Home Kinetics of green solid-liquid extraction of useful compounds from plant materials: kinetics coefficients and modeling
Article Open Access

Kinetics of green solid-liquid extraction of useful compounds from plant materials: kinetics coefficients and modeling

  • Evgeni Simeonov

    Evgeni Simeonov has been a lecturer and a researcher at the Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, Sofia, Bulgaria since 1989. His scientific interests are: heat/mass transfer processes, design of heat/mass transfer equipment, mathematical modeling, nanofiltration. He is an author of three textbooks, over 60 scientific publications and 200 citations, and has participated in international university/research exchanges at universities in Germany, France, and England.

    , Zvezdelina Yaneva

    Zvezdelina Yaneva works at Chemistry Unit, Department of Pharmacology, Animal Physiology and Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria. Her current research interests are focused on sorption phenomena, organic synthesis and UV/VIS, HPLC analyses of biologically active organic substances, FTIR analyses, mathematical modeling of mass transfer processes, and wastewater treatment. She has over 50 publications and 130 citations to her credit.

    EMAIL logo
    and Chavdar Chilev

    Chavdar Chilev works at the Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, Sofia, Bulgaria. His research interests are in the field of biomass valorization process, nanotechnology, high pressure adsorption, separation technology, distillation, solid-liquid/liquid-liquid extraction, separation, and purification of gas mixtures. He is skilled in a number of spectrophotometry and chromatography analytical methods (AAS, ICP-AAS, GTA, VGA, UV/VIS).

Published/Copyright: March 30, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A mathematical model for modeling solid-liquid extraction from plants was developed. Two extraction systems, System I Nicotiana tabacum L.-water and System II Geranium sanguineum L.-water, were investigated. The effect of agitation rate on the mode of the extraction process was studied, as the limit values in the case of internal diffusion for System I and System II were determined. The kinetics of extraction for both systems at determined technological parameters (temperature and solid/liquid ratio) was experimentally investigated. The values of the partial mass transfer coefficient, k, were determined by the Regular regime method. A four-parameter empirical model for prediction of the effective diffusivity, Deff, was also presented. The model adequacy is verified with the experimental data and shows very good coincidence.

1 Introduction

Solid-liquid extraction is a process which gives products that are widely used in the pharmaceutical, cosmetics, tobacco, and food industries and also applied for environmental purposes. The latter provoked numerous scientific studies focused on the process kinetics [1], [2], [3], yield of extraction [2], [4], [5], [6], [7], and process design [8], [9].

The mathematical modeling is a powerful tool for equipment optimization, simulation, design, and control allowing theoretical description of the process and evaluation of the mass transfer coefficients [3], [10], [11], [12]. The possibility to extract maximum valuable compounds in short time is of significant interest for the practice.

In scientific literature, the processes of solid-liquid extraction of biologically active substances from various natural materials are described and simulated by several mathematical models. Some of the extensively applied theoretical models: of Crank [13], the film theory and unsteady state diffusion model [14], are derived from Fick’s second law of diffusion [6], [15]. Model equations that are based on a second-order rate law are used for the modeling of conventional and nonconventional extraction processes [16]. Commonly applied empirical models were proposed also by So and Macdonald, Patricelli, Peleg, Perez and applied for modeling of rapeseed extraction, oil extraction and wild sunflower extraction, respectively [17], [18]. The kinetics equations of Ponomaryov and a model based on nonstationary diffusion through the plant material were applied for describing the kinetics of total extractives and inositol hexaphosphate from sesame seeds [19]. Resinoid extraction from Hypericum perforatum L. aerial parts was successfully modeled by the parabolic diffusion model, power law model, Weibull’s and Elovich’s equations [20]. The effect of particle size and solid-liquid ratio on the kinetics of green solid-liquid extraction of andrographolide from Andrographispaniculata (AP) were investigated. The second-order rate law showed a better agreement with the experimental data. It was established that the extraction rate coefficient significantly increased with a decrease in particle size and an increase in solid-liquid ratio [21]. So and Macdonald’s model was suitable to describe the kinetics of the three stages (fast initial washing period, fast diffusion, and slow diffusion) of caffeine and total catechins extraction from green tea at different pressures [17]. Two mathematical models were developed by Winitsorn et al. [22] for solid-liquid extraction from tamarind seed coat and green tea. When comparing results of neglecting and considering external mass transfer resistance, both models displayed satisfactory applicability for prediction of the extraction yield.

In order to set up an experimental installation the diffusion type and the factors that are of main importance for the process have to be known. There are three different approaches for that purpose: analytical solution for the three classic shapes of the solid phase, numerical solutions based on simplifications, and experimental data description applying the method of standard or characteristic functions [9], [23].

The extraction of valuable components from plant raw material is almost ever limited by the mass transfer inside the pores of the solid phase. Each experimental kinetic curve (dependence) represents in a hidden way all the factors influencing the diffusion process velocity like: polydispersion, anisotropy, solid particles form, and liquid phase concentration change. These factors are given quantitatively by the effective diffusion coefficient (Deff) [3], [12], [23].

Such a kinetic curve can be represented by an equation of the type:

(1)C1=ABe(Hτ),

where A, B, and H are constants determined numerically on the basis of the experimental data that have specific physical meaning, compared with the analytical solutions of the process of solid phase extraction [12]. Quantitatively, these factors are reported by the effective diffusion coefficient (Deff). The exact calculation of Deff is important for the process engineering. The combination of the experimental and process analytical data is used for the calculation of Deff using the method of Regular regime [12], [23].

The aim of this work is to study experimentally the effect of agitation rate on the diffusion mode during the extraction of valuable target components from plant raw materials, as well as to determine the values of the kinetics coefficients (effective diffusivity, Deff and partial mass transfer coefficient, k) by the Regular regime method.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Plant materials

Experiments were carried out with two important to practice plant materials. System I Nicotianatabacum L.-water and System II Geranium sanguineum L.-water for obtaining extractive substances.

2.2 Extraction design

The kinetic experiments were performed in a stirred vessel. The ground raw material with suitable size was placed in the reactor and poured on with H2O. The reactor was immersed in a water bath and the temperature was maintained constant, controlled by a thermometer. The mixture was continuously stirred. To ensure limiting internal diffusion the angular velocity of the mixer was regulated. After extraction, the samples were taken and filtrated through plaited filter to separate the solid from the liquid phase.

2.3 Analytical methods for the extraction analysis

A weighing method with a precision of 10−3 g was applied for the quantitative determination of tobacco concrete and extractive compounds. The extracts were evaporated in a drying oven at t=70°C.

3 Kinetics study, diffusion coefficients, and modeling

3.1 Diffusion model

The extraction from the solid phase can be described with a mathematical model of the type:

(2)C2τ=Deff(2C2x2+txC2x)

with boundary conditions:

(3)Deff(C2x)x=x=k(C2x=xmC1)
(4)(C2x)x=0=0
(5)C2,τ=0=C0

where m is the distribution coefficient, m≈1 because of the low concentration range (well-known fact in literature for the investigated plant material).

The general analytical solution has the form:

(6)C0C2¯C0Cm=11+βn=14.(υ+1)μn2+4(υ+1)2β(1+β)expμn2DeffτR2,

where C0 is the initial concentration in the solid phase; Cm=C1i by periodical processes; C1i is the initial concentration in the liquid phase; C2¯ is the average concentration in the solid phase; Deff is the effective diffusion coefficient in the pores of the solid phase; R is the size of the solid particles; τ is the time;β=C1eqC0C1eq;C1eq is the equilibrium concentration in the liquid phase; μn is the roots of the characteristic equation; and ν is the shape factor for the solid phase.

3.2 Method using Regular regime

The Regular regime is a method for determination of Deff based on the combination between the analytical solutions of Eq. (1) and the experimentally obtained C2¯=f(τ) for the boundary case Bi→∞, β→0 [20]. This method is based on a comparison between the experimental obtained data, for a nonconstant mass transfer from the solid into the liquid phase, with the analytical solutions at the same conditions of mass transfer. It is known that at the beginning of this regime Deff=const and for Eq. (6) for plate and sphere shape of the solid phase by τ=0, C2=C0=const, Cli=0, we can obtain:

  • plate

    (7)C2¯C0=n=18π2(2n1)2eπ24(2n1)2F0,
  • sphere

    (8)C2_C0=n=16π2n2eπ2n2DeffτR2,

    where C1 is the concentration in the liquid phase; C1i is the initial concentration in the liquid phase; F0=DeffτR2 is the Fourier number.

With the increase of Fo (and respectively τ) the convergence of Eq. (6) becomes fast growing and can practically be limited to the first member. Equation (6) is rearranged in the form:

(9)C0C2¯C0Cm=11+βB1eμ12F0

or [20], [21]:

(10)lg(11+βC0C2¯C0Cm)=lgB10.434μ12DeffτR2

For the investigated system, the limit values of the parameters at intraparticle diffusion, for a plate and sphere, are presented in Table 1.

Table 1:

Boundary values of the parameters for a plate and sphere.

β ≈0Bi→∞, β≈0
SpherePlateSpherePlate
μ1tgμ=μ1Bicotgμ=μBiππ/2
B16Bi2μ2(μ2Bi+Bi2)2Bi2μ2(μ2+Bi+Bi2)6/π28/π2
F00.10.264

4 Results and discussion

4.1 Kinetics study

4.1.1 Effect of agitation rate on the rate limiting stage of the extraction process

Series of experiments with both studied systems at various agitation rates, extraction temperature t=20°C and solvent-water, were conducted.

System I Nicotiana tabacum L. leaves-water: Five experiments at agitation rates n=1, 1.5, 2, 3; and 4/s, solid/liquid ratio ξ=0.04 m3/kg and extraction time τ=900 s were conducted. The derived relationship between the concentration of the tobacco concrete in the liquid phase and the agitation rate is graphically displayed in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Dependence of tobacco concrete liquid phase concentration on the agitation rate at t=20°C; ζ=0.04 m3/kg and solvent water.
Figure 1:

Dependence of tobacco concrete liquid phase concentration on the agitation rate at t=20°C; ζ=0.04 m3/kg and solvent water.

System II Geranium sanguineum L. roots-water: Figure 2 presents the dependence of the liquid phase concentration of the extractable components on the agitation rate. The plot was obtained by the data from five experiments conducted at agitation rates n=0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 4/s, solid/liquid ratio ξ=0.03 m3/kg and extraction time τ= 3600 s.

Figure 2: Dependence of Geranium sanguineum L. liquid phase concentration on the agitation rate at t=20°C; ζ=0.03 m3/kg and solvent water.
Figure 2:

Dependence of Geranium sanguineum L. liquid phase concentration on the agitation rate at t=20°C; ζ=0.03 m3/kg and solvent water.

The plots on Figures 1 and 2 displayed that at agitation rates n>1.5–2 s−1, the process was limited by external diffusion, i.e. the liquid concentration of the extractable components remains constant at these conditions. Consequently, the external mass transfer resistance was eliminated.

4.1.2 Kinetics of periodical batch extraction

The kinetics of periodical batch extraction from the plant raw materials – tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) and red geranium (Geranium sanguineum L.) in a stirred tank was investigated at the following working conditions:

  • for extraction from tobacco leaves – extraction temperature t=20°C, solvent water, solid/liquid ratio ξ=0.05 m3/kg and agitation rate n=3 s−1;

  • for extraction from red geranium roots – extraction temperature t=20°C, solvent water, solid/liquid ratio ξ=0.04 m3/kg and agitation rate n=4 s−1.

The kinetics at constant technological parameters (solvent, solid/liquid ratio, and temperature) could be described by an equation of type (1), where A, B, and H are constants determined numerically on the basis of the experimental data. The values of these constants are presented in Table 2.

Table 2:

Values of the constants A, B, and H in Eq. (1).

Plant raw materialWorking conditionsABH×103
Tobacco leavest=20°C; solvent – water;6.4436.2340.549
ξ=0.05 m3/kg; n=4 s−1
Red geranium rootst=20°C; solvent – water;3.8833.7050.254
ξ=0.04 m3/kg; n=3 s−1

The experimental kinetic curves are presented in Figure 3 for System I and in Figure 4 for System II.

Figure 3: Dependence of concentration on time at t=20°C; ζ=0.05 m3/kg and solvent water for System I.
Figure 3:

Dependence of concentration on time at t=20°C; ζ=0.05 m3/kg and solvent water for System I.

Figure 4: Dependence of concentration on time at t=20°C; ζ=0.04 m3/kg and solvent water for System II.
Figure 4:

Dependence of concentration on time at t=20°C; ζ=0.04 m3/kg and solvent water for System II.

4.2 Numerical solution and determination of the diffusion coefficients by the Regular regime method

The programming environment Matlab 8.0.1 was used for modeling of the obtained experimental data. For accurate modeling of an extraction process, the effective diffusivity, in the equation describing solid phase mass transfer, has to be approximated with an appropriate function dependent on time.

The results in the present study were obtained by applying Eq. (10) and the solid phase form was accounted:

  • for tobacco leaves – R=0.75×10−3 m; B1=8/π2; μ1=π/2; ρs=930 kg/m3; ε=0.7 m3/m3;

  • for red geranium roots – R=0.5×10−3 m; B1=6/π2; μ1=π; ρs=1100 kg/m3; ε=0.4 m3/m3.

A four-parameter model for the effective diffusivity was suggested:

(11)Deff=aebτ+cedτ

The parameters there in can be determined by linear regression of the experimental data.

The applicability of the model was analyzed based on the experimental data and model plots presented in Figures 5 and 6 for System I and System II, respectively.

Figure 5: Experimental data and model curve of Deff for System I at t=20°C and ξ=0.05 m3/kg.
Figure 5:

Experimental data and model curve of Deff for System I at t=20°C and ξ=0.05 m3/kg.

Figure 6: Experimental data and model curve of Deff for System II at t=20°C and ξ=0.04 m3/kg.
Figure 6:

Experimental data and model curve of Deff for System II at t=20°C and ξ=0.04 m3/kg.

The results obtained display that the value of Deff decreases with time to a final value. The authors suppose that the reduction observed is related to the fact that with the progress of the process, extraction of the substance from pores that were previously unavailable or too hard to be reached, takes place. These are usually micropores, in which the mass transfer is limited and the general mass transfer as a whole decreases, i.e. the value of Deff decreases. The intensity of the mass transfer in the boundary layer around the particle depends on the partial mass transfer coefficient k. This coefficient mainly depends on the nature of the solvent and the extractable component and its value is in the range of 10−6–10−4 m/s. Depending on the values of k and the effective diffusivity (respectively Biot number) the rate limiting stage – external or intraparticle diffusion, could be determined. The values of the partial mass transfer coefficient, k, were derived by the Regular regime method and presented in Table 3 for both studied systems.

Table 3:

Values of the constants A, B, H, Bi number, and the partial mass transfer coefficient k.

SystemNABH ×103Bik×106
s−1m/s
Tobacco-water36.4436.3240.54961.631.796
Geranium-water43.8833.7050.25472.310.192

The values of the constants A, B, and H are obtained at time τ=900 s for the system tobacco-water and at τ=3600 s for the system geranium-water.

5 Conclusions

The kinetics of extraction of valuable target compounds from tobacco leaves (Nicotiana tabacum L.) and red geranium roots (Geranium sanguineum L.) with solvent water at periodic conditions in a batch mode was experimentally investigated. The effect of agitation rate on the regime of the extraction process was determined by means of the calculated Biot number Bi 61.63 for System I and Bi 72.31 for System II. The experimentally obtained kinetics data were presented by the Regular regime method for both studied systems. The partial mass transfer coefficients: k=1.796×10−6 m/s for System I, and k=0.192×10−6 m/s for System II, were calculated. An empirical four-parameter model for variable effective diffusivity, Deff, was suggested. The empirical solutions that were obtained in the recent study display its satisfactory applicability to the experimental kinetics data of extraction of valuable target compounds from plant raw materials.

About the authors

Evgeni Simeonov

Evgeni Simeonov has been a lecturer and a researcher at the Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, Sofia, Bulgaria since 1989. His scientific interests are: heat/mass transfer processes, design of heat/mass transfer equipment, mathematical modeling, nanofiltration. He is an author of three textbooks, over 60 scientific publications and 200 citations, and has participated in international university/research exchanges at universities in Germany, France, and England.

Zvezdelina Yaneva

Zvezdelina Yaneva works at Chemistry Unit, Department of Pharmacology, Animal Physiology and Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria. Her current research interests are focused on sorption phenomena, organic synthesis and UV/VIS, HPLC analyses of biologically active organic substances, FTIR analyses, mathematical modeling of mass transfer processes, and wastewater treatment. She has over 50 publications and 130 citations to her credit.

Chavdar Chilev

Chavdar Chilev works at the Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, Sofia, Bulgaria. His research interests are in the field of biomass valorization process, nanotechnology, high pressure adsorption, separation technology, distillation, solid-liquid/liquid-liquid extraction, separation, and purification of gas mixtures. He is skilled in a number of spectrophotometry and chromatography analytical methods (AAS, ICP-AAS, GTA, VGA, UV/VIS).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Science & Research Programme of the UCTM (Sofia) for the financial support (project 11 574).

References

[1] Wongkittipong R, Prat L, Damroglerd S, Gourdon C. Separ. Purif. Technol. 2004, 40, 147–154.10.1016/j.seppur.2004.02.002Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bucić-Kojić A, Planinića M, Tomasa M, Bilića M, Velića D. J. Food Eng. 2007, 81, 236–242.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.10.027Search in Google Scholar

[3] Simeonov E, Tsibranska I, Minchev A. Chem. Eng. J. 1999, 73, 255–259.10.1016/S1385-8947(99)00030-3Search in Google Scholar

[4] Pinelo M, Sineiro J, Núñez MJ. J. Food Eng. 2006, 77, 57–63.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.06.021Search in Google Scholar

[5] Seikova I, Simeonov E, Ivanova E. J. Food Eng. 2004, 61, 165–171.10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00083-9Search in Google Scholar

[6] Cacace JE, Mazza G. J. Food Eng. 2003, 59, 379–389.10.1016/S0260-8774(02)00497-1Search in Google Scholar

[7] Mantell C, Rodríguez M, Martínez de la Ossa E. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57, 3831–3838.10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00320-2Search in Google Scholar

[8] Simeonov E, Nedialcova J. J. UCTM 2006, 41, 445–448.10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500141Search in Google Scholar

[9] Simeonov E, Seikova I, Pentchev I, Mintchev A. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 4903–4907.10.1021/ie030650mSearch in Google Scholar

[10] Hou K, Zheng Q, Li Y, Shen J, Hu S. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24, 1343–1348.10.1016/S0098-1354(00)00411-7Search in Google Scholar

[11] Meireles A. Extracting Bioactive Compounds For Food Products: Theory and Applications, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, 2009.10.1201/9781420062397Search in Google Scholar

[12] Chilev Ch, Koleva V, Simeonov E. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 6288–6296.10.1021/ie402473rSearch in Google Scholar

[13] Petrovic SS, Ivanovic J, Milovanovic S, Zizovic I. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 2012, 77, 799–813.10.2298/JSC110616009PSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Velickovic DT, Milenovic DM, Ristic MS,Veljkovic VB. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2006, 13, 150–156.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2005.02.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Martinez-Vera C, Ruiz-Martinez RS, Vizcarra-Mendoza MG, Álvarez-Calderón J. J. Food Eng. 2010, 101, 16–22.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.06.003Search in Google Scholar

[16] Pan Z, Qu W, MaH, Atungulu GG, Mchugh TH. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2012, 19, 365–372.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2011.05.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Xi J, Yan L, He L. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 133, 155–159.10.1016/j.seppur.2014.06.043Search in Google Scholar

[18] Fernandez MB, Perez E, Crapiste GH, Nolasco SM. J. Food Eng. 2012, 111, 682–689.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.01.036Search in Google Scholar

[19] Zdravković A, Nikolić V, Ilić-Stojanović S, Stanojević L, Savić I. Adv. Technol. 2012, 1, 48–57.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Kitanovic S, Milenovic D, Veljkovic VB. Biochem. Eng. J. 2008, 41, 1–11.10.1016/j.bej.2008.02.010Search in Google Scholar

[21] Abubakar UI, Chua LS, Aziz R. Green Process. Synth. 2015, 4, 399–410.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Winitsorn A, Douglas PL, Douglas S, Pongampai S, Teppaitoon W. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2008, 195, 1457–1464.10.1080/00986440801967288Search in Google Scholar

[23] Axelrood GA, Lisjanski W. Extraction (Solid-Liquid Systems) Chimia, St. Petersburg, USSR, 1974.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-11-9
Accepted: 2017-2-19
Published Online: 2017-3-30
Published in Print: 2018-2-23

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gps-2016-0179/html
Scroll to top button