Model Legislation and the Diffusion of LGBTQ Policies
-
Scott J. LaCombe
,
Margot Audero
Abstract
The past decade has seen a dramatic surge in state LGBTQ policymaking, rising from a few dozen policies a year to hundreds of expansive and restrictive proposals, raising questions about what drives this rapid spread. A potential explanation is the growing mobilization of pro- and anti-LGBTQ interest groups at the state level due to federal gridlock. We investigate this dynamic by identifying model legislation for two prominent policies: bans on gender-affirming care and conversion therapy. Using text analysis, we track how legislative text spreads across states. We find extensive text borrowing in both policy areas (both from interest groups and other states), with interest groups playing a more central role in the network supporting gender-affirming care bans. States are significantly more likely to borrow policy language from others with similar partisan control, ideology, and legislative professionalism. These findings suggest that ideology-driven interest group activity is shaping the structure and pace of policy diffusion. In the wake of the 2024 election, these dynamics are likely to continue, accelerating state-level polarization in LGBTQ rights and restrictions.
References
Alliance. 2023a. “BREAKING: 20 States Have Passed Help Not Harm Laws.” Family Policy. https://familypolicyalliance.com.Search in Google Scholar
Alliance. 2023b. “BREAKING: Federal Judge Strikes Down Arkansas SAFE Act.” Family Policy. https://familypolicyalliance.com.Search in Google Scholar
American Civil Liberties Union. 2024. “Mapping Attacks on LGBTQ Rights in U.S. State Legislatures in 2024.” https://www.aclu.org (accessed February 02, 2025).Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, Gary L., and Liliana Montoro Donchik. 2016. “Privatizing Schooling and Policy Making: The American Legislative Exchange Council and New Political and Discursive Strategies of Education Governance.” Educational Policy 30 (2): 322–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814528794.Search in Google Scholar
Baka, Jennifer, Arielle Hesse, Kate J. Neville, Erika Weinthal, and Karen Bakker. 2020. “Disclosing Influence: Hydraulic Fracturing, Interest Groups, and State Policy Processes in the United States.” Energy Research and Social Science 70: 101734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101734.Search in Google Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth, Kohei Watanabe, Haiyan Wang, Nulty Paul, Adam Obeng, Stefan Müller, et al.. 2018. “Quanteda: An R Package for the Quantitative Analysis of Textual Data.” Journal of Open Source Software 3 (30): 774. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00774.Search in Google Scholar
Berry, Frances Stokes, and William D. Berry. 1990. “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis.” American Political Science Review 84 (2): 395–415. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963526.Search in Google Scholar
Bishin, Benjamin George, Thomas Joseph Hayes, Matthew Benjamin Incantalupo, and Charles Anthony Smith. 2021. Elite-Led Mobilization and Gay Rights: Dispelling the Myth of Mass Opinion Backlash. University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.11927173Search in Google Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J., Mark Brockway, Bruce Desmarais, Jeffrey Harden, Scott LaCombe, Fridolin Linder, et al.. 2020. “SPID: A New Database for Inferring Public Policy Innovativeness and Diffusion Networks.” Policy Studies Journal 48 (2): 517–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12357.Search in Google Scholar
Boushey, Graeme. 2010. Policy Diffusion Dynamics in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511778834Search in Google Scholar
Callaghan, Timothy, Andrew Karch, and Mary Kroeger. 2020. “Model State Legislation and Intergovernmental Tensions over the Affordable Care Act, Common Core, and the Second Amendment.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 50 (3): 518–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjaa012.Search in Google Scholar
Collingwood, Loren, Stephen Omar El-Khatib, and Benjamin Gonzalez O’Brien. 2019. “Sustained Organizational Influence: American Legislative Exchange Council and the Diffusion of Anti-sanctuary Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 47 (3): 735–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12284.Search in Google Scholar
DeMora, Stephanie L., Loren Collingwood, and Adriana Ninci. 2019. “The Role of Super Interest Groups in Public Policy Diffusion.” Policy and Politics 47 (4): 513–41. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319x15659214258414.Search in Google Scholar
Dick, Hannah. 2021. “Advocating for the Right: Alliance Defending Freedom and the Rhetoric of Christian Persecution.” Feminist Legal Studies 29 (3): 375–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-021-09468-0.Search in Google Scholar
Dorrell, Robert M., and Joshua M. Jansa. 2022. “Copy, Paste, Legislate, Succeed? The Effect of Policy Plagiarism on Policy Success.” Policy and Politics 50 (4): 605–23. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321x16445954252430.Search in Google Scholar
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. 2023. “Bachelor’s Degree or Higher by State.” Dataset https://fred.stlouisfed.org/release/tables?eid=391444rid=330.Search in Google Scholar
Garrett, Kristin N., and Joshua M. Jansa. 2015. “Interest Group Influence in Policy Diffusion Networks.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 15 (3): 387–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440015592776.Search in Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P. 2001. “Policy Diffusion as a Geographical Expansion of the Scope of Political Conflict: Same-Sex Marriage Bans in the 1990s.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 1 (1): 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000100100102.Search in Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Kenneth J. Meier. 1996. “The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict.” The Journal of Politics 58 (2): 332–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960229.Search in Google Scholar
Hansen, Eric R., and Joshua M. Jansa. 2021. “Complexity, Resources and Text Borrowing in State Legislatures.” Journal of Public Policy 41 (4): 752–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x20000252.Search in Google Scholar
Harjai, Kavish, Jeff McMillan, and Kimberlee Kruesi. 2023. Transgender Health: Comparing Model Bills to Real Proposals. Associated Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander. 2014. “Who Passes Business’s “Model Bills”? Policy Capacity and Corporate Influence in U.S. State Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (3): 582–602. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592714001601.Search in Google Scholar
Jansa, Joshua M., Eric R. Hansen, and Virginia H. Gray. 2019. “Copy and Paste Lawmaking: Legislative Professionalism and Policy Reinvention in the States.” American Politics Research 47 (4): 739–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x18776628.Search in Google Scholar
Kreitzer, Rebecca J., Kellen A. Kane, and Christopher Z. Mooney. 2019. “The Evolution of Morality Policy Debate: Moralization and Demoralization.” The Forum 17 (1): 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2019-0003.Search in Google Scholar
Kroeger, Mary A., Andrew Karch, and Timothy Callaghan. 2022. “Model Bills, State Imitation, and the Political Safeguards of Federalism.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 47 (4): 855–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12373.Search in Google Scholar
Mitchell, Joshua L., and Adam M. Butz. 2019. “Social Control Meets New Public Management: Examining the Diffusion of State Prison Privatization, 1979-2010.” Politics and Policy 47 (3): 506–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12309.Search in Google Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z. 1999. “The Politics of Morality Policy: Symposium Editor’s Introduction.” Policy Studies Journal 27 (4): 675–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01995.x.Search in Google Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z., and Mei-Hsien Lee. 1995. “Legislative Morality in the American States: the Case of Pre-roe Abortion Regulation Reform.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 599–627. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111646.Search in Google Scholar
Norrander, Barbara, and Clyde Wilcox. 2009. Understanding Public Opinion. SAGE.Search in Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 2017. “A Squire Index Update.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 17 (4): 361–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440017713314.Search in Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 2024. “A Squire Index Update: Stability and Change in Legislative Professionalization, 1979–2021.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 24 (1): 110–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/spq.2023.22.Search in Google Scholar
Strate, John, and Marvin Zalman. 2004. “Interest Group Lobbying on a Morality Policy Issue: The Case of Physician-Assisted Suicide in Michigan.” American Review of Politics 24: 321. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2003.24.0.321-342.Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, Jami, Andrew Flores, Donald Haider-Markel, Daniel Lewis, and Patrick Miller. 2024. “American Federalism: A Blessing and a Curse for Transgender Rights.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 54 (3): 511–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjae016.Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, Jami K., Donald P. Haider-Markel, and Daniel C. Lewis. 2018. The Remarkable Rise of Transgender Rights. University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.9448956Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, Jami K., Daniel C. Lewis, and Donald P. Haider-Markel. 2020. “LGBTQ Policy and Fragmented Federalism in the U.S.” State and Local Government Review 52 (4): 255–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x21990839.Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. 2023a. “American Community Survey (ACS) 1-Year Estimates: Population by Sex.” Dataset https://data.census.gov.Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. 2023b. “American Community Survey (ACS) 1-Year Estimates: S1901Income in the past 12 Months (In 2023 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars).” Dataset https://data.census.gov.Search in Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations Among the American States.” American Political Science Review 63 (3): 880–99. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954434.Search in Google Scholar
Warshaw, Christopher and Chris Tausanovitch. 2022. “Subnational Ideology and Presidential Vote Estimates (V2022).” Harvard Dataverse 1.Search in Google Scholar
Wen, Yuni. 2024. “Informational Lobbying, Information Asymmetry, and the Adoption of the Ride-Hailing Model Policy in the U.S. States.” Business and Politics 26 (3): 1–32, https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2024.1.Search in Google Scholar
Yingling, Dylan L., and Daniel J. Mallinson. 2024. “Courts-First Federalism: How Model Legislation Becomes Impact Litigation.” Perspectives on Politics 22 (4): 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592724000616.Search in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2025-2023).
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
