Abstract
Iodination of various industrially and pharmaceutically important substituted aromatics has been achieved using N-iodosuccinimide (NIS) in solid state by grinding at room temperature. This method provides several advantages such as short reaction time (5–8 min), high yields (94–99%), and nonhazardous and simple work-up procedure. High gas chromatography (GC) purity (95–99.9%) suggests that the reaction is highly selective. Substrates which are sensitive to oxidation, viz aniline and phenols are iodinated smoothly in high yield.
1 Introduction
Aromatic iodides are important intermediates for the synthesis of various pharmaceutical and bio-active materials [1]. However, the low electrophilic nature of molecular iodine compared to molecular bromine and chlorine makes direct iodination difficult [2]. Thus, iodination of aromatic substrates requires the presence of a mediator such as a strong oxidizing agent [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], i.e. (IO3 anions, silver complexes, nitric acid, sulfuric acid, iodic acid, sulfur trioxide, H2O2 and NaOCl), and use of activators such as toxic heavy metals [11] (lead, mercury and chromium). Iodination of organic compounds has been reviewed by Frota et al. [12]. However, most of these procedures have the drawback of poor yields, long reaction time, harsh reaction conditions, and use of hazardous or toxic reagents, hence questioning the suitability for commercial production. N-iodosuccinimide (NIS) is a potential source of iodonium ions, and has been used along with p-toluenesulfonic acid, trifluoromethanesulfonic acid and trifluoroacetic acid [13], [14], [15]. The presence of p-toluenesulfonic acid needs a low temperature, long reaction time (14 h) and leads to a mixture of isomeric products. The use of trifluoromethanesulfonic acid results in low yield (17–79%). The trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile takes 1.5–6 h. These procedures require the use of expensive and toxic acids and acetonitrile as solvent. It is also known that NIS exhibits maximal activity in strongly acidic medium [16]. However, the system NIS–H2SO4 shows lower yield and low selectivity [17], [18]. Keeping the aforesaid literature data in mind, a new system using substrate, NIS (1:1 ratio) in acetic acid, at room temperature has been evaluated. This reaction gave 91–99% yield in 30–240 min. It is a clean organic reaction process which does not use harmful organic solvents and hence is in great demand today [19]. Recently, the grinding technique has been tried in synthetic organic chemistry [20]. This is because molecules in the crystals are arranged tightly and regularly [21]. Furthermore, the solid state reaction has many advantages: little pollution, low cost, and simplicity in progress and handling [22]. In the present method we report a simple and clean method for iodination of organic compounds of industrial significance at room temperature, short duration (5–7 min) and high yields (94–99%). Acetic acid was used as a catalyst.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 General
Products were characterized by comparison with standard samples using spectral techniques, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The 1H NMR spectra were recorded using a 400 MHz Bruker Avance II 400 NMR spectrometer in CDCl3/DMSO and are reported in ppm using tetramethylsilane as an internal standard. The FTIR spectra were recorded on a Prestige 21 FTIR spectrometer (Shimadzu). The FTIR spectra were recorded in the range 4000–450 cm−1 in KBr. The UV spectra were recorded on a UV-1800 double beam UV-visible spectrometer (Shimadzu) in the wavelength range 190–1100 nm. GC-MS analyses were recorded on a GCMS QP 2010 plus (Shimadzu, Japan). The column used was Rtx-5 Sil. The GC-MS and mass scanned in the range 5–350 amu. The GC-MS purity is reported by area percentage (%).
2.2 General procedure for iodination
2.2.1 Preparation of 2,6-diiodo-4-nitrophenol (1.n) (conventional method):
NIS (0.0039 mol) in AcOH (5 ml) was added into a 100 ml round bottom flask, and to the resulting solution, 4-nitrophenol (4-NP) (0.0019 mol) was added rapidly. Finally, the reaction mixture was stirred at 25°C and the reaction was monitored using thin-layer chromatography (TLC). After completion of the reaction (240 min) the mixture was poured into ice-cold water to precipitate the product. The precipitated mass was separated from the mother liquid by vacuum filtration utilizing a Buchner funnel and then washed twice with deionized water and dried. The total isolated yield was 0.72 g (97%).
2.2.2 Preparation of 2,6-diiodo-4-nitrophenol (1.n) (grinding method):
4-NP (0.0019 mol), NIS (0.0039 mol) and 0.5 ml of AcOH as a catalyst were mixed in a mortar. Finally, the reaction mixture was grounded together in a mortar using a pestle at room temperature (25°C) and monitored by TLC. After completion of the reaction (5 min) the mixture was poured into ice-cold water to precipitate the product. The precipitated mass was separated from the mother liquid by vacuum filtration utilizing a Buchner funnel and then washed twice with deionized water and dried. The total isolated yield was 0.725 g (98%) with a GC-MS purity of 98.06%.
2.2.3 Preparation of 2-iodo-4-nitroaniline (1.a):
The procedure was the same as given in general procedure (2.2.2). The reactant NIS (1 mol) with 4-nitroaniline (0.27 g, 0.0019 mol) and 0.5 ml of AcOH was used as a catalyst. The reaction was monitored by TLC. The isolated yield was 0.515 g (99%).
2.2.4 Preparation of 2,4,6-triiodoaniline (1.i):
Here, 3 mol equivalent of NIS was taken wrt 1 mol equivalent of aniline and the reaction procedure was the same as general procedure (B). The total isolated yield was 0.913 g (97%) with GC purity of 95.33%.
2.3 Spectral data of different compounds
2.3.1 2,6-Diiodo-4-nitrophenol (1.n):
Yellow crystal, mp 155°C, lit. 154–157°C [23]. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.60(s, 2H). MS (APCI): calcd. for C6H2 NO3I2 [M]+ 390.90; found, 391.
2.3.2 2-Iodo-4-nitroaniline (1.a):
Orange powder, mp 106°C, lit. 106–107°C [24]. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3477, 3371, 1608, 1579, 1489, 1303, 1257, 1151, 1114, 1029. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ: 8.50(d, 1H, Ar-H), 8.00(dd, 1H, Ar-H), 6.7(d, 1H, Ar-H) ppm. MS (APCI): calcd. for C6H6N2O2I [M]+ 264.022; found, 264.
2.3.3 2,4,6-Triiodoaniline (1.i):
Dark powder, mp 185°C, lit. 185°C [25]. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3305, 1753, 1606, 1514, 1436, 1396, 1367, 1051, 536. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ: 7.83(s, 2H, ArH), 2.22(s, 1H, CH) ppm. MS (APCI): calcd. for C6H4I3N [M]+ 470; found, 470.
2.3.4 5-Iodovanillin (1.b):
0.532 g (97%). Reddish brown, mp 183–185°C, lit. 181–182°C [26] IR (KBr) cm−1: 3153, 2980, 2846, 1664, 1585, 1571, 1490, 1460, 1417, 1354, 1296, 1259, 1246, 1166, 1143, 1039, 854, 785, 669. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ: 3.94(s, 3, OCH3), 7.34 (d, 1, C-2H), 7.81 (d, 1, C-6H), 9.73 (s, 1, CHO) ppm. MS (APCI): calcd. for C8H7IO3 [M]+ 278.04; found, 278.
2.3.5 5,7-Diiodo-8-hydroxyquinoline (1.f):
0.738 g (97%). Greenish powder, mp 212–214°C, lit. 214–215°C [23] IR (KBr) cm−1: 3061, 2883, 1483, 1454, 1388, 1328, 1201. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.61(1H, dd) 8.29(1H, dd), 8.31 (1H,s), 8.81 (1H, dd) ppm, MS (APCI): calcd. for C9H6NOI2 [M]+ 396.95; found, 397.
2.3.6 4-Iodo-2-nitroaniline (1.h):
0.49 g (98%). Orange solid, mp 120–121°C, lit. 122°C [26] IR (KBr) cm−1: 2877, 1598, 1529, 1444, 1317, 1246, 1155, 1087, 877, 752, 665. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.42(d, H-3) 7.57(dd, H-5), 7.26 (s, NH2), 6.62 (d, H-6) ppm. MS (APCI): calcd. for C6H5IN2O2 [M]+ 264.02; found, 264.
2.3.7 3,5-Diiodo-4-hydroxybenzaldehyde (1.e):
0.688 g (98%). White solid, mp 200–202°C, lit.199–200°C [24] IR (KBr) cm−1: 3192, 1707, 1666, 1456, 1408. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ: 8.20(s, 2H) 9.73(s, 1H, CHO) ppm. MS (APCI): calcd. for C7H4I2O2 [M]+ 373.91; found, 374.
2.3.8 3,5-Diiodosalicyclic acid (1.c):
0.751 g (98%). White powder, mp 232°C, lit. 232–234°C [26] IR (KBr) cm−1: 3500, 1699, 1616, 1581, 1558, 1436, 1417, 1392, 1274, 1222, 881, 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ: 7.33(d, H-3) 2.66(d, H-2), 2.15 (s, 1H), MS (APCI): calcd. for C7H4I2O3 [M]+ 471; found, 471.
2.3.9 4-Iodoacetanilide (1.j):
0.466 g (94%). Off white solid, mp 184°C, lit. mp 184°C [24] IR (KBr) cm−1: 3290, 3253, 1666, 1529, 1483, 1383, 1307, 1253, 1002, 817, 738, 503. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ: 2.15(s, H-3, COCH3) 7.34(d, H-2), 7.58 (d, H-2), ppm. MS (APCI): calcd. for C8H8INO [M]+ 261.06; found, 261.
2.3.10 3,5-Diiodosalicyaldehyde (1.l):
0.708 g (99%). Pale yellow, mp 109°C, lit. mp 109–110°C [24] 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ:11.73(s, 1H) 9.70(s,1H) 8.23(d, 1H) 7.83(d,1H). MS (APCI): calcd. for C7H4I2O2 [M]+ 374; found, 374.
2.3.11 2,4-Diiodo-6-nitrophenol (1.m):
0.725 g (98%). Yellow crystal, mp 99°C, lit. 98°C [24] 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ: 8.32(d, 1H,Ar-H),8.40(d, 1H) ppm. MS (APCI): calcd. for C6H2 NO3I2 [M]+ 391; found, 391.
2.3.12 2,4-Diiodoaniline (1.g):
0.642 g (98%). Dark powder, mp 95°C, lit. 95°C [25] 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.30(dd, 1H) ,7.86(d, 1H), 2.17(s, 2H) ppm.
2.3.13 2,4,6-Triiodophenol (1.d):
0.912 g (96%). Light brown, mp, 159°C, lit. 156–159°C [23] IR (KBr) cm−1: 3441, 3053, 1732, 1539, 1433, 1230, 858, 700. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ: 7.93 (s 2 H, ArH) 5.76 (s 1H, OH) ppm. MS (APCI): calcd. for C6H3 I3O[M]+ 471.80; found, 472.
2.3.14 3,5-Diiodo- 4-hydroxybenzonitrile (1.k):
0.694 g (99%). Beige, mp, 204°C, lit. 202–204°C [24] 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ: 7.98 (s 1 H, CH) 2.17 (s 1H, CH) ppm. MS (APCI): calcd. for C7H3I2NO [M]+ 370.91; found, 371.
3 Results and discussion
The present paper reports a convenient and highly selective method for the iodination of activated aromatic compounds. A variety of ortho/para hydroxyl substituted aromatic aldehydes and highly activated arenes, such as aniline and phenol, were selected for the iodination reaction using NIS by the grinding method in a mortar and pestle at room temperature. Iodination was achieved in a shorter period (5–7 min) with excellent yield (94–99%, Tables 1 and 2) and selectivity (95–99.9%, Table 3). After completion of the reaction, water was added to separate the product. The end product does not require further purification. This method has an advantage in that substrates like anilines and phenol do not get oxidized. The products were identified by comparing melting points, FTIR, GC-MS, and 1H NMR spectral data with that reported in literature. The system has been successfully applied to a variety of industrially important substrates (Table 1). Initially, the diiodination of 4-NP as a model compound using a combination of NIS (2 equivalent) and AcOH (0.5 ml) has been used as a catalyst by grinding has proved to be an excellent reagent at room temperature, to give 2,6-diiodo-4-nitrophenol in excellent yield of 98% (Table 1, entry 1.n) in 5 min. Gallo et al. [43] reported the formation of 2,6-diiodo-4-nitrophenol at higher temperature (50°C), using longer duration (24 h) and with lower yield (80%). Zielinska and Skulski [41] also reported that 2,6-diiodo-4-nitrophenol can be prepared at higher temperature (50°C), with lower yield (72%). The effects of the concentration of NIS on the yield of 1.n were examined. Figure 1 suggests that the quality of the product is strongly dependent on the mole ratio of NIS/4-NP. It has been found that the optimum yield (98%) of 2,6-diiodo-4-nitrophenol is obtained at the mole ratio of NIS/4-NP 2/1. No effect on the yield of the product was observed when we further increased the mole ratio of NIS/4-NP from 2.0 to 2.2 (98%). When the mole ratio of NIS/4-NP was decreased from 2.0 to 1.8, the yield of 2,6-diiodo-4-nitrophenol decreased (64%). Further decrease in the mole ratio from 1.5 to 1 leads to formation of 2-iodo-4-nitrophenol (1.o) which melts at 86°C (mp of 2-iodo-4-nitophenol is 86–87°C [26]). Thus, from the above observations, it is concluded that the optimum mole ratios of 4-NP to NIS (1:2 and 1:1) were found to be ideal for diiodination (1.n).and monoiodination, respectively. It has been observed that GC-MS analysis of the final product obtained at the above mole ratio shows 98.06% purity for 2,6-diiodo-4-nitrophenol (see Table 3, entry 1.n). The iodination of vanillin (1.b) resulted in 5-iodovaniline with excellent selectivity and yield of 98%, 97% with no detectable ortho or para compounds. Gary and Doxsee [28] reported preparation of 5-iodovanilin at 0°C and lower yield (83%). Phenol and aniline were instantaneously triiodinated (1.d, 1.i) to their corresponding iododerivatives with excellent selectivity and yield (99.9%, 95.33%, and 96%, 97%, respectively). Triiodination formation requires 1:3 molar ratio of substrate/NIS. Reddy et al. [31] reported synthesis of 2,4,6-triiodophenol using longer duration (8 h), with lower yield (64%) and poor GC purity (66%). Bell et al. [32] reported synthesis of 2,4,6-triiodoaniline under severe reaction conditions, with poor yield (87%, 3 h). The iodination of p-hydroxybenzaldehyde (1.e) resulted in 3,5-diiodo-4-hydroxybenzaldehyde with excellent yield (98%) and purity (99.9%). Ping et al. [36] reported preparation of 3,5-diiodo-4-hydroxybenzaldehyde using longer duration (14 h), with poor yield (68%). Another industrially important aldehyde, 3,5-diiodosalicyaldehyde (i.l), shows high selectivity (99.9%) and excellent yield (99%). Janson [30] reported the formation of 3,5-diiodosalicyaldehyde at higher temperature (50–70°C) and low yield (82%). The iodination of 3,5-diiodo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile (1.k) shows high regioselectivity (99.9%) and excellent yield (99%). The potential antimicrobial agent 2,4-diiodoaniline (1.g) can also be obtained using the same reaction conditions with excellent yield 98%. Bell et al. [32] reported the synthesis of 2,4-diiodoaniline under severe reaction conditions, with poor yield (57%, 3 h). Deactivated anilines (1.h, 1.c) were smoothly iodinated to their iodo derivatives with excellent yield. Another industrially important compound, 3,5-diiodosalicyclic acid (1.c), was also prepared from salicylic acid in excellent yield (98%) in 5 min at room temperature. This substrate undergoes iodination at high temperature and a longer reaction time [34]. The iodination of acetanilide (1.j) under similar conditions was achieved with good selectivity and yield (99%, 94%), respectively. Sket et al. [37] reported synthesis of 4-iodoacetanilide under very harsh conditions (105°C) with poor yield (47%). 8-Hydroxyquinoline (oxime) (1.f) also underwent clean iodination to yield 5,7-diiodo-8-hydroxyquinoline in good yield (97%). Previous procedures for the iodination of 8-hydroxyquinoline were more costly and cumbersome, relying, e.g. on the use of cross linked polystyrene-[4-vinylpridinium dichloroiodate (I)] [46] or MeOCONCl2 and NaI [45]. Acid-sensitive substrates like aromatic amines (entries 1.a, 1.h and 1.p), including notably 4-nitroaniline (1.a), lead to iodination at vacant ortho position to give 2-iodo-4-nitroaniline in 99% yield. Boothe et al. [7] reported the formation of 2-iodo-4-nitroaniline at 0°C with a reported yield of 70%. The iodination of 2-nitroaniline (1.h) gave excellent selectivity (99.9%) and yield (98%). Emmanuvel et al. [35] reported the formation of 4-iodo-2-nitroaniline in a longer duration (8 h). There was no effect of electron withdrawing -NO2 group in the case of o-nitrophenol (1.m) which gave excellent purity (99.9%) and yield (98%). Zielinska and Skulski [41] reported the formation of 2,4-diiodo-6-nitrophenol at higher temperature (50°C) with lower yields (80%).
Iodination of aromatic compounds using N-iodosuccinimide (NIS) by grinding and with solvent, a comparison.
Entry | Substrate | Product | By grinding | With solventb | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time (min) | Yield (%) | Time (min) | Yield (%) | |||
1.a | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 99 | 120 | 96 |
1.b | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 97 | 120 | 95 |
1.c | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 98 | 120 | 94 |
1.d | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 96 | 30 | 93 |
1.e | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 98 | 120 | 98 |
1.f | ![]() | ![]() | 7 | 97 | 180 | 95 |
1.g | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 98 | 120 | 95 |
1.h | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 98 | 120 | 98 |
1.i | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 97 | 240 | 93 |
1.j | ![]() | ![]() | 8 | 94 | 240 | 91 |
1.k | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 99 | 240 | 99 |
1.l | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 99 | 120 | 98 |
1.m | ![]() | ![]() | 7 | 98 | 240 | 96 |
1.n | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 98 | 240 | 97 |
1.o | ![]() | ![]() | 7 | 97 | 240 | 94 |
1.p | ![]() | ![]() | 7 | 97 | 240 | 93 |
aReaction conditions: substrate: NIS, 1:1 (monomer), 1:2 (dimer), 1:3 (trimer); AcOH, 0.5 ml, temperature at 25°C.
bReaction conditions: substrate: NIS, 1:1 (monomer), 1:2 (dimer), 1:3 (trimer); AcOH, 5 ml, temperature at 25°C.
NIS, N-iodosuccinimide.
Product selectivity wrt starting material in the iodination of various aromatics using N-iodosuccinimide (NIS).
Entry | Substrate | Substrate: NIS | Product | Yielda (%) | Product purityb (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main product | Others | |||||
I.h | ![]() | 1:1 | ![]() | 98 | 99.9 | – |
I.k | ![]() | 1:2 | ![]() | 99 | 99.9 | – |
I.l | ![]() | 1:2 | ![]() | 99 | 99.9 | – |
I.e | ![]() | 1:2 | ![]() | 98 | 99.9 | – |
I.m | ![]() | 1:2 | ![]() | 98 | 99.9 | – |
I.d | ![]() | 1:3 | ![]() | 96 | 99.9 | – |
I.j | ![]() | 1:1 | ![]() | 94 | 99.9 | – |
I.n | ![]() | 1:2 | ![]() | 98 | 98.06 | 1.94 |
I.b | ![]() | 1:1 | ![]() | 97 | 98.87 | 1.13 |
I.i | ![]() | 1:3 | ![]() | 97 | 95.33 | 4.67 |
aIsolated yields.
bPurity determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).
Comparison of iodination of aromatic compounds using N-iodosuccinimide (NIS) by grinding method with other reported systems.
Entry | Substrate | Product | Present study (by grinding) | Literature results | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time (min) | yield (%) | Time (min) | yield (%) | Application | |||
1.a | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 99 | 180 | 69 [1] | Hyper proliferative disorder [27] |
1.b | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 97 | 180 | 83 [28] | In ink jet printer [29] |
1.c | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 98 | 1,200 | 80 [30] | Intermediate for veterinary anthelmintic agents [26] |
1.d | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 96 | 480 | 64 [31] | Antiinflammatory, analgesic, antiatherosclerotic [23] |
1.e | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 98 | 840 | 68 [32] | Herbicide [33] |
1.f | ![]() | ![]() | 7 | 97 | 240 | 50 [34] | Drug, anti-corrosion and chelating agent [26] |
1.g | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 98 | 180 | 57 [35] | Anti-microbial agent [24] |
1.h | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 98 | 480 | 98 [36] | In fuel cell [37] |
1.i | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 97 | 240 | 87 [35] | Intermediates for drugs, pesticides and fungicides [38] |
1.j | ![]() | ![]() | 8 | 94 | 1,440 | 47 [34] | Intermediate for drugs, chemical, and dyestuff [39] |
1.k | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 99 | 480 | 80 [35] | Used in herbicide [40] |
1.l | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 99 | 50–70°C, | 82 [30] | A potent antibacterial [31] |
1.m | ![]() | ![]() | 7 | 98 | 50°C | 72 [41] | Used in treatment of hookworm infection [42] |
1.n | ![]() | ![]() | 5 | 98 | 1,440 | 80 [43] | Used in treatment of hookworm infection [44] |
1.o | ![]() | ![]() | 7 | 97 | 0°C | 70 [45] | Used in medicine, and pharmaceutics [41] |
1.p | ![]() | ![]() | 7 | 97 | 0°C | 72 [45] | Used as intermediates for drugs, pesticides [38] |
aReaction conditions: substrate: NIS, 1:1 (monoiodination), 1:2 (diiodination), 1:3 (triiodination); AcOH, 0.5 ml, temperature at 25°C.
bReaction conditions: substrate: NIS, 1:1 (monoiodination), 1:2 (diiodination), 1:3 (triiodination); AcOH, 5 ml, temperature at 25°C and gave 91–99% yield.
NIS, N-iodosuccinimide.

Effect of mole ratio of N-iodosuccinimide/4-nitrophenol on the yield in the iodination of 4-nitrophenol to 2,6-diiodo-4-nitrophenol.
A possible mechanism of iodination for aromatic compounds is shown in Scheme 1. NIS is activated by AcOH. It is proposed that the active species for this iodination is probably the in situ formed “I+” which can act as a very reactive electrophile, allowing iodination in a short reaction time at room temperature. As far the mechanism of iodination of organic compounds using NIS is concerned, UV-visible spectroscopy was carried out. The absorption spectra of NIS exhibit maximum absorption at 469 nm and another peak at 300 nm (Figure 2). When substrate 4-hydroxybenzonitrile with maximum absorption at 250 nm (Figure 3) was added to the reaction mixture, the peak due to NIS disappears at 469 nm completely and a peak at 230 nm (Figure 4) appears, suggesting the formation of succinimide. There was no peak at 420 nm and 366 nm, which are attributed to I2 and I3, respectively, in the literature [47]. This shows that these intermediate species of iodine are not formed during this iodination process. These observations support the mechanism.

A possible mechanism of iodination for aromatic compounds.

UV spectra of N-iodosuccinimide.

UV spectra of hydroxybenzonitrile.

UV spectra of reaction mixture.
4 Conclusion
It can be concluded that this is a simple, highly regioselective and efficient method for iodination of activated aromatic compounds, aldehydes, phenol and aniline using NIS by the grinding method. This method providing a practical alternative to other procedures by avoiding the use of harsh reaction conditions like high temperature, long reaction time, costly metal catalysts, and problematic halogenated solvents. Furthermore, ambient conditions and simple work-up procedure, shorter reaction time (5–7 min) and commercially viable route for synthesis of iodo-organics make the present method an attractive procedure in comparison to other iodination protocols.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to express their thanks to Professor S.K. Srivastava, S.O.S Chemistry, Jiwaji University, Director, Sophisticated Analytical Instrumentation Facility, Punjab University, Chandigarh and Assistant Manager, Shimadzu Pvt. Ltd in carrying out the spectral analysis of the compound.
Conflict of interest statement: The authors confirm that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the content of this article.
References
[1] Adimurthy S, Ramachandraiah G, Ghosh KP, Bedekar VA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 5099–5101.10.1016/S0040-4039(03)01144-4Search in Google Scholar
[2] Mukaiyama T, Kitagawa H, Matsuo J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9383–9386.10.1016/S0040-4039(00)01454-4Search in Google Scholar
[3] Jereb M, Zupan M, Stavber S. Chem. Commun. 2004, 2614–2615.10.1039/B409919BSearch in Google Scholar
[4] Branytska OV, Neumann R. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9510–9512.10.1021/jo035271hSearch in Google Scholar
[5] Lambert C, Noll G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2. 2002, 2039–2043.10.1039/B207736ASearch in Google Scholar
[6] Pizey S. Synthetic Reagent 3, Wiley: New York, 1977, pp. 227–276.Search in Google Scholar
[7] Boothe R, Dial C, Conaway R, Pagnl RM, Kabalka GW. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 2207–2210.10.1016/S0040-4039(00)84488-3Search in Google Scholar
[8] Sugita T, Idei M, Ishibashi Y, Takegami Y. Chem. Lett. 1982, 1481.10.1246/cl.1982.1481Search in Google Scholar
[9] Suzuki H, Haruta Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1973, 46, 589–592.10.1246/bcsj.46.589Search in Google Scholar
[10] Suzuki H. Org. Synth. Coll. 1988, 6, 700–704.Search in Google Scholar
[11] Plater MJ, Jackson T. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 4687–4692.10.1016/S0040-4020(03)00521-0Search in Google Scholar
[12] Frota C, Casagrande GA, Pizzuti L, Raminelli C. Curr. Org. Synth. 2012, 9, 1570–1794.Search in Google Scholar
[13] Bovonsombat P, Leykajarakul J, Khan C, Pla-on K, Krause MM, Khanthapura P, Ali RD. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 2664–2667.10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.03.128Search in Google Scholar
[14] Olah GA, Wang Q, Sandford G, Prakash GK. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3194–3195.10.1021/jo00063a052Search in Google Scholar
[15] Carreño CM, Ruano JL, Ruano G, Sanz G, Miguel A, Toledo UA. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5328–5331.10.1021/jo00121a064Search in Google Scholar
[16] Chaikovskii VK, Skorokhodov VI, Filimonov VD. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 37, 1503–1504.10.1023/A:1013435608182Search in Google Scholar
[17] Bonesi SM, Erra-Balsells RJ. Heterocycl. Chem. 2001, 38, 77–87.10.1002/jhet.5570380111Search in Google Scholar
[18] Filimonov VD, Krasnokutskaya EA, Lesina AY. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 39, 875–880.10.1023/B:RUJO.0000003168.84924.b9Search in Google Scholar
[19] Anastas PT, Williamson TC. Green Chemistry, ACS Symposium Series 626, American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1996.10.1021/bk-1996-0626Search in Google Scholar
[20] Wang GW, Gao J. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2385–2388.10.1021/ol900451dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[21] Tanaka K, Toda F. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1025–1074.10.1021/cr940089pSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[22] Bavel VB, Jaremo M, Karlsson L, Lindstrom G. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 1279–1283.10.1021/ac951042mSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[23] Lista L, Pezzella A, Napolitano A, Ischia MD. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 234–239.10.1016/j.tet.2007.10.062Search in Google Scholar
[24] Milwaukee WI. Aldrich Handbook of Fine Chemicals, Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc.: Wisconsin, USA, 1990.Search in Google Scholar
[25] Vatsadze SZ, Titanyuk ID, Chernikov AV, Zyk NV. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2004, 53, 471–473.10.1023/B:RUCB.0000030826.76441.afSearch in Google Scholar
[26] Merck. The Merck Index, 13th ed., An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biologicals, Merck and Co. Inc.: Whitehouse Station, NJ, 2001.Search in Google Scholar
[27] Ribeiro RS, Esteves PM, Mattos CS. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2008, 19, 1239.10.1590/S0103-50532008000700002Search in Google Scholar
[28] Gary LS, Doxsee MK. Educ. Quim. 2009, 433–440.Search in Google Scholar
[29] Banerjee A. 2006, WO/020681/.10.1055/s-2006-926408Search in Google Scholar
[30] Janzon. U.S. Patent 3929907, 1975.Search in Google Scholar
[31] Reddy KR, Venkateshwar CM, Maheswari U, Kumar PS. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 2170–2173.10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.02.074Search in Google Scholar
[32] Bell NV, Bowman WR, Coe PF, Turner AT, Whybrow D. Can. J. Chem. 1997, 75, 873–883.10.1139/v97-105Search in Google Scholar
[33] Marritt W. U.S. Patent 6776830, 2004.Search in Google Scholar
[34] Yusubov MS, Filimonov VD, Jin HW, Chi WK. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 1988, 19, 400–401.Search in Google Scholar
[35] Emmanuvel L, Shukla RK, Sudalai A, Gurunath S, Sivaram S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 4793–4796.10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.05.062Search in Google Scholar
[36] Ping S, Zhou G, Qin FR, Ling XL, Liang ZH. Chin. J. Struct. Chem. 2009, 28, 87–93.Search in Google Scholar
[37] Sket B, Zupet P, Zupan M. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1. 1989, 2279–2281.10.1039/P19890002279Search in Google Scholar
[38] Jalmar R, Jorge C. U.S. Patent 4677124, 1987.Search in Google Scholar
[39] Hamprecht GK, Heniz K, Fischer AF. U.S. Patent 3896155, 1975.Search in Google Scholar
[40] Monnereau C, Blart E, Odobel F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 5421–5423.10.1016/j.tetlet.2005.05.117Search in Google Scholar
[41] Zielinska A, Skulski L. Molecules 2005, 10, 1307–1317.10.3390/10101307Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[42] Ltatami H, Kashima M, Tasaki Y. U.S. Patent 4567280, 1986.Search in Google Scholar
[43] Gallo DC, Gebara KS, Muzzi RM, Raminelli C. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2010, 21, 770–774.10.1590/S0103-50532010000400026Search in Google Scholar
[44] Vesela AB, Franc M, Pelantova H, Kubac D, Vejvoda V, Sulc M. Biodegradation 2010, 21, 761–770.10.1007/s10532-010-9341-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[45] Johnson R, Meijer A, Ellervik U. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 11657–11663.10.1016/j.tet.2005.09.051Search in Google Scholar
[46] Baudouin A, Chabrier P, Thuillier G. Bull. Soc. Chin. Fr. 1954, 226.Search in Google Scholar
[47] Jirousek L, Soodak M. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 1973, 70, 1401–1405.10.1073/pnas.70.5.1401Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- In this issue
- Original articles
- CO2 absorption in flat membrane microstructured contactors of different wettability using aqueous solution of NaOH
- Iodination of industrially important aromatic compounds using N-iodosuccinimide by grinding method
- Cu(OH)x-clay catalyst promoted synthesis of 4,5-dihydro-1,2,4-oxadiazole at room temperature
- Synthesis of ternary g-C3N4/Bi2MoO6/TiO2 nanotube composite photocatalysts for the decolorization of dyes under visible light and direct sunlight irradiation
- Preparation of the anatase phase TiO2 nanocrystallites using subcritical water as the solvent and evaluation of their photocatalytic properties under visible light irradiation
- Solvent-free mechanochemical synthesis of Zn(II), Cd(II), and Cu(II) complexes with 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-(2-(1-(pyridin-2-yl)ethylidene)hydrazinyl)-1H-pyrrole-3-carbonitrile
- A simple and efficient process for the extraction of naringin from grapefruit peel waste
- Microwave-enhanced silver nanoparticle synthesis using chitosan biopolymer: optimization of the process conditions and evaluation of their characteristics
- Microwave-assisted and regular leaching of germanium from the germanium-rich lignite ash
- The effect of NaOH on the direct calcification–carbonation method for processing of Bayer process red mud
- Zinc and lead recovery from jarosite residues produced in zinc hydrometallurgy by vacuum reduction and distillation
- Book review
- Sustainable synthesis of pharmaceuticals: using transition-metal complexes as catalysts
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- In this issue
- Original articles
- CO2 absorption in flat membrane microstructured contactors of different wettability using aqueous solution of NaOH
- Iodination of industrially important aromatic compounds using N-iodosuccinimide by grinding method
- Cu(OH)x-clay catalyst promoted synthesis of 4,5-dihydro-1,2,4-oxadiazole at room temperature
- Synthesis of ternary g-C3N4/Bi2MoO6/TiO2 nanotube composite photocatalysts for the decolorization of dyes under visible light and direct sunlight irradiation
- Preparation of the anatase phase TiO2 nanocrystallites using subcritical water as the solvent and evaluation of their photocatalytic properties under visible light irradiation
- Solvent-free mechanochemical synthesis of Zn(II), Cd(II), and Cu(II) complexes with 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-(2-(1-(pyridin-2-yl)ethylidene)hydrazinyl)-1H-pyrrole-3-carbonitrile
- A simple and efficient process for the extraction of naringin from grapefruit peel waste
- Microwave-enhanced silver nanoparticle synthesis using chitosan biopolymer: optimization of the process conditions and evaluation of their characteristics
- Microwave-assisted and regular leaching of germanium from the germanium-rich lignite ash
- The effect of NaOH on the direct calcification–carbonation method for processing of Bayer process red mud
- Zinc and lead recovery from jarosite residues produced in zinc hydrometallurgy by vacuum reduction and distillation
- Book review
- Sustainable synthesis of pharmaceuticals: using transition-metal complexes as catalysts