Home Social Sciences “In the Mold of Justice Scalia”: The Contours & Consequences of the Trump Judiciary
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

“In the Mold of Justice Scalia”: The Contours & Consequences of the Trump Judiciary

  • Amanda Hollis-Brusky

    Amanda Hollis-Brusky is Associate Professor and Chair of the Politics Department at Pomona College. She is the author of Ideas with Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution (Oxford 2015; 2019) and Separate But Faithful: The Christian Right’s Radical Struggle to Transform Law and Legal Culture (Oxford 2020, with Joshua C. Wilson).

    EMAIL logo
    and Celia Parry

    Celia Parry is a Politics major at Pomona College and an editor at The Claremont Journal of Law and Public Policy.

Published/Copyright: July 28, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This article reviews the causes, contours and potential consequences of President Donald J. Trump’s 234 appointments to the federal judiciary. The causes will be familiar to political scientists who are fond of reminding people that “elections have consequences” and that the “Supreme Court [and by extension entire federal judiciary] follows the election returns.” The contours of the Trump Judiciary are congruent with Trump’s campaign promise to appoint judges “in the mold of Justice Scalia,” the conservative legal icon who died suddenly in February 2016. We show how Trump and Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell made good on this promise with the help of the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies, appointing ideologically conservative, young, and mostly male and white judges to lifetime appointments on the federal bench. In laying out the potential consequences of Trump’s remaking of the federal judiciary, we outline three areas where these judges are likely to make an impact on law and politics in the coming decades: rolling back liberal and progressive victories in the culture wars, likely in more subtle ways that align with Alison Gash’s concept of “below-the-radar” legal change; extending the federal deregulation campaign that began in earnest with the Reagan Administration; and issuing rulings in the areas of voting rights, campaign finance, and redistricting that tip the scales of democracy in favor of Republican electoral outcomes.


Corresponding author: Amanda Hollis-Brusky, Pomona CollegeClaremont, CA, USA, E-mail:

About the authors

Amanda Hollis-Brusky

Amanda Hollis-Brusky is Associate Professor and Chair of the Politics Department at Pomona College. She is the author of Ideas with Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution (Oxford 2015; 2019) and Separate But Faithful: The Christian Right’s Radical Struggle to Transform Law and Legal Culture (Oxford 2020, with Joshua C. Wilson).

Celia Parry

Celia Parry is a Politics major at Pomona College and an editor at The Claremont Journal of Law and Public Policy.

References

Adler, J. 2017. “How Scalia-Esque Will Donald Trump’s Supreme Court Nominee Be?” In Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/01/26/how-scalia-esque-will-donald-trumps-supreme-court-nominee-be/ (January 26, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

American Constitution Society. 2021. Diversity of the Federal Bench: Current Statistics on the Gender and Racial Diversity of the Article III Courts. https://www.acslaw.org/judicial-nominations/diversity-of-the-federal-bench/ (accessed February 6, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, R. 2017. “Federalist Society, White House Cooperation on Judges Paying Benefits.” In Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/federalist-society-white-house-cooperation-on-judges-paying-benefits/2017/11/18/4b69b4da-cb20-11e7-8321-481fd63f174d_story.html (November 18, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Bell, L. C. 2002. “Senatorial Discourtesy: The Senate’s Use of Delay to Shape the Federal Judiciary.” Political Research Quarterly 55 (3): 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290205500305.Search in Google Scholar

Berman, A. 2015. Give Us the Ballot: The Modern Struggle for Voting Rights in America. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar

Binder, S. A. and F. Maltzman. 2002. “Senatorial Delay in Confirming Federal Judges, 1947-1998.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 190–99. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088422.Search in Google Scholar

Bonica, A. and M. Sen. 2017. “A Common-Space Scaling of the American Judiciary and Legal Profession.” Political Analysis 25 (1): 114–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2016.10.Search in Google Scholar

Boot, M. 2020. “Trump has Appointed a Lot of Judges. But They Won’t Necessarily Do what He Wants.” In Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/12/02/trump-has-appointed-lot-judges-they-wont-necessarily-do-what-he-wants/ (December 2, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Boyd, C. L., M. S. Lynch, and A. J. Madonna. 2015. “Nuclear Fallout: Investigating the Effect of Senate Procedural Reform on Judicial Nominations.” The Forum 13 (4): 623–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2015-0042.Search in Google Scholar

Bradner, E. 2016. “New Poll Shows Clinton over Trump by Double-Digits.” In CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2016/10/23/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-presidential-polls (October 23, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Burke, T. 2004. Lawyers, Lawsuits and Litigation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Choi, J. 2021. “GOP AGs say House voting Rights Bill Unconstitutional.” In The Hill. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/541617-republican-ags-say-democrats-voting-rights-bill-is-unconstitutional.Search in Google Scholar

Christiansen, M. R. and W. N. Eskridge Jr. 2014. “Congressional Overrides of Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions, 1967-2011.” Texas Law Review 92: 1318–541.Search in Google Scholar

Clayton, C. and J. M. Pickerill. 2006. “The Politics of Criminal Justice: How the New Right Regime Shaped the Rehnquist Court’s Criminal Justice Jurisprudence.” The Georgetown Law Journal 94 (5): 1385.Search in Google Scholar

Curry, T. A. and M. S. Hurwitz. 2016. “Strategic Retirements of Elected and Appointed Justices: A Hazard Model Approach.” The Journal of Politics 78 (4): 1061–75. https://doi.org/10.1086/686024.Search in Google Scholar

Cui, I. 2021. “The Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Act Case Could Gut Civil Rights Protections. Then what?” In Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/03/15/supreme-courts-voting-rights-act-case-could-gut-civil-rights-protections-then-what/.Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, R. A. 1957. “The Supreme Court as a National Policy Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6: 279.Search in Google Scholar

Decker, J. 2016. The Other Rights Revolution: Conservative Lawyers and the Remaking of American Government. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190467302.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Epp, C. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226772424.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Epps, D. and G. Sitaraman. 2019. “How to Save the Supreme Court.” The Yale Law Journal 129 (1): 148–207. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ylr129&i=155.10.2139/ssrn.3288958Search in Google Scholar

Everett, B. and G. Thrush. 2016. “McConnell Throws Down the Gauntlet: No Scalia Replacement under Obama.” In Politico. https://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/mitch-mcconnell-antonin-scalia-supreme-court-nomination-219248 (February 13, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Gardner, A., K. Rabinowitz, and H. Stevens. 2021. “How GOP Backed Voting Measures Could Create Hurdles for Tens of Millions of Voters.” In Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2021/voting-restrictions-republicans-states/ (March 11, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Gash, A. L. 2015. Below the Radar: How Silence Can Save Civil Rights. Oxford University. Internet Archive, archive.org/details/belowtheradarhow0000gash/page/n7/mode/2up.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190201159.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gerhardt, M. J. 2003. “Judicial Selection as War.” UC Davis Law Review 36 (3): 667–94. (February 2003) https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/davlr36&i=685.Search in Google Scholar

Gerken, H. 2013. “Goodbye to the Crown Jewel of the Civil Rights Movement.” In Slate. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2013/06/supreme-court-and-the-voting-rights-act-goodbye-to-section-5.html (June 25, 2013).Search in Google Scholar

Gillman, H. 2008. “Courts and the Politics of Partisan Coalitions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, edited by Caldeira, G., Keleman, D. and Whittington, K. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0037Search in Google Scholar

Goldman, S. 2003. “Assessing the Senate Judicial Confirmation Process: Index of Obstruction and Delay.” Judicature 86 (5): 251–7(March–April 2003) https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/judica86&i=255.10.1016/B978-044451494-3/50008-1Search in Google Scholar

Grossmann, M. and D. A. Hopkins. 2016. Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190626594.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Guillén, Alex. and Paul. Demko. 2020. “How the New Supreme Court Could Stymie a Biden Presidency.” In Politico. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/25/supreme-court-regulations-biden-421934 (September 25, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Guttmacher Institute. 2021. An Overview of Abortion Laws. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-abortion-laws (accessed March 21, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Hagle, T. M. 1993. “Strategic Retirements: A Political Model of Turnover on the United States Supreme Court.” Political Behavior 15: 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993415.Search in Google Scholar

Hasen, R. 2021. “H. R. 1 Can’t Pass the Senate. But Here Are Some Voting Reforms that Could.” In Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/03/16/hr-1-voting-reforms/ (March 16, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Hasen, R. 2016. Plutocrats United: Campaign Money, the Supreme Court, and the Distortion of American Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hasen, R. 2013. “End of Dialogue?” Southern California Law Review 86 (2): 205–61.Search in Google Scholar

Hollis-Brusky, A. 2020. “The Supreme Court Closed the Door on LGBTQ Employment Discrimination. But it Opened a Window.” In The Monkey Cage. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/06/16/supreme-court-closed-door-lgbtq-employment-discrimination-it-opened-window/ (June 16, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Hollis-Brusky, A. 2019. Ideas with Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hollis-Brusky, A. 2018. “An Activist’s Court: Political Polarization and the Roberts Court.” In Parchment Barriers, edited by Courser, Z., Helland, E. and Miller, K. P. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.10.2307/j.ctv7n0c0s.8Search in Google Scholar

Hollis-Brusky, A. and J. C. Wilson. 2020. Separate but Faithful: The Christian Right’s Radical Struggle to Transform Law and Legal Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190637262.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hollis-Brusky, A. and J. C. Wilson 2017. “Playing for the Rules: How and Why New Christian Right Public Interest Law Firms Invest in Secular Litigation.” Law & Policy 39 (2): 121–41.10.1111/lapo.12075Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, K. R. 2017. “How Political Ideology Undermines Racial and Gender Diversity in Federal Judicial Selection: The Prospects for Judicial Diversity in the Trump Years.” Wisconsin Law Review 2017 (2): 345–66. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/wlr2017&i=353.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, K. 2021. “What the Rise and Fall of Jim Crow Laws Can Teach Today’s Voting Rights Advocates.” In The Monkey Cage. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/03/24/what-rise-fall-jim-crow-laws-can-teach-todays-voting-rights-advocates/ (March 24, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Kalman, L. 2005. “The Constitution, the Supreme Court, and the New Deal.” The American Historical Review 110 (4): 1052–80.10.1086/ahr.110.4.1052Search in Google Scholar

Karlan, P. 2012. “Democracy and Disdain.” Harvard Law Review 126.Search in Google Scholar

Katz, J. 2016. Presidential Forecast. https://www.nytimes.com/newsgraphics/2016/10/18/presidential-forecast-updates/newsletter.html accessed (April 6, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Keck, T. M. 2021. Biden Is Considering Overhauling the Supreme Court. That’s Happened during Every Crisis in U.S. Democracy. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/04/13/bidens-considering-reforming-supreme-court-thats-happened-during-every-crisis-us-democracy/ (April 13, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Keck, T. M. 2020. Court-Packing and Democratic Erosion: Cambridge University Press. (October 9, 2020, draft) https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3476889.Search in Google Scholar

Keck, T. M. 2014. Judicial Politics in Polarized Times. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226182551.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kim, S. Min. 2020. “Trump’s Conservative Imprint on the Federal Judiciary Gives Democrats a Playbook — if They Win.” In Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/court-barrett-senate-trump/2020/10/25/d9eed9c0-16bc-11eb-befb-8864259bd2d8_story.html (October 26, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Kitchen, A. J., P. Trivedi, D. Ng, and K. Mokbel. 2005. “Is There a Link between Breast Cancer and Abortion: a Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Fertility and Women’s Medicine 50 (6): 267–71. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16526417/.Search in Google Scholar

Klein, E. 2020. Why We’re Polarized. New York: Avid Reader Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lambda Legal. 2021. Courts, Confirmations, & Consequences: How Trump Restructured the Federal Judiciary and Ushered in a Climate of Unprecedented Hostility toward LGBTQ+ People and Civil Rights. Lambda Legal. https://www.lambdalegal.org/sites/default/files/judicial_report_2020.pdf (accessed February 3, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Langer, G., G. Holyk, and C. Kiewiet De Jonge. 2016. “Clinton Vaults to a Double-Digit Lead, Boosted by Broad Disapproval of Trump (POLL).” In ABC News. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-vaults-double-digit-lead-boosted-broad-disapproval/story?id=42993821 (October 23, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Lee, F. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226409184.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Li, M. 2019. Five Ways H.R. 1 Would Transform Redistricting. Brennan Center for Justice. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/five-ways-hr-1-would-transform-redistricting (June 19).Search in Google Scholar

Lithwick, D. and M. J. Stern. 2021. “Democrats Won the Senate. Can They Fix the Courts Now?” In Slate. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/01/biden-fight-for-courts-crisis.html (January 8, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Lopez, G. 2018. “Anthony Kennedy’s Retirement Is Devastating for LGBTQ Rights.” In Vox. https://www.vox.com/identities/2018/6/27/17510902/anthony-kennedy-retirement-lgbtq-gay-marriage-supreme-court (June 27, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Mann, T. and N. Ornstein. 2016. It’s Even Worse than it Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

McMillion, B. J. 2017. “The Blue Slip Process for U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations: Frequently Asked Questions.” In Congressional Research Service. October 2. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44975.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Millhiser, I. 2021. “Republicans Have an Agenda All Right, and They Don’t Need Congress for it.” In New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/30/opinion/republican-party-supreme-court.html (March 30, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Mortenson, J. and N. Bagley. 2021. “Delegation at the Founding.” Columbia Law Review 121: 277–367.10.2139/ssrn.3512154Search in Google Scholar

Mystal, E. 2021. “Biden’s Supreme Court Commission Is Designed to Fail.” In The Nation. https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/supreme-court-commission/.Search in Google Scholar

Neidig, H. 2016. “McConnell: Don’t Replace Scalia until after Election.” In The Hill. https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/269389-mcconnell-dont-replace-scalia-until-after-election (February 13, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Pew Research Center. 2018. Trends in Party Affiliation Among Demographic Groups. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/03/20/1-trends-in-party-affiliation-among-demographic-groups/ (March 20, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Pozen, D. E. 2019. “Hardball And/as Anti-hardball.” New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy 21 (4): 949–56 https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/nyulpp21&i=973.Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, Natan. 2020. “Legal Risk Hangs over Biden’s Climate Plans.” In Resources. https://www.resources.org/common-resources/legal-risk-hangs-over-bidens-climate-plans/ (December 14, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Rosenberg, G. 2008. The Hollow Hope, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226726687.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Rosenwald, B. 2019. Talk Radio’s America: How an Industry Took over a Political Party that Took Over the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674243224Search in Google Scholar

Scherer, N. and B. Miller. 2009. “The Federalist Society’s Influence on the Federal Judiciary.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (2): 366–78. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27759874.10.1177/1065912908317030Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, C. W. 2018. “The Forgotten Issue: The Supreme Court and the 2016 Presidential Campaign.” Chicago Kent Law Review 93 (2): 411–52. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/chknt93&i=437.Search in Google Scholar

Sherman, A. 2020. “In Context: Is There a ‘Biden Rule’ on Supreme Court Nominations in a Presidential Election Year?” In Politifact. https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/sep/21/context-there-biden-rule-supreme-court-nominations/ (September 21, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Siegel, J. R. 2018. “The Constitutional Case for Chevron Deference.” Vanderbilt Law Review 71 (3): 937–94.Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, G. 2009. Law’s Allure: How Law Shapes, Constrains, Saves and Kills Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511809934Search in Google Scholar

Spriggs, J. F. and P. J. Wahlbeck. 1995. “Calling it Quits: Strategic Retirement on the Federal Courts of Appeals, 1893-1991.” Political Research Quarterly 48 (3): 573–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299504800306.Search in Google Scholar

Sprunt, B. 2020. “Amy Coney Barrett Confirmed to Supreme Court, Takes Constitutional Oath.” In NPR. https://www.npr.org/2020/10/26/927640619/senate-confirms-amy-coney-barrett-to-the-supreme-court. (October 26, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Stabenow, D., S. C. Schumer, and S. S. Whitehouse. 2020. Captured Courts. Washington: Democratic Policy and Communications Committee. https://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/DPCC%20Captured%20Courts%20EMBARGOED%20to%205-27.pdf (June, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Stern, M. J. 2020. “Trump Judge: COVID Business Closures Violate Employers’ Constitutional Rights.” In Slate. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/09/pennsylvania-covid-trump-judge-lochner.html (September 15, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Stern, M. J. 2021a. “The Supreme Court Broke its Own Rules to Radically Redefine Religious Liberty.” In Slate. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/04/supreme-court-religious-liberty-covid-california.html (April 12, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Stern, M. J. 2021b. “Trump Judge Issues Bizarre, Unenforceable Injunction against Biden’s Deportation Pause.” In Slate. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/01/trump-judge-injunction-biden-deportation-pause.html (January 26, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Syed, M. 2020. “Charting the Long-Term Impact of Trump’s Judicial Appointments.” In ProPublica. https://projects.propublica.org/trump-young-judges/ (October 30, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Teles, S. 2008. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400829699Search in Google Scholar

Teles, S. and R. Saldin. 2020. Never Trump. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190880446.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Tushnet, M. 2004. “Constitutional Hardball.” UIC John Marshall Law Review 37: 523. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/12916580/Constitutional%20Hardball%2037%20J.%20Marshall%20L.%20Rev.%20523%20%282004%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.Search in Google Scholar

United States Government. Judgeship Appointments by President. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/apptsbypres.pdf (accessed February 3, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Vandewalker, I. and K. Morris. 2020. “The Reform Law Needed to Counter Citizens United: H.R. 1.” Brennan Center for Justice. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/reform-law-needed-counter-citizens-united-hr-1 (January 21).Search in Google Scholar

Weber, M., C. Tremblay, G. D. Carli, A. Chung, L. Hurley, and C. Chan. 2021. “Courting Change.” In Reuters Graphics. https://graphics.reuters.com/TRUMP-EFFECT-COURTS/010080E30TG/index.html.Search in Google Scholar

Wheeler, R. 2018. “Senate Obstructionism Handed a Raft of Judicial Vacancies to Trump – what Has He Done with Them?” In Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2018/06/04/senate-obstructionism-handed-judicial-vacancies-to-trump/ (June 4, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, J. C. 2016. The New States of Abortion Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503600539Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, J. C. and A. Hollis-Brusky. 2020. “The Supreme Court’s Culture War Whiplash Is All in Your Head.” In Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-courts-culture-war-whiplash-all-your-head-opinion-1516631 (July 9, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Windett, J., J. J. Harden, M. Hazelton, and M. Hall. 2020. “Amy Coney Barrett Is Conservative. New Data Shows Us How Conservative.” In Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/10/22/amy-coney-barrett-is-one-most-conservative-appeals-court-justices-40-years-our-new-study-finds/ (October 22, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Ziegler, M. 2020. Abortion and the Law in America: Roe V. Wade to the Present. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108653138Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, L. 2019. “Study: Trump’s Judicial Appointees Are More Conservative Than Those of Past Republican Presidents.” In Vox. https://www.vox.com/2019/1/25/18188541/trump-judges-mconnell-senate (January 25, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-07-28

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/for-2021-0006/html
Scroll to top button