Home Intensification of β-glucosidase enzyme production from Aspergillus niger using extractive fermentation with an aqueous two-phase system
Article Open Access

Intensification of β-glucosidase enzyme production from Aspergillus niger using extractive fermentation with an aqueous two-phase system

  • Avinash B. Dhage

    Avinash B. Dhage has completed his MTech in Bioprocessing Technology at the Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai. He has a DHMS degree along with a BPharma. He is currently working as a consultant for natural drug treatment. His research interests include process intensification, fermentation production, separation process, and extraction of herbal drugs.

    and Virendra K. Rathod

    Virendra K. Rathod is a professor at the Chemical Engineering Department, Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai, India. His research interests include extraction of natural ingredients, synthesis of perfumes and flavors, separation of biomolecules, enzyme-catalyzed reactions, biodiesel preparation and purification, separation processes, and wastewater treatment. He is currently a fellow of the Maharashtra Academy of Sciences. He has almost 14 years of teaching and research experience, and has published around 95 papers in international, peer-reviewed journals.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 3, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

An extractive fermentation approach in an aqueous two-phase system (ATPS) with wheat bran as a main substrate was used in this study to intensify the production of β-glucosidase enzyme (EC 3.2.1.21) from Aspergillus niger NRRL 322. Possible parameters, such as phase concentration and incubation period, were evaluated based on enzyme production. The fungus expressed high enzyme production, i.e. 948 U/ml after 96 h at 180 RPM when PEG4000 (12% w/w) and potassium phosphate (14% w/w) were used. This strategy of extractive fermentation with ATPS shows an increase in β-glucosidase enzyme yield of 948 U/ml compared with submerged fermentation, which gives a yield of 790 U/ml. β-Glucosidase yield in salt phase also increased by 1.2-fold compared with the submerged fermentation under the same conditions.

1 Introduction

Various bacteria and fungi are used for the production of β-glucosidase enzyme (EC 3.2.1.21), an important component of cellulase complex, which consists of three principal types of enzymes, namely, exo-(1-4)-β-glucanase (cellobiohydrolase), endo-(1-4)-β-glucanase and β-glucosidase [1]. Cellulase complex is mainly involved in complete saccharification of cellulose into glucose. It also has potential applications for biostoning and biopolishing purposes in the textile industry as well as biofuel production in the pulp and paper, food, agricultural, and detergent industries, among others [2]. Hence, the cellulase system has attracted much interest in recent years.

The organism Aspergillus niger has been reported for the production of whole cellulase system, and β-glucosidase is the rate-limiting enzyme inhibited by its own end products, glucose and substrate cellobiose. The β-glucosidase is an extracellular enzyme that is secreted into the fermentation medium. In submerged fermentation, at the lag phase of growth, the enzyme concentration is low, but at the log phase, maximum concentration of enzymes can be observed, which inhibit the growth of micro-organisms, i.e. product inhibition occurs and reduces the yield of enzyme. To avoid this phenomenon, the yield of β-glucosidase enzyme must be improved. The overall efficiency of saccharification may be improved either by supplementation of cellulase with glucose tolerant β-glucosidase or continuous removal of β-glucosidase from the system. This can be done by using a strategy of extractive fermentation combined with an aqueous two-phase system (ATPS), in which enzyme production in one phase and separation in another phase occurs simultaneously. Thus, ATPS provides an alternative and efficient approach for the purification and simultaneous production of the β-glucosidase enzyme. Hence β-glucosidase is a noticeably more important component of the cellulase system and has attracted much interest in recent years. For this reason, the current study is more focused on β-glucosidase.

ATPS is formed due to the incompatibility of polymers, either between two polymers in water or a polymer solution with a salt solution. ATPS contains a large amount, i.e. 80%–90% of water, and this is the reason why it can provide an excellent environment for biologically active substances and cell organelles. As the β-glucosidase enzyme is hydrophilic, it can be easily separated into the aqueous phase of the ATPS. “Extractive fermentation” refers to a novel technique that involves the use of ATPS-based in situ fermentation processes. This technique provides technological solutions to overcome the limitations of product inhibition and the low volumetric productivity of biotechnological processes. It also has many advantages, such as rapid mass transfer due to low-interfacial tension, ease of operation under a continuous mode, as well as rapid and selective separation. This technique also has the advantages of biocompatibility, separation at room temperature, eco-friendly property, suitability for systems with product inhibition, and high yield of biomolecules [3]. A prior work focused on a technique, where simultaneous cell cultivation and downstream processing of extracellular lipase from Burkholderia pseudomallei was studied [4]. Production of pectinases by Polyporus squamosus using extractive fermentations in ATPS has also been reported [5].

The present work also focuses on different concentrations of components that are responsible for phase formation and incubation period for achieving the maximum yield of the β-glucosidase enzyme. Extractive fermentation by ATPS shows promising effect on improving the yield of this enzyme. However, to date, no reports are available on the production of β-glucosidase enzyme from Aspergillus niger NRRL 322 by using this technique. Hence, the objectives of the present work are as follows: (1) to study the effects of different parameters, such as phase concentration and incubation period, which influence the production of the β-glucosidase enzyme from Aspergillus niger NRRL 322, and (2) to intensify the process to ensure maximum enzyme yield.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Micro-organisms

Aspergillus niger NRRL 322 was obtained from the National Chemical Laboratory Pune, India. The fungus was maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium. Spore suspension was prepared by dislodging the spores from fully sporulated PDA slant into sterile 0.05% Tween 80 solution. Spore count was determined using a haemocytometer.

2.2 Substrate

Wheat bran was obtained from Surya Rice and Poha Mills, Thane (W), Mumbai (India). The substrate was dried at 105°C to constant weight and then ground to a 20 mesh size [6].

2.3 Chemicals

The substrate for β-glucosidase, i.e. p-nitrophenyl β-d-glucopyranoside (pNPG) was purchased from Sesco Reaserch Laboratory (SRL), Mumbai. All the chemicals, media components and solvents used in the medium were of reagent grade and were purchased from Himedia (India) and Sigma (USA).

2.4 Fermentation

Basal media composition used in g/l urea: 0.3, (NH4)2SO4: 1.4, KH2PO4: 0.4, MgSO4; 7H2O: 0.3, peptone: 0.75, yeast extract: 0.25, FeSO4; 7H2O: 0.05, MnSO4; 7H2O: 0.01, ZnSO4; 7H2O: 0.01, and COCl2: 0.01) as per the reported literature [5]. About 1% wheat bran was used as a carbon source. Fermentation was carried out in a 250-ml Erlenmeyer flask with 50 ml working volume. Different fermentation parameters, such as incubation period, inoculum size, and pH, were optimized by using One Factor at a Time approach (data not shown). The fungus expressed high enzyme production, i.e. 790 U/ml at initial pH 4, Inoculum size 2×106 per ml after 96 h at 180 RPM.

2.5 Extractive fermentation with ATPS

ATPS was prepared by mixing aqueous dispersions of a PEG and Potassium phosphate salt (polymer-salt ATPS), the pH of which was adjusted to 4.0 with 10% H2SO4. This system was supplemented with 1% wheat bran as a main carbon source, and the same was used for fermentation. Total system made was 50% (w/w). The medium was autoclaved and inoculated with 0.5 ml spore suspension, i.e. 2×106 spores in 50 ml of medium and incubated at 30°C for 96 h at 180 rpm. Finally, cells were separated by centrifugation, and the supernatant was collected in a separating funnel to separate the phases. Each phase was analyzed for enzyme activity.

2.6 Enzyme assay

β-glucosidase assay was performed by using pNPG as substrate (5 mm pNPG in 0.05 m acetate buffer, pH 4.8). About 0.1 ml of appropriately diluted enzyme sample was incubated with 1 ml of substrate solution at 50°C for 10 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 2 ml of 1 m Na2CO3. The activity of β-glucosidase was estimated spectro-photometrically by reading the absorbance of the liberated p-nitrophenol at 400 nm. A standard graph was prepared with varying concentrations of p-nitrophenol (0–500 μm) in 0.05 m acetate buffer. One unit of BGL activity was defined as the μM of p-nitrophenol released per ml of enzyme per minute under the standard assay conditions [7].

2.7 Protein assay

The protein content of the sample was determined at 595 nm according to Bradford [8]. A system without a sample was taken as a blank reading. Bovine serum albumin was used as a standard. The protein estimation was carried out in duplicate for each sample, and the mean value was used.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Enzyme production kinetic in a shake flask

As the primary metabolite of the organism incubation period, the enzyme is the most important parameter to be optimized in extractive fermentation with ATPS. The incubation period was studied in a biphasic system containing 12% (w/w) PEG and 14% (w/w) salt. As shown in Figure 1, enzyme activity continuously increased up to 96 h and then gradually decreased. This is because enzymes are primary metabolite proteins and their concentrations increase at the exponential phase of the growth. Maximum protein production of 0.59 mg/ml is observed at 96 h of growth. Here, the growth of A. niger occurred continuously up to 96 h; hence, enzyme activity was maximum, i.e. 946 U/ml (sum of enzyme activity in both phases). Further, in-growth decreases may be attributed to the depletion of substrate and utilization of enzyme as a substrate by micro-organism. Thus, all further fermentation experiments were performed till 96 h.

Figure 1: Enzyme production kinetics of Aspergillus niger in a shake flask at pH 4.0 and temperature of 30°C.
Figure 1:

Enzyme production kinetics of Aspergillus niger in a shake flask at pH 4.0 and temperature of 30°C.

3.2 Effect of PEG concentration on yield

The distribution of enzymes in ATPS depends upon the phase concentration, which has to be optimized for maximum enzyme production and purification. The influence of PEG concentration on the production and separation of β-glucosidase enzyme was studied at different PEG 4000 concentrations, while maintaining the constant salt concentration of 14% (w/w). Thus, enzyme activity was measured at different PEG concentrations ranging from 10% to 18% (w/w), as reported in Figure 2. It has been observed that maximum β-glucosidase production occurred at a PEG concentration of 12% (w/w) with a gradual increase from 10% to 12% (w/w) and then decreased slowly. The possible reason is explained as follows. PEG is a hydrophilic polymer and, at particular concentration, it forms a matrix network in which the maximum number of macromolecules become enclosed and further increase in concentration, leading to the formation of a dense matrix network that repels the molecule towards the opposite phase. Partitioning of the protein molecules is dependent on the type of protein when the polymer concentration is increased. Usually, an increased polymer concentration pushes the cells at the interface or into lower phase [9, 10]. Similarly, an increase in the molecular weight of a phase-forming polymer can cause a protein to partition more towards the opposite phase [3]. Here, the matrix network formed at 12% w/w was sufficient to enclose the maximum enzyme, hence producing the maximum yield (630 U/ml). A further increase in PEG concentration from 14% to 18% (w/w) repels enzyme molecules in the opposite phase due to the formation of dense PEG matrix, which reduces enzyme yield. The calculation of the fold yield was done by comparing the results with submerged fermentation under the same conditions of constant salt concentration, 14% (w/w) and at different PEG concentration. Maximum fold yield (i.e. 1.2) was obtained when the biphasic system has PEG and salt concentrations of 12% (w/w) and 14% (w/w) as expressed in Figure 3.

Figure 2: β-Glucosidase production at different PEG concentrations.pH 4.0 and temperature 30°C.
Figure 2:

β-Glucosidase production at different PEG concentrations.

pH 4.0 and temperature 30°C.

Figure 3: Effects of PEG concentration on fold yield.pH 4.0 and temperature 30°C.
Figure 3:

Effects of PEG concentration on fold yield.

pH 4.0 and temperature 30°C.

3.3 Effect of salt concentration on yield

The influence of different salt concentrations with constant PEG concentration, 12% (w/w) was studied on the production as well as separation of β-glucosidase enzyme. The enzyme activity was measured at different salt concentrations ranging from 12% to 20% (w/w), and results are reported in Figure 4. As can be seen, enzyme activity was increased from salt concentration of 12% to 14% (w/w) and then decreased slowly up to 20% (w/w). This is attributed to the fact that the potassium phosphate salt forms multivalent ions in its aqueous dispersion; moreover, the phase-forming ability of multivalent salts with PEG is closely related to the lyotropic series of Hoffmeister [11]. An electrical potential is created between the two phases when a salt is included in the phase system. This can be attributed to the fact that different salts have different chemical affinities for the two phases. A potential difference can influence the partitioning of charged macromolecules and particles, especially those carrying a high number of surface electrical charges [3]. On the other hand, total proteins and β-glucosidase to the top and bottom phases, respectively, are partitioned based on their isoelectric points (pIs). If the pH of the medium is lower than the isoelectric point of the enzyme, then the enzyme will have a positive surface charge and then partitioned in a phase with a negative surface charged molecule and vice-versa. Here, the top phase of an aqueous biphasic system is composed of PEG, which carries a positive charge, whereas the bottom phase has phosphate salt, which carries a negative charge [12]. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 4.0, which is below the pI of β-glucosidase enzyme, i.e. pI~8.7 [13]; hence, the enzyme will have a positive charge and get partitioned in the salt phase, which has a negative charge.

Figure 4: β-Glucosidase production at different salt concentrations.pH 4.0 and temperature 30°C.
Figure 4:

β-Glucosidase production at different salt concentrations.

pH 4.0 and temperature 30°C.

Here, maximum yield (i.e. 885 U/ml) was obtained at a salt concentration of 14% (w/w), indicating that this concentration was optimum for partitioning the maximum enzyme molecules and also favors the growth of A. niger. A further increase in salt concentration decreases the growth of micro-organisms, thus reducing the yield of the enzyme. As shown in Figure 5, the fold yield was calculated by comparing with that of the submerge fermentation under the same conditions at different salt concentrations, but with constant PEG concentration, 12% (w/w). Maximum fold yield (i.e. 1.2) was obtained when the biphasic system has PEG and salt concentrations of 12% (w/w) and 14% (w/w), respectively.

Figure 5: Effects of salt concentrations on fold yield.pH 4.0 and temperature 30°C.
Figure 5:

Effects of salt concentrations on fold yield.

pH 4.0 and temperature 30°C.

4 Conclusion

The yield of β-glucosidase enzyme from A. niger NRRL 322 was successfully enhanced using extractive fermentation. As confirmed by the results, the selection of the proper incubation period is an essential criterion. An incubation period of 96 h has been selected to achieve maximum yield. This study also demonstrates the effect of the concentration of phase-forming components, such as PEG 4000 and potassium phosphate salt, on the yield of β-glucosidase enzyme in ATPS. In addition, 12% (w/w) PEG and 14% (w/w) potassium phosphate salt concentrations were selected as optimum concentrations that can ensure maximum β-glucosidase enzyme yield of 948 U/ml. Therefore, the extractive fermentation with ATPS increased β-glucosidase enzyme yield from 790 U/ml to 948 U/ml. Finally, β-glucosidase yield at above-phase concentration increased by 1.2-fold in the salt phase compared with the submerged fermentation under the same conditions.

About the authors

Avinash B. Dhage

Avinash B. Dhage has completed his MTech in Bioprocessing Technology at the Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai. He has a DHMS degree along with a BPharma. He is currently working as a consultant for natural drug treatment. His research interests include process intensification, fermentation production, separation process, and extraction of herbal drugs.

Virendra K. Rathod

Virendra K. Rathod is a professor at the Chemical Engineering Department, Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai, India. His research interests include extraction of natural ingredients, synthesis of perfumes and flavors, separation of biomolecules, enzyme-catalyzed reactions, biodiesel preparation and purification, separation processes, and wastewater treatment. He is currently a fellow of the Maharashtra Academy of Sciences. He has almost 14 years of teaching and research experience, and has published around 95 papers in international, peer-reviewed journals.

References

[1] Thomas M, Sheila I. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1982, 128, 2973–2982.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Kuhad RC, Gupta R, Singh A. Enzyme Res. 2011, 2011, 1–10.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Banik R, Santhiagu A, Kanari B, Sabarinath C, Upadhyay S. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 19, 337–348.10.1023/A:1023940809095Search in Google Scholar

[4] Siew H, Siti M, Chein O. Process Biochem. 2011, 46, 68–76.10.1016/j.procbio.2010.07.014Search in Google Scholar

[5] Pericin D, Antov M. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2000, 28, 467–472.10.1016/S0141-0229(00)00356-2Search in Google Scholar

[6] Reeta R, Kumar S, Rajasree K, Abraham M. Process Biochem. 2011, 46, 1521–1524.10.1016/j.procbio.2011.04.006Search in Google Scholar

[7] Gote J, Reczey K. J. Chomatogr. B 1998, 711, 61–172.10.1016/S0378-4347(97)00627-0Search in Google Scholar

[8] Mandel M, Weber J. Biotechnology 1994, 8, 783–788.10.1007/BF00152884Search in Google Scholar

[9] Chen J, Lee M. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1995, 17, 1021–1027.10.1016/0141-0229(95)00030-5Search in Google Scholar

[10] Albertsson P. Partition of Cell Particles and Macromolecules, 3rd ed., Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1986, ISBN 0471828203.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Silva D, Pontes M, Souza M, Vitolo M, Silva JB, Pessoa A. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2002, 33, 196–201.10.1590/S1517-83822002000300002Search in Google Scholar

[12] Chen P. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1992, 73, 140–147.10.1016/0922-338X(92)90579-JSearch in Google Scholar

[13] Chen H, Hayn M, Esterbauer H. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1992, 1121, 54–60.10.1016/0167-4838(92)90336-CSearch in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-6-28
Accepted: 2017-2-24
Published Online: 2017-6-3
Published in Print: 2017-8-28

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gps-2016-0114/html
Scroll to top button