Literary “higher dimensions” quantified: a stylometric study of nine stories

Corpus under study

Abbott, Edwin A. 1884. Flatland: A romance of many dimensions. London: Seeley & Co. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/45506/45506-h/45506-h.htm (accessed 5 September 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Blackwood, Algernon. 1998 [1914]. A victim of higher space. In Sunand Tryambak Joshi (ed.), The complete John Silence stories, 230–246. New York: Dover Publications, Inc. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/10659/10659-h/10659-h.htm (accessed 7 September 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Clarke, Arthur C. 2000 [1946]. Technical error. In The collected stories of Arthur C. Clarke, 56–68. London: Gollancz, an imprint of Orion Books, Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Heinlein, Robert A. 1941. “—And he built a crooked house—”. In Astounding Science-Fiction (Street & Smith Publications, Inc) 26 (6). 68–83. https://ia800204.us.archive.org/11/items/Astounding_v26n06_1941-02_dtsg0318-LennyS/Astounding_v26n06_1941-02_dtsg0318-LennyS.pdf (accessed 6 September 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Hinton, Charles Howard. 1907. An episode of Flatland or how a plane folk discovered the third dimension. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co. Ltd. http://www.forgottenfutures.co.uk/flat2/flat2-00.htm (accessed 12 September 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Leinster, Murray. 1950 [1935]. The fourth dimensional demonstrator. In Frederick Orlin Tremaine (ed.), Astounding stories (Street & Smith Publications, Inc.), December 1935, illustrated by Wallace Saaty. In Sidewise in time, 175–190. Chicago, IL: Shasta Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Padgett, Lewis. 1943. Mimsy were the borogoves. In John W. Campbell Jr (ed.), Astounding Science Fiction Magazine, 52–70. Street & Smith Publications, Inc., Feb. 1943. http://jabberwockland.blogspot.com/2007/03/mimsy-were-borogoves-by-lewis-padgett.html (accessed 12 October 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Waldeyer, Graph. 1941. The 4-D Doodler. In Frederick Orlin Tremaine (ed.), Comet (H-K Publications, Inc.), July 1941, 1(5). 90–100. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/22227/22227-h/22227-h.htm (accessed 4 October 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Wells, Herbert G. 1957 [1895]. The remarkable case of Davidson’s eyes. In The short stories of H. G. Wells, 273–283. London: Ernest Benn. http://www.online-literature.com/wellshg/2867/ (accessed 17 October 2018).Search in Google Scholar

References

Andreev, Sergey, Michal Místecký & Altmann Gabriel. 2018. Sonnets: Quantitative inquiries. Lüdenscheid: RAM-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Atkins, Sue, Jeremy Clear & Nicholas Ostler. 1992. Corpus design criteria. Literary and Linguistic Computing 7(1). 1–16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242692098_Corpus _Design_ Criteria/link/55af9dd008ae11d310387326/download (accessed 18 October 2020).10.1093/llc/7.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Baker, John Paul. 2013 [1997]. Consistency and accuracy in correcting automatically tagged data. In Roger Garside, Geoffrey Leech & Tony McEnery (eds.), Corpus annotation: Linguistic information from computer text corpora, 243–251. London / New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Banchoff, Thomas F. 1991. Introduction to Flatland: A romance of many dimensions, xv–xxxi. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Banchoff, Thomas F. 2018. Edwin Abbott Abbott: The man, the book. https://www.math.brown.edu/∼banchoff/abbott/Flatland/ISR/; http://www.math.brown.edu/∼banchoff/abbott/life/index.shtml (accessed 6 October 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Bartsch, Sabine. 2004. Structural and functional properties of collocations in English: A corpus study of lexical and pragmatic constraints on lexical co-occurrence. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Friedrich L. 2007 [1997]. Decrypted secrets: Methods and maxims of cryptology. Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Bertagnolli, Nicolas. 2015. Elbow method and finding the right number of clusters. http://www.nbertagnolli.com/jekyll/update/2015/12/10/Elbow.html (accessed 17 October 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Bird, Steven & Mark Y. Liberman. 2000. A formal framework for linguistic annotation (revised version). In CoRR, cs.CL/0010033, 23–60. https://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/0010033.pdf (accessed 22 October 2018).10.1016/S0167-6393(00)00068-6Search in Google Scholar

Blackblock, Mark. 2018. The emergence of the fourth dimension: Higher spatial thinking in the fin de siècle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198755487.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bork, Alfred M. 1964. The fourth dimension in nineteenth-century physics. Isis 55(3). 326–338. https://www.jstor.org/stable/228574 (accessed 19 October 2020).10.1086/349865Search in Google Scholar

Bragdon, Claude F. 1913. A primer of higher space: The fourth dimension. Rochester / New York: The Manas Press. https://archive.org/details/aprimerhighersp00braggoog (accessed 10 September 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Brezina, Vaclav. 2018. Statistics in corpus linguistics: A practical guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316410899Search in Google Scholar

Brezina, Vaclav, Tony McEnery & Stephen Wattam. 2015. Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20(2). 139–173. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre.Search in Google Scholar

Brysbaert, Mark & Boris New. 2009. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41(4). 977–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.977.Search in Google Scholar

Burger, Dionys. 1965 [1957]. Sphereland: A fantasy about curved spaces and an expanding universe. Trans. by Cornelia J. Rheinbold. New York: Crowell.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Ruina & Gabriel Altmann. 2015. Conceptual inertia in texts. Glottometrics 30. 73–88.Search in Google Scholar

Church, Kenneth Ward & Patrick Hanks. 1990. Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics 16(1). 22–29.10.3115/981623.981633Search in Google Scholar

Conrad, Joseph & Ford Madox Hueffer [Ford]. 1901. The inheritors: An extravagant story. New York: McClure, Philips & Co. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14888/14888-h/14888-h.htm (accessed 2 November 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Cover, Thomas M. & Joy A. Thomas. 1991. Elements of information theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/0471200611Search in Google Scholar

Covington, Michael A. & Joe D. McFall. 2010. Cutting the Gordian knot: The moving average type-token ratio (MATTR). Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 17(2). 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296171003643098.Search in Google Scholar

Craig, Hugh. 1999. Authorial attribution and computational stylistics: If you can tell authors apart, have you learned anything about them? Literary and Linguistic Computing 14(1). 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/14.1.103.Search in Google Scholar

Čech, Radek. 2011. Frequency structure of New Year’s presidential speeches in Czech. The authorship analysis. In Emmerich Kelih, Victor Levickij & Yuliya Matskulyak (eds.), Issues in quantitative linguistics 2, 75−87. Lüdenscheid: RAM-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Čech, Radek, Ioan-Iovitz Popescu & Gabriel Altmann. 2014. Metody kvantitativní analýzy (nejen) básnických textů [Methods of quantitative analysis of (not only) poetic texts]. Olomouc: Palacký University.Search in Google Scholar

Čech, Radek, Radovan Garabík & Altmann Gabriel. 2015. Testing the thematic concentration of text. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 22(3). 215–232.10.1080/09296174.2015.1037157Search in Google Scholar

Danielewski, Mark Z. 2000. House of leaves. New York: Pantheon, Random House.Search in Google Scholar

Dick, Philip K. 1988 [1969]. Ubik. London: Grafton Books / Collins Publishing Group.Search in Google Scholar

Dror, Rotem, Gili Baumer, Marina Bogomolov & Roi Reichart. 2017. Replicability analysis for natural language processing: Testing significance with multiple datasets. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 5 (Action Editor: Brian Roark). 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00074.Search in Google Scholar

Dunning, Ted E. 1993. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics 19(1). 61–74.Search in Google Scholar

Durrant, Philipe & Alice Doherty. 2010. Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6(2). 125–155. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2010.006.Search in Google Scholar

Eder, Maciej. 2017. Visualization in stylometry: Cluster analysis using networks. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 32(1). 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqv061.Search in Google Scholar

Egbert, Jesse & Michaela Mahlberg. 2017. Fiction – one register or two? Narrative and fictional speech in Dickens’s novels. In The 9th International Corpus Linguistics Conference 24–28 July 2017. University of Birmingham. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/092c/109c072529 588b3d9dc1c9c01f800e59fa18.pdf (accessed 17 November 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Evert, Stefan. 2005. The statistics of word cooccurrences: Word pairs and collocations. Institut für maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, Universität Stuttgart dissertation. https://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/bitstream/11682/2573/1/Evert2005phd.pdf (accessed 22 October 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Fraser, Paul. 2019. The Great SF Stories Volume 5, 1943. In Isaac Asimov & Martin H. Greenberg (eds.), SF MAGAZINES – SF, Fantasy & Horror Magazine Reviews. https://sfmagazines.com/?p=9990 (accessed 21 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, Mary Eleanor Wilkins. 1905. The hall bedroom. In William Patten (ed.), Short story classics (American), vol. 4, 1275–1302. New York: P. F. Collier and Son. http://wilkinsfreeman.info/Short/HallBedroomSS.htm (accessed 14 November 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Gale, William A. & Kenneth Ward Church. 1994. What is wrong with adding one? In Nelleke Oostdijk & Pieter de Haan (eds.), Corpus-based research into language, 189–198. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004653566_015Search in Google Scholar

Garside, Roger, Geoffrey Leech & Tony McEnery (eds.). 2013 [1997]. Corpus annotation: Linguistic information from computer text corpora. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

GIGAcalculator.com. 2017–2019. Copyright © Normality Test Calculator. https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/normality-test-calculator.php (accessed 12 December 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Gilbert, Elliot L. 1991. ‘Upward, not northward’: Flatland and the quest for the new. English Literature in Transition 1880-1920 34(4). 391–403.Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Martin H. (ed.). 1985. The best of Marion Zimmer Bradley. Chicago, Illinois: Academy Chicago Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan T. 2009. What is corpus linguistics? Language and Linguistics Compass 3. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2009.00149.x.Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan T. 2013. 50-something years of work on collocations: What is or should be next…. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(1). 137–165. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.1.09gri.Search in Google Scholar

Grieve, Jack W. 2007. Quantitative authorship attribution: An evaluation of techniques. Literary and Linguistic Computing 22(3). 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqm020.Search in Google Scholar

Grzybek, Peter. 2006. History and methodology of word length studies: The state of the art. In Peter Grzybek (ed.), Contributions to the science of text and language: Word length studies and related issues, vol. 31, 15–90. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-4068-9_2Search in Google Scholar

Henderson, Linda Dalrymple. 1983. The fourth dimension and non-Euclidean geometry in modern art. New Haven, CT: Princeton University Press.10.2307/1575193Search in Google Scholar

Hermann, J. Berenike, Karina van DalenOskam & Christoph Schöch. 2015. Revisiting style, a key concept in literary studies. Journal of Literary Theory 9(1). 25–52.10.1515/jlt-2015-0003Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, David I. 1998. The evolution of stylometry in humanities scholarship. Literary and Linguistic Computing 13(3). 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/13.3.111.Search in Google Scholar

Hoover, David L. 2002. Frequent word sequences and statistical stylistics. Literary and Linguistic Computing 17. 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/17.2.157.Search in Google Scholar

Hoover, David L. 2003. Frequent collocations and authorial style. Literary and Linguistic Computing 18(3). 261–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/18.3.261.Search in Google Scholar

Huemer, Wolfgang. 2016. Literary style. In Noël Carroll & John Gibson (eds.), The Routledge companion to philosophy of literature, 195–204. New York & London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315708935-17Search in Google Scholar

IMDb. 2002. Cube2: Hypercube | Sci-Fi, Thriller | | 1h 34min | Director Andrzej Sekula. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt000000000285492/ (accessed 6 October 2018).Search in Google Scholar

IMDb. 2014. Interstellar | Adventure, Drama, Sci-Fi | | 2h 49min | Director Christopher Nolan. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0816692/ (accessed 17 September 2018).Search in Google Scholar

James, Henry. 1909 [1908]. The jolly corner. In The novels and tales of Henry James, New York edn., vol. 17, 435–485. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Jann, Rosemary. 1985. Abbott’s “Flatland”: Scientific imagination and “Natural Christianity. Victorian Studies 28(3). 473–490.Search in Google Scholar

Juola, Patrick. 2008. Authorship attribution. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval I(3). 233–334.10.1561/9781601981196Search in Google Scholar

Jurafsky, Daniel & James H. Martin. 2018. Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition, 3rd edn. draft. https://web.stanford.edu/∼jurafsky/slp3/ed3book.pdf (accessed 20 October 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Kidd, Virginia. 1976. The best of Judith Merril. New York City: Warner Books.Search in Google Scholar

Köhler, Reinhard. 2006. Text corpus as an abstract data structure: The architecture of a universal corpus interface. In Peter Grzybek (ed.), Contributions to the science of text and language: Word length studies and related issues, vol. 31, 187–199. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-4068-9_7Search in Google Scholar

Korhonen, Anna & Ted, Briscoe. 2004. Extended lexical-semantic classification of English verbs. CLS ’04: Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL Workshop on Computational Lexical Semantics, 38–45. doi: 10.31115/1596431.1596437. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2947783_Extended_Lexical-Semantic_Classification_of_English_Verbs (accessed 2 October 2019).10.3115/1596431.1596437Search in Google Scholar

Kreisel, Deanna. 2016. The discovery of hyperspace in Victorian literature. BRANCH: Britain, representation and nineteenth-century history. In Dino Franco Felluga (ed.), Extension of romanticism and victorianism on the Net. http://www.branchcollective.org/?ps_articles =deanna-kreisel-the-discovery-of-hyperspace-in-victorian-literature (accessed 17 November 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Křen, Michal. 2006. Kolokační míry a čeština: srovnání na datech Českého národního korpusu. In František Čermák & Michal Šulc (eds.), Kolokace [The collocation], 223–248. Prague: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny. Kolokační míry a čeština: srovnání na datech Českého národního korpusu [Collocation measures and Czech: comparison on the grounds of the Czech National Corpus data].Search in Google Scholar

Kubát, Miroslav. 2017. Kvantitativní analýza žánrů [A quantitative analysis of genres]. Ostrava: University of Ostrava.Search in Google Scholar

Kubát, Miroslav & Radek Čech. 2016. Quantitative analysis of US presidential inaugural addresses. Glottometrics 34. 14–27.Search in Google Scholar

Kubát, Miroslav, Vladimír Matlach & Radek Čech. 2014. QUITA – Quantitative Index Text Analyzer. Lüdenscheid: RAM-Verlag. https://code.google.com/archive/p/oltk/ (accessed 20 September 2018).Search in Google Scholar

LancsBox. 2018. Lancaster University corpus toolbox. © Vaclav Březina. Lancaster University. http://corpora.lancs.ac.uk/lancsbox/download.php (accessed 7 September 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Leadbeater, Charles Webster. 1899. Clairvoyance. Adyar, Madras (India): Theosophical Pub. House. https://archive.org/details/Clairvoyance1899 (accessed 12 September 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey. 1974. Semantics. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey. 1997. Corpus annotation: Linguistic information from computer text corpora. London: Longman.10.4324/9781315841366Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey & Mick Short. 2007 [1981]. Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose, 2nd edn. (English Language Series). Harlow, England: Pearson – Longman. http://sv-etc.nl/styleinfiction.pdf (accessed 26 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Levickij, Viktor V. 2012. Semasiologija: Monografija, 2-e izd., ispr. i dopoln [Semasiology: Monograph. 2nd ed., rev. and suppl.]. Vinnica: Nova Knyha.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Cixin. 2014 [2006]. The three-body problem. (Series Remembrance of Earth’s Past). New York: Tor Books.Search in Google Scholar

MacDonald, George. 2000 [1895]. Lilith: A romance. Grand Rapids, MI: William. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Mahlberg, Michaela. 2012. The corpus stylistic analysis of fiction – or the fiction of corpus stylistics? In Joybrato Mukherjee & Magnus Huber (eds.), Corpus linguistics and variation in English: Theory and description, 77–95. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401207713_008Search in Google Scholar

Mandravickaité, Justina & Tomas Krilavičius. 2017. Stylometric analysis of parliamentary speeches: Gender dimension. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Balto-Slavic Natural Language Processing, Valencia, Spain, 4 April 2017, 102–107.10.18653/v1/W17-1416Search in Google Scholar

Manning, Christopher D. & Hinrich Schütze. 2000 [1999]. Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Manning, Christopher D., Prabhakar Raghavan & Hinrich Schütze. 2008. Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511809071Search in Google Scholar

Masrani, Vaden, Gabriel Murray, Thalia Field & Giuseppe Carenini. 2017. Detecting dementia through retrospective analysis of routine blog posts by bloggers with dementia. In Proceedings of the BioNLP 2017 workshop, August 4, 2017, 232–237. Vancouver: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318739625_Detecting_Dementia_through_Retrospective_Analysis_of_Routine_Blog_Posts_by_Bloggers_with_Dementia (accessed 26 November 2019).10.18653/v1/W17-2329Search in Google Scholar

McEnery, Tony & Andrew Wilson. 2001. Corpus linguistics, 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McGee, Iain. 2009. Adjective-noun collocations in elicited and corpus data: Similarities, differences, and the whys and wherefores. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5(1). 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2009.004.Search in Google Scholar

Meer, Syed H. 2018. Differences between a short story, novelette, novella, & a novel. https://owlcation.com/humanities/Difference-Between-A-Short-Story-Novelette-Novella-And-A-Novel (accessed 30 October 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Milička, Jiří & Miroslav Kubát. 2013. Vocabulary richness measure in genres. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 20(4). 339–349.10.1080/09296174.2013.830552Search in Google Scholar

Místecký, Michal & Tomi S. Melka. 2019–2020. Online Text supplement to Literary “higher dimensions” quantified: A stylometric study of nine stories. https://misteckymelka.wordpress.com/ (accessed 16 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Místecký, Michal & Sergey Andreev. 2018. Activity in Czech and Russian nineteenth-century sonnets: A contrastive study. Glottotheory 9(1). 89–104.10.1515/glot-2018-0004Search in Google Scholar

Ohmann, Richard. 1964. Generative grammars and the concept of literary style. WORD 20(3). 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659831.Search in Google Scholar

Okrent, Arika. 2009. In the land of invented languages: Esperanto rock stars, Klingon poets, Loglan lovers, and the mad dreamers who tried to build a perfect language. New York: Spiegel & Grau / Random House, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Pace-Sigge, Michael. 2013. Lexical priming in spoken English usage. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9781137331908Search in Google Scholar

Pecina, Pavel. 2009. Lexical association measures: Collocation extraction (A preview). (Studies in Computational and Theoretical Linguistics. Vol. 4). Prague: ÚFAL. https://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/books/preview/pecina_preview.pdf (accessed 24 October 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Pecina, Pavel. 2010. Lexical association measures and collocation extraction. Language Resources and Evaluation 44(1–2). 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-009-9101-4.Search in Google Scholar

Pelegrinová, Kateřina & Altmann Gabriel. 2017. The study of adverbials in Czech. Glottometrics 37. 34–53.Search in Google Scholar

Pennebaker, James W. & Laura A. King. 1999. Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(6). 1296–1312. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296.Search in Google Scholar

Perneger, Thomas V. 1998. What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. British Medical Journal 316(7139). 1236–1238. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1236. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1112991/(accessed 22 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Philadelphia Museum of Art (PMA). 2020 [1911−1912]. Man with a violin; Pablo Ruiz y Picasso, Spanish (1881–1973). Oil on canvas. https://www.philamuseum.org/collections/permanent/51089.html (accessed 28 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Piantadosi, Steven T., Harry Tily & Edward Gibson. 2011. Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 108(9). 3526–3529. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1012551108 (accessed 19 December 2018).10.1073/pnas.1012551108Search in Google Scholar

Popescu, Ioan-Iovitz & Gabriel Altmann. 2011. Thematic concentration in texts. In Emmerich Kelih, Victor Levickij & Yuliya Matskulyak (eds.), Issues in quantitative linguistics 2, 110−116. Lüdenscheid: RAM-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Popescu, Ioan-Iovitz, Gabriel Altmann, Peter Grzybek, Bijapur D. Jayaram, Reinhard Köhler, Viktor Krupa, Ján Mačutek, Regina Pustet, Ludmila Uhlířová & Mattumal N. Vidya. 2009. Word frequency studies. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110218534Search in Google Scholar

Popescu, Ioan-Iovitz, Radek Čech & Gabriel Altmann. 2011. The Lambda-structure of texts. Lüdenscheid: RAM-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Richards, Joan L. 1988. Mathematical visions: The pursuit of geometry in Victorian England. Boston: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rudman, Joseph. 1998. The state of authorship attribution studies: Some problems and solutions. Computers and the Humanities 31. 351–365.10.1023/A:1001018624850Search in Google Scholar

Rybicki, Jan, David Hoover & Maciej Eder. 2016. Computational stylistics and text analysis. In Constance Crompton, Richard L. Lane & Ray Siemens (eds.), Doing digital humanities, 123–144. London / New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Sandulescu, George, Lidia Vianu, Ioan-Iovitz Popescu, Andrew Wilson, Róisín Knight & Gabriel Altmann. 2015. Quantifying Joyce’s Finnegans Wake. Glottometrics 30. 45–72.Search in Google Scholar

Scherer, Klaus Rainer. 2000. Psychological models of emotion. In Joan C. Borod (ed.), The neuropsychology of emotion, 137–162. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schofield, Alfred Taylor. 1905 [1888]. Another world or the fourth dimension, 3rd edn. London: Swann & Sonnenschein & Co. Lim. https://archive.org/details/cu31924031255882 (accessed 6 September 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Schroder, Karl. 2003. Permanence (A novel of the Cycler Compact). New York: Tor (Science Fiction) Books.Search in Google Scholar

Serjeantson, Mary. 1935. A history of foreign words in English. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Smadja, Frank. 1993. Retrieving collocations from text: XTRACT. Computational Linguistics 19. 143–177.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Joseph A. & Colleen Kelly. 2002. Stylistic constancy and change across literary corpora – Using measures of lexical richness to date works. Computers and the Humanities 36(4). 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020201615753.10.1023/A:1020201615753Search in Google Scholar

Stamatatos, Efstathios. 2013. On the robustness of authorship attribution based on character n-gram features. Journal of Law and Policy 21(2). 421–440.Search in Google Scholar

Stewart, Ian (ed.). 2002 The annotated Flatland: A romance of many dimensions. Reading, MA & Oxford: Perseus.Search in Google Scholar

Strauss, Udo, Peter Grzybek & Gabriel Altmann. 2006. Word length and word frequency. In Peter Grzybek (ed.), Contributions to the science of text and language: Word length studies and related issues, vol. 31, 277–294. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-4068-9_13Search in Google Scholar

Strunk Jr, William & Elwyn Brooks White. 1979 [1972, 1959]. The elements of style. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Stubbs, Michael. 2009. The search for units of meaning: Sinclair on empirical semantics. Applied Linguistics 30(1). 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn052.Search in Google Scholar

Tausczik, Yla R. & James W. Pennebaker. 2010. The psychological meanings of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29(1). 24–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x09351676.Search in Google Scholar

Throesch, Elizabeth Lea. 2007. The Scientific Romances of Charles Howard Hinton: The Fourth Dimension as Hyperspace, Hyperrealism and Proto-modernism. University of Leeds, School of English. Doctoral thesis. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/371/ (accessed 27 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Tuldava, Juhan. 2005. Stylistics, author identification. In Reinhard Köhler, Gabriel Altmann & Raimund G. Piotrowski (eds.), Quantitative linguistics: An international handbook, 368–387. Berlin / New York: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Tweedie, Fiona J. 2005. Statistical models in stylistics and forensic linguistics. In Reinhard Köhler, Gabriel Altmann & Raimund G. Piotrowski (eds.), Quantitative linguistics: An international handbook, 387–397. Berlin / New York: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

van den Berg, Ruben Geert. 2019. SPSS Shapiro-Wilk test – Quick tutorial with example. https://www.spss-tutorials.com/spss-shapiro-wilk-test-for-normality/ (accessed 12 December 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Watts, Peter. 2006. Blindsight. New York: Tor Books.Search in Google Scholar

Wells, Carolyn. 1905 [1902]. A nonsense anthology. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Wiechmann, Daniel. 2008. On the computation of collostruction strength: Testing measures of association as expressions of lexical bias. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 4(2). 253–290. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2008.011.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Carrington B. 1970. Style and vocabulary: Numerical studies. London: Griffin.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Carrington B. 1975. Mendenhall’s studies of word-length distribution in the works of Shakespeare and Bacon. Biometrika 62(1). 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/62.1.207.Search in Google Scholar

Willink, Arthur. 1893. The world of the unseen: An essay on the relation of higher space to things eternal. London & New York: Macmillan. https://archive.org/details/worldofun seeness00willrich (accessed 6 September 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Whitney, William Dwight. 1874. Language and the study of language: Twelve lectures on the principles of linguistic science, 5th edn. New York: Scribner, Armstrong & Co. https://ia801407.us.archive.org/9/items/languagestudyofl00whitrich/languagestudyofl00whitrich.pdf (accessed 9 November 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Zörnig, Peter & Altmann Gabriel. 2016. Activity in Italian presidential speeches. Glottometrics 35. 38–48.Search in Google Scholar