Abstract
Extended admissible groups belong to a particular class of graph of groups which possess a graph of groups decomposition generalizing that of any non-geometric 3-manifold and Croke–Kleiner admissible groups. In this paper, under mild conditions on vertex groups of an extended admissible group G, we show that finitely generated abelian subgroups of G are separable (in particular G is residually finite and has solvable word problem), cohomologically good, and the profinite topology on G is efficient. These results extend those in [E. Hamilton, Abelian subgroup separability of Haken 3-manifolds and closed hyperbolic n-orbifolds, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 83 2001, 3, 626–646] and [H. Wilton and P. Zalesskii, Profinite properties of graph manifolds, Geom. Dedicata 147 2010, 29–45] from 3-manifold groups to a wider class of graphs of groups. Finally, we establish that G has property (QT) in the sense of Bestvina–Bromberg–Fujiwara.
Funding statement: The author was partially supported by the National Key Program for the development of Mathematics in the period from 2021 to 2030 under grant number B2024-CTT-04.
Acknowledgements
We thank Alex Margolis and Wenyuan Yang for useful conversations. The author is grateful for the insightful and detailed critiques of the referee that have helped improve the exposition of this paper.
References
[1] C. Abbott, H. T. Nguyen and A. J. Rasmussen, Largest hyperbolic action of 3-manifold groups, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 56 (2024), no. 10, 3090–3113. 10.1112/blms.13118Search in Google Scholar
[2] J. Bajpai, Omnipotence of surface groups, Master’s thesis, McGill University, 2007. Search in Google Scholar
[3] M. Bestvina, K. Bromberg and K. Fujiwara, Constructing group actions on quasi-trees and applications to mapping class groups, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 122 (2015), 1–64. 10.1007/s10240-014-0067-4Search in Google Scholar
[4] M. Bestvina, K. Bromberg and K. Fujiwara, Proper actions on finite products of quasi-trees, Ann. H. Lebesgue 4 (2021), 685–709. 10.5802/ahl.85Search in Google Scholar
[5] M. R. Bridson and A. Haefliger, Metric Spaces of Non-Positive Curvature, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 319, Springer, Berlin, 1999. 10.1007/978-3-662-12494-9Search in Google Scholar
[6] R. G. Burns, A. Karrass and D. Solitar, A note on groups with separable finitely generated subgroups, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 36 (1987), no. 1, 153–160. 10.1017/S0004972700026393Search in Google Scholar
[7] C. B. Croke and B. Kleiner, Spaces with nonpositive curvature and their ideal boundaries, Topology 39 (2000), no. 3, 549–556. 10.1016/S0040-9383(99)00016-6Search in Google Scholar
[8] C. B. Croke and B. Kleiner, The geodesic flow of a nonpositively curved graph manifold, Geom. Funct. Anal. 12 (2002), no. 3, 479–545. 10.1007/s00039-002-8255-7Search in Google Scholar
[9] F. Dahmani, Combination of convergence groups, Geom. Topol. 7 (2003), 933–963. 10.2140/gt.2003.7.933Search in Google Scholar
[10] A. Dranishnikov and T. Januszkiewicz, Every Coxeter group acts amenably on a compact space, Topol. Proc. 24 (1999), 135–141. Search in Google Scholar
[11] C. Druţu and M. Kapovich, Geometric Group Theory, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ. 63, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2018. 10.1090/coll/063Search in Google Scholar
[12] R. Frigerio, J.-F. Lafont and A. Sisto, Rigidity of High Dimensional Graph Manifolds, Astérisque 372, Société Mathématique de France, Paris, 2015. Search in Google Scholar
[13] M. Hagen, J. Russell, A. Sisto and D. Spriano, Equivariant hierarchically hyperbolic structures for 3-manifold groups via quasimorphisms, preprint (2022), https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.12244. Search in Google Scholar
[14] M. F. Hagen and H. Petyt, Projection complexes and quasimedian maps, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 22 (2022), no. 7, 3277–3304. 10.2140/agt.2022.22.3277Search in Google Scholar
[15] E. Hamilton, Abelian subgroup separability of Haken 3-manifolds and closed hyperbolic n-orbifolds, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 83 (2001), no. 3, 626–646. 10.1112/plms/83.3.626Search in Google Scholar
[16] S. Han, H. T. Nguyen and W. Yang, Property (QT) for 3-manifold groups, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 25 (2025), no. 1, 107–159. 10.2140/agt.2025.25.107Search in Google Scholar
[17] S. Han, W. Yang and Y. Zou, Counting double cosets with application to generic 3-manifolds, preprint (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06169. Search in Google Scholar
[18] J. Hempel, Residual finiteness for 3-manifolds, Combinatorial Group Theory and Topology, Ann. of Math. Stud. 111, Princeton University, Princeton (1987), 379–396. 10.1515/9781400882083-018Search in Google Scholar
[19] R. Kim, Residual finiteness and abelian subgroup separability of some high dimensional graph manifolds, Korean J. Math. 29 (2021), no. 3, 603–612. Search in Google Scholar
[20] G. Levitt and A. Minasyan, Residual properties of automorphism groups of (relatively) hyperbolic groups, Geom. Topol. 18 (2014), no. 5, 2985–3023. 10.2140/gt.2014.18.2985Search in Google Scholar
[21] D. D. Long, Immersions and embeddings of totally geodesic surfaces, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 19 (1987), no. 5, 481–484. 10.1112/blms/19.5.481Search in Google Scholar
[22] A. Margolis and H. Nguyen, Quasi isometric rigidity of extended admissible groups, preprint (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.03635. Search in Google Scholar
[23] A. Margolis, H. Nguyen and Y. Qing, Existence, visibility and other applications of quasi-redirecting boundaries, in preparation. Search in Google Scholar
[24] Z. Munro and H. Petyt, Coarse obstructions to cocompact cubulation, preprint (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09275. Search in Google Scholar
[25]
H. T. Nguyen and Y. Qing,
Sublinearly Morse boundary of
[26] H. T. Nguyen and W. Yang, Croke-Kleiner admissible groups: property (QT) and quasiconvexity, Michigan Math. J. 73 (2023), no. 5, 971–1019. 10.1307/mmj/20216045Search in Google Scholar
[27] G. A. Niblo and D. T. Wise, Subgroup separability, knot groups and graph manifolds, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (2001), no. 3, 685–693. 10.1090/S0002-9939-00-05574-XSearch in Google Scholar
[28] D. V. Osin, Peripheral fillings of relatively hyperbolic groups, Invent. Math. 167 (2007), no. 2, 295–326. 10.1007/s00222-006-0012-3Search in Google Scholar
[29] P. Przytycki and D. T. Wise, Separability of embedded surfaces in 3-manifolds, Compos. Math. 150 (2014), no. 9, 1623–1630. 10.1112/S0010437X14007350Search in Google Scholar
[30] P. Scott, Subgroups of surface groups are almost geometric, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 17 (1978), no. 3, 555–565. 10.1112/jlms/s2-17.3.555Search in Google Scholar
[31] P. Scott and T. Wall, Topological methods in group theory, Homological Group Theory London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 36, Cambridge University, Cambridge (1979), 137–203. 10.1017/CBO9781107325449.007Search in Google Scholar
[32] A. Sisto, Projections and relative hyperbolicity, Enseign. Math. (2) 59 (2013), no. 1–2, 165–181. 10.4171/lem/59-1-6Search in Google Scholar
[33] H. Sun, Non-LERFness of arithmetic hyperbolic manifold groups and mixed 3-manifold groups, Duke Math. J. 168 (2019), no. 4, 655–696. 10.1215/00127094-2018-0048Search in Google Scholar
[34] H. Wilton, Virtual retractions, conjugacy separability and omnipotence, J. Algebra 323 (2010), no. 2, 323–335. 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2009.10.009Search in Google Scholar
[35] H. Wilton and P. Zalesskii, Profinite properties of graph manifolds, Geom. Dedicata 147 (2010), 29–45. 10.1007/s10711-009-9437-3Search in Google Scholar
[36] D. T. Wise, Subgroup separability of graphs of free groups with cyclic edge groups, Q. J. Math. 51 (2000), no. 1, 107–129. 10.1093/qmathj/50.1.107Search in Google Scholar
[37] D. T. Wise, The Structure of Groups with a Quasiconvex Hierarchy, Ann. of Math. Stud. 209, Princeton University, Princeton, 2021. 10.1515/9780691213507Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston