Home Sublinearly Morse boundaries from the viewpoint of combinatorics
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Sublinearly Morse boundaries from the viewpoint of combinatorics

  • Merlin Incerti-Medici EMAIL logo and Abdul Zalloum
Published/Copyright: March 31, 2023

Abstract

We prove that the sublinearly Morse boundary of CAT ( 0 ) cubulated groups with factor systems continuously injects in the Gromov boundary of a certain hyperbolic graph Γ. We also show that for all CAT ( 0 ) cube complexes, convergence to sublinearly Morse geodesic rays has a simple combinatorial description using the hyperplanes crossed by such sequences. As an application of this combinatorial description, we show that a certain subspace of the Roller boundary continuously surjects on the subspace of the visual boundary consisting of sublinearly Morse geodesic rays.

MSC 2020: 20F65

Communicated by Clara Löh


Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Carolyn Abbott, Ruth Charney, Matthew Durham, Elia Fioravanti, Anthony Genevois, Mark Hagen, Qing Liu, Kasra Rafi, and Jacob Russell for fruitful discussions. Finally, we would like to thank the referee whose comments helped improve the exposition considerably.

References

[1] C. Abbott, S. Balasubramanya and D. Osin, Hyperbolic structures on groups, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 19 (2019), no. 4, 1747–1835. 10.2140/agt.2019.19.1747Search in Google Scholar

[2] C. Abbott, J. Behrstock and M. G. Durham, Largest acylindrical actions and stability in hierarchically hyperbolic groups, preprint (2017), https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.06219. Search in Google Scholar

[3] I. Agol, The virtual Haken conjecture, Doc. Math. 18 (2013), 1045–1087. 10.4171/dm/421Search in Google Scholar

[4] J. Behrstock, M. Hagen and A. Sisto, Hierarchically hyperbolic spaces. I: Curve complexes for cubical groups, Geom. Topol. 21 (2017), no. 3, 1731–1804. 10.2140/gt.2017.21.1731Search in Google Scholar

[5] N. Bergeron and D. T. Wise, A boundary criterion for cubulation, Amer. J. Math. 134 (2012), no. 3, 843–859. 10.1353/ajm.2012.0020Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. Beyrer and E. Fioravanti, Cross ratios and cubulations of hyperbolic groups, preprint (2018), https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.08087. Search in Google Scholar

[7] J. Beyrer, E. Fioravanti and M. Incerti-Medici, CAT ( 0 ) cube complexes are determined by their boundary cross ratio, preprint (2018), https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.08478. Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. R. Bridson and A. Häfliger, Metric Spaces of Non-Positive Curvature, Springer, Berlin, 1999. 10.1007/978-3-662-12494-9Search in Google Scholar

[9] P.-E. Caprace and M. Sageev, Rank rigidity for CAT(0) cube complexes, Geom. Funct. Anal. 21 (2011), no. 4, 851–891. 10.1007/s00039-011-0126-7Search in Google Scholar

[10] C. H. Cashen and J. M. Mackay, A metrizable topology on the contracting boundary of a group, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 372 (2019), no. 3, 1555–1600. 10.1090/tran/7544Search in Google Scholar

[11] R. Charney and H. Sultan, Contracting boundaries of CAT ( 0 ) spaces, J. Topol. 8 (2015), no. 1, 93–117. 10.1112/jtopol/jtu017Search in Google Scholar

[12] M. Cordes, Morse boundaries of proper geodesic metric spaces, Groups Geom. Dyn. 11 (2017), no. 4, 1281–1306. 10.4171/GGD/429Search in Google Scholar

[13] M. Cordes, A survey on Morse boundaries and stability, Beyond Hyperbolicity, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 454, Cambridge University, Cambridge (2019), 83–116. 10.1017/9781108559065.007Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. Cordes and D. Hume, Stability and the Morse boundary, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 95 (2017), no. 3, 963–988. 10.1112/jlms.12042Search in Google Scholar

[15] C. B. Croke and B. Kleiner, Spaces with nonpositive curvature and their ideal boundaries, Topology 39 (2000), no. 3, 549–556. 10.1016/S0040-9383(99)00016-6Search in Google Scholar

[16] T. Fernós, J. Lécureux and F. Mathéus, Random walks and boundaries of CAT ( 0 ) cubical complexes, Comment. Math. Helv. 93 (2018), no. 2, 291–333. 10.4171/CMH/435Search in Google Scholar

[17] I. Gekhtman, Y. Qing and K. Rafi, Genericity of sublinearly Morse geodesics, in preparation. Search in Google Scholar

[18] A. Genevois, Hyperbolicities in CAT ( 0 ) cube complexes, Enseign. Math. 65 (2019), no. 1–2, 33–100. 10.4171/LEM/65-1/2-2Search in Google Scholar

[19] A. Genevois, Contracting isometries of CAT(0) cube complexes and acylindrical hyperbolicity of diagram groups, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 20 (2020), no. 1, 49–134. 10.2140/agt.2020.20.49Search in Google Scholar

[20] M. Gromov, Hyperbolic groups, Essays in Group Theory, Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ. 8, Springer, New York (1987), 75–263. 10.1007/978-1-4613-9586-7_3Search in Google Scholar

[21] M. Hagen, Large facing tuples and a strengthened sector lemma, Tunis. J. Math. 4 (2022), no. 1, 55–86. 10.2140/tunis.2022.4.55Search in Google Scholar

[22] M. F. Hagen, Weak hyperbolicity of cube complexes and quasi-arboreal groups, J. Topol. 7 (2014), no. 2, 385–418. 10.1112/jtopol/jtt027Search in Google Scholar

[23] M. F. Hagen and P. Przytycki, Cocompactly cubulated graph manifolds, Israel J. Math. 207 (2015), no. 1, 377–394. 10.1007/s11856-015-1177-5Search in Google Scholar

[24] M. F. Hagen and T. Susse, On hierarchical hyperbolicity of cubical groups, Israel J. Math. 236 (2020), no. 1, 45–89. 10.1007/s11856-020-1967-2Search in Google Scholar

[25] F. Haglund, Finite index subgroups of graph products, Geom. Dedicata 135 (2008), 167–209. 10.1007/s10711-008-9270-0Search in Google Scholar

[26] M. Incerti-Medici, Comparing topologies on the Morse boundary and quasi-isometry invariance, Geom. Dedicata 212 (2021), 153–176. 10.1007/s10711-020-00553-3Search in Google Scholar

[27] Q. Liu, Dynamics on the Morse boundary, Geom. Dedicata 214 (2021), 1–20. 10.1007/s10711-021-00600-7Search in Google Scholar

[28] M. Miller, Stable subgroups of the genus two handlebody group, preprint (2020), https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.05067. Search in Google Scholar

[29] D. Murray, Topology and dynamics of the contracting boundary of cocompact CAT ( 0 ) spaces, Pacific J. Math. 299 (2019), no. 1, 89–116. 10.2140/pjm.2019.299.89Search in Google Scholar

[30] D. Murray, Y. Qing and A. Zalloum, Sublinearly Morse geodesics in CAT(0) spaces: Lower divergence and hyperplane characterization, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 22 (2022), no. 3, 1337–1374. 10.2140/agt.2022.22.1337Search in Google Scholar

[31] P. Przytycki and D. T. Wise, Graph manifolds with boundary are virtually special, J. Topol. 7 (2014), no. 2, 419–435. 10.1112/jtopol/jtt009Search in Google Scholar

[32] P. Przytycki and D. T. Wise, Mixed 3-manifolds are virtually special, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 31 (2018), no. 2, 319–347. 10.1090/jams/886Search in Google Scholar

[33] Y. Qing and K. Rafi, Sublinearly Morse boundary I: CAT(0) spaces, Adv. Math. 404 (2022), Paper No. 108442. 10.1016/j.aim.2022.108442Search in Google Scholar

[34] Y. Qing and G. Tiozzo, Excursions of generic geodesics in right-angled Artin groups and graph products, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2021 (2021), no. 22, 16910–16937. 10.1093/imrn/rnz294Search in Google Scholar

[35] K. Rafi and Y. Verberne, Geodesics in the mapping class group, preprint (2018), https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.12489. Search in Google Scholar

[36] M. Sageev, CAT ( 0 ) cube complexes and groups, Geometric Group Theory, IAS/Park City Math. Ser. 21, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2014), 7–54. 10.1090/pcms/021/02Search in Google Scholar

[37] S. Shepherd, A cubulation with no factor system, preprint (2022), https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.10421. Search in Google Scholar

[38] D. T. Wise, Cubulating small cancellation groups, Geom. Funct. Anal. 14 (2004), no. 1, 150–214. 10.1007/s00039-004-0454-ySearch in Google Scholar

[39] D. T. Wise, Research announcement: The structure of groups with a quasiconvex hierarchy, Electron. Res. Announc. Math. Sci. 16 (2009), 44–55. 10.3934/era.2009.16.44Search in Google Scholar

[40] A. Zalloum, A symbolic coding of the Morse boundary, preprint (2018), https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.10383. Search in Google Scholar

[41] A. Zalloum, Convergence of sublinearly contracting horospheres, Geom. Dedicata 216 (2022), no. 3, Paper No. 35. 10.1007/s10711-022-00693-8Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-09-14
Revised: 2023-01-08
Published Online: 2023-03-31
Published in Print: 2023-07-01

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/forum-2022-0269/html
Scroll to top button