Home Why is the Iura Novit Curia Principle not Applied Yet in English Law?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Why is the Iura Novit Curia Principle not Applied Yet in English Law?

New comparative reflections
  • Cesare Cavallini EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 19, 2017

Abstract

This article adopts a comparative approach to map a global context for the fundamentals of civil justice. In view of the acknowledged incomplete role of the EU regulatory framework in this respect, the article aims to discuss whether it would be useful and how it would be possible to find a shared space for civil justice, starting from the role of the judge to «find the law» as well as the notorious and universally recognised principle of «iura novit curia». Following this, the article recognises the commonalities in the role of the judge between civil and common law through the value of the constitutional principles. The aim is to understand the natural enforcement of iura novit curia also in English Law, notwithstanding the fact that this principle has been traditionally cast within the «public» civil procedural rules (rather than, by way of example, the «private» arbitration act). Secondly, this article presents itself as a possible starting point for a methodological approach to the notion of a common ground for civil justice, in contrast with the recent view of setting it within the limits of the incomplete European Civil procedure.

Published Online: 2017-7-19

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gj-2017-0010/html
Scroll to top button