Home Group actions and geometric combinatorics in 𝔽qd
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Group actions and geometric combinatorics in 𝔽qd

  • Michael Bennett , Derrick Hart , Alex Iosevich EMAIL logo , Jonathan Pakianathan and Misha Rudnev
Published/Copyright: August 5, 2016

Abstract

In this paper we apply a group action approach to the study of Erdős–Falconer-type problems in vector spaces over finite fields and use it to obtain non-trivial exponents for the distribution of simplices. We prove that there exists s0(d)<d such that if E𝔽qd, d2, with |E|Cqs0, then |Tdd(E)|Cq(d+12), where Tkd(E) denotes the set of congruence classes of k-dimensional simplices determined by k+1-tuples of points from E. Non-trivial exponents were previously obtained by Chapman, Erdogan, Hart, Iosevich and Koh [4] for Tkd(E) with 2kd-1. A non-trivial result for T22(E) in the plane was obtained by Bennett, Iosevich and Pakianathan [2]. These results are significantly generalized and improved in this paper. In particular, we establish the Wolff exponent 43, previously established in [4] for the q3 mod 4 case to the case q1 mod 4, and this results in a new sum-product type inequality. We also obtain non-trivial results for subsets of the sphere in 𝔽qd, where previous methods have yielded nothing. The key to our approach is a group action perspective which quickly leads to natural and effective formulae in the style of the classical Mattila integral from geometric measure theory.

MSC 2010: 42B; 52C

Communicated by Christopher D. Sogge


Award Identifier / Grant number: DMS-10-45404

Funding statement: The work of the second listed author was partially supported by the NSF Grant DMS-10-45404.

A Appendix

A.1 Quadratic forms, spheres and isotropic subspaces

Let k be a field of characteristic not equal to 2. Let V be a finite-dimensional k-vector space and Q a quadratic form on V. Associated to Q, there is a symmetric bilinear inner product ,:V×Vk such that Q is the norm map Q(x)=x,x. We say that Q is non-degenerate if x,y=0 for all yV implies x=0. The isometry group of Q is denoted O(Q), the orthogonal group associated to Q, and consists of all linear transformations which preserve (the inner product associated to) Q. When Q is the standard dot product on 𝔽qd, then the isometry group is denoted Od(𝔽q).

The quadratic form Q can be represented by a symmetric matrix 𝔹 such that Q(x)=xT𝔹x and under change of basis 𝔸, 𝔹 transforms as 𝔹𝔸T𝔹𝔸 and so the determinant of 𝔹 modulo squares is an invariant of Q called the discriminant, denoted by disc(Q). If Q is non-degenerate, we view the discriminant as an element of k*/(k*)2.

When k is a finite field of odd characteristic, Witt showed (see for example [9] or [12]) that two quadratic forms Q,Q are isomorphic if and only if they are equal in dimension (via the vector space they are defined on) and discriminant. Thus on 𝔽qd there are only two distinct non-degenerate quadratic forms up to isomorphism: the standard dot product and another one. We will denote their isometry groups as Od(𝔽q) and Od(𝔽q) for the remainder of this section.

Furthermore, if x and y are two nonzero elements of 𝔽qd, Witt also showed that there is an isometry taking x to y if and only if x and y have the same norm, i.e., Q(x)=Q(y). Thus for any non-degenerate quadratic form, the sphere of radius r in (𝔽qd,Q) can be identified as the quotient of O(Q) by the stabilizer of any given element on that sphere. Thus a discussion of sphere sizes is equivalent to a discussion of isometry group and stabilizer sizes.

Let H denote the hyperbolic plane, the 2-dimensional quadratic form represented by matrix [0110] of discriminant -1. The hyperbolic plane H has the important property that it has two totally isotropic lines (lines consisting completely of vectors of norm 0) and its n-fold orthogonal direct sum nH has maximal totally isotropic subspaces of dimension n called Lagrangian subspaces. Furthermore, H plays an important role in the classification of non-degenerate quadratic forms over finite fields F of odd characteristic. One can characterize completely the structure of any such non-degenerate quadratic form as follows: If dim(V)=2n is even, then the isomorphism class of Q has two possibilities:

Q{nHif (-1)ndisc(Q) is a square,(n-1)HNK/Fif (-1)ndisc(Q) is a non-square.

Here NK/F is the 2-dimensional quadratic form given by the norm map of the unique degree 2 extension field K of F. If dim(V)=2n+1 is odd, then

QnHcx2,

where c=(-1)ndisc(Q).

As the standard dot product on 𝔽qd has dimension d and discriminant 1 it follows that when d is even, it is isomorphic to d2H if (-1)d2 is a square modulo q and d-22HNK/F if not. When d is odd, it is isomorphic to d-12H(-1)d-12x2. Regardless, when d3, totally isotropic subspaces are unavoidable.

The following theorem was proved by Minkowski at the age of 17 (see [10]) based on the classification we just discussed:

Theorem A.1

Let SrQ denote the sphere of radius r in (V,Q), i.e., SrQ={xV:Q(x)=r} and let νQ(r)=|SrQ|. If QnH so that d=2n, then

νQ(r)={qd-1-qd-22if r0,qd-1+qd2-qd-22if r=0.

If Q(n-1)HNK/F so that d=2n, then

νQ(r)={qd-1+qd-22if r0,qd-1-qd2+qd-22if r=0.

If QnHcx2 so that d=2n+1, then

νQ(r)={qd-1+qd-12sgn(rc)if r0,qd-1if r=0,

where sgn stands for the Legendre symbol. In particular, the size of a sphere is always qd-1(1+o(1)) when d2 except maybe when d=2,r=0. The size is always also qd-1+O(qd2). Also note that in any given case, there are at most three possibilities for sphere sizes. Thus in any given scenario, there are only three possibilities for the sizes of stabilizers of nonzero points in O(Q).

The degenerate case possibilities in Theorem A.1 affect sizes of spheres and stabilizers but not the magnitude of the isometry groups. This is because all non-degenerate quadratic forms in 1 dimension are nonzero multiples of each other and hence have exactly the same isometry group. Then using induction in dimension 2 and higher, and that nonzero radius sphere counts agree up to (1+o(1)) in all cases from Theorem A.1, one can prove that for any two non-degenerate d-dimensional quadratic forms Q and Q one has |O(Q)|=|O(Q)|(1+o(1)) as q. In fact, one has:

Proposition A.2

Let Q be a non-degenerate quadratic form on Fqd. Then |O(Q)|=2q(d2)(1+o(1)) as q.

Proof.

Note that Od(𝔽q)/Od-1(𝔽q) is bijective to Sd-1, the sphere of radius 1 in 𝔽qd by action theory. Hence |Od(𝔽q)|=|Sd-1||S1||O1(𝔽q)|. As |O1(𝔽q)|=2, the proposition follows from Theorem A.1. ∎

A.2 Degenerate simplices

Let us work inside 𝔽qd, where q is odd in this section.

Let [x0,,xk] be a k-simplex in 𝔽qd. After a translation this simplex transforms to the 0-pinned k-simplex [0,x1-x0,,xk-x0] which has the same congruence class and ordered distance vector. It is easy to see that the stabilizer in the Euclidean group of [x0,,xk] has exactly the same size as the stabilizer in Od(𝔽q) of the pinned simplex [0,x1-x0,,xk-x0] so we will restrict out attention to O(Q) and pinned simplices in this subsection.

The dimension of a k-simplex is the dimension of the space spanned by the vertices in its corresponding pinned simplex. A k-simplex is called non-degenerate if this is as big as possible, i.e., k-dimensional, and degenerate otherwise. All k-simplices are degenerate when k>d.

Take a k-simplex and let V denote the vector space generated by its associated pinned simplex. Suppose we have a non-degenerate quadratic form Q on 𝔽qd like for example the standard dot product. Let V denote the perp with respect to Q. We then say that V is good if VV=0. Under these conditions, QQ|VQ|V and it is easy to show that the stabilizer of the k-simplex in O(Q) can be identified with O(Q|V) which has the size |Od-m(𝔽q)|(1+o(1)), where m is the dimension of V. Thus we have proven the following lemma:

Lemma A.3

Let Q be a non-degenerate quadratic form on Fqd, q odd. Consider a good k-simplex, i.e., a simplex whose associated pinned simplex spans a space V of dimension mk with VV=0. Then the stabilizer of the simplex in O(Q) is O(Q|V), a subgroup of size |Od-m(Fq)|(1+o(1)). The minimum size is achieved in the non-degenerate case and is of size |Od-k(Fq)|(1+o(1)).

Note that non-degenerate d-simplices in 𝔽qd are automatically good as V=0.

In the case the simplex is not good, in the sense that the associated spanned space has isotropic vectors, the argument of Lemma A.3 can break down, as Gram–Schmidt breaks down when one has vectors of norm 0. This situation will not lead to any big difficulty in this paper, though, so we will ignore it for now. However as an example to show that things are different, consider the line (t,it) in 𝔽q2, where q=1 mod 4 and the pinned 1-simplex [(0,0),(1,i)]. Under O2(𝔽q), its orbit has size 2(q-1) which is twice as big as orbits of non-degenerate good pinned 1-simplices. Thus the corresponding circle is twice as big as normal and so the stabilizer set is half as big as normal. Thus (1+o(1)) no longer suffices to record the difference. For many arguments a factor of 2 is no big deal but in arguments involving cancelation of lead order terms, they can play a big role.

As a final goal of this section, let us show that the set of ordered distances generated by degenerate k-simplices in 𝔽qd are insignificant in the set of all ordered distances of k-simplices.

Lemma A.4

Let kd and distances be measured with respect to any non-degenerate inner product Q. There are at most O(k(q(k+1)k2-1)) ordered distances arising from degenerate k-simplices in Fqd.

Proof.

It suffices to work with pinned simplices. Note that a degenerate pinned k-simplex lies in a vector space V of dimension <k which inherits an inner product Q|V from the one on 𝔽qd. This inherited inner product might be degenerate. However it is known that Q|V=Q0Q1, where Q0 is the null inner product and Q1 is a non-degenerate inner product. The ordered distances generated by our k-simplex would hence be identical to one lying in the vector space supporting Q1. Thus the set of ordered distances of degenerate k-simplices in 𝔽qd lies in the union of the set of ordered distances of k-simplices in (W,Q), where (W,Q) range over all non-degenerate quadratic forms of dimension m<k. As there are at most two distinct non-degenerate quadratic forms per dimension, it follows that the set of ordered distances of degenerate k-simplices in 𝔽qd is no more than 2(k-1) times the set of ordered distances of k-simplices in 𝔽qk-1 with a non-degenerate inner product.

Consider such a pinned k-simplex in the vector space 𝔽qk-1. Leaving out the last vertex of the k-simplex yields a (k-1)-pinned simplex in 𝔽qk-1 which we can assume to be non-degenerate without loss of generality and which determines at most O(q(k2)) ordered distances as mentioned earlier. Adding back the last simplex, we note that we have qk-1 choices of location which each determine at most one final ordered distance vector for each scenario of distance vector from the first k vertices in that pinned k-simplex.

Thus there can be at most O(q(k2)+(k-1)) ordered distances corresponding to k-simplices in 𝔽qk-1. Thus the number of ordered distances of degenerate k simplices in 𝔽qd is at most 2kO(q(k2)+k-1).

As (k2)+(k-1)=(k+12)-1<(k+12), we are done. ∎

Theorem A.5

Let Q be a non-degenerate quadratic form on Fqd and let kd. Then the number of congruence classes of non-degenerate k-simplices is O(q(k+12)) as q. The number of congruence classes of degenerate k-simplices is of smaller order and so this count is also the order of the full count of the number of congruence classes of k-simplices.

Proof.

Two non-degenerate pinned k-simplices are congruent if and only if they have the same ordered distance. This is because if σ and σ are two such, and V,V are the vector spaces they generate, Q|VQ|V and so there is an isometry Q|VQ|V which extends to an isometry in O(Q) by Witt’s theorem. Hence there are at most q(k+12) such congruence classes as that is the maximum number of possibilities for ordered distance vectors of k-simplices. From lemma A.4, the degenerate k-simplices contribute a number of congruence classes with strictly smaller order than this, hence the theorem follows. ∎

References

[1] Aksoy Yazici E., Murphy B., Rudnev M. and Shkredov I. D., Growth estimates in positive characteristic via collisions, preprint 2015, http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.06613v1. 10.1093/imrn/rnw206Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bennett M., Iosevich A. and Pakianathan J., Three-point configurations determined by subsets of 𝔽q2 via the Elekes–Sharir paradigm, Combinatorica 34 (2014), no. 6, 689–706. 10.1007/s00493-014-2978-6Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bourgain J., Katz N. and Tao T., A sum-product estimate in finite fields, and applications, Geom. Funct. Anal. 14 (2004), 27–57. 10.1007/s00039-004-0451-1Search in Google Scholar

[4] Chapman J., Erdogan M. B., Hart D., Iosevich A. and Koh D., Pinned distance sets, k-simplices, Wolff’s exponent in finite fields and sum-product estimates, Math. Z. 271 (2012), no. 1–2, 63–93. 10.1007/s00209-011-0852-4Search in Google Scholar

[5] Erdog̃an B., A bilinear Fourier extension theorem and applications to the distance set problem, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2005 (2005), no. 23, 1411–1425. 10.1155/IMRN.2005.1411Search in Google Scholar

[6] Guth L. and Katz N., On the Erdős distinct distance problem in the plane, preprint 2011, http://arxiv.org/pdf/1011.4105. 10.4007/annals.2015.181.1.2Search in Google Scholar

[7] Hart D., Iosevich A., Koh D. and Rudnev M., Averages over hyperplanes, sum-product theory in finite fields, and the Erdős–Falconer distance conjecture, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 363 (2011), 3255–3275. 10.1090/S0002-9947-2010-05232-8Search in Google Scholar

[8] Iosevich A. and Rudnev M., Erdős distance problem in vector spaces over finite fields, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 359 (2007), no. 12, 6127–6142. 10.1090/S0002-9947-07-04265-1Search in Google Scholar

[9] Lang S., Algebra, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, 1984. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Minkowski H., Grundlagen für eine Theorie quadratischen Formen mit ganzzahligen Koeffizienten, Gesammelte Abhandlungen. Band 1, B. G. Teubner, Leipzig (1911), 3–145. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Rudnev M., On the number of incidences between planes and points in three dimensions, preprint 2015, http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.0426v5; to appear in Combinatorica. 10.1007/s00493-016-3329-6Search in Google Scholar

[12] Serre J. P., A Course in Arithmetic, Grad. Texts in Math. 7, Springer, New York, 1973. 10.1007/978-1-4684-9884-4Search in Google Scholar

[13] Solymosi J. and Vu V., Distinct distances in high dimensional homogeneous sets, Towards a Theory of Geometric Graphs, Contemp. Math. 342, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2004), 259–268. 10.1090/conm/342/06146Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-12-11
Published Online: 2016-8-5
Published in Print: 2017-1-1

© 2017 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/forum-2015-0251/html
Scroll to top button