Skip to main content
Article Open Access

Improving the efficiency of CaO-based sorbent by SrCO3 for high-temperature sulfur removal during coal combustion

  • Yanhong Gao obtained her PhD in Metallurgical Engineering from Chongqing University (Chongqing, China) in 2012. In 2013, she was appointed an associate professor at Chongqing University of Science and Technology. She mainly studies metallurgy and process engineering.

    EMAIL logo
    ,

    Yanhua Yang obtained an MSc in Metallurgical Engineering from Kunming University of Science and Technology in 2007. She then moved to Chongqing University of Science and Technology, where she is currently undertaking research on nonferrous metallurgy and reaction engineering during coal combustion.

    ,

    Guangjun Zhu received an MSc in Thermal Engineering from Beijing University of Science and Technology in 1993. She completed advanced studies at Tsinghua University in 2003 and Tohoku University in 2008. She is currently engaged in research on metallurgical engineering as well as high efficiency and clean technology during coal combustion.

    and

    Nengyun Deng graduated with a degree in Metallurgy from Chongqing University of Science and Technology in 1993. Currently, he is an engineer in a laboratory and is familiar with reaction experiments.

Published/Copyright: March 4, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

With the goal of adding the appropriate amount of SrCO3 to coal, the synergistic effects of SrCO3 and desulfurization agents were studied by using a sulfur determination device and a carbon–sulfur spectrometer. Mineral constituents were investigated with an XRD diffraction analyzer. Results show that, at a given temperature, desulfurization efficiency increased in varying degrees based on the proportion of added SrCO3. An increasing amount of calcium sulphoaluminates also appeared in the ash residue. Meanwhile, SrCO3, sulfur capture capacity improved when the temperature reached 1200°C because of the large amount of generated calcium sulphoaluminates (3CaO·3Al2O3·CaSO4) and the controlled decomposition of CaSO4. At temperatures of 1200°C–1300°C, the ascending rate of the sulfur-fixing ratio decreased due to the sharp decomposition of CaSO4 and the pyrolysis of a small amount of calcium sulphoaluminate. From 1300°C, the decomposition of increasing amounts of calcium sulphoaluminate gradually worsened the desulfurization. The diffraction peak of calcium sulphoaluminate was the strongest at 1300°C and the sulfur-fixing ratio was also the largest. Therefore, calcium sulphoaluminate reached the highest level at this temperature.

1 Introduction

Coal is an important resource in China. The strong demand for coal is the main driver of coal-fired power plants. However, the combustion of pulverized coal releases harmful gases (e.g. SO2), which form acid rain and damages the environment. Adding calcium-based sorbent to coal significantly improves the sulfur-fixing effect at low temperature. However, the improvement is not ideal at high temperatures, especially over 1200°C. In some studies, such additives as CeO2 [1], Cr2O3 [1], [2], Fe2O3 [3], MnO2 [4], Al2O3 [1], SiO2 [1], and MgO [5], [6], are added to calcium-based sorbent to generate high-temperature stable phases, such as 3CaO·3Al2O3·CaSO4 (i.e. C4A3S) [7], [8], BaSO4, and Ca5(SiO4)2SO4[9]. Hence, the sulfur-fixing effect is improved by preventing or postponing the decomposition of CaSO4 (desulfurization product) [10], [11].

Strontium and calcium are both alkaline earth metals. The addition of strontium salt results not only in the generation of SrSO4, which is relatively stable at a high temperature, but also in the increased amounts of generated C4A3S. However, the reaction mechanism and decomposition temperature of C4A3S varies depending on certain conditions [12], [13], [14]. On the basis of Ca/S=2, Guozhen Lin et al. added silicon, iron, and strontium to coal and found that, after high-temperature combustion (more than 1200°C), the main phases in the Sr system are SrSO4 and C4A3S, whereas in the Si and Fe system, the main phase is CaSO4 [15]. By analyzing the sulfur-fixing principles of different sulfur adsorbents at high temperature, Peng Bai found that the sulfur-fixing efficiencies of barium salt and strontium salt with an equal mole ratio (M/S=1 and 2) are higher than those of calcium-based sulfur adsorbents [16]. However, their study did not analyze the mineral composition of coal ash. Hong Zhang discovered that strontium carbonate can improve the desulfurization efficiency of limestone [17] and that SrSO4 can be found in coal ash [18]. In other studies, pure chemical reagents, such as CaO, Al2O3, and CaSO4, are mixed according to certain proportions to study the generation mechanism of C4A3S [19], [20], [21], [22], [23].

Based on the low utilization rate of calcium and the poor effect of high-temperature sulfur fixation in the actual production process, the synergistic effects of SrCO3 and desulfurization agents on the formation of C4A3S, mineral constituents, and sulfur-fixing efficiency are investigated by employing a sulfur determination device, an XRD diffraction analyzer, and so on. This process is advantageous in enhancing the sulfur-fixing efficiency and increasing the use of high-sulfur coal.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Reagents and materials

The pulverized coal used in this experiment was high-sulfur coal (41.92% FCd; 9.04% Vd; 49.04% Ad; 7.02% St, d). Compositions of Ash are shown in Table 1. The following materials (pure chemical reagent) were prepared: Ca(OH)2, (Jinbei Fine Chemical Co. Ltd., Tianjin, China) as sulfur-fixing agent and SrCO3, (Zhiyuan Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd., Tianjin, China) as additive. Ca/S mole ratio was equal to 1.5.

Table 1:

Compositions of ash in high-sulfur coal.

CompositionsSiO2Fe2O3Al2O3CaOMgOK2ONa2O
Contents (%)51.7620.1921.462.241.121.961.27

The high-sulfur coal and Ca(OH)2 were taken and mixed according to a given proportion. About 1%, 3%, and 5% SrCO3 were added to coal samples, respectively. They were then blended and ground in a grinding bowl to prepare the samples. A certain amount of coal, which was taken from the samples, was placed in the corundum crucible, and then calcined at 1200°C, 1300°C, and 1400°C and preserve heat for 1 h, respectively. The ash residues were collected to determine the sulfur content.

2.2 Experimental equipment

In the current work, a YX-DL8300 Sulphur Determination Device (Changsha Youxin Instrument Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Changsha, China) was used to verify the sulfur content in the coal samples. An ash melting point detector (YX-HRD3000, Changsha Qiulong Equipment Co. Ltd., Changsha, China) was utilized to calcine the coal samples, after which an infrared carbon–sulfur spectrometer (ZY-HWC8, Nanjing Zhengyuan Analytical Instrument Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Nanjing, China) was used to ascertain the sulfur content in the ash. The changes of the mineral constituents in coal ash were investigated through an XRD diffraction analyzer (DX-2700, Dandong Fangyuan Instrument Co. Ltd., Dandong, China).

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Effects of additive proportion on high sulfur coal desulfurization

The sulfur-releasing rates of the coal samples with different amounts of SrCO3 when temperatures reach 1100°C are shown in Figure 1. Although the size, shape, and location of each peak vary, the changing trends are basically the same, that is, the curves evidently present twin peaks. The two peaks indicate the release process of organic sulfur (i.e. aliphatic, aromatic, etc.) and inorganic sulfur (i.e. sulfate, iron sulfide, etc.). The decomposition temperature of inorganic sulfur is comparatively high, and the decomposition rate is lower than that of organic sulfur (i.e. with a lower decomposition temperature); thus, the second peak is flat. After 300 s, the released sulfur concentration begins to rise rapidly. Then, it is maintained for approximately 300 s, when it approaches 200 ppm. Finally, sulfur in the coal sample is released completely. A large transition interval exists between two peaks as a result of the decomposition of pyrite (around 600°C) to sulfur [24], [25], [26], [27].

Figure 1: Rules for sulfur release during the combustion of coal samples.
Figure 1:

Rules for sulfur release during the combustion of coal samples.

Compared with the case in which no strontium carbonate is added, the first peak is pointed, and the peak value is higher, indicating that more sulfur is released in a relatively short time. After the addition of 1% strontium carbonate, sulfur precipitation accelerates, and the peak appears in advance, but the peak value decreases obviously; further, when the addition ratio is 3% or 5%, the presence of the peak is delayed. It is possible that, to a certain extent, a small amount of strontium carbonate (1% SrCO3) plays a catalytic role in the release of sulfur, although this assumption requires further research). However, when more strontium carbonate (3% or 5% SrCO3) is added, the actions of desulphurization begin to hold a dominant position.

With the increase in SrCO3 content, the first peak value decreases and the duration of the second peak reduces, suggesting that at 1100°C, the addition of 3% or 5% SrCO3 promotes sulfur fixation.

3.2 Influence of temperature on the desulfurization effect

Desulfurization rate (ηs) evaluates the sulfur fixation effect and is calculated on the basis of the formula expressed as

(1)ηs=S0S1S0.

where S0 is the initial sulfur content in coal sample (7.02%), and S1 is the sulfur content that escaped in the form of gas during combustion under different conditions.

Desulfurization rates are plotted in Figure 2 as a function of the temperature from 1100°C to 1400°C. The changing trends of the curves are roughly the same, that is, the desulfurization rate increases first and then descends. After adding SrCO3, the desulfurization rate enhances greatly (the higher the temperature, the more obvious the effect of SrCO3). It is worth mentioning that, after adding 3% SrCO3 to the coal samples, the sulfur-fixing ratio slightly increases compared with the case in which 1% SrCO3 is added at 1100°C or 1400°C. Meanwhile, at 1200°C or 1300°C, the increase is larger, but the desulfurization rate is slightly less than the value of the coal sample with 5% SrCO3. This finding implies that at 1200°C, some compounds that keep the desulfurization product (e.g. CaSO4) from decomposing are generated. Otherwise, this finding could also mean that CaSO4 further reacts to form new sulfur retention phases that are stable at high temperature, which in turn, induces a sulfur-fixing ratio that increases significantly. When the temperature is higher than 1300°C, the sulfur-fixing ratio shows a declining trend. This may be due to the weakening effect of the inhibition of desulfurization product decomposition or the disintegration of the decomposition of sulfur retention phases at this temperature. When temperature exceeds a certain value, sulfur retention phases decompose gradually and release sulfur again. Previous studies have shown that this compound is C4A3S [28].

Figure 2: Effects of temperature on sulfur fixation.
Figure 2:

Effects of temperature on sulfur fixation.

3.3 Influence of temperature on the formation of calcium sulphoaluminate

The XRD spectra of different coal ash samples at different temperatures are presented in Figures 3 and 4. As can be seen in both figures, no characteristic peak of C4A3S appears at 1100°C, and the main mineral is 3CaO·5Al2O3. In addition, small amounts of CaO·2Al2O3, 12CaO·7Al2O3 (in Figure 4), and residual CaSO4, Ca(OH)2 and Al2O3 are observed. These observations indicate that the formation temperature of 3CaO·5Al2O3 is lower than that of C4A3S and that its generation speed is faster than that of C4A3S.

Figure 3: XRD spectra of coal ash samples at different temperatures (3% SrCO3).(1) CaSO4, (2) Ca(OH)2, (3) Ca3All0O18, (4) 3CaO·3Al2O3·CaSO4, (5) Ca12Al14O33, (6) Al2O3, (7) CaAl4O7, (8) Ca3Al2O6, and (9) SrSO4.
Figure 3:

XRD spectra of coal ash samples at different temperatures (3% SrCO3).

(1) CaSO4, (2) Ca(OH)2, (3) Ca3All0O18, (4) 3CaO·3Al2O3·CaSO4, (5) Ca12Al14O33, (6) Al2O3, (7) CaAl4O7, (8) Ca3Al2O6, and (9) SrSO4.

Figure 4: XRD spectra of coal ash samples at different temperatures (5% SrCO3).(1) CaSO4, (2) Ca(OH)2, (3) Ca3All0O18, (4) 3CaO·3Al2O3·CaSO4, (5) Ca12Al14O33, (6) Al2O3, (7) CaAl4O7, (8) Ca3Al2O6, and (9) SrSO4.
Figure 4:

XRD spectra of coal ash samples at different temperatures (5% SrCO3).

(1) CaSO4, (2) Ca(OH)2, (3) Ca3All0O18, (4) 3CaO·3Al2O3·CaSO4, (5) Ca12Al14O33, (6) Al2O3, (7) CaAl4O7, (8) Ca3Al2O6, and (9) SrSO4.

As shown in Figures 3 and 4, when the temperature rises to 1200°C, C4A3S appears in the mineral phases, and CaSO4, Ca(OH)2 (in Figure 4), and 3CaO·5Al2O3 still exist simultaneously, suggesting that, within the temperature range, only a part of CaSO4 and CaO react with Al2O3 to form high-temperature, stable C4A3S. In addition, CaSO4 still exists at this temperature, indicating that the addition of SrCO3 may melt and harden on the surface of the sulfur fixation agent, wrap the CaSO4, and prevent CaSO4 from decomposing to a certain extent.

Furthermore, the figures show that, the C4A3S crystals grow larger at 1300°C and that the diffraction peak intensity continues to strengthen, but the growth slows down, and decomposition occurs. At this point, 3CaO·5Al2O3, CaSO4, and Ca(OH)2 have all disappeared, and only small amounts of 3CaO·Al2O3 and 12CaO·7Al2O3 appear. This may be attributed to the following series of reactions: CaO first reacts with Al2O3 to generate CaO·2Al2O3, and then CaO·2Al2O3 reacts with CaO, CaSO4, and Al2O3 to form C4A3S and 12CaO·7Al2O3; then, 3CaO·Al2O3 is generated by the decomposition of C4A3S at a high temperature. This finding indicates that a small amount of C4A3S has already decomposed at 1300°C.

As temperature continues to rise to 1400°C, SrSO4 appears in the ash residue in Figures 3 and 4. However, the peak intensity of C4A3S starts to decline rapidly. In the coal ash sample with 3% SrCO3 (Figure 3), the peak intensity of 3CaO·Al2O3 increases, whereas in the coal ash sample with 5% SrCO3 (Figure 4), CaSO4 and 3CaO·Al2O3 reappear, suggesting that the significant pyrolysis of C4A3S occurs at 1400°C.

In summary, adding a certain amount of SrCO3 (3% SrCO3 or 5% SrCO3) to coal promotes the formation of C4A3S. Under this experimental condition, C4A3S is generated rapidly at around 1200°C. At 1300°C, the reaction continues, and decomposition begins to occur. At 1400°C, decomposition obviously increases. Therefore, the best calcining temperature for the synthesis of C4A3S is between 1200°C and 1300°C.

3.4 Effects of additive proportion on the formation of calcium sulphoaluminate

According to the above analysis, although the sulfur retention product CaSO4 decomposes at high temperature, the existence of high temperature phase C4A3S increases the sulfur-fixing rate owing to the addition of SrCO3.

To determine the appropriate proportion of SrCO3, the mineral constituents of the coal ash samples were analyzed at 1200°C and 1300°C, as shown in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. As can be seen, the solid reaction products are basically the same. Given the addition of different quantities of SrCO3, the diffraction peak intensity of the generated phases is also different. With the addition of 1% SrCO3 at 1200°C or 1300°C, C4A3S is discovered. With the addition proportions increasing to 3% and 5%, the peak intensity of C4A3S increases because the addition of SrCO3 accelerates the sulfide and promotes the creation of C4A3S. However, based on Figure 2, at 1200°C, the increase in the sulfur-fixing ratio with the addition proportion of SrCO3 increasing from 1% to 3% is similar to that with the addition proportion increasing from 3% to 5%. At 1300°C, the growth in the sulfur-fixing ratio with the addition proportion of SrCO3 increasing from 1% to 3% is higher than that with the proportion increasing from 3% to 5%. Thus, the best addition proportion of SrCO3 should be around 3%.

Figure 5: XRD spectra of coal ash samples at 1200°C.(1) CaSO4, (2) Ca(OH)2, (3) Ca3All0O18, (4) 3CaO⋅3Al2O3⋅CaSO4, (5) Ca12Al14O33, (6) Al2O3, (7) CaAl4O7, and (8) Ca3Al2O6.
Figure 5:

XRD spectra of coal ash samples at 1200°C.

(1) CaSO4, (2) Ca(OH)2, (3) Ca3All0O18, (4) 3CaO⋅3Al2O3⋅CaSO4, (5) Ca12Al14O33, (6) Al2O3, (7) CaAl4O7, and (8) Ca3Al2O6.

Figure 6: XRD spectra of coal ash samples at 1300°C.(1) CaSO4, (2) Ca(OH)2, (3) Ca3All0O18, (4) 3CaO⋅3Al2O3⋅CaSO4, (5) Ca12Al14O33, (6) Al2O3, (7) CaAl4O7, and (8) Ca3Al2O6.
Figure 6:

XRD spectra of coal ash samples at 1300°C.

(1) CaSO4, (2) Ca(OH)2, (3) Ca3All0O18, (4) 3CaO⋅3Al2O3⋅CaSO4, (5) Ca12Al14O33, (6) Al2O3, (7) CaAl4O7, and (8) Ca3Al2O6.

4 Conclusions

By adding different proportions of SrCO3 to coal samples, the effects of SrCO3 on desulfurization efficiency at different temperatures are analyzed and the calcined ashes are examined through XRD. The addition of SrCO3 promotes the generation of C4A3S and prevents the pyrolysis of CaSO4 at high temperatures to a certain extent, greatly increasing the sulfur-fixing ratio. C4A3S grows rapidly at 1200°C, slows down at 1300°C, and decomposes quickly at 1400°C. At a certain temperature, the sulfur-fixing ratio rises with an increase in the addition proportion of SrCO3. Finally, the sulfur-fixing effect is improved when 3% SrCO3 is added at temperatures between 1200°C and 1300°C.

About the authors

Yanhong Gao

Yanhong Gao obtained her PhD in Metallurgical Engineering from Chongqing University (Chongqing, China) in 2012. In 2013, she was appointed an associate professor at Chongqing University of Science and Technology. She mainly studies metallurgy and process engineering.

Yanhua Yang

Yanhua Yang obtained an MSc in Metallurgical Engineering from Kunming University of Science and Technology in 2007. She then moved to Chongqing University of Science and Technology, where she is currently undertaking research on nonferrous metallurgy and reaction engineering during coal combustion.

Guangjun Zhu

Guangjun Zhu received an MSc in Thermal Engineering from Beijing University of Science and Technology in 1993. She completed advanced studies at Tsinghua University in 2003 and Tohoku University in 2008. She is currently engaged in research on metallurgical engineering as well as high efficiency and clean technology during coal combustion.

Nengyun Deng

Nengyun Deng graduated with a degree in Metallurgy from Chongqing University of Science and Technology in 1993. Currently, he is an engineer in a laboratory and is familiar with reaction experiments.

Acknowledgments

Varying degrees of financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51374267), the Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology (No. cstc2013jcyjA90007), the Scientific and Technological Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (No. KJ1713326), and the Research Foundation of Chongqing University of Science and Technology (No. CK2014B16) are hereby acknowledged.

  1. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Zhang Z, Wei N. Coal Technology 2015, 1, 58–60.10.5437/08956308X5804005Search in Google Scholar

[2] Benarchid MY, Rogez J. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 2074–2080.10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.06.005Search in Google Scholar

[3] Huang YP, Shen XD, Ma SH. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society 2007, 35, 485–488.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Zhang SQ, Xie B. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2013, 6, 4157–4161.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.644-650.4157Search in Google Scholar

[5] Liu XC, Li YJ. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 1685–1687.10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.08.008Search in Google Scholar

[6] Xu LL, Yang NR, Zhong BQ. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society 1995, 23, 206–210.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Idrissi M, Diouri A, Damidot D, Greneche JM, Alami TM, Taibi M. Cem. Concr. Res. 2010, 40, 1314–1319.10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.02.009Search in Google Scholar

[8] Luz CA, Pera J, Cheriaf M, Rocha JC. Cem. Concr. Res. 2007, 37, 624–629.10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.11.018Search in Google Scholar

[9] Li YY, Guo YX, Cheng FQ, Xie YY, Wang J. Chin. J. Environ Eng. 2011, 5, 1592–1597.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Liu H, Qiu JR, Xie JL, Zeng HC, Kong FH, Cheng B, Xie C. J. Eng. Thermophys. 2007, 28, 351–353.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Cheng J, Zhou JH, Liu JZ, Zhou ZJ, Huang ZY, Cao XY, Zhao X, Cen KF. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2003, 29, 381–405.10.1016/S0360-1285(03)00030-3Search in Google Scholar

[12] Niu X, Liu X, Song L, Li Y. Mater. Res. Innov. 2007, 11, 92–94.10.1179/143307507X196644Search in Google Scholar

[13] Wang L, Li JH, Yang J. J. Mineral. Petrol. 2009, 29, 23–28.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Zhao GJ, Xie JL, Lu CM, Han KH. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2006, 34, 665–669.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Lin GZ, Xiao PL, Wang QG, Xie GG. Environ. Sci. 1994, 15, 15–17.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Bai P. Experimental study of sulfur retention at high temperature by compound sulfur-fixing agent premixed with low sulfur coal [Master Thesis], Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Zhang H. Research on efficient sulfur-fixation agent in coal-fired fluidized bed [Ph.D. Thesis], Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Xiao PL, Shen DX, Lin GZ, He ZY, Zhuang YH. Environ. Chem. 1994, 13, 389–394.10.1002/etc.5620130305Search in Google Scholar

[19] Fu Y, Lin GZ, Zhuang YH. Environ. Chem. 1994, 13, 492–497.10.1049/cp:19940181Search in Google Scholar

[20] Feng YQ. Experimental research on sulfur removal during coal combustion at high temperature [Ph.D. Thesis], Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Li N. Study of desulfurization reaction mechanism during high temperature coal combustion and industrial practice [Ph.D. Thesis], Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Liu H, Qiu JR, Li J, Wu H, Yang JF. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2002, 30, 306–310.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Zhou JH, Yang TH, Cheng J, Ma Y, Cao XY, Cen KF. Journal of China Coal Society 2003, 28, 285–289.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Xu YW. Formation mechanism of high temperature sulfur retention phase-sulphoaluminate and influence of atmosphere [Master Thesis], Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Lv DZ, Xu MH, Yao H, Liu XW, Gu Y, Jiang W. J. Eng. Thermophys. 2009, 30, 1427–1430.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Liu JZ, Zhou JH, Cheng J, Cao XY, Wu XR, Cen KF. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2001, 29, 368–370.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Guan RG, Li W, Chen HK, Li BQ. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering 2003, 54, 813–818.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Wang L. Mechanism and effect of calcium and aluminum-based sulfur-fixation agent desulfurization during coal combustion [Master Thesis], China University of Geoseience, Wuhan, China, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-7-3
Accepted: 2017-1-6
Published Online: 2017-3-4
Published in Print: 2017-11-27

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 17.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gps-2016-0118/html
Scroll to top button