Home Social Sciences Reflections on Government Success and Failure: Then and Now
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Reflections on Government Success and Failure: Then and Now

  • Lawrence S. Rothenberg EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 30, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
The Forum
From the journal The Forum

Abstract

This discussion surveys changes in the world that might impact the ability to solve policy problems as outlined initially in Glazer and Rothenberg (2001. Why Government Succeeds and Why It Fails. Harvard University Press). While the basic premises of the original analysis hold, interrelated political and economic changes have occurred in ways that would produce a far different monograph than was authored roughly a quarter-century ago. Politically, four changes are highlighted: (1) growth in polarization; (2) rise of private politics; (3) heightened globalization; and (4) media diversification. Economically, three notable changes are discussed involving: (1) the changing nature of industrial organization; (2) the redesign of supply and value chains; and (3) the dramatic rise of artificial intelligence. While no universal statement can be offered, changes in these features, both individually and interactively, provide additional opportunities and new obstacles for policy successes to be realized and suggest areas for further scholarly investigation.


Corresponding author: Lawrence S. Rothenberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, USA, E-mail:
Lawrence S. Rothenberg is the Corrigan-Minehan Professor of Political Science at the University of Rochester and Director of the W. Allen Wallis Institute of Political Economy.

References

Abito, Jose Muguel, David Besanko, and Daniel Diermeier. 2019. Corporate Reputation and Social Activism: Strategic Interaction, Firm Behavior, and Social Welfare. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199386154.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Al-Antari, Mugahed A. 2023. “Artificial Intelligence for Medical Diagnostics – Existing and Future AI Technology.” Diagnostics 13 (4): 688. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040688.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Matthew E., Christina L. Boyd, Jennifer Hickey, and Adam G. Rutkowski. 2024. “How the Politics of Federal Judicial Selection Affect Judicial Diversity and What This Means for Public Confidence in Courts.” Law and Contemporary Problems 87 (1): 85–118.Search in Google Scholar

Baldwin, Richard, and Rebecca Freeman. 2022. “Risks and Global Supply Chains: What We Know and What We Need to Know.” Annual Review of Economics 14 (1): 153–80. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-051420-113737.Search in Google Scholar

Baron, David P. 2003. “Private Politics.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 12 (1): 31–66. https://doi.org/10.1162/105864003321220724.Search in Google Scholar

Baron, DavidP. 2014. “Self-regulation in Private and Public Politics.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 9 (2): 231–67.10.1561/100.00013076Search in Google Scholar

Berger, Suzanne, and Ronald Dore, eds. 2018. National Diversity and Global Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish, Arvind Panagariya, and Thirukodikaval N. Srinivasan. 2002. “The Muddles over Outsourcing.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (4): 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330042632753.Search in Google Scholar

Bode, Leticia. 2016. “Political News in the News Feed: Learning Politics from Social Media.” Mass Communication and Society 19 (1): 24–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1045149.Search in Google Scholar

Bonica, Adam. 2013. “Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12014.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Trevor E., and Suzanne Mettler. 2024. “Sequential Polarization: The Development of the Rural-Urban Political Divide, 1976–2020.” Perspectives on Politics 22 (3): 630–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592723002918.Search in Google Scholar

Calabresi, Steven G., and Christopher S. Yoo. 2008. The Unitary Executive: Presidential Power from Washington to Bush. New Haven: Yale University Press.10.12987/yale/9780300121261.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Canen, Nathan, Chad Kendall, and Francesco Trebbi. 2020. “Unbundling Polarization.” Econometrica 88 (3): 1197–233. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta16756.Search in Google Scholar

Cinelli, Matteo, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Alessandro Galeazzi, Walter Quattrociocchi, and Michele Starnini. 2021. “The Echo Chamber Effect on Social Media.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (9): e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118.Search in Google Scholar

Curry, James M., and Frances E. Lee. 2020. The Limits of Party: Congress and Lawmaking in a Polarized Era. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226716497.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

DellaVigna, Stefano, and Woojin Kim. 2022. “Policy Diffusion and Polarization Across U.S. States.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper w30142.10.3386/w30142Search in Google Scholar

Dodds, Graham. 2019. The Unitary Presidency. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781351052788Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, Eric. 2021. “The U.S. Needs to Reimagine Its Pharma Supply Chain.” Harvard Business Review, August 12.Search in Google Scholar

Eguia, Emanuel, Adrienne N. Cobb, Anai N. Kothari, Ayrin Molefe, Majid Afshar, Gerard V. Aranha, et al.. 2018. “Impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid Expansion on Cancer Admissions and Surgeries.” Annals of Surgery 268 (4): 584–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002952.Search in Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John. 2002. “Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law.” Law and Contemporary Problems 65 (3): 41–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/1192402.Search in Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P., and Samuel J. Abrams. 2008. “Political Polarization in the American Public.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 563–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836.Search in Google Scholar

Glazer, Amihai, and Lawrence S. Rothenberg. 2001. Why Government Succeeds and Why It Fails. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goswami, Gaurav. 2025. “AI Echo Chambers: How Algorithms Shape Reality, Influence Democracy, and Fuel Misinformation.” TechRxiv.10.36227/techrxiv.174059950.03385147/v1Search in Google Scholar

Howell, William G. 2016. Relic: How Our Constitution Undermines Effective Government--and Why We Need a More Powerful Presidency. New York: Basic.Search in Google Scholar

Jordan, Soren, and Cynthia J. Bowling. 2016. “Introduction: The State of Polarization in the States.” State and Local Government Review 48 (4): 220–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x17699527.Search in Google Scholar

Judd, Gleason, and Lawrence S. Rothenberg. 2020. “Flexibility or Stability? Analyzing Proposals to Reform the Separation of Powers.” American Journal of Political Science 64 (2): 309–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12446.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Frances E., and Nolan McCarty, eds. 2019. Can America Govern Itself? New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108667357Search in Google Scholar

Lieberman, Robert C., Suzanne Mettler, and Kenneth M. Roberts, eds. 2021. Democratic Resilience: Can the United States Withstand Rising Polarization? New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108999601Search in Google Scholar

Lipka, Michael, and Elisa Shearer. 2023. “Audiences Are Declining for Traditional News Media in the U.S.—With Some Exceptions.” Pew Research Center, November 23.Search in Google Scholar

Loewenstein, George, and Nick Chater. 2017. “Putting Nudges in Perspective.” Behavioural Public Policy 1 (1): 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2016.7.Search in Google Scholar

McCarty, Nolan, Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. 2016. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 2000. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reynolds, Molly E. 2017. Exceptions to the Rule: The Politics of Filibuster Limitations in the U.S. Senate. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.10.5040/9780815751267Search in Google Scholar

Rothenberg, Lawrence S. 2018. Policy Success in an Age of Gridlock: How the Toxic Substances Control Act Was Finally Reformed. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108628044Search in Google Scholar

Shor, Boris, and Nolan McCarty. 2022. “Two Decades of Polarization in American State Legislatures.” Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy 3 (3–4): 343–70. https://doi.org/10.1561/113.00000063.Search in Google Scholar

United States Executive Office of the President. 2016. Preparing for the Future of Artificial Intelligence. Technical Report. National Science and Technology Council.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Tian, Sílvia Majó-Vázquez, Rasmus K. Nielsen, and Sandra González-Bailón. 2020. “Exposure to News Grows Less Fragmented with an Increase in Mobile Access.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 46: 28678–83.10.1073/pnas.2006089117Search in Google Scholar

Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina, Maria Petrova, and Ruben Enikolopov. 2020. “Political Effects of the Internet and Social Media.” Annual Review of Economics 12 (1): 415–38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-050239.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2025-12-30

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 9.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/for-2025-2034/html
Scroll to top button