Home The Post-Brown Era in Judicial Policymaking
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Post-Brown Era in Judicial Policymaking

  • Thomas F. Burke EMAIL logo and Jeb Barnes
Published/Copyright: July 31, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Brown v. Board of Education marked the beginning of a long era in American politics in which courts, litigation and legal rights were associated with progressive causes. That association, however, is now eroding. The left’s discontent with the Supreme Court is well known, but less attention has been paid to liberal concerns about judicial policymaking – including some of the very mechanisms honed by liberals in the Brown era – that go well beyond the Court. The Brown era obscured a simple truth about lawsuits that the next few years are likely to clarify: They are much better at gumming things up than they are at making things work. Policymaking through litigation, though associated with liberals in the Brown era, in fact reflects a deep distrust of centralized governance. Given that it is conservatives, not liberals, who are more often interested in constraining government, this makes lawsuits ordinarily a more congenial policy tool for Republicans than Democrats. For many elements of the Democratic agenda of the next few years, litigation is likely to prove a clumsy tool, more effective in the hands of opponents than proponents.


Corresponding author: Thomas F. Burke, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA, USA, E-mail:

References

Adelman, D. E., and R. L. Glicksman. 2018. “Presidential and Judicial Politics in Environmental Litigation.” Ariz. St. LJ 50: 3.Search in Google Scholar

Bagley, N. 2019. “The Procedure Fetish.” Mich.L.Rev. Mich. Law Rev. 118: 345, https://doi.org/10.36644/mlr.118.3.procedure.Search in Google Scholar

Barnett, K., and C. J. Walker. 2017. “Chevron in the Circuit Courts.” Mich. L. Rev. 116: 1. https://doi.org/10.36644/mlr.116.1.chevron.Search in Google Scholar

Bennon, M., and D. Wilson. 2023. “NEPA Litigation over Large Energy and Transport Infrastructure Projects.” Env’t L. Rep. 53: 10836.Search in Google Scholar

Berrey, E., R. L. Nelson, and L. B. Nielsen. 2017. Rights on Trial: How Workplace Discrimination Law Perpetuates Inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226466996.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Britschgi, C. 2023. “The Abundance Agenda Promises Everything All at Once.” Reason, December 2023. reason.com/2023/11/12/the-abundance-agenda-promises-everything-to-everyone-all-at-once/Search in Google Scholar

Brown, S. P. 2002. Trumping Religion: The New Christian Right, the Free Speech Clause, and the Courts. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bumiller, K. 1992. The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore: JHU Press.Search in Google Scholar

Burbank, S. B., and S. Farhang. 2021. “A New (Republican) Litigation State?” UC Irvine L. Rev. 11: 657.10.2139/ssrn.3565995Search in Google Scholar

Burke, T. F. 2002. Lawyers, Lawsuits, and Legal Rights: The Battle Over Litigation in American Society. Berkeley: Univ of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Burke, T. F., and J. Barnes. 2018. “The Civil Rights Template and the Americans with Disabilities Act.” In The Rights Revolution Revisited, edited by L.G. Dodd, 167–196. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Burns, K., and L. E. Fox. 2022. “The Impact of the 2021 Expanded Child Tax Credit on Child Poverty.” US Census Bureau SEHSD Working Paper #2022-24. https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/2022/demo/SEHSD-wp2022-24.html.Search in Google Scholar

Center for American Progress. 2023. “NEPA Permitting Process Crucial to Renewable Infrastructure Project Success.” https://www.americanprogress.org/article/nepa-permitting-process-crucial-to-renewable-infrastructure-project-success/.Search in Google Scholar

Chafetz, J. 2023. “The New Judicial Power Grab.” St. Louis ULJ 67: 635.Search in Google Scholar

Chellam, M. D. 2022. “The What, How and Why of Abundance.” Modern Power/Substack. https://modernpower.substack.com/p/whathowwhyofabundance.Search in Google Scholar

Coffee, J. C. 2015. Entrepreneurial Litigation: Its Rise, Fall, and Future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674287075Search in Google Scholar

Council of Economic Advisors. 2024. “Economic Report of the President.” https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/ERP-2024.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Davenport, C. 2024. “Biden Administration Moves to Speed Up Permits for Clean Energy.” The New York Times, April 30, 2024.Search in Google Scholar

Decker, J. 2016. The Other Rights Revolution: Conservative Lawyers and the Remaking of American Government. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190467302.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dougherty, C. 2020. Golden Gates: Fighting for Housing in America. New York: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Edelman, L. B. 2020. Working Law: Courts, Corporations, and Symbolic Civil Rights. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Farhang, S. 2010. The Litigation State: Public Regulation and Private Lawsuits in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400836789Search in Google Scholar

Felstiner, W. L., R. L. Abel, and A. Sarat. 1980. “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming.” Law & Soc’y Rev. 631. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053505.Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, A. D. 1978. “Legitimizing Racial Discrimination through Antidiscrimination Law: A Critical Review of Supreme Court Doctrine.” Minn. L. Rev. 62: 1049.Search in Google Scholar

Galanter, M. 1974. “Why the Haves Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law & Soc’y Rev. 9: 95. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053023.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, J. L. 2023. “Losing Legitimacy: The Challenges of the Dobbs Ruling to Conventional Legitimacy Theory.” Amer. J. Pol. Sci. 68: 1041, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AO71YJ.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, J. L. 2024. “Do The Effects of Unpopular Supreme Court Rulings Linger? the Dobbs Decision Rescinding Abortion Rights.” Amer. Po. Sci. Rev. 118: 1, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055424000169.Search in Google Scholar

Grove, T. L. 2019. “The Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Dilemma.” Harv. Law. Rev. 1132: 2240.Search in Google Scholar

Helmore, Edward, and Vargas Ramon Antonio. 2022. ““They Set a Torch to it”: Warren Says Court Lost Legitimacy with Roe Reversal.” The Guardian, June 26, 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/26/elizabeth-warren-democrats-question-supreme-court-legitimacy.Search in Google Scholar

Hollis-Brusky, A. 2015. Ideas with Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hollis-Brusky, A., and J. C. Wilson. 2020. Separate but Faithful: The Christian Right’s Radical Struggle to Transform Law & Legal Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190637262.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kagan, R. A. 2019. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674242678Search in Google Scholar

Keck, T. M. 2014. Judicial Politics in Polarized Times. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226182551.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Klein, Ezra. 2022. “What America Needs Is a Liberalism that Builds.” The New York Times, March 29, 2022.Search in Google Scholar

Kritzer, H. M., and S. S. Silbey. 2003. In Litigation: do the “Haves” Still Come Out Ahead? Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lawrence, C. R. 1987. “The Id, the Ego, and Equal Protection: Reckoning with Unconscious Racism.” Stan. Law Rev 39: 317, https://doi.org/10.2307/1228797.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, E. Y., and A. G. Rutherford. 2022. “Quicker but Less Dirty: The Biden Administration Both Streamlines and Seeks to Expand.” Construction Lawyer 41 (4): 17–26.Search in Google Scholar

McCann, M. 1987. Taking Reform Seriously: Perspectives on Public Interest Liberalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McConnell, G. 1966. Private Power and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.Search in Google Scholar

Melnick, R. S. 2004. “Courts and Agencies.” In Making Policy, Making Law: An Interbranch Perspective, edited by M. C. Miller, and J. Barnes, 89–104. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Michaels, J. D., and D. L. Noll. 2022. “Vigilante Federalism.” Cornell L. Rev. 108: 1187.Search in Google Scholar

Molotch, H. 1976. “The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place.” Amer. J. Soc. 82: 309. https://doi.org/10.1086/226311.Search in Google Scholar

Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States. 2021. Final Report, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/SCOTUS-Report-Final-12.8.21-1.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Putnam, R. D., and S. R. Garrett. 2020. The Upswing: How America Came Together a Century Ago and How We Can do it Again. New York: Simon and Schuster.Search in Google Scholar

Rosenberg, G. N. 2023. The Hollow Hope: can Courts Bring About Social Change?, 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226312507.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ruhl, J. B., and J. Salzman. 2020. “What Happens when the Green New Deal Meets the Old Green Laws?” Vt. L. Rev. 44: 693.Search in Google Scholar

Ruhl, J. B., and J. Salzman. 2023. “The Greens’ Dilemma: Building Tomorrow’s Climate Infrastructure Today.” Emory LJ 73: 1.Search in Google Scholar

Ruple, J. C., and K. M. Race. 2020. “Measuring the NEPA Litigation Burden.” Environ. Law 50: 479.Search in Google Scholar

Sabin, P. 2021. Public Citizens: The Attack on Big Government and the Remaking of American Liberalism. New York: WW Norton & Company.Search in Google Scholar

Shapiro, M. 1966. Freedom of Speech: The Supreme Court and Judicial Review. New York: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Shapiro, M. 1968. The Supreme Court and Administrative Agencies. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shapiro, M. 1988. Who Guards the Guardians? Judicial Control of Administration. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Search in Google Scholar

Spence, D. B. 2019. “Regulation and the New Politics of (Energy) Market Entry.” Notre Dame L. Rev. 95: 327.10.2139/ssrn.3342486Search in Google Scholar

Staszak, S. 2024. Privatizing Justice: Arbitration and the Decline of Public Governance in the U.S. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780197771723.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Stewart, R. B. 1974. “The Reformation of American Administrative Law.” Harv. L. Rev. 88: 1667. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340207.Search in Google Scholar

Stokes, L. C., E. Franzblau, J. R. Lovering, and C. Miljanich. 2023. “Prevalence and Predictors of Wind Energy Opposition in North America.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120 (40): https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2302313120.Search in Google Scholar

Sturm, S. 2001. “Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach.” Colum. Law Rev. 101: 458. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123737.Search in Google Scholar

Talesh, S. A. 2009. “The Privatization of Public Legal Rights: How Manufacturers Construct the Meaning of Consumer Law.” Law & Soc’y Rev. 43: 527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00381.x.Search in Google Scholar

Talesh, S. A. 2013. “How the “Haves” Come Out Ahead in the Twenty-First Century.” DePaul Law Rev. 62: 519.Search in Google Scholar

Tankersly, J., and C. Dougherty. 2024. “Biden Suggests a Bigger Federal Role to Reduce Housing Costs.” The New York Times, March 21, 2024.Search in Google Scholar

Teles, S. M. 2008. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400829699Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, D. 2022. “A Simple Plan to Solve All of America’s Problems.” The Atlantic, January 12, 2022.Search in Google Scholar

Vladeck, S. 2023. The Shadow Docket: How the Supreme Court Uses Stealth Rulings to Amass Power and Undermine the Republic. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Winkler, A. 2018. We the Corporations: How American Businesses Won Their Civil Rights. New York: Liveright Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Zambrano, D. A., N. Guha, A. Peters, and J. Xia. 2023. “Private Enforcement in the States.” U. Pa. L. Rev. 172: 61. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4365144.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-07-31

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 21.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/for-2024-2008/html
Scroll to top button