Home Blame, Policy Feedback, and the Politics of Student Debt Relief Policy
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Blame, Policy Feedback, and the Politics of Student Debt Relief Policy

  • Mallory E. SoRelle EMAIL logo and Serena Laws
Published/Copyright: July 1, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Less than 1 year after President Biden announced a sweeping plan to reduce – and in many cases eliminate – the student loan burden for the 46 million Americans who hold educational debt, the Supreme Court ruled the proposal unconstitutional in Biden v. Nebraska. Media accounts immediately speculated about whether the Court’s actions would spell trouble for the President’s reelection efforts, presuming that voters would punish Biden for a perceived policy failure. Despite, or perhaps because of, these concerns, the administration has continued to pursue student debt forgiveness through other means, and highlighting these efforts has been a key component of the president’s re-election strategy. Prior research suggests that Democrats, and the president in particular, stand to benefit electorally from pursuing student debt relief. But did the Supreme Court’s decision to block the president’s plan change who voters hold accountable for the problem of student loan debt? And to what extent is the issue motivating voters from different constituencies in 2024? This study leverages insights from an original survey experiment fielded in August 2023 to explore the dynamics of blame attribution for federal student debt cancellation efforts. We find that, contrary to media speculation, voters place much greater blame on the Supreme Court and congressional Republicans for the problem of student debt, while President Biden receives relatively little blame. We consider the implications of these findings for the short-term electoral politics of student debt relief policy as well as the increasingly salient politics of debt relief more broadly.


Corresponding author: Mallory E. SoRelle, Assistant Professor, Duke University, Durham, USA, E-mail:

References

Ajzen, Icek. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t.Search in Google Scholar

Ajzen, Icek, and Martin Fishbein. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 2009. Agendas and Instability in American Politics, 2nd ed.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Binkley, Collin. 2018. “Obama-Era Rule Leads to $150M in Student Loan Forgiveness.” Chicago Sun Times. https://chicago.suntimes.com/2018/12/14/18430550/obama-era-rule-leads-to-150m-in-student-loan-forgiveness (accessed May 1, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Bolsen, Toby. 2011. “The Construction of News: Energy Crises, Advocacy Messages, and Frames toward Conservation.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 16 (2): 143–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161210392782.Search in Google Scholar

Bolsen, Toby, James N. Druckman, and Fay Lomax Cook. 2014. “The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion.” Political Behavior 36: 235–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400841318Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Jowei. 2013. “Voter Partisanship and the Effect of Distributive Spending on Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (1): 200–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00613.x.Search in Google Scholar

Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman. 2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10 (1): 103–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054.Search in Google Scholar

Chong, Dennis, Jack Citrin, and Patricia Conley. 2001. “When Self-Interest Matters.” Political Psychology 22 (3): 541–70.10. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00253.Search in Google Scholar

Cordray, Richard. 2022. “Letter to Public Service Workers.” Federal Student Aid.Search in Google Scholar

Crowley, Stacy. 2023. “How Millions of Borrowers Got $127 Billion in Student Loans Canceled.” New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/11/business/student-loans-debt-cancellation.html (accessed April 11, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Dinerstein, Michael, Constantine Yannelis, and Ching-Tse Chen. 2023. Debt Moratoria: Evidence from Student Loan Forbearance. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 31247. https://www.nber.org/papers/w31247 (accessed May 1, 2024).10.3386/w31247Search in Google Scholar

Druckman, James N. 2004. “Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)Relevance of Framing Effects.” American Political Science Review 98 (4): 671–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404041413.Search in Google Scholar

Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.Search in Google Scholar

Faricy, Christopher, and Christopher Ellis. 2014. “Public Attitudes Toward Social Spending in the United States: The Differences Between Direct Spending and Tax Expenditures.” Political Behavior 36: 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9225-5.Search in Google Scholar

Galvin, Daniel J., and Chloe N. Thurston. 2017. “The Democrats’ Misplaced Faith in Policy Feedback.” In The Forum, Vol. 15, 333–43. De Gruyter.10.1515/for-2017-0020Search in Google Scholar

Gamson, William A., and Andre Modigliani. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213.Search in Google Scholar

Gilens, Martin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226293660.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hacker, Jacob S. 1998. “The Historical Logic of National Health Insurance: Structure and Sequence in the Development of British, Canadian, and U.S. Medical Policy.” Studies in American Political Development 12 (1): 57–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X98001308.Search in Google Scholar

Hackett, Ursula. 2019. “Attenuated Governance: How Policymakers Insulate Private School Choice from Legal Challenge.” Policy Studies Journal 47 (2): 237–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12327.Search in Google Scholar

Hanson, Melanie. 2023. Average Student Loan Payment. EducationData.org. May 30. https://educationdata.org/average-student-loan-payment (accessed April 1, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Haselswerdt, Jake. 2020. “Carving Out: Isolating the True Effect of Self-Interest on Policy Attitudes.” American Political Science Review 114 (4): 1103–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055420000465.Search in Google Scholar

Heider, Fritz. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.10.1037/10628-000Search in Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto. 1990. “Framing Responsibility for Political Issues: The Case of Poverty.” Political Behavior 12 (1): 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992330.Search in Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto, and Sean J. Westwood. 2015. “Fear and Loathing Across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152.Search in Google Scholar

Kanno-Youngs, Zolan. 2024. “Biden Chips Away at Student Loan Debt, Bit by Bit, Amid High Expectations.” New York Times. February 21. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/21/us/politics/biden-student-loan-forgiveness-debt.html (accessed April 11, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W. 1984. “Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies.” Boston: Little, Brown.Search in Google Scholar

Kreitzer, Rebecca J., Elizabeth A. Maltby, and Candis W. Smith. 2022. “Fifty Shades of Deservingness: An Analysis of State-Level Variation and Effect of Social Constructions on Policy Outcomes.” Journal of Public Policy 42 (3): 436–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x21000222.Search in Google Scholar

Lacombe, Matthew J. 2022. “Post-Loss Power Building: The Feedback Effects of Policy Loss on Group Identity and Collective Action.” Policy Studies Journal 50 (3): 507–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12446.Search in Google Scholar

Liptak, Adam. 2022. “An ‘Imperial Supreme Court’ Asserts its Power, Alarming Scholars.” New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/19/us/politics/supreme-court-power.html (Accessed May 2, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Mason, Lilliana. 2016. “A Cross-Cutting Calm: How Social Sorting Drives Affective Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (S1): 351–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw001.Search in Google Scholar

Mason, Lilliana, and Julie Wronski. 2018. “One Tribe to Bind Them All: How Our Social Group Attachments Strengthen Partisanship.” Political Psychology 39 (S1): 257–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12485.Search in Google Scholar

McMahon, Kevin J. 2024. A Supreme Court unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226831077.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mettler, Suzanne. 2011. The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226521664.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mettler, Suzanne. 2014. Degrees of Inequality: How the Politics of Higher Education Sabotaged the American Dream. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Mettler, Suzanne, and Joe Soss. 2004. “The Consequences of Public Policy for Cemocratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (1): 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592704000623.Search in Google Scholar

Mettler, Suzanne, Lawrence R. Jacobs, and Ling Zhu. 2023. “Policy Threat, Partisanship, and the Case of the Affordable Care Act.” American Political Science Review 117 (1): 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055422000612.Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, Thomas E., Rosalee A. Clawson, and Zoe M. Oxley. 1997. “Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and its Effect on Tolerance.” American Political Science Review 91 (3): 567–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952075.Search in Google Scholar

Parker, Kim. 2019. The Growing Partisan Divide in Views of Higher Education. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2019/08/19/the-growing-partisan-divide-in-views-of-higher-education-2/ (accessed April 13, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Patashnik, Eric M. 2009. Reforms at Risk: What happens After Major Policy Changes are Enacted. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400828852Search in Google Scholar

Patashnik, Eric M. 2023. Countermobilization: Policy Feedback and Backlash in a Polarized Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226829883.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Patashnik, Eric M., and Julian E. Zelizer. 2013. “The Struggle to Remake Politics: Liberal Reform and the Limits of Policy Feedback in the Contemporary American State.” Perspectives on Politics 11 (4): 1071–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592713002831.Search in Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Aaron. 2021. “Submerged for Some? Government Visibility, Race, and American Political Trust.” Perspectives on Politics 19 (4): 1098–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592720002200.Search in Google Scholar

Sahar, Gail. 2014. “On the Importance of Attribution Theory in Political Psychology.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 8 (5): 229–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12102.Search in Google Scholar

Schermele, Zachary. 2024 “The Biden Administration Owes Student Debt Relief to Thousands. Many Haven’t Seen it Yet.” USA Today. February 28. https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2024/02/28/biden-owes-student-loan-debt-relief/72749567007/ (accessed May 1, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, Anne, and Helen Ingram. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2939044.Search in Google Scholar

Schram, Sanford, Joe Soss, and Richard Fording, eds. 2003. Race and the Politics of Welfare Reform. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.11932Search in Google Scholar

Sniderman, Paul M., and Sean M. Theriault. 2004. “The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing.” Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change 3 (3): 133–65.10.1515/9780691188386-007Search in Google Scholar

SoRelle, Mallory E. 2020. Democracy Declined: The Failed Politics of Consumer Financial Protection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226711829.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

SoRelle, Mallory E. 2022. “From Personal Responsibility to Political Mobilization: Using Attribution Frames to Overcome Policy Feedback Effects.” American Politics Research 50 (2): 173–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x211063215.Search in Google Scholar

SoRelle, Mallory E. 2023. “Privatizing Financial Protection: Regulatory Feedback and the Politics of Financial Reform.” American Political Science Review 117 (3): 985–1003. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055422001071.Search in Google Scholar

SoRelle, Mallory E., and Serena Laws. 2023. “The Political Benefits of Student Loan Debt Relief.” Research & Politics 10 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680231174079.Search in Google Scholar

SoRelle, Mallory E., and Serena Laws. 2024. “Deservingness and the Politics of Student Debt Relief.” Perspectives on Politics 22 (2): 372–390. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592723001457.Search in Google Scholar

SoRelle, Mallory E., and Delphia Shanks. 2024. “The Policy Acknowledgement Gap: Explaining (Mis)perceptions of Government Social Program Use.” Policy Studies Journal 52 (1): 47–71, https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12513.Search in Google Scholar

Sparks, Holloway. 2003. “Queens, Teens and Model Mothers.” In Race and the Politics of Welfare Reform, edited by S. Schram, J. Soss, and F. Richard, pp. 171–95. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar

Thurston, Chloe N. 2018. At the Boundaries of Homeownership: Credit, Discrimination, and the American State. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108380058Search in Google Scholar

van Oorschot, Wim. 2000. “Who Should Get What, and Why? On Deservingness Criteria and the Conditionality of Solidarity Among the Public.” Policy & Politics 28 (1): 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1332/0305573002500811.Search in Google Scholar

Velez, Erin, Melissa Cominole, and Alexander Bentz. 2019. “Debt Burden After College: The Effect of Student Loan Debt on Graduates’ Employment, Additional Schooling, Family Formation, and Home Ownership.” Education Economics 27 (2): 186–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1541167.Search in Google Scholar

Weiner, Bernard. 1985. “An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion.” Psychological Review 92 (4): 548–73. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.92.4.548.Search in Google Scholar

Weiner, Bernard. 2006. Social Motivation, Justice, and the Moral Emotions: An Attributional Approach. Psychology Press.10.4324/9781410615749Search in Google Scholar

Westwood, Sean J., Shanto Iyengar, Stefaan Walgrave, Rafael Leonisio, Luis Miller, and Oliver Strijbis. 2018. “The Tie that Divides: Cross-National Evidence of the Primacy of Partyism.” European Journal of Political Research 57 (2): 333–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12228.Search in Google Scholar

White House. 2022. “Fact Sheet: President Biden Announces Student Loan Relief for Borrowers Who Need it Most.” August 24. White House Statements and Releases. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/08/24/fact-sheet-president-biden-announces-student-loan-relief-for-borrowers-who-need-it-most/ (accessed January 31, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

White House. 2024. “President Joe Biden Outlines New Plans to Deliver Student Debt Relief to Over 30 Million Americans Under the Biden-⁠Harris Administration.” White House Statements and Releases. April 8. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/04/08/president-joe-biden-outlines-new-plans-to-deliver-student-debt-relief-to-over-30-million-americans-under-the-biden-harris-administration/ (accessed August 4, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-07-01

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/for-2024-2009/html
Scroll to top button