Death, enemies, and illness: How English and Russian metaphorically conceptualise boredom

References

Biryukova, Avgustina. Forthcoming. Étude comparative de l’ennui en anglais, français et russe. Paris: University of Paris 8 doctoral thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Biryukova, Avgustina & Dylan Glynn. Forthcoming. Controlling boredom: A quantitative cross-linguistic and context-dependent analysis of the emotion concept boredom. Research in Language.Search in Google Scholar

Dirven, René, Louis Goossens, Yvan Putseys & Emma Vorlat. 1982. The scene of linguistic action and its perspectivization by SPEAK, TALK, SAY, and TELL. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pb.iii.6Search in Google Scholar

Eastwood, John, Alexandra Frischen, Mark Fenske & Daniel Smilek. 2012. The unengaged mind defining boredom in terms of attention. Perspective in Psychological Science 7. 482–495.10.1177/1745691612456044Search in Google Scholar

Fahlman, Shelley, Kimberley Mercer-Lynn, David Flora & John Eastwood. 2013. Development and validation of the multidimensional state boredom scale. Assessment 20. 68–85.10.1177/1073191111421303Search in Google Scholar

Fontaine, Johnny, Klaus R. Scherer & Cristina Soriano. 2013. Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592746.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Geeraerts, Dirk. 2003. Lectal data and empirical variation in Cognitive Linguistics. In Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibañez & Sandra Peña Cervel (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics. Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interactions, 163–189. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197716.2.163Search in Google Scholar

Geeraerts, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Peter Bakema. 1994. The structure of lexical variation. Meaning, naming and context. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110873061Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan. 1997. A fuzzy approach to feelings. A cognitive semantic analysis of three French emotion concepts. Sydney: University of Sydney Honours thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan. 1999. Les contraintes aspectuelles sur la structuration métaphorique de l’amour en français. In Hans-Otto Spillmann & Ingo Warnke (eds.), Internationale Tendenzen der Syntaktik, Semantik und Pragmatik, Akten des 32. Linguistischen Kolloquiums in Kassel 1997, 224–332. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan. 2002. Love and anger. The grammatical structure of conceptual metaphors. Style. [Special issue: Cognitive approaches to metaphor] 36. 541–559.Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan. 2007. Mapping meaning: Corpus methods for Cognitive Semantics. Leuven: Leuven University doctoral thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan. 2009. The lexis, culture and concept of fate (sud’ba). A Usage-based and contrastive study in Russian and Ukrainian. Paper presented at the Slavic Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Charles University, Prague, 15–17 October.Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan. 2014a. The social nature of anger. Multivariate corpus evidence for context effects upon conceptual structure. In Peter Blumenthal, Iva Novakova & Dirk Siepmann (eds.), Emotions in discourse, 69–82. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan. 2014b. Correspondence Analysis: An exploratory technique for identifying usage patterns. In Dylan Glynn & Justyna Robinson (eds.), Corpus methods for semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy, 443–486. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.43.17glySearch in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan. 2015. The usage-based cognitive model of anger. A multifactorial usage-feature analysis. Paper presented at the 13th International Cognitive Linguistic Conference, Northumbria University, 20–25 July.Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan & Juliana Zmetáková. 2015. Contextually Sensitive Evidence for Conceptual Structuring. A corpus-driven study of anger in Czech, English, Portuguese and Slovak. Paper presented at the Conference of the International Society for Research on Emotion, University of Geneva, 8–10 July.Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan & Karolina Krawczak. 2014. Operationalisation of non-observable usage-features: An exploratory study in English and Polish. Paper presented at the International Conference on Evidentiality and Modality in European Languages, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 6–8 October.Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan & Irina Matusevich. 2016. Metaphoric Structuring of anger. Developing usage-based methods for contrastive linguistics. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, University of Alcalá, 26–28 October.Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan & Irina Matusevich. 2017. Metaphoric structuring of anger in English and Russian Further developments in profile-based methods. Paper presented at the Fourteenth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, University of Tartu, 10–14 July.Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan & Justyna Robinson (eds.). 2014. Corpus methods for semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.43Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan & Kerstin Fischer (eds.). 2010. Quantitative methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-driven approaches. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226423Search in Google Scholar

Greenacre, Michael. 2007 [1993]. Correspondence analysis in practice (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2003. Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: A study of particle placement. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.). 2006. Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197709Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Andrew & R. E. Perkins. 1985. Towards a model of boredom. British Journal of Psychology 76. 235–240.10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01947.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 1986. Metaphors of anger, pride, and love. A lexical approach to the structure of concepts. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pb.vii.8Search in Google Scholar

Krawczak, Karolina. 2014a. Shame, embarrassment and guilt: Corpus evidence for the cross-cultural structure of social emotions. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 50. 441–475.10.1515/psicl-2014-0023Search in Google Scholar

Krawczak, Karolina. 2014b. Shame and its near-synonyms in English: A multivariate corpus-driven approach to social emotions. In Peter Blumenthal, Iva Novakova & Dirk Siepmann (eds.), Emotions in discourse, 83–94. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Krawczak, Karolina. 2018. Reconstructing social emotions across languages and cultures: A multifactorial account of the adjectival profiling of shame in English, French, and Polish. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16. 455–493.10.1075/rcl.00018.kraSearch in Google Scholar

Krawczak, Karolina & Dylan Glynn. 2015. Operationalising mirativity: A usage-based quantitative study on constructional construal in English. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13. 253–282.10.1075/rcl.13.2.04kraSearch in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Loukidou, Lia, John Loan-Clarke & Kevin Daniels. 2009. Boredom in the workplace: More than monotonous tasks. International Journal of Management Reviews 11. 381–405.10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00267.xSearch in Google Scholar

Martin, Marion, Gaynor Sadlo & Graham Stew. 2006. The phenomenon of boredom. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3. 193–211.10.1191/1478088706qrp066oaSearch in Google Scholar

Nordmark, Henrik & Dylan Glynn. 2013. anxiety between mind and society: A corpus-driven cross-cultural study of conceptual metaphors. Explorations in English Language and Linguistics 1. 107–130.Search in Google Scholar

Pragglejaz Group. 2007. MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22. 1–39.10.1080/10926480709336752Search in Google Scholar

Raffaelli, Quentin, Caitlin Mills & Kalina Christoff. 2018. The knowns and unknowns of boredom: A review of the literature. Experimental Brain Research 236. 2451–2462.10.1007/s00221-017-4922-7Search in Google Scholar

Sandford, Jodi. 2014. Turn a colour with emotion: A linguistic construction of colour in English. Journal of the International Colour Association 13. 67–83.Search in Google Scholar

Sandström, Karin. 2006. When motion becomes emotion. A study of emotion metaphors derived from motion verbs. Linguistics in the midnight sun, Report 3. Luleå University of Technology: Department of Languages and Cultures.Search in Google Scholar

Soares da Silva, Augusto. 2020. Exploring the cultural conceptualization of emotions across national language varieties. A multifactorial profile-based account of pride in European and Brazilian Portuguese. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18. 42–74.10.1075/rcl.00050.soaSearch in Google Scholar

Soares da Silva, Augusto. 2021. Measuring the impact of (non)figurativity in the cultural conceptualization of emotions in the two main national varieties of Portuguese. In Augusto Soares da Silva (ed.), Figurative language – Intersubjectivity and usage, 387–438. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/ftl.11.13silSearch in Google Scholar

Soriano, Cristina & Johnny Fontaine. 2015. Surprise in the GRID. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13. 436–460.10.1075/rcl.13.2.07sorSearch in Google Scholar

Speelman, Dirk & Dylan Glynn. 2005/2012. LiveJournal Corpus of American and British English, Russian and Ukrainian. Leuven University and Lund University.Search in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2004. Happiness in English and German: A metaphorical-pattern analysis. In Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Language, culture, and mind, 134–149. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2006. Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In Anatol Stefanowitsch & Stefan Th. Gries (eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy, 61–105. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199895Search in Google Scholar

Van Tilburg, Wijnand & Eric Igou. 2012. On boredom: Lack of challenge and meaning as distinct boredom experiences. Motivation and Emotion 36. 181–194.10.1007/s11031-011-9234-9Search in Google Scholar

Vodanovich, Stephen J. 2003. On the possible benefits of boredom: A neglected area in personality research. Psychology and Education – An Interdisciplinary Journal 40. 28–33.Search in Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1992. Semantics, culture, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195073256.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1997. Understanding cultures through their key words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195088359.001.0001Search in Google Scholar