Home Pretreatment of arsenic-bearing gold ore with microwave-assisted alkaline leaching
Article Open Access

Pretreatment of arsenic-bearing gold ore with microwave-assisted alkaline leaching

  • Hongzhou Ma

    Hongzhou Ma is an Associate Professor at the School of Metallurgical Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, China. Currently, he is engaged in developing methods for the efficient and environmentally friendly metallurgical processing of gold. He has also done a lot of work in comprehensive utilization of resources.

    EMAIL logo
    , Chao Yan

    Chao Yan is a postgraduate student at the School of Metallurgical Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, China. Currently, he is trying to develop a new metallurgical technology with a short process and low energy consumption.

    and Yaoning Wang

    Yaoning Wang is a lecturer at the School of Metallurgical Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, China. Currently, she is dedicated to the study of the metallurgical process of energy conservation and emission reduction.

Published/Copyright: May 5, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this paper, the removal of arsenic from arsenic-bearing gold ore through air oxidation and sodium hydroxide leaching with microwave irradiation was studied. Firstly, single-factor experiments were carried out. The results indicated that the removal rate of arsenic was influenced by the sodium hydroxide concentration, ratio of liquid to solid, microwave power, and reaction time. Then, orthogonal experiments were done to determine the main influencing factors. The results obtained from the experiments of orthogonal arrays showed that reaction time and microwave power were the important influencing factors, and the optimum conditions of sodium hydroxide concentration, reaction time, microwave power, and ratio of liquid to solid were 18 wt.%, 60 min, 700 W, and 5, respectively. Under the optimal conditions, the removal of arsenic could reach approximately 81.46 wt.% and, at the same conditions, the sulfur removal rate was about 55.56 wt.%. The results of X-ray diffraction analysis revealed that AsS and FeAsS were decomposed during the leaching process, while FeS2 was not.

1 Introduction

The exhaustion of easily leachable gold ore resources has turned complex and low-grade arsenic-bearing gold ores into an increasingly important source for the production of gold. Such ores are known as refractory. Gold found in these raw ores can occur as two main forms, either as discrete particles encapsulated in sulfide minerals such as pyrite and arsenopyrite, or as submicroscopic gold particles locked within the sulfide lattice, which renders gold particles inaccessible to the leaching agent [1, 2]. In order to achieve a satisfactory recovery, it is necessary to break down or at least to modify the sulfide matrix before conventional cyanidation procedures. Different approaches have been promoted to release the gold from arsenic-bearing ores, including roasting [3, 4], bio-oxidation [57], pressure oxidation [8, 9], and so on. Roasting, as a traditional way of treating refractory gold concentrates prior to the cyanidation procedure, is increasingly losing its attractiveness because the process would release SO2 and As2O3 and pollute the environment. Bio-oxidation has been used to treat arsenopyritic-pyritic gold concentrates; however, the process is slow and the gold recovery can be incomplete [10]. Pressure oxidation, known as a clean and efficient method for strengthening leaching, has been used in the pretreatment of refractory gold ore; however, it requires equipment for high pressures and high temperatures [11, 12]. Thus, it is necessary to find new pretreatment methods that are efficient and environmentally friendly.

Microwaves are electromagnetic waves with wavelengths from 1 mm to 1 m, and corresponding frequencies between 300 MHz and 300 GHz [13]. Microwave heating has various advantages over traditional heating processes, including energy saving, clean heating, and rapid heating. The most significant characteristic of microwave heating is that microwave energy can selectively heat the adsorbent material while passing through the transparent material. Microwave-assisted leaching, as a clean and efficient method of strengthening leaching, has been used in the pretreatment of complex and refractory ores such as chalcopyrite [14, 15], nickel laterite [16, 17], and sulfide concentrates [18]. In this paper, the removal of arsenic from arsenic-bearing gold ore through air oxidation and sodium hydroxide leaching under the effect of microwave irradiation was investigated.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Raw materials

The mineral samples used in this work were gold concentrates obtained from Henan Province, China. The proportion of mineral grains with a diameter of <200 mesh is >80%. The main minerals in the refractory gold concentrate were arsenopyrite, pyrite, realgar, and quartz according to the X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, as shown in Figure 1. The grades of some of the important constituents of the concentrate were 18.5% S, 6.87% As, 20.2% Fe, and 60.1 g/t Au. The sodium hydroxide solution used for leaching was of analytical grade.

Figure 1: XRD pattern of arsenic-bearing gold ore.
Figure 1:

XRD pattern of arsenic-bearing gold ore.

2.2 Methods

Microwave-assisted leaching was carried out in an experimental microwave oven. A certain concentration of sodium hydroxide solution and a 20-g ore sample were added into a one-necked round-bottomed flask, which was positioned on an insulating board at the center of the base of the microwave chamber. A reflux condenser was set up on the glass reactor to prevent the loss of solution due to evaporation. A glass tube with a diameter of 6.0 mm was inserted into the sample bottom to pump in air, in order to oxidize and resolve the gold concentrate ore in the leaching process. Air agitation was used in the leaching process, and the air flow rate was 200 ml/l. After the leaching process, the slurries were separated by vacuum filtration and the filter cake was dried at 100°C. The chemical compositions of the obtained residues were analyzed. The leaching ratio was calculated by using the following equation:

(1)w=a-ba×100%, (1)

where w is the arsenic or sulfur leaching ratio (%), a is the arsenic or sulfur quantity of raw ore (g), and b is the arsenic or sulfur quantity of the leaching residue. The phase composition of the residues was analyzed by using the XRD method.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Effect of sodium hydroxide concentration

Experiments were carried out in the solution with a liquid-to-solid ratio of 5:1 under a microwave power of 539 W and an air flux of 200 ml/min for 90 min. The concentrations of sodium hydroxide were 5, 10, 12, 15, and 18 wt.%. The effect of the sodium hydroxide concentration on the arsenic removal rate is shown in Figure 2. It can be seen that the sodium hydroxide concentration has a greater influence on arsenic removal. According to the E-pH diagram of the FeAsS-H2O system [19], FeAsS existed in the low electric potential and it can be decomposed by O2 and other oxidants. With the increase of alkaline in the solution, the stable regions of HAsO42- and AsO43- were enlarged and, thus, FeAsS is easily transformed into arsenate. Ferric arsenate does not dissolve in the low-alkalinity solution; however, it could be converted to soluble arsenate under high alkalinity. That is to say, the increase in sodium hydroxide concentration is beneficial to the removal of arsenic, which is consistent with the experimental data, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Effect of sodium hydroxide concentration on arsenic removal rate.
Figure 2:

Effect of sodium hydroxide concentration on arsenic removal rate.

3.2 Effect of the liquid-to-solid ratio

The ore was leached in the solution containing 18 wt.% sodium hydroxide under a microwave power of 539 W and an air flux of 200 ml/min for 90 min. The ratio of liquid to solid was from 5 to 8. The effect of the liquid-to-solid ratio on the arsenic removal rate is shown in Figure 3. It can be seen that the arsenic removal rate increased with the increase in the liquid-to-solid ratio. The higher arsenic removal was about 78.22 wt.% at a liquid-to-solid ratio of 7:1.

Figure 3: Effect of liquid-to-solid ratio on arsenic removal rate.
Figure 3:

Effect of liquid-to-solid ratio on arsenic removal rate.

3.3 Effect of leaching time

Experiments were carried out in the solution with a liquid-to-solid ratio of 7:1 and containing 18 wt.% sodium hydroxide under an air flux of 200 ml/min. The sample was radiated at 539 W versus various times. The effect of leaching time on arsenic removal from the arsenic-bearing gold ore is presented in Figure 4. Within 90 min, the arsenic removal rate increased with the increase of leaching time, and it reached equilibrium after 90 min. Leaching time is related to the degree of reaction and the leaching efficiency. A long leaching time means that the interaction between the ore sample and the leaching reagent will proceed thoroughly. However, with the leaching time extension, the leaching rate of arsenic was maintained at a stable value when the reaction reached the greatest extent.

Figure 4: Effect of leaching time on arsenic removal rate.
Figure 4:

Effect of leaching time on arsenic removal rate.

3.4 Effect of microwave power

Experiments concerning the effect of microwave power on arsenic removal were carried out in the solution with a liquid-to-solid ratio of 7:1 and containing 18 wt.% sodium hydroxide under an air flux of 200 ml/min for 90 min. The microwave power was from 120 to 700 W. Figure 5 shows the effect of microwave power on the arsenic removal rate. It was found that the arsenic removal rate increased with the microwave power. The temperature of ore pulp under the effect of microwave irradiation is primarily determined by its microwave-absorbing property. With the increasing energy of the ore pulp, the polar molecule rapidly changes direction into such a high-speed vibration that the ore pulp temperature would be higher especially during the initial leaching time, which would provide suitable thermodynamic conditions for the leaching process. In addition, sulfides are favorable to microwave absorption; however, gangue cannot be heated by microwaves [20]. Therefore, a temperature gradient existed between sulfide phases and gangue. At high microwave power, sulfide phases were heated up faster than the gangue, and thus a temperature gradient would arise between them. The two temperature gradients mentioned above would create thermal stresses that are helpful in improving the removal rate of arsenic.

Figure 5: Effect of microwave power on arsenic removal rate.
Figure 5:

Effect of microwave power on arsenic removal rate.

3.5 Orthogonal experiment

The overall effects of reaction time, sodium hydroxide concentration, liquid-to-solid ratio, and microwave power on the removal of arsenic were investigated by using an L9 (34) orthogonal array under an air flux of 200 ml/min. The parameters and their levels in the leaching experiment are shown in Table 1. Table 2 shows the orthogonal test conditions and the results of alkaline leaching of arsenic under microwave irradiation.

Table 1:

Parameters and their levels in the leaching experiment.

Parameter levelSodium hydroxide concentration (%)Liquid-solid ratioReaction time (min)Microwave power (W)
15530231
212760539
318890700
Table 2:

Orthogonal test conditions and results of alkaline leaching of arsenic.

Experiment no.NaOH concentration (%) [A]Liquid-solid ratio [B]Reaction time (min) [C]Microwave power (W) [D]Arsenic removal rate (%)Sulfur removal rate (%)
1553023171.8837.83
2576053971.642.72
3589070073.1454.47
41273070070.8546.61
51286023171.2643.87
61259053978.8962.78
71883053978.6945.55
81856070081.4655.56
91879023179.5442.7
I351.64388.4351.41347.08
II374.26354.02366.47380.23
III383.7366.98391.52382.09
I/3117.21129.47117.14115.69
II/3124.75118.01122.16126.74
III/3127.9122.32130.51127.36
R10.6911.4613.3711.67
Degree of influence of factorC>D>B>A
Optimum conditionsA2B1C3D2

Table 2 shows that reaction time and microwave power were the important influencing factors. The optimum conditions analyzed were reaction time, sodium hydroxide concentration, liquid-to-solid ratio, and microwave power of 60 min, 18 wt.%, 5:1, and 700 W, respectively. Under these conditions, the removal rate of arsenic was approximately 81.46 wt.% and, at the same condition, the sulfur removal rate was about 55.56 wt.%. The temperature of the leaching system under the conditions of experiment no. 8 has been measured. We found that the temperature of the ore pulp could reach 110°C within 6 min, and it would not increase with the increase of time. Conventional leaching experiments under the conditions of reaction time, sodium hydroxide concentration, and liquid-to-solid ratio of 60 min, 18 wt.%, and 5:1, respectively, were also carried out at this measured temperature, and the experimental results show that the removal rate of arsenic was 80.10%, which is less than the 81.46% rate under microwave-heated conditions. The XRD pattern of the leaching residue under the conditions of experiment no. 8 is shown in Figure 6. It can be seen that FeAsS and AsS have been completely decomposed by the NaOH solution during the leaching process, while FeS2 has not.

Figure 6: X-ray diffraction of leaching residue.
Figure 6:

X-ray diffraction of leaching residue.

4 Conclusions

  1. Under the microwave irradiation system, the removal rate of arsenic was influenced by the liquid-to-solid ratio, sodium hydroxide concentration, and especially by microwave power and reaction time. The optimum conditions selected to maximize the removal were a microwave power, reaction time, liquid-to-solid ratio, and sodium hydroxide concentration of 700 W, 60 min, 5:1, and 18 wt.%, respectively. The removal of arsenic and sulfur was 81.46 and 55.56 wt.%, respectively.

  2. Microwave energy is beneficial to the pretreatment of arsenic-bearing gold ores.

  3. The decomposition of arsenopyrite is easier than that of pyrite in the alkaline condition.

About the authors

Hongzhou Ma

Hongzhou Ma is an Associate Professor at the School of Metallurgical Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, China. Currently, he is engaged in developing methods for the efficient and environmentally friendly metallurgical processing of gold. He has also done a lot of work in comprehensive utilization of resources.

Chao Yan

Chao Yan is a postgraduate student at the School of Metallurgical Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, China. Currently, he is trying to develop a new metallurgical technology with a short process and low energy consumption.

Yaoning Wang

Yaoning Wang is a lecturer at the School of Metallurgical Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, China. Currently, she is dedicated to the study of the metallurgical process of energy conservation and emission reduction.

Acknowledgments:

The authors express sincere thanks to the Natural Science Foundation of Shannxi Province, China, for financial support of the project.

References

[1] Abrantes LM, Costa MC. Hydrometallurgy 1996, 40, 99–110.10.1016/0304-386X(94)00077-GSearch in Google Scholar

[2] Dunn JG, Chamberlain AC. Miner. Eng. 1997, 10, 919–928.10.1016/S0892-6875(97)00074-5Search in Google Scholar

[3] Liu J, Chi R, Xu Z, Zeng Z, Liang J. Metallurg. Mater. Trans. B 2000, 31, 1163–1168.10.1007/s11663-000-0002-6Search in Google Scholar

[4] Wagner FE, Swash PM, Marion Ph. Hyperfine Interact. 1989, 46, 681–688.10.1007/BF02398259Search in Google Scholar

[5] Canales C, Acevedo F, Gentina JC. Process Biochem. 2002, 37, 1051–1055.10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00303-XSearch in Google Scholar

[6] Langhans D, Lord A, Lampshire D, Burbank A, Baglin E. Miner. Eng. 1994, 8, 147–158.10.1016/0892-6875(94)00109-PSearch in Google Scholar

[7] Nyashanu RM, Monhemius AJ, Buchanan DL. Process Metall. 1997, 9, 431–441.10.1016/S1572-4409(99)80044-3Search in Google Scholar

[8] Fleming CA. Miner. Metallurg. Process. 2010, 27, 81–88.10.1007/BF03402383Search in Google Scholar

[9] Gudyanga FP, Mahlangu T, Roman RJ, Mungoshi J, Mbeve K. Miner. Eng. 1999, 12, 863–875.10.1016/S0892-6875(99)00074-6Search in Google Scholar

[10] Linge HG. Miner. Eng. 1995, 8, 1327–1331.10.1016/0892-6875(95)00099-CSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Gao G, Li D, Zhou Y, Sun X, Sun W. Miner. Eng. 2008, 22, 111–115.10.1016/j.mineng.2008.05.001Search in Google Scholar

[12] Liu W, Yang T, Zhang D, Chen L, Liu Y. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2014, 128, 48–54.10.1016/j.minpro.2014.03.002Search in Google Scholar

[13] Das S, Mukhopadhyay AK, Datta S, Basu D. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2008, 31, 943–956.10.1007/s12034-008-0150-xSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Al-Harahsheh M, Kingman S, Bradshaw S. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2006, 80, 198–204.10.1016/j.minpro.2006.04.003Search in Google Scholar

[15] Al-Harahsheh M, Kingman S, Hankins N, Somerfield C, Bradshaw S, Louw W. Miner. Eng. 2005, 18, 1259–1268.10.1016/j.mineng.2005.06.006Search in Google Scholar

[16] Zhai X, Wu Q, Fu Yan, Ma L, Fan C, Li N. Trans. Nonferrous Metals Soc. China 2010, 20, s77–s81.10.1016/S1003-6326(10)60016-7Search in Google Scholar

[17] Zhai X, Fu Y, Zhang X, Ma L, Xie F. Hydrometallurgy 2009, 99, 189–193.10.1016/j.hydromet.2009.08.006Search in Google Scholar

[18] Hari Krishnan K, Mohanty DB, Sharma KD. Hydrometallurgy 2007, 89, 332–336.10.1016/j.hydromet.2007.08.007Search in Google Scholar

[19] Kim C, Zhang T, Mu W, Zeng Y. J. Northeast. Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2011, 32, 1599–1602.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Li F, Zhang M, Wand X. Chin. J. Process Eng. 2007, 7, 186–193.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-11-12
Accepted: 2016-2-8
Published Online: 2016-5-5
Published in Print: 2016-6-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In this issue
  3. Original articles
  4. Regioselective alkylation of 1,2,4-triazole using ionic liquids under microwave conditions
  5. A continuous flow process for the green and sustainable production of N-alkyl imidazoles
  6. Microwave-assisted one-pot syntheses of 4-aminoquinazolines
  7. Microwave assisted adsorption based elution: a benign green process optimized by Box-Behnken modeling yields pure vasicine from Adhatoda vasica
  8. Pretreatment of arsenic-bearing gold ore with microwave-assisted alkaline leaching
  9. Synthesis and mechanical behaviour of green metal matrix composites using waste eggshells as reinforcement material
  10. Efficient green synthesis of monomethine cyanines via grinding under solvent-free conditions
  11. Green chemistry preparation of MgO grit like nanostructures: efficient catalyst for the synthesis of 4H-pyrans and α,α′-bis(substituted-benzylidene) cycloalkanone derivatives
  12. An improved method for aldol condensation catalyses by Amberlyst A-26 OH: application in the synthesis of pseudoionone derivative, 11,15-dimethylhexadeca-8,10,14-trien-7-one
  13. Synthesis and characterization of amorphous Al2O3 and γ-Al2O3 by spray pyrolysis
  14. Synergetic surface modification effect of argon and oxygen for diamond films by MPCVD
  15. Optimization of process variables in the synthesis of butyl butyrate using amino acid-functionalized heteropolyacids as catalysts
  16. A new and facile method for the functionalization of a Merrifield resin with terpyridines: application as a heterogeneous catalyst for the synthesis of biaryls in environmentally friendly solvents
  17. Conference announcements
  18. International Conference on Green Chemistry and Sustainable Engineering (Rome, Italy, 20–22 July, 2016)
  19. International MicroNanoConference (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, December 13–14, 2016): where science and business discuss microfluidics, photonics and nanoinstrumentation
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gps-2015-0122/html
Scroll to top button