Does Judicial Selection Affect Judicial Performance? Evidence from a Natural Experiment

References

American Bar Association Commission on the 21st Century Judiciary. 2003. Justice in Jeopardy. Chicago: American Bar Association.Search in Google Scholar

Arizona Judicial Branch. 2015a. 2014 Case Activity by County. Accessed at https://www.azcourts.gov/statistics/Annual-Data-Reports/2014-Data-Report/2014-Case- Activity-by-County in June 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Arizona Judicial Branch. 2015b. Superior Courts. Accessed at https://www.azcourts.gov/AZCourts/SuperiorCourt.aspx in April 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Arizona State Bar. 2013. Judicial Merit Selection in Arizona. Accessed at https://www.azbar.org/aboutus/leadership/boardofgovernors/importantissues/fairandimpa rtialcourts/meritselection in December 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Aspin, L. 2007. “Trends in Judicial Retention Elections, 1964-2007.” Judicature 90 (5): 208–13.Search in Google Scholar

Atkins, B. M., and H. R. Glick. 1974. “Formal Judicial Recruitment and State Supreme Court Decisions.” American Politics Quarterly 2 (4): 427–49, https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x7400200404.Search in Google Scholar

Besley, T., and A. Payne. 2013. “Implementation of Anti-discrimination Policy: Does Judicial Selection Matter?.” American Law and Economics Review 15 (1): 212–51, https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/aht003.Search in Google Scholar

Bonneau, C. W., and M. G. Hall. 2009. In Defense of Judicial Elections. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203876992Search in Google Scholar

Brace, P., and B. D. Boyea. 2008. “State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges.” American Journal of Political Science. 52 (2): 360–72, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00317.x.Search in Google Scholar

Caldarone, R. P., B. Canes-Wrone, and T. S. Clark. 2009. “Partisan Labels and Democratic Accountability: An Analysis of State Supreme Court Abortion Decisions” Journal of Politics 71 (2): 560–73, https://doi.org/10.1017/s002238160909046x.Search in Google Scholar

Caldeira, G. A. 1983. “On the Reputation of State Supreme Courts.” Political Behavior 5 (1): 83–108, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00989987.Search in Google Scholar

Canes-Wrone, B., T. S. Clark, and J. K. Park. 2012. “Judicial Independence and Retention Elections.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 28 (2): 211–34, https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewq009.Search in Google Scholar

Canes-Wrone, B., T. S. Clark, and J. P. Kelly. 2014. “Judicial Selection and Death Penalty Decisions.” American Political Science Review 108 (1): 23–39, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055413000622.Search in Google Scholar

Cann, D. 2002. “Campaign Contributions and Judicial Behavior.” American Review of Politics 23 (3): 261–74, https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2002.23.0.261-274.Search in Google Scholar

Cann, D. 2007. “Beyond Accountability and Independence: Judicial Selection and State Court Performance.” Judicature 90 (5): 226–32.Search in Google Scholar

Cann, D. M., C. W. Bonneau, and B. D. Boyea. “Campaign Contributions and Judicial Decisions in Partisan and Nonpartisan Elections.” In New Directions in Judicial Politics, edited by K. T. McGuire, 38–52. New York: Routledge, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Canon, B. C. 1972. “The Impact of Formal Selection Processes on the Characteristics of Judges – Reconsidered.” Law & Society Review 6 (4): 579–94, https://doi.org/10.2307/3052949.Search in Google Scholar

Cass, R. A. 1995. “Judging: Norms and Incentives of Retrospective Decision-Making.” Boston University Law Review 75:941–96.Search in Google Scholar

Choi, S. J., M. Gulati, and E. A. Posner. 2009. “Judicial Evaluations and Information Forcing: Ranking State High Courts and Their Judges.” Duke Law Journal 58 (7): 1313–81.Search in Google Scholar

Choi, S. J., G. M. Gulati, and E. A. Posner. 2010. “Professionals or Politicians: The Uncertain Empirical Case for an Elected rather Than Appointed Judiciary.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 26 (2): 290–336, https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewn023.Search in Google Scholar

Choi, S. J., M. Gulati, and E. A. Posner. 2012. “What Do Federal District Judges Want? an Analysis of Publications, Citations, and Reversals” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization: 28 (3):518, https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewq020.Search in Google Scholar

Comparato, S. A. April 2002. “On the Reputation of State Supreme Courts Revisited.” Paper presented at the annual meeting for the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago, Illinois.Search in Google Scholar

Cross, F. B., S. A. Lindquist. 2009. “Judging the Judges.” Duke Law Journal 58: 1383–437.Search in Google Scholar

Dear, J., and E. W. Jessen. 2007. Followed Rates” and Leading State Cases, 1940- 2005, Vol. 41: 683–711, 1665–1670.Search in Google Scholar

Dinan, S. 2009. Sotomayor Reversed 60% by High Court: Washington Times, May 27, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Epstein, L., W. M. Landes, and R. A. Posner. 2013. The Behavior of Federal Judges: A Theoretical and Empirical Study of Rational Choice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674067325Search in Google Scholar

Flango, V. E., and C. R. Ducat. 1979. “What Difference Does Method of Judicial Selection Make? Selection Procedures in State Courts of Last Resort.” Justice System Journal 5 (1): 25–44.Search in Google Scholar

Franklin, C. H. 2002. “Behavioral Factors Affecting Judicial Independence.” In Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach, edited by S. B. Burbank, and B. Friedman, 148–59: Sage Publications and the American Academy of Political and Social Science.10.4135/9781452229577.n7Search in Google Scholar

Friedman, L. M., R. A. Kagan, B. Cartwright, and S. Wheeler. 1981. “State Supreme Courts: A Century of Style and Citation.” Stanford Law Review 33 (5): 773–818, https://doi.org/10.2307/1228400.Search in Google Scholar

Gill, R. D. 2013. “Beyond High Hopes and Unmet Expectations: Judicial Reforms in the States.” Judicature 96 (6): 278–95, https://doi.org/10.1353/hpn.2013.0078.Search in Google Scholar

Glick, H. R., and C. F. Emmert. 1987. “Selection Systems and Judicial Characteristics: The Recruitment of State Supreme Court Judges.” Judicature 70 (4): 228–35.Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, S. C., and G. A. Huber. 2007. “The Effect of Electoral Competitiveness on Incumbent Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2 (2): 107–38, https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00006035.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, M. G. 1992. “Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Politics 54 (2): 427–46, https://doi.org/10.2307/2132033.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, M. G. 2001. “State Supreme Courts in American Democracy: Probing the Myths of Judicial Reform.” American Political Science Review 95 (2): 315–30, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055401002234.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, M. G. 2007. “Voting in State Supreme Court Elections: Competition and Context as Democratic Incentives.” Journal of Politics 69 (4): 1147–59, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00614.x.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, M. G. 2011. “On the Cataclysm of Judicial Election and Other Popular Antidemocratic Myths.” In What’s Law Got to Do with it? what Judges Do, Why They Do it, and What’s at Stake, edited by G. Geyh, 223–247. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hanssen, F. A. 1999. “The Effect of Judicial Institutions on Uncertainty and the Rate of Litigation: The Election versus Appointment of State Judges.” Journal of Legal Studies 28 (1): 205–32, https://doi.org/10.1086/468050.Search in Google Scholar

Harrison, M. I., S. S. Greene, K. Swisher, and M. H. Grabel. 2006. “On the Validity and Vitality of Arizona’s Judicial Merit Selection System: Past, Present, and Future.” Fordham Urban Law Journal 34 (1): 239–63.Search in Google Scholar

Hartzell, J. 2014. “Probability of Success on Appeal: Reversal Rates for the Fourth Circuit and the North Carolina Court of Appeals.” Trial Briefs April 30, 2014: 30–34.Search in Google Scholar

Holmstrom, B. and P. Milgrom. 1991. “Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 7: 24–52, https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/7.special_issue.24.Search in Google Scholar

Huber, G. A., and S. C. Gordon. 2004. “Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind when it Runs for Office?.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 247–63, https://doi.org/10.2307/1519881.Search in Google Scholar

Hurwitz, M.S., and D. N. Lanier. 2003. “Explaining Judicial Diversity: The Differential Ability of Women and Minorities to Attain Seats on State Supreme and Appellate Courts.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 3 (4): 329–52, https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000300300401.Search in Google Scholar

Hurwitz, M. S., and D. N. Lanier. 2008. “Diversity in State and Federal Appellate Courts: Change and Continuity across 20 Years.” Justice System Journal 29 (1): 47–70.Search in Google Scholar

Iaryczower, M., G. Lewis, and M. Shum. 2013. “To Elect or to Appoint? Bias, Information, and Responsiveness of Bureaucrats and Politicians.” Journal of Public Economics 97 (1): 230–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.08.007.Search in Google Scholar

Kang, M. S., and J. M. Shepherd. 2011. “The Partisan Price of Justice: An Empirical Analysis of Campaign Contributions and Judicial Decisions.” New York University Law Review 86: 69–130.Search in Google Scholar

King, G., M. Tomz, and J. Wittenberg. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 347–61, https://doi.org/10.2307/2669316.Search in Google Scholar

Klumpp, A. J. 2008. Arizona Judicial Retention: Three Decades of Elections and Candidates: Arizona Attorney.November 2008:12–18.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, S. E. 1973. “Judicial Selection and Tenure in Arizona.” Law and the Social Order (1): 51–80.Search in Google Scholar

Liptak, A. January 18, 2015. Supreme Court to Review Bans on Solicitations in Judge Races: The New York Times.Search in Google Scholar

Maskin, E., and J. Tirole. 2004. “The Politician and the Judge: Accountability in Government.” American Economic Review 94 (4): 1034–54, https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002606.Search in Google Scholar

McCall, M. M. 2003. “The Politics of Judicial Elections: The Influence of Campaign Contributions on the Voting Patterns of Texas Supreme Court Justices, 1994-1997.” Politics & Policy 31 (2): 314–43, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2003.tb00151.x.Search in Google Scholar

McCall, M. M. and M. A. McCall. 2007. “Campaign Contributions, Judicial Decisions, and the Texas Supreme Court: Assess the Appearance of Impropriety.” Judicature 90 (5): 214–25.Search in Google Scholar

Mott, R. L. 1936. “Judicial Influence.” American Political Science Review 30 (2): 295–315, https://doi.org/10.2307/1947260.Search in Google Scholar

National Center for State Courts. 2002. Call to Action: Statement of the National Summit on Improving Judicial Selection. Williamsburg, Virginia: National Center for State Courts.Search in Google Scholar

National Center for State Courts. 2015. Methods of Judicial Selection: Arizona. Accessed at https://www.judicialselection.com/judicial_selection/methods/selection_of_judges.cfm?stat e=AZ in April 2015.Search in Google Scholar

O’Callaghan, J. 1991. “Another Test for the Merit Plan.” Justice System Journal 15 (1): 477–85, https://doi.org/10.1080/23277556.1991.10871139.Search in Google Scholar

O’Connor, S. D., and R. N. A. Jones. 2008. “Reflections on Arizona’s Judicial Selection Process.” Arizona Law Review 50:15–24, https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910810889048.Search in Google Scholar

Owens, R. J., A. Tahk, P. C. Wohlfarth, and A. C. Bryan. 2015. “Nominating Commissions, Judicial Retention, and Forward-Looking Behavior on State Supreme Courts.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 15 (2): 211–38, https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440014567858.Search in Google Scholar

Posner, R. A. 2000. “Is the Ninth Circuit Too Large?.” A Statistical Study of Judicial Quality.” The Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2):711–9, https://doi.org/10.1086/468090.Search in Google Scholar

Reddick, M. 2002. “Merit Selection: A Review of the Social Scientific Literature.” Dickinson Law Review 106 (4): 729–45.Search in Google Scholar

Romero, F. S., D. W. Romero, and V. Ford. April 2001. “The Influence of Selection Method on Racial Discrimination Cases: A Longitudinal State Supreme Court Analysis.” Paper presented at the annual meeting for the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago, Illinois.Search in Google Scholar

Schlesinger, R. 2009. “The Myth of Sotomayor’s 60 Percent Supreme Court Reversal Rate.” US News and World Report May 28, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Sen, M. 2015. “Is Justice Really Blind? Race and Reversal in US Courts.” Journal of Legal Studies. 44 (1): 187–229, https://doi.org/10.1086/682691.Search in Google Scholar

Shepherd, J. M. 2009a. “Are Appointed Judges Strategic Too?.” Duke Law Journal 58 (7): 1589–626.Search in Google Scholar

Shepherd, J. M. 2009b. “The Influence of Retention Politics on Judges’ Voting.” Journal of Legal Studies 38 (1): 169–203, https://doi.org/10.1086/592096.Search in Google Scholar

Tabarrok, A., and E. Helland. 1999. “Court Politics: The Political Economy of Tort Awards.” Journal of Law and Economics 42 (1): 157–88, https://doi.org/10.1086/467421.Search in Google Scholar

The Center for Voting and Democracy. 2012. Congressional and Presidential Primaries: Open, Closed, Semi-closed, and ‘Top-Two. Accessed at https://www.fairvote.org/research- and-analysis/presidential-elections/congressional-and-presidential-primaries-open-closed- semi-closed-and-top-two/ in April 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Waltenburg, E. N., and C. S. Lopeman. 2000. “Tort Decisions and Campaign Dollars.” Southeastern Political Review 28 (2): 241–63, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2000.tb00575.x.Search in Google Scholar

Ware, S. J. 1999. “Money, Politics, and Judicial Decisions: A Case Study of Arbitration Law in Alabama.” Journal of Law and Politics 15: 645–86.Search in Google Scholar

Watson, R. A., and R. G. Downing. 1969. The Politics of the Bench and the Bar: Judicial Selection under the Missouri Nonpartisan Court Plan. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Search in Google Scholar