Home Affluence and the Demand-side for Policy Improvements: Exploring Elite Beliefs About Vulnerability to Societal Problems
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Affluence and the Demand-side for Policy Improvements: Exploring Elite Beliefs About Vulnerability to Societal Problems

  • Alan S. Gerber EMAIL logo , Mackenzie Lockhart and Eric M. Patashnik
Published/Copyright: July 29, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

An important stylized fact about American government is that many societal problems persist despite expert recognition that better outcomes are technically feasible. What explains the weakness of the political demand for more effective public policies? This study investigates one factor that may contribute to the attenuated demand for policy improvements: namely, the belief among many affluent citizens that they are personally insulated from societal problems. Drawing on a national public opinion survey, we show that affluent Americans believe their resources and ability to activate powerful social networks affords them a measure of personal insulation from key problems in areas such as education, healthcare and neighborhood safety. We also find that the affluent express a more optimistic view than other respondents of the average citizen’s financial situation and capacity to manage problems in several domains. Taken together, our results have important implications for understanding how highly influential Americans think about public policy in an era of inequality.


Corresponding author: Alan S.Gerber, Yale University, New Haven, USA, E-mail:

References

Adler, N. E., E. S. Epel, G. Castellazzo, and J. R. Ickovics. 2000. “Relationship of Subjective and Objective Social Status with Psychological and Physiological Functioning: Preliminary Data in Healthy, White Women.” Health Psychology 19 (6): 586. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.19.6.586.Search in Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 1996. “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 194–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111700.Search in Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, K. E., P. V. Marsden, and J. S. Hurlbert. 1986. “Social Resources and Socioeconomic Status.” Social Networks 8 (1): 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-8733(86)80017-x.Search in Google Scholar

Emanuel, E. J., E. Gudbranson, J. Van Parys, M. Gørtz, J. Helgeland, and J. Skinner. 2021. “Comparing Health Outcomes of Privileged US Citizens with Those of Average Residents of Other Developed Countries.” JAMA Internal Medicine 181 (3): 339–44. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.7484.Search in Google Scholar

Feldman, S. 1988. “Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: The Role of Core Beliefs and Values.” American Journal of Political Science: 416–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111130.Search in Google Scholar

Gerber, Alan S., and Eric M. Patashnik, eds. 2006. Promoting the General Welfare: New Perspectives on Government Performance. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gilens, Martin 2012. Affluence & Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press and Russell Sage Foundation.10.1515/9781400844821Search in Google Scholar

Gilens, Martin, and Adam Thal. 2018. “Doing Well and Doing Good? How Concern for Others Shapes Policy Preferences and Partisanship Among Affluent Americans.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82 (2): 209–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy020.Search in Google Scholar

Grossmann, Matt, and David A. Hopkins. 2024. Polarized by Degrees: How the Diploma Divide and the Culture War Transformed American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009057141Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Poll. 2023. The Patient Experience: Perspectives on Today’s Healthcare. https://www.aapa.org/download/113513/?tmstv=1684243672 (accessed June 21, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Hetherington, M. J. 2005. Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691188690Search in Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691186740Search in Google Scholar

Kinder, D. R., and D. R. Kiewiet. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11 (2): 129–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400002544.Search in Google Scholar

Kuklinski, J. H., P. J. Quirk, J. Jerit, D. Schwieder, and R. F. Rich. 2000. “Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship.” The Journal of Politics 62 (3): 790–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00033.Search in Google Scholar

Kyne, D., and D. P. Aldrich. 2020. “Capturing Bonding, Bridging, and Linking Social Capital Through Publicly Available Data.” Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 11 (1): 61–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12183.Search in Google Scholar

Mijs, J. J., and E. L. Roe. 2021. “Is America Coming Apart? Socioeconomic Segregation in Neighborhoods, Schools, Workplaces, and Social Networks, 1970–2020.” Sociology Compass 15 (6): e12884. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12884.Search in Google Scholar

Mutz, D. C., and J. J. Mondak. 1997. “Dimensions of Sociotropic Behavior: Group-Based Judgements of Fairness and Well-Being.” American Journal of Political Science: 284–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111717.Search in Google Scholar

Patashnik, Eric M., Alan S. Gerber, and Conor M. Dowling. 2018. Unhealthy Politics: The Battle over Evidence-Based Medicine. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400888658Search in Google Scholar

Rigby, Elizabeth, and Gerald C. Wright. 2013. “Political Parties and Representation of the Poor in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science 57: 552–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12007.Search in Google Scholar

Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semi-sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Schuck, P. H. 2015. Why Government Fails So Often: And How it Can Do Better. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400850044Search in Google Scholar

Wang, X., T. Pei, C. Song, J. Chen, H. Shu, Y. Liu, S. Guo, and X. Chen. 2023. “How Does Socioeconomic Status Influence Social Relations? A Perspective from Mobile Phone Data.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 615: 128612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.128612.Search in Google Scholar

Wilensky, H. L. 2019. Rich Democracies: Political Economy, Public Policy, and Performance. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Witko, Christopher, Jana Morgan, Nathan J. Kelly, and Peter K. Enns. 2021. Hijacking the Agenda: Economic Power and Political Influence. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-07-29

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/for-2024-2007/html
Scroll to top button