Abstract
Taking the move from the theories of cultural internationalism and nationalism, some problematic issues that hamper the creation of an effective, common legal regime of protection against illicit trafficking of cultural objects, are analysed in the light of UNESCO 70 and UNIDROIT 95 together with the case of Italy as a paradigmatic example. In this context, absent an effective common legal framework, restitution of cultural heritage as a trans-boundary customary practice has recently been progressively implemented along with other alternative instruments such as mediation and bilateral agreements that allow for shared forms of enjoyment and exchange.
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- The Algerian Constitutional Reform of 2016: A Critical Analysis
- Consumer Over-Indebtedness, Credit Contracts and Responsible Lending
- Protecting Foreign Investments in Public Services: Regulatory Stability at Any Cost?
- Why is the Iura Novit Curia Principle not Applied Yet in English Law?
- The Law Governing Cultural Heritage in Italy: Universal Values Versus National Cultural Identity
- The Role of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights in Developing Norms and Standards on HIV/AIDS and Human Rights
Articles in the same Issue
- The Algerian Constitutional Reform of 2016: A Critical Analysis
- Consumer Over-Indebtedness, Credit Contracts and Responsible Lending
- Protecting Foreign Investments in Public Services: Regulatory Stability at Any Cost?
- Why is the Iura Novit Curia Principle not Applied Yet in English Law?
- The Law Governing Cultural Heritage in Italy: Universal Values Versus National Cultural Identity
- The Role of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights in Developing Norms and Standards on HIV/AIDS and Human Rights