Strong multiplicity one for Siegel cusp forms of degree two

References

[1] A. N. Andrianov, Euler products that correspond to Siegel’s modular forms of genus 2, Russian Math. Surveys 29 (1974), 45–116. 10.1070/RM1974v029n03ABEH001285Search in Google Scholar

[2] L. V. Dieulefait, On the images of the Galois representations attached to genus 2 Siegel modular forms, J. Reine Angew. Math. 553 (2002), 183–200. 10.1515/crll.2002.098Search in Google Scholar

[3] L. V. Dieulefait, Irreducibility of Galois actions on level 1 Siegel cusp forms, Modular Curves and Abelian Varieties, Progr. Math. 224, Birkhäuser, Basel (2004), 75–80. 10.1007/978-3-0348-7919-4_5Search in Google Scholar

[4] D. W. Farmer, A. Pitale, N. C. Ryan and R. Schmidt, Multiplicity one for L-functions and applications, preprint (2013), https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3972. Search in Google Scholar

[5] N. Kurokawa, On Siegel eigenforms, Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 57 (1981), no. 1, 47–50. 10.3792/pjaa.57.47Search in Google Scholar

[6] G. Laumon, Sur la cohomologie à supports compacts des variétés de Shimura pour GSp⁢(4)𝐐, Compositio Math. 105 (1997), no. 3, 267–359. 10.1023/A:1000102414055Search in Google Scholar

[7] J. Meher and M. R. Murty, Oscillations of coefficients of Dirichlet series attached to automorphic forms, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 145 (2017), no. 2, 563–575. 10.1090/proc/13264Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. R. Murty and S. Pujahari, Distinguishing Hecke eigenforms, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 145 (2017), no. 5, 1899–1904. 10.1090/proc/13446Search in Google Scholar

[9] J. Neukirch, Class Field Theory, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 280, Springer, Berlin, 1986. 10.1007/978-3-642-82465-4Search in Google Scholar

[10] V. M. Patankar and C. S. Rajan, Distinguishing Galois representations by their normalized traces, J. Number Theory 178 (2017), 118–125. 10.1016/j.jnt.2017.03.001Search in Google Scholar

[11] A. Pitale, Siegel Modular Forms. A Classical and Representation-Theoretic Approach, Lecture Notes in Math. 2240, Springer, Cham, 2019. 10.1007/978-3-030-15675-6Search in Google Scholar

[12] A. Pitale, A. Saha and R. Schmidt, Transfer of Siegel cusp forms of degree 2, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 232 (2014), no. 1090, 1–107. Search in Google Scholar

[13] G. Prasad and A. S. Rapinchuk, Subnormal subgroups of the groups of rational points of reductive algebraic groups, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 130 (2002), no. 8, 2219–2227. 10.1090/S0002-9939-02-06514-0Search in Google Scholar

[14] C. S. Rajan, On strong multiplicity one for l-adic representations, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 1998 (1998), no. 3, 161–172. 10.1155/S1073792898000142Search in Google Scholar

[15] D. Ramakrishnan, Decomposition and parity of Galois representations attached to GL⁢(4), Automorphic Representations and L-Functions, Tata Inst. Fundam. Res. Stud. Math. 22, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai (2013), 427–454. Search in Google Scholar

[16] E. Royer, J. Sengupta and J. Wu, Non-vanishing and sign changes of Hecke eigenvalues for Siegel cusp forms of genus two, Ramanujan J. 39 (2016), no. 1, 179–199. 10.1007/s11139-014-9667-3Search in Google Scholar

[17] R. Schmidt, Packet structure and paramodular forms, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 370 (2018), no. 5, 3085–3112. 10.1090/tran/7028Search in Google Scholar

[18] R. Taylor, Galois representations associated to Siegel modular forms of low weight, Duke Math. J. 63 (1991), no. 2, 281–332. 10.1215/S0012-7094-91-06312-XSearch in Google Scholar

[19] R. Weissauer, Four dimensional Galois representations, Automorphic Forms (II). The Case of the Group G⁢S⁢p⁢(4), Astérisque 302, Société Mathématique de France, Paris (2005), 67–150. Search in Google Scholar

[20] R. Weissauer, Endoscopy for GSp⁢(4) and the Cohomology of Siegel Modular Threefolds, Lecture Notes in Math. 1968, Springer, Berlin, 2009. 10.1007/978-3-540-89306-6Search in Google Scholar