’s standards to tackle unemployment and inequality (Mokofe 2021). Rossier and Ouedraogo (2021) adapted the Decent Work Scale for Burkina Faso to include local factors such as physical safety and social factors. These studies underscore the importance of tailoring decent work frameworks to the specific contexts of SSA countries.

3.2.2 Challenges in Key Sectors: Youth Employment, Informal Work, and the Gig Economy

A significant body of research addresses the challenges of youth employment, the dominance of informal work, and the rise of the gig economy in SSA. A study by Cieslik, Barford, and Vira highlights the persistent challenges of youth unemployment and working poverty in SSA. The region’s growing youth population presents both opportunities and challenges for employment creation. Their research emphasizes the need for locally tailored strategies to address Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 8.6, which targets reducing the proportion of youth not in employment, education, or training (NEET) (Cieslik, Barford, and Vira 2021a). In the gig economy, Cieslik, Banya, and Vira (2021b) examined e-hailing drivers in Lagos, Nigeria, and found that while these platforms can provide higher earnings than traditional taxi services, they often lack formal labor protection. Similarly, Sibi and Du Toit (2022) focused on the domestic work sector in South Africa, particularly the SweepSouth platform, noting that while some workers gain autonomy and flexible hours, many still face low wages and inadequate social benefits. The study by Ayentimi and colleagues also revealed the precarious nature of gig work and the need for policies to ensure fair labor practices (Ayentimi, Ali Abadi, and Burgess 2022).

Danquah, Schotte, and Sen (2021) differentiated between upper-tier informal workers who may transition to formal employment and lower-tier self-employed individuals trapped in poor working conditions. Policies aimed at improving occupational safety, providing social protections such as maternity benefits, and organizing informal workers’ associations are essential for addressing these vulnerabilities (Mramba and Mhando 2020; Sanhokwe and Takawira 2022). This struggle for decent work is further illustrated by Dery and Bisung (2022), who emphasize the health hazards in the informal water sector and the urgent need for policies that ensure safe working conditions. Women dominate the informal economy in SSA, where they face significant vulnerabilities.

3.2.3 Gender Dimensions of Decent Work: Disparities and Inclusion

Gender inequalities permeate the landscape of decent work in SSA, requiring targeted interventions to promote economic inclusion. Women in SSA are disproportionately represented in informal employment, characterized by lower wages and job insecurity, with 90 % of women compared to 84 % of men in such roles (Agholor 2019; Joseph, Nevo, and Nwolisa 2022). This over-representation in informal sectors leaves women particularly vulnerable to exploitation and unsafe working conditions, as informal jobs often lack health and safety protections, social benefits (e.g. paid leave, pensions), and legal safeguards (Joseph, Nevo, and Nwolisa 2022). Their wages are typically lower than men, and the types of work they perform, such as street vending or home-based labor, expose them to physical risks and economic insecurity. Despite small differences in labor force participation rates, significant gender wage gaps persist (The Economic Growth Center 2024). Structural barriers, including limited access to productive resources and gender-blind policies, exacerbate these economic disparities (Agholor 2019; Chigbu and Nekhwevha 2023)

The study by Asongu et al. (2024) evaluates the impact of microfinance institutions (MFIs) on financial access and gender economic inclusion in 44 SSA countries. The findings suggest that a sufficient presence of MFIs is necessary for female bank account ownership to significantly reduce female unemployment, particularly at higher levels of unemployment (Asongu et al. 2024). Similarly, the intersection of gender and decent work is further addressed by Wignall, Piquard, and Joel (2023), who advocate for reimagining Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) programs in SSA to combat patriarchal inequalities while aligning with the decent work framework.

3.2.4 Governance, Policy Frameworks, and the Future of Work

The reviewed research also highlights the importance of effective governance, policy reforms, and forward-looking strategies to promote decent work in SSA. Maphiri, Matasane, and Mudimu (2021) discussed the implementation challenges of Sustainable Development Goal 8 within the Southern African Development Community, stressing the importance of job creation and social protection. The intersection of macroeconomic policies and decent work is reflected in Bhorat (2020), who explores how “work fundamentalism” influences policy making in South Africa. Kayode and Agboola (2019) urge a deeper investigation into the applicability of the “decent work” principle within Nigeria’s socioeconomic context, while Abdychev et al. (2018) reflect on the future of work in SSA amid technological, climatic, and economic changes. Ludwig and Webster (2020) proposed a revaluation of what constitutes decent work in light of persistent unemployment challenges.

3.2.5 Summary of Findings

These studies underscore the intricate interplay of factors influencing decent work in SSA. The quest for decent work in the region presents complex challenges and opportunities, as research highlights the significant effects of suitable working conditions on mental health, societal frameworks (such as gender norms), and the welfare of workers in informal sectors. Consequently, these findings are crucial for policymakers, organizations, and stakeholders dedicated to improving employment quality and fostering socioeconomic progress in the area. Addressing inequalities across various sectors requires comprehensive policy reforms and enhanced labor protections, including policies aimed at enhancing formal labor standards, broadening social protections, and acknowledging the agency of workers to significantly influence the creation of a better future for labor on the continent.

3.3 Reports from International Organizations

The 2024 reports from the UN Statistics Division, UNDP, ILO statistical reports, and insights from the World Economic Forum collectively present an instrumental perspective on region-specific challenges and progress toward achieving Gender Equality (SDG 5) and promoting Decent Work and Economic Growth (SDG 8) in SSA.

3.3.1 SSA’s Progress on Gender Equality

The UNDP’s 2024 Gender Inequality Index (GII) reveals significant disparities, with only 38 % of women being able to make autonomous decisions regarding their sexual and reproductive health, starkly contrasting with over 80 % in Europe. This discrepancy underscores the pressing need for strategic interventions, especially in education, where SSA lags with scores below 90 %, and significant gender gaps in school enrollment persist (UNDP 2024). On the legislative front, the SDG report notes progress with the 56 legal amendments and quota systems across 13 SSA countries aimed at enhancing the gender balance (UN Statistics Division 2024a). This legislative momentum is exemplified by Rwanda, with 54.7 % of women occupying parliamentary seats, while Nigeria lags by just 4.5 % (UNDP 2024). Such political representation is crucial as it correlates with SSA improvements in gender parity, as indicated by the World Economic Forum’s (2024) Global Gender Gap (GGG) Index. The GGG Index has shown gradual advancements since 2006 in the SSA region, despite persistent cultural challenges such as child marriage, and female genital mutilation affecting countless girls and women (UN Statistics 2024a).

Despite these hurdles, there is a growing sense of optimism, with 21 SSA economies ranked among the top 100 globally, as countries such as Namibia, South Africa, Mozambique, Burundi, and Rwanda have made considerable progress in bridging the gender gap (World Economic Forum 2024). Nevertheless, the Economic Participation and Opportunity sector has seen only marginal improvement, with a mere 0.4 % point increase since the previous year, 2023 (World Economic Forum 2024), as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: 
Global Gender Gap Report 2024: Rankings of countries in SSA. Source: Adapted by the authors from the World Economic Forum (2024); Global Gender Gap Report.
Figure 2:

Global Gender Gap Report 2024: Rankings of countries in SSA. Source: Adapted by the authors from the World Economic Forum (2024); Global Gender Gap Report.

The World Economic Forum 2024 report shows optimism about the SSA region, with all countries surpassing 50 % gender parity in workforce participation and many achieving fair representation in key economic roles (World Economic Forum 2024). However, the area of Educational Attainment demands urgent attention, as SSA trails behind it, scoring under 90 %. The prevalent literacy gap and imbalances in school enrollment between genders present substantial hurdles (World Economic Forum 2024). The transition from educational systems to professional venues in SSA draws attention to gender-based discrepancies in skill acknowledgment, emphasizing the critical need for reskilling initiatives and equal economic participation.

The UNDP 2024 report also examined the broader implications of GII by correlating these findings with the Human Development Index (HDI) rankings (UNDP 2024), as illustrated in Figure 3. The GII reveals that considerable variations exist throughout SSA, where some nations, such as Cabo Verde and Mauritius, are ranked relatively well in terms of gender equality, while Nigeria and Somalia demonstrate more prominent inequalities (UNDP 2024). This report is in line with the SDGs’ 2024 report, which uncovers contrasts across SSA: regions such as Eastern and Southern Africa have observed trends; conversely, Western and Central Africa have faced declines in female autonomy. Crucial influences of this divide include varying degrees of wealth, levels of education, and differences between urban and rural living situations (UN Statistics Division 2024a). According to the UN Statistics Division's 2024 SDG report, 33 Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries, such as Angola, Ethiopia, and Uganda, are classified as Least Developed Countries (LDCs) due to economic challenges. Sixteen nations, including Botswana, Mali, and Zimbabwe, are recognized as Landlocked Developing Countries (LLDCs) with trade difficulties. Six Small Island Developing States (SIDS) like Cabo Verde and Seychelles face unique challenges due to isolation. Twelve other countries, including Ghana, Kenya, and South Africa, do not fall into these categories but face diverse challenges (United Nations Statistics Division b 2024b).

Figure 3: 
Gender Inequality Index (GII) and Human Development Index (HDI) for SSA countries. Source: Adapted by the authors from the UNDP Human Development (2024).
Figure 3:

Gender Inequality Index (GII) and Human Development Index (HDI) for SSA countries. Source: Adapted by the authors from the UNDP Human Development (2024).

The interconnectedness of gender equality and overall development is further emphasized by the observed trend of lower GII scores associated with higher Human Development Index (HDI) standings, particularly in SSA countries with superior HDI rankings, such as Cabo Verde, Mauritius, and South Africa (UNDP 2024). Nevertheless, the journey toward achieving gender parity by 2030 faces significant challenges, including macroeconomic and geopolitical dynamics that threaten sustained progress (World Economic Forum 2024). Social protection systems are increasingly incorporating gender-sensitive strategies to address inequalities. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries implemented measures targeting women’s economic vulnerabilities in SSA (UN Women 2021). Between 2021 and 2022, seven SSA countries implemented legal reforms aimed at enhancing women’s economic participation, demonstrating growing momentum toward achieving legal gender equality (Tavares and Benetatos 2024). However, gaps remain in integrating comprehensive gender equality frameworks into national social protection strategies (UN Women 2021).

3.3.2 SSA’s Progress on Decent Work

Achieving decent work for all in SSA remains a critical development challenge, as highlighted by both the International Labour Organization (ILO) and the UN Statistics Division’s SDG 2024 report. The region is characterized by high unemployment rates, a predominant informal economy, and ongoing economic and social transitions. Currently, SSA has a labor force participation rate of approximately 62.8 %, with significant variations across individual countries. As shown in Figure 4, while the official unemployment rate stands at 6.3 %, these figures do not fully capture the extensive underemployment and the overwhelming presence of informal employment, which constitutes about 83.1 % of the workforce (ILO 2024). This informality often leads to jobs that lack social protection, job security, and regular income, severely inhibiting broad social and economic development.

Figure 4: 
ILO statistics in Africa. Source: Adapted by the authors from the UNDP Human Development (2024).
Figure 4:

ILO statistics in Africa. Source: Adapted by the authors from the UNDP Human Development (2024).

The alarming statistic that 29.0 % of working individuals in SSA live in poverty (ILO 2024) underscores the urgent need for formalized employment policy frameworks and the implementation of corrective measures to address diminishing adherence to fundamental labor rights (UN Statistics Division 2024c). Moreover, gender inequality in the labor market remains pronounced, with women often confined to lower-paying and less secure jobs, which limits overall productivity and perpetuates cycles of poverty and inequality (ILO 2024). Young women, in particular, face significant obstacles in attaining equitable employment compared to their male counterparts, with higher unemployment rates among young women (27 %) compared to young men (16.9 %) in 2023 (ILO 2024; UN Statistics Division 2024c).

The aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these challenges, with trade conflicts and increasing debt burdens further complicating the region’s economic landscape (UN Statistics Division 2024c). Despite an initial recovery in global real GDP per capita, SSA faces formidable barriers to economic development, including trade tensions and geopolitical strains that threaten growth prospects and labor conditions (UN Statistics Division 2024c). The region’s demographic structure, marked by a burgeoning youth population, intensifies the issues of youth unemployment and underemployment, with a growing number of young individuals not engaged in education, employment, or training (NEET). This situation increases the likelihood of persistent joblessness among the younger population (UN Statistics Division 2024c).

In summary, the interplay of high informal employment, youth unemployment, gender disparities, and the economic repercussions of the post-COVID-19 era underscores the urgent need for cohesive policies aimed at enhancing labor conditions and fostering sustainable economic growth in SSA.

3.3.3 Global Regional Comparison

In evaluating the Global Gender Gap Index and its sub-indicators, substantial regional disparities and areas of progress in gender equality are evident, which are crucial when compared to SSA (see Figures 5 and 6). The Global Gender Gap Index ranks SSA at 68.40 %, reflecting moderate success toward gender balance when compared to other regions (World Economic Forum 2024).

Figure 5: 
Global Gender Gap Index. Source: Adapted by the authors from the World Economic Forum (2024); Global Gender Gap Report.
Figure 5:

Global Gender Gap Index. Source: Adapted by the authors from the World Economic Forum (2024); Global Gender Gap Report.

Figure 6: 
Regional Performance 2024 by subindex. Source: Adapted by the authors from the World Economic Forum (2024); Global Gender Gap Report.
Figure 6:

Regional Performance 2024 by subindex. Source: Adapted by the authors from the World Economic Forum (2024); Global Gender Gap Report.

While SSA's overall gender parity score of 68.4 % in 2024 highlights progress in narrowing the gender gap, it represents a modest increase of about 0.4 percentage points from the previous year and a total improvement of approximately 5.6 percentage points since 2006 (Alwago 2024; World Economic Forum 2024). This progress is particularly evident in urban areas where women earn 40–46% less than men. However, the average gender pay gap across East and Southern Africa is about 21 % (ILO 2024). Despite these gains, significant disparities in pay and economic participation persist. Ongoing challenges in economic participation and educational attainment continue to hinder faster progress. SSA scores 67.40 % in Economic Participation and Opportunity, higher than Latin America (65.70 %) and Central Asia (66.80 %), but lagging behind Northern America (76.30 %) and Europe (68.00 %). Educational Attainment for SSA is at 86.70 %, indicating room for improvement, especially compared to Europe and Northern America, highlighting the need for investment in education and girls’ access. In Health and Survival, SSA performs well at 97.20 %, surpassing Northern America (96.90 %), yet improved reproductive healthcare is necessary. Political Empowerment stands at 22.40 % for SSA, below Europe (35.70 %) and Latin America (34.00 %), necessitating legislative reforms such as the quota systems mentioned in the UNDP and SDG reports. Overall, while SSA shows potential in health and economic participation, significant efforts are needed in education and political empowerment to achieve gender equality and sustainable progress.

3.3.4 Strategies for Achieving Gender Equality and Decent Work in SSA

A multifaceted strategy is essential to promote gender equality and secure decent work, advancing SDGs by 2030 in SSA. The UNDP (2024) emphasizes enhancing educational opportunities for girls and increasing women’s political representation to foster decent work conditions and sustainable development. The SDG Report 2024 by the UN Statistics Division stresses the importance of economic policies that promote inclusive growth, entrepreneurship, and innovation. Overcoming cultural, economic, and political barriers to gender equality requires collaborative efforts from governments, civil society, and international organizations (World Economic Forum 2024). The UN Statistics Division’s 2024 report highlights formalizing the informal sector and reinforcing labor rights as crucial for creating fair employment opportunities, especially for women and youth. The World Economic Forum (2024) also points to the need for established employment policy frameworks and compliance with fundamental labor rights. The UNDP report urges action on health disparities and initiatives that advance human development and gender equality. Empowering women and youth are critical in the post-pandemic era, making them central to recovery efforts.

The Global Gender Parity Sprint 2030 by the World Economic Forum (2024) underscores cooperative actions that integrate gender parity with industry structures while responding to technological, environmental, and healthcare challenges. This initiative catalyses strategies for economic reform and sustained growth. Aligning the aims of SDGs with established international norms is vital for an inclusive sustainable development agenda. The insights from the United Nations and World Economic Forum can enhance efforts to improve gender equality and decent work in SSA. Proactive endeavours from governments, businesses, and civil society are needed to accelerate transformations, ensuring no one is left behind.

The ILO (2024) recommends a multifaceted strategy, including investment in diverse sectors like agriculture, technology, and services to create job opportunities beyond the traditional industrial base. Educational reforms and vocational training aligned with labour market needs can equip young people with relevant skills. Policies to formalize informal enterprises can enhance employment quality and labour protections. Collaboration among governments, employers, and workers can improve labour policies and the social contract. Empowering women economically can reduce gender disparities and boost economic growth. Coordinated policy efforts, improved data collection, and strong partnerships are essential to address decent work challenges in SSA, supporting economic growth and contributing to social stability and human dignity. Continued attention to labour statistics and development frameworks is crucial for informing policy and measuring progress towards achieving decent work for all (ILO 2024).

3.4 Examples of Successful Initiatives in SSA

To foster gender equality and improve decent work conditions in SSA, several strategies have been implemented, showcasing diverse approaches across the SSA regions. These initiatives highlight objectives, measures, outcomes, challenges, and transferable lessons that can inform future interventions.

3.4.1 West Africa: Nigeria’s “YouWin!” Program

Nigeria’s “YouWin!” program exemplifies a public-private partnership aimed at fostering entrepreneurship and decent work standards, particularly for women. The program provides funding, mentorship, and business training to young entrepreneurs through a competitive process. By offering grants of up to 10 million Naira (approximately $64,000), the initiative has significantly increased women’s participation in entrepreneurship and improved their economic independence. However, challenges such as limited reach to rural areas and the need for sustained funding mechanisms remain barriers to its broader impact. A key transferable lesson from this program is that collaborative efforts between governments and private sectors can effectively foster gender equality in entrepreneurship (Okwa 2022).

3.4.2 East Africa: Rwanda’s Vision 2020 Initiative, Kenya’s M-Pesa, and the Girl Effect Initiative

Rwanda’s Vision 2020 initiative highlights the potential of sectoral diversification to enhance gender equality by investing in industries beyond agriculture. Through targeted investments in information technology and services, Rwanda has significantly increased women’s workforce participation. However, balancing rapid economic growth with equitable resource distribution remains a challenge. The initiative demonstrates that targeted sectoral investments can drive gender-inclusive economic transformation (Kagame 2012).

Kenya’s M-Pesa mobile banking system has been instrumental in providing financial access to women, enabling them to invest in small businesses and achieve greater financial independence. By offering secure transactions without requiring traditional bank accounts, M-Pesa has empowered women economically and facilitated business growth. Despite its success, digital literacy gaps among rural women limit its adoption rates. This case illustrates how leveraging technology can bridge financial inclusion gaps for underserved populations (Kagan 2023).

The “Girl Effect” initiative operates in several East African countries such as Kenya, Ethiopia, and Rwanda. It leverages media and technology to raise awareness among women and girls about their rights while addressing societal norms that hinder their empowerment. Through campaigns like Kenya’s “Tukisonga,” which combines TV dramas, podcasts, and community screenings, the initiative has informed and empowered communities by addressing issues such as reproductive health and economic opportunities. The initiative highlights how media-driven approaches can amplify girls’ voices and create transformative social change (Girl Effect 2024).

3.4.3 Central Africa: The Maputo Protocol

The Maputo Protocol serves as a landmark framework to enhance legal protections against gender discrimination and establish fair compensation practices across African Union member countries. Its adoption has influenced national policy adaptations aimed at improving women’s rights and workplace equity. For example, it has led to legislative changes such as banning child marriage in several countries and broadening access to safe abortion under specific circumstances. Nevertheless, challenges persist due to variations in enforcement across countries, often stemming from differing political will and resource constraints. A key lesson is that regional frameworks like the Maputo Protocol can act as catalysts for national-level reforms when aligned with local contexts (African Union 2019).

3.4.4 Southern Africa: CAMFED and SUNCASA Initiatives

The Campaign for Female Education (CAMFED) operates across Southern African countries such as South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Malawi. It focuses on improving girls’ education and employability through scholarships and mentorship programs. These efforts have resulted in higher education completion rates among girls and increased employability for women. Challenges include addressing systemic barriers like poverty and cultural norms that limit girls’ education. CAMFED demonstrates that holistic support systems combining financial aid with mentorship can lead to sustainable educational outcomes (CAMFED 2023).

The SUNCASA initiative in Johannesburg, South Africa, addresses harmful gender norms by promoting equitable participation in urban nature-based solutions (NbS). Through community-driven training sessions involving marginalized groups, the initiative has increased awareness of gender equity concepts and improved community engagement in NbS governance. However, achieving long-term societal change requires continuous dialogue and community buy-in. This case highlights how community-driven approaches that address cultural norms can lay the foundation for inclusive policy implementation (SUNCASA 2025).

These case studies demonstrate how localized strategies across SSA regions effectively address gender equality and decent work challenges. Key lessons include leveraging public-private partnerships for entrepreneurship development, utilizing technology to bridge financial inclusion gaps, addressing cultural norms through community engagement, and adopting regional frameworks like the Maputo Protocol to influence national policies. Together, these initiatives underscore the potential for scalable solutions tailored to regional contexts to achieve SDGs related to gender equality and decent work environments.

4 Conclusions

This scoping review synthesizes empirical research on gender equality and decent work environments in SSA, covering studies from 2018 to 2024. While progress has been made in educational opportunities and women’s labor force participation, systemic issues and cultural norms continue to challenge gender equality. The study also reveal that while progress has been made in incorporating decent work principles across SSA, challenges such as ensuring adequate compensation, access to healthcare, formal labor protections, and addressing unemployment necessitate comprehensive policy reforms and enhanced labor protections to effectively engage vulnerable workers and improve work quality for marginalized populations. These findings highlight the need for legislative reforms, targeted policy initiatives, and strategies that engage multiple stakeholders to effectively address these challenges. Advocacy efforts must be informed by empirical data that guide responses tailored to SSA’s unique contexts. The study emphasizes the role of collective action in advancing SDGs and urges a reassessment of societal norms to promote gender equality. It calls for continued research, policy reforms, and strategies that are inclusive and culturally considerate, ensuring sustained socio-economic development in the region. By bridging theory and practice, this review provides actionable insights for achieving global aspirations for gender equity and decent work standards in SSA.

4.1 Recommendations for Future Agenda

To foster gender equality and improve decent work conditions in SSA, several strategies are recommended.

4.1.1 Economic Diversification and Sector-Specific Strategies

In regions with a strong agricultural base, such as East Africa, initiatives can focus on supporting women in agribusiness through access to resources and training programs tailored to enhance productivity and sustainability. Conversely, in West African countries with burgeoning technology sectors, policies could encourage female participation in STEM fields by offering scholarships and fostering mentorship networks.

4.1.2 Cultural and Linguistic Considerations in Education

In multilingual and culturally diverse regions, such as Central Africa, educational policies should incorporate local languages and cultural contexts to make learning more accessible and relevant for women and girls. Programs such as in Southern Africa might emphasize maintaining cultural heritage while promoting gender equality, using local leaders to advocate for change within communities.

4.1.3 Legal Frameworks and Political Will

Addressing gender-based violence and discrimination requires strong legal frameworks; however, their implementation must be adapted to regional needs. For instance, East Africa’s legal reforms can be supported by community-based organizations that facilitate access to justice. In regions undergoing political transitions, like parts of West Africa, international partnerships can provide support and resources to strengthen women’s political representation and influence policymaking.

4.1.4 Infrastructure Development and Access to Services

In rural parts of SSA, such as the Sahel, investments in infrastructure especially in transportation and energy can improve women’s access to markets and economic opportunities. Urban areas, particularly in countries like Nigeria and South Africa, may benefit from digital infrastructure that advances financial inclusion and literacy for women.

To enhance gender equality and improve work environments in SSA, policies must consider the regional variations, ensuring they are sustainable and equitable. This approach leverages SSA’s diversity, builds on local strengths, and addresses specific challenges to foster inclusive growth. These initiatives can significantly advance gender equality and empower women, contributing to broader socioeconomic development across the continent. Achieving these goals requires collaboration among governments, civil society, the private sector, and development partners, aligning local efforts with global Sustainable Development Goals.

4.2 Implications of the Study

The implications of this comprehensive study are multifaceted and have the potential to shape future socio-economic development in SSA.

4.2.1 Theoretical Contributions

This study significantly enhances theoretical discourse by examining the interplay between gender equality and decent work environments as essential components of sustainable development in SSA. It synthesizes empirical data and theoretical perspectives to create a holistic framework, demonstrating how gender inequality and inadequate work conditions mutually reinforce each other, hindering progress. By contextualizing existing development within SSA’s unique socio-cultural, economic, and political landscapes, the research broadens theoretical models to include relevant variables affecting gender equality and work environments. It advocates for a cross-disciplinary theoretical agenda, integrating insights from gender studies, labor economics, and sustainable development to inform policymaking effectively.

Furthermore, the study identifies gaps in current research, encouraging further exploration of successful intervention models that promote gender equality and improved work conditions. Overall, it merges empirical analysis with theory, providing a nuanced understanding of how these elements collectively drive sustainable development in SSA, and to some extent globally.

4.3 Practical Contributions

This study offers practical contributions that inform policymaking and interventions aimed at enhancing gender equality and creating decent work environments in SSA, thus driving sustainable development in the region. The recommendations extend beyond SSA to other regions facing similar gender disparities, such as Southern Asia, the Middle East, and Northern Africa. Key recommendations include strengthening legal frameworks to combat gender discrimination and promote fair labor standards. The study emphasizes targeted educational initiatives and empowering women through financial services as effective strategies for improving gender equality, highlighting the success of community-driven initiatives with potential relevance in other low-resource settings.

By synthesizing empirical data and analyzing regional trends, the study provides actionable policy recommendations for inclusive education, enforcement of anti-discrimination laws, and ensuring equal pay and leadership opportunities for women. It emphasizes the need for a cohesive approach among stakeholders to align local policies with global goals such as the SDGs, addressing pressing challenges like job insecurity and cultural norms. Practical strategies are proposed to enhance educational opportunities and increase women’s labor force participation, thereby narrowing the gender gap. Successful case studies from SSA offer a blueprint for NGOs and local stakeholders to design effective interventions. Policymakers worldwide can utilize the empirical evidence and insights presented to tailor interventions that address specific local needs while drawing on proven practices from SSA. This comprehensive approach not only addresses gender inequalities but also fosters environments that support SDGs universally, ensuring interventions are culturally sensitive and impactful.

Thus, this research serves as a valuable resource for advocacy groups, providing evidence-based insights into the challenges and opportunities related to gender equality and decent work in SSA. It equips advocates to push for necessary policy changes and resource allocation. Overall, the study provides policymakers, practitioners, and advocates with the tools and knowledge needed to promote gender equality and decent work environments in SSA, facilitating progress toward SDGs both regionally and globally.

4.4 Limitations of the Study and Future Research

This scoping review was constrained by certain factors. For instance, the exclusive inclusion of empirical studies and reports published in English from 2018 to 2024 offers a snapshot of current trends but may overlook significant work in other languages or from earlier dates that could provide additional context. Focusing on articles from recognized international organizations means that smaller-scale studies or local reports, which could capture grassroots insights or novel regional initiatives, were not considered. This focus also limits the cultural and linguistic diversity of the reviewed evidence, potentially narrowing the understanding of gender equality and decent work environments in SSA. Additionally, the exclusion of theoretical papers, opinion pieces, and editorials restricts the scope of the discussion and may omit influential contributions to the field.

Future research should aim to overcome these limitations by including a broader scope of sources and perspectives. This could involve extending the language criteria to encompass significant work conducted in local languages within SSA and considering a longer historical range of publications to track progress over time. Future studies may also include relevant qualitative data and small-scale local research, which can offer a deeper, context-specific understanding of gender equality and work environments. Diverse methodological approaches, such as longitudinal studies, can assess the long-term impacts of policy changes and societal shifts. Longitudinal studies can track changes and trends over time, uncovering patterns and long-term outcomes that shorter studies might miss. Conducting in-depth case studies of specific initiatives or regions can offer detailed, context-rich analyses of successful strategies or challenges encountered. This qualitative approach allows exploration of the unique cultural, economic, and social factors influencing outcomes in different SSA areas.

Mixed-methods research, combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, can offer a holistic view of policy impacts. By integrating statistical data with interviews, focus groups, and observational research, stakeholders can gain a comprehensive understanding of both theoretical and experiential aspects of gender equality and decent work. Comparative studies can highlight differences in policy effectiveness and contextual factors contributing to gender equality and decent work across different SSA countries, informing best practices and guiding regional policy adaptations. Participatory action research (PAR) involving local communities and stakeholders in the research process can ensure findings are relevant and actionable. PAR can empower participants and foster ownership of policy changes, leading to more effective and enduring outcomes.

By adopting these diverse methodologies, future research can better inform policy development and implementation, ensuring changes are both impactful and sustainable. These approaches will bridge the gap between empirical evidence and practical action, supporting SSA’s progress towards achieving gender equality and decent work as part of sustainable development. Finally, research bridging empirical evidence and theoretical frameworks could enhance strategy and policy development, deepening the impact on practical and systemic changes in the region.


Corresponding author: Genevieve Ataa Fordjour, PhD, Department of Psychology, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We also acknowledge the efforts of the anonymous reviewers for their time and constructive comments.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: Conceptualization, GAF and CLWC; methodology, GAF; validation, GAF; formal analysis, GAF; investigation, PA and GAF; resources, CLWC; data curation, GAF and PA; writing – original draft preparation, GAF; writing – review and editing, CLWC and PA; visualization, GAF; supervision, CLWC. All the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

Abdychev, Aidar, Cristian Alonso, Emre Alper, Dominique Desruelle, Siddharth Kothari, Yun Liu, Mathilde Perinet, Sidra Rehman, Axel Schimmelpfennig, and Preya Sharma. 2018. “The Future of Work in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Departmental Paper 18 (18): 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484383094.087.Search in Google Scholar

Abreha, Solomon Kibret, and Yacob Abrehe Zereyesus. 2020. “Women’s Empowerment and Infant and Child Health Status in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review.” Maternal and Child Health Journal 25 (1): 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-020-03025-y.Search in Google Scholar

Adekunle, Ibrahim Ayoade, Toluwani Grace Kalejaiye, Olayinka Ogundade Ayomide, Jimoh Sina Ogede, and Caleb Olugbenga Soyemi. 2020. “Engendering Macroeconomic Policy for Gender Equality in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Asian Women 36 (4): 113–36. https://doi.org/10.14431/aw.2020.12.36.4.113.Search in Google Scholar

African Union. 2019. “Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa”, September 2019. https://au.int/en/treaties/protocol-african-charter-human-and-peoples-rights-rights-women-africa (accessed November 23, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Agholor, A. I. 2019. “Gender Gap in Sub-Saharan Africa, Reminiscence of Rural Extension and Advisory Services: Delineation, Challenges and Strategies.” Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif Vir Landbouvoorligting/South African Journal of Agricultural Extension 47 (3). https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3221/2019/v47n3a514.Search in Google Scholar

Ahinkorah, Bright Opoku, John Elvis Hagan, Edward Kwabena Ameyaw, Seidu Abdul-Aziz, and Thomas Schack. 2021. “COVID-19 Pandemic Worsening Gender Inequalities for Women and Girls in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Frontiers in Global Women S Health 2 (July). https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2021.686984.Search in Google Scholar

Aina, Tade Akin. 2018. “Region Report 2018: Sub-Saharan Africa.” https://scholarworks.indianapolis.iu.edu/items/eeea720f-4435-4850-bd45-1664f6559249.Search in Google Scholar

Alwago, Wycliffe Obwori. 2024. “Is Sub-Sahara Africa Closing The Gender Inequality Gaps? A Principal Component-Cluster Analysis.” International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research 09 (03): 708–40. https://doi.org/10.46609/ijsser.2024.v09i03.005.Search in Google Scholar

Amponsah, Mary, Frank W. Agbola, and Amir Mahmood. 2023. “The Relationship between Poverty, Income Inequality and Inclusive Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Economic Modelling 126 (June): 106415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106415.Search in Google Scholar

Amponsah-Tawiah, Kwesi, Justice Mensah, Ruth Boakyewaa, and Grace Asare. 2023. “From Muddiness to Madness: An Examination of Decent Work and Mental Health in the Ghanaian Mining Industry.” International Journal of Law and Management 65 (4): 289–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-01-2022-0001.Search in Google Scholar

Arksey, Hilary, and Lisa O’Malley. 2005. “Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (1): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.Search in Google Scholar

Asongu, Simplice A., Joseph Nnanna, and Paul N. Acha-Anyi. 2020. “Inequality and Gender Economic Inclusion: The Moderating Role of Financial Access in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Economic Analysis and Policy 65 (January): 173–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.01.002.Search in Google Scholar

Asongu, Simplice A., Therese E. Zogo, Mariette C. N. Mete, and Barbara D. Mensah. 2024. “Not All That Glitters Is Gold: Financial Access, Microfinance, and Female Unemployment in Sub‐Saharan Africa.” World Affairs 187 (4): 421–36, https://doi.org/10.1002/waf2.12047.Search in Google Scholar

Atitsogbe, Kokou A., Enyonam Y. Kossi, Paboussoum Pari, and Jérôme Rossier. 2020. “Decent Work in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Application of Psychology of Working Theory in a Sample of Togolese Primary School Teachers.” Journal of Career Assessment 29 (1): 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072720928255.Search in Google Scholar

Ayentimi, Desmond Tutu, Hossein Ali Abadi, and John Burgess. 2022. “Decent Gig Work in Sub Sahara Africa?” Journal of Industrial Relations 65 (1): 112–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856221111693.Search in Google Scholar

Bataka, Hodabalo. 2020. “Globalization and Gender Inequalities in Sub-Saharan Africa.” International Trade Journal 34 (6): 516–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2020.1774448.Search in Google Scholar

Baten, Joerg, Michiel De Haas, Elisabeth Kempter, and Felix Meier Zu Selhausen. 2021. “Educational Gender Inequality in Sub‐Saharan Africa: A Long‐Term Perspective.” Population and Development Review 47 (3): 813–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12430.Search in Google Scholar

Beghini, Valentina, Umberto Cattaneo, and Emanuela Pozzan. 2022. The Urgency of a Quantum Leap for Gender Equality in the World of Work, 53–69. Leiden: Brill|Nijhoff eBooks.10.1163/9789004467682_004Search in Google Scholar

Beulahbel, Bency P. B. 2018. Gender Equality through Women Empowerment Strategy – A Conceptual View, 23–30. Coimbatore: BONFRING eBooks.10.9756/BP2018.1012/05Search in Google Scholar

Bhorat, Haroon. 2020. “Inclusive Dualism: Labour Intensive Development, Decent Work and Surplus Labour in Southern Africa.” Journal of Development Studies 56 (10): 1980–1. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2020.1786941.Search in Google Scholar

Blankenship, Jenna, and Paul Kubicek. 2018. “Democratization and Gender Equality in Sub-Saharan Africa.” The Journal of the Middle East and Africa 9 (1): 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/21520844.2018.1449458.Search in Google Scholar

Burnett, Cora. 2018. “Politics of Gender (In)Equality Relating to Sport and Development within a Sub-Saharan Context of Poverty.” Frontiers in Sociology 3 (October). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00027.Search in Google Scholar

CAMFED. 2023. “CAMFED – Campaign for Female Education.” https://camfed.org/us/ (accessed November 16, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Chandra-Mouli, Venkatraman, Sarah Neal, and Ann-Beth Moller. 2021. “Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health for All in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Spotlight on Inequalities.” Reproductive Health 18 (S1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01145-4.Search in Google Scholar

Chigbu, Bianca Ifeoma, and Fhulu Nekhwevha. 2023. “Exploring the Concepts of Decent Work through the Lens of SDG 8: Addressing Challenges and Inadequacies.” Frontiers in Sociology 8 (November). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1266141.Search in Google Scholar

Chungu, Chanda, and Evance Kalula. 2021. “Labor Law, Labor Market Regulation, and Social Protection.” In Sub-Saharan Africa Emerging Trends in Comparative Perspective, 347–60. London: Routledge eBooks.10.4324/9781351142366-23Search in Google Scholar

Cieslik, Katarzyna, Roland Banya, and Bhaskar Vira. 2021b. “Offline Contexts of Online Jobs: Platform Drivers, Decent Work, and Informality in Lagos, Nigeria.” Development Policy Review 40 (4). https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12595.Search in Google Scholar

Cieslik, Katarzyna, Anna Barford, and Bhaskar Vira. 2021a. “Young People Not in Employment, Education or Training (NEET) in Sub-Saharan Africa: Sustainable Development Target 8.6 Missed and Reset.” Journal of Youth Studies 25 (8): 1126–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2021.1939287.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Ngwakwe C. 2020. “Gender Equality and Extreme Poverty Alleviation in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Demography and Social Economy 4: 56–70. https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2020.04.056.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Robert O., and James M. Burns. 2013. “The Peoples of sub-Saharan Africa: Society, Culture, and Language.” In A History of Sub-Saharan Africa, 40–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139795333.005Search in Google Scholar

Danquah, Michael, Simone Schotte, and Kunal Sen. 2021. “Informal Work in Sub-Saharan Africa: Dead End or Stepping-Stone?” IZA Journal of Development and Migration 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.2478/izajodm-2021-0015.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Julia, Hannah Corrie, Zack Guido, Andrew Zimmer, Laura McCann, Jane Battersby, and Tom Evans. 2020. “Barriers to Urban Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Food Policy 103 (101999). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101999.Search in Google Scholar

Delprato, Marcos. 2022. “Educational Gender Gap in sub-Saharan Africa: Does the Estimation Method Matter? A Comparison Using a Sample of Opposite Sex Twins.” International Journal of Educational Development 95 (102683). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102683.Search in Google Scholar

Dery, Florence, and Elijah Bisung. 2022. “Exploring Informalities, Inequalities, and Health Risk in the Informal Water Sector in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Water Security 17 (3): 100128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2022.100128.Search in Google Scholar

Dim, Eugene Emeka. 2024. “How Gender and Political Ideology Impact Women-Focused Aid to Sub-Saharan Africa.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies 42 (1): 104–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2024.2320770.Search in Google Scholar

Doğan, Nezahat, and Dervis Kirikkaleli. 2021. “Does Gender Equality in Education Matter for Environmental Sustainability in Sub-saharan Africa?” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 (29): 39853–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13452-1.Search in Google Scholar

Eke, Priscilla, Janet Firth, and Paschal Anosike. 2024. “Deconstructing Gender Inequality: Implications for Women Leadership and COVID-19 Recovery in Nigeria.” International Journal of Management Practice 17 (4): 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmp.2024.139662.Search in Google Scholar

Elu, Juliet. 2018. “Gender and Science Education in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Journal of African Development 20 (2): 105–10. https://doi.org/10.5325/jafrideve.20.2.0105.Search in Google Scholar

Forkuor, John Boulard, Mavis Ama Buari, and Clifford Kwaku Agbenyo Aheto. 2019. “Breaking Barriers: The Experiences of Women in Male Dominated Informal Sector Occupations in Urban Ghana.” Gender Issues 37 (1): 25–43, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-019-09231-5.Search in Google Scholar

Gaddis, Isis, Rahul Lahoti, and Wenjie Li. 2018. Gender Gaps in Property Ownership in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks.Search in Google Scholar

Galal, Saifaddin. 2024. “Agriculture Sector as a Share of GDP in Africa 2023, by Country.” Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1265139/agriculture-as-a-share-of-gdp-in-africa-by-country/ (December 30, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Gasparatos, Alexandros, Abubakari Ahmed, Merle Naidoo, Alice Karanja, Osamu Saito, Kensuke Fukushi, and Kazuhiko Takeuchi. 2020. “Sustainability Challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa: Trade-Offs, Opportunities and Priority Areas for Sustainability Science.” In Science for Sustainable Societies, 245–62. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-5358-5_10Search in Google Scholar

GIRL EFFECT. 2024. “Our Missions.” 2024. https://www.girleffect.org/our-missions/ (accessed November 19, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Hakura, Dalia, Mumtaz Hussain, Monique Newiak, Vimal Thakoor, and Fan Yang. 2016. “Inequality, Gender Gaps and Economic Growth: Comparative Evidence for Sub-Saharan Africa.” IMF Working Paper 16 (111): 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484382349.001.Search in Google Scholar

Hawker, Sheila, Sheila Payne, Christine Kerr, Michael Hardey, and Jackie Powell. 2002. “Appraising the Evidence: Reviewing Disparate Data Systematically.” Qualitative Health Research 12 (9): 1284–99, https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302238251.Search in Google Scholar

International Growth Centre. 2023. “Cities as Places to Innovate, Trade, and Work.” Cities Alliance. https://www.citiesalliance.org/resources/publications/city-policy-brief/cities-places-innovate-trade-and-work (accessed April 20, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). 2025. “SUNCASA|Resilient Cities. Natural Solutions.” IISD. https://www.iisd.org/suncasa.Search in Google Scholar

International Labour Organization (ILO). 2024. “Labour Statistics in Africa.” ILOSTAT. https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/africa (accessed November 24, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Joseph, Tonuchi, Chinedu Nevo, and Chinyere Nwolisa. 2022. “Informal Economy and Gender Inequality in Africa.” African Economic and Management Review 2 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.53790/aemr.v2i1.25.Search in Google Scholar

Juju, Denabo, Gideon Baffoe, Rodolfo Dam Lam, Alice Karanja, Merle Naidoo, Abubakari Ahmed, and Marcin Pawel Jarzebski, et al.. 2020. “Sustainability Challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa in the Context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).” In Science for Sustainable Societies, 3–50. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-4458-3_1Search in Google Scholar

Kagame, Paul. 2012. “RWANDA VISION 2020.” https://www.minecofin.gov.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/Minecofin/Publications/STRATEGIES/Vision_2020/Vision_2020_.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Kagan, Julia. 2023. “What Is M-Pesa? Definition, How the Service Works, and Example.” Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mpesa.asp (accessed June 21, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Kayode, G. M., and B. G. Agboola. 2019. “Decent Work and Social Security: A Myth or Reality in Nigerian Macro Communities?” Annals of Global History 1 (1): 19–23. https://doi.org/10.22259/2642-8172.0101003.Search in Google Scholar

Koissy-Kpein, Sandrine A. 2019. “Achieving Gender Equality in Education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Progress and Challenges in Moving from the MDGs to the SDGs.” In Gender, Development and Social Change, 143–64. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-14935-2_9Search in Google Scholar

Kolovich, Lisa, Vivian Malta, Monique Newiak, and David Robinson. 2020. “Gender Equality and Macroeconomic Outcomes: Evidence and Policy Implications.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 36 (4): 743–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa049.Search in Google Scholar

Kyoore, Jude E., and Iddisah Sulemana. 2019. “Do Educational Attainments Influence Attitudes toward Gender Equality in Sub-Saharan Africa?” Forum for Social Economics 48 (4): 311–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2018.1509797.Search in Google Scholar

Levac, Danielle, Heather Colquhoun, and K. O’Brien Kelly. 2010. “Scoping Studies: Advancing the Methodology.” Implementation Science 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.Search in Google Scholar

Ludwig, Carmen, and Edward Webster. 2020. “Decent Work for All: Rethinking Decent Work in the Context of South Africa.” Sozialpolitik Ch, no. 2/2020 (December). https://doi.org/10.18753/2297-8224-158.Search in Google Scholar

Maphiri, Mikovhe, Matsietso Agnes Matasane, and Godknows Mudimu. 2021. “Challenges to the Effective Implementation of SDG 8 in Creating Decent Work and Economic Growth in the Southern African Hemisphere: Perspectives from South Africa, Lesotho and Zimbabwe.” CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance: 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62501-6_3.Search in Google Scholar

May, John F., and Vincent Turbat. 2017. “The Demographic Dividend in Sub-Saharan Africa: Two Issues That Need More Attention.” Journal of Demographic Economics 83 (1): 77–84, https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2016.21.Search in Google Scholar

Mbodji, Yérim Codé. 2023. “Effects of Public Expenditure on Education on Gender Inequality in Education in Sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA).” The Review of Education 11 (2). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3398.Search in Google Scholar

McGowan, Jessie, Margaret Sampson, Douglas M. Salzwedel, Elise Cogo, Vicki Foerster, and Carol Lefebvre. 2016. “PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 75 (March): 40–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021.Search in Google Scholar

Melesse, Dessalegn Y, Martin K. Mutua, Allysha Choudhury, Yohannes D. Wado, Cheikh M. Faye, Sarah Neal, and Ties Boerma. 2020. “Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health in sub-Saharan Africa: Who Is Left Behind?” BMJ Global Health 5 (1): e002231, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002231.Search in Google Scholar

Mhlanga, Ruth, Caroline Downey, Leena Patel, and Noble Rachel. 2023. “Valuing Women’s Work: A Framework for Business on Gender Equality and Decent Work.” Oxfam International 2–3. https://doi.org/10.21201/2023.000003.Search in Google Scholar

Moen, Bente Elisabeth, Israel Paul Nyarubeli, Alexander M. Tungu, Aiwerasia Vera Ngowi, Abera Kumie, Wakgari Deressa, and Simon Henry David Mamuya. 2019. “The Challenge of Obtaining a Decent Work Environment in Sub-Saharan Africa.” In Sustainable Development Goals Series, 155–64. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-14857-7_15Search in Google Scholar

Mohammed, Jemal. 2020. “Challenges in Implementing Biodiversity Policy in Sub-Saharan Africa Region.” American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics 6 (2): 24. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20200602.12.Search in Google Scholar

Mokofe, William Manga. 2021. “The International Labour Organisation in Pursuit of Decent Work in Southern Africa: An Appraisal.” Obiter 41 (3): 573–92. https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v41i3.9580.Search in Google Scholar

Møller, Valerie, and Benjamin J. Roberts. 2021. “Locating Sub-Saharan Africa on the Globe.” In Human Well-Being Research and Policy Making, 3–8. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-65788-8_1Search in Google Scholar

Morozenskaya, Evgenia. 2023. “Sub-Saharan Africa.” In Contributions to Economics, 495–512. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-20328-2_24Search in Google Scholar

Moyo, Theresa, and Rogers Dhliwayo. 2019. “Achieving Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons from the Experience of Selected Countries.” Journal of Developing Societies 35 (2): 256–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796x19845957.Search in Google Scholar

Mramba, Nasibu Rajabu, and Nandera Ernest Mhando. 2020. “Moving towards Decent Work for Street Vendors in Tanzania.” Utafiti 15 (2): 257–78. https://doi.org/10.1163/26836408-15020033.Search in Google Scholar

Norman, Ishmael Dilnos. 2022. “Statism and the Growth of Authoritarianism in Sub-Saharan Africa.” European Journal of Law and Political Science 1 (2): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejpolitics.2022.1.2.14.Search in Google Scholar

Ntuli, Miracle, and Prudence Kwenda. 2019. “Gender Gaps in Employment and Wages in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review.” Gender, Development and Social Change 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14935-2_11.Search in Google Scholar

Okwa, Nero. 2022. “YouWin! – A Gift of Nigerian Genius – Notes by Nero Okwa – Medium.” The Medium. https://medium.com/nero-okwa/youwin-a-gift-of-nigerian-genius-41ba9ca9b3d9 (accessed January 7, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Olabiyi, Olaniyi Joshua. 2022. “Decent Employment and Poverty Alleviation for Socio-economic Development and Its Implications for the Well-Being of the Citizenry in South Africa.” Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce 16 (2). https://doi.org/10.19041/apstract/2022/2/10.Search in Google Scholar

Onu, Matthew Adah, Olusola Olaitan Ayeleru, Helen Uchenna Modekwe, Bilainu Oboirien, and Peter Apata Olubambi. 2024. “Chapter 10 - Water and wastewater safety plan in sub-Saharan Africa.” Water, The Environment, and the Sustainable Development Goals 223–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-15354-9.00019-0.Search in Google Scholar

Onyeaka, Helen, Phemelo Tamasiga, Ifeanyi Michael Mazi, Hope Akegbe, and John K. Osiri. 2023. “Gender‐Based Impacts of COVID‐19 in Sub‐Saharan Africa.” Sexuality Gender & Policy 6 (4): 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/sgp2.12077.Search in Google Scholar

Perelli, Chiara, Luca Cacchiarelli, Valentina Peveri, and Giacomo Branca. 2024. “Gender Equality and Sustainable Development: A Cross-Country Study on Women’s Contribution to the Adoption of the Climate-Smart Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Ecological Economics 219 (February): 108145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108145.Search in Google Scholar

Rossier, Jérôme, and Abdoulaye Ouedraogo. 2021. “Work Volition, Decent Work, and Work Fulfilment, in the Formal and Informal Economy in Burkina Faso.” British Journal of Guidance and Counselling 49 (2): 255–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2021.1879991.Search in Google Scholar

Sage, Mathilde. 2022. “Gender Equality through Secondary Education in Sub-Saharan Africa.” International Growth Centre. https://www.theigc.org/blogs/gender-equality/gender-equality-through-secondary-education-sub-saharan-africa (accessed April 7, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Sanhokwe, Hamfrey, and Simon Takawira. 2022. “Evaluating the Decent Work Scale Measurement Model in Zimbabwe.” Journal of Career Development 50 (3): 727–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/08948453221120961.Search in Google Scholar

Sibiya, Wandile, and David Du Toit. 2022. “Sweeping up Decent Work: Paid Domestic Work and Digital Platforms in South Africa.” Gender and Development 30 (3): 637–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2022.2126199.Search in Google Scholar

Skagerlind, Helena Hede. 2021. “Governing Development: Global Performance Indicators and Gender Policy Change in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Journal of International Relations and Development 24 (3): 726–52. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-021-00210-6.Search in Google Scholar

Suubi, K., E. Yegon, C. Ajema, N. Wandera, C. Afifu, and C. Mugyenyi, and International Center for Research on Women (ICRW). 2022. Impact of COVID-19 on Women Workers in the Urban Informal Economy in Uganda and Kenya: Secondary Data Review. International Center for Research on Women (ICRW). https://www.icrw.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Impact-of-COVID-19-on-Women-Workers-in-the-Urban-Informal-Economy-in-Uganda-and-Kenya-Secondary-Data-Review.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Tavares, Paula, and Dion Benetatos. 2024. “Gender Equality Gains Momentum in Sub-Saharan Africa.” World Bank Blogs (blog). https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/developmenttalk/gender-equality-gains-momentum-sub-saharan-africa (accessed March 16, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Tayal, Deeksha. 2019. “Gender Inequality, Reproductive Rights and Food Insecurity in Sub-Saharan Africa – A Panel Data Study.” International Journal of Development Issues 18 (2): 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijdi-10-2018-0165.Search in Google Scholar

The Economic Growth Center (EGC). 2024. “Gender and Growth Gaps in Sub-Saharan Africa – Research and Policy Dialogue 2024.” Economic Growth Center. https://egc.yale.edu/events/2024/gender-and-growth-gaps-sub-saharan-africa-research-and-policy-dialogue-2024.Search in Google Scholar

Tricco, Andrea C., Erin Lillie, Wasifa Zarin, Kelly K. O’Brien, Heather Colquhoun, Danielle Levac, David Moher, et al.. 2018. “PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.” Annals of Internal Medicine 169 (7): 467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0850.Search in Google Scholar

UN Development Programme. 2020. “About Africa.” UNDP in Africa. https://web.archive.org/web/20200411014537/https://www.africa.undp.org/content/rba/en/home/regioninfo.html.Search in Google Scholar

UN Women. 2021. “Putting Gender Equality at the Centre of Social Protection Strategies in Sub-Saharan Africa: How Far Have We Come?” UN Women – Headquarters. https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2021/12/policy-brief-putting-gender-equality-at-the-centre-of-social-protection-strategies-in-sub-saharan-africa.Search in Google Scholar

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2024. “Human Development Report 2023-24.” Human Development Reports. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2023-24 (accessed March 13, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

United Nations Statistics Division (a). 2024a. “Gender Equality – SDG Indicators.” https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2024/goal-05/.Search in Google Scholar

United Nations Statistics Division (b). 2024b. “Regional Groupings – SDG Indicators.” https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/regional-groups/.Search in Google Scholar

United Nations Statistics Division (c). 2024c. “Decent Work and Economic Growth – SDG Indicators.” https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2024/goal-08/.Search in Google Scholar

Van Den Broeck, Goedele, Talip Kilic, and Janneke Pieters. 2023. “Structural Transformation and the Gender Pay Gap in Sub-Saharan Africa.” PLoS One 18 (4): e0278188. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278188.Search in Google Scholar

Wignall, Ross, Brigitte Piquard, and Emily Joel. 2023. “Up-Skilling Women or De-skilling Patriarchy? How TVET Can Drive Wider Gender Transformation and the Decent Work Agenda in Sub-saharan Africa.” International Journal of Educational Development 102 (July): 102850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102850.Search in Google Scholar

Wikipedia Contributors. 2024. Sub-Saharan Africa. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub-Saharan_Africa#cite_note-5 (accessed October 27, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Workneh, Migbaru A. 2020. “Gender Inequality, Governance, and Poverty in Sub‐Saharan Africa.” Poverty & Public Policy 12 (2): 150–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/pop4.278.Search in Google Scholar

World Bank. 2024. “The World Bank in Africa.” https://www.worldbank.org/en/region/afr/overview (accessed October 15, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

World Bank. 2022. “Assessing the Damage: Early Evidence on Impacts of the COVID-19 Crisis on Girls and Women in Africa.” World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/infographic/2022/05/25/assessing-the-damage-early-evidence-on-impacts-of-the-covid-19-crisis-on-girls-and-women-in-africa (accessed May 25, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

World Economic Forum. 2024. “Global Gender Gap Report 2024.” https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-gender-gap-report-2024/ (accessed September 30, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Ruohan, and Xueyu Cheng. 2016. “Gender Equality in the Workplace: The Effect of Gender Equality on Productivity Growth among the Chilean Manufacturers.” The Journal of Developing Areas 50 (1): 257–74. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2016.0001.Search in Google Scholar

Yeboua, Kouassi. 2024. “Get Gender Equality Right in Africa, and Prosperity Will Follow|ISS Africa.” ISS Africa. https://issafrica.org/iss-today/get-gender-equality-right-in-africa-and-prosperity-will-follow (accessed May 6, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Yeboua, Kouassi, and Jakkie Cilliers. 2025. Gender – ISS African Futures. https://futures.issafrica.org/thematic/16-gender/.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-11-05
Accepted: 2025-04-28
Published Online: 2025-07-03

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter on behalf of the Zhejiang Normal University, China

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 3.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gsgs-2024-0014/html
Scroll to top button