African Americans and Contemporary Southern Politics
-
Charles S. Bullock
Charles S. Bullock III is University Professor of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia.and Mark J. Rozell
Mark J. Rozell is dean of the School of Policy, Government, and International Affairs at George Mason University in Virginia. They are co-editors ofThe New Politics of the Old South (Rowman & Littlefield, 5th edition, 2014).
Abstract
This article describes and analyzes the evolution of African American political participation in the states of the former Confederacy since the time of V.O. Key’s classic study of southern politics (1949). Expanded voting and electoral success for African Americans in the south have dramatically transformed the politics of the region and portenddeeper and longer-lasting change in the future, unless the Republican Party can begin to appeal to more minority voters. Current trends point toward possibly a major shifting in the politics of the region given demographic patterns and the difficulties of the Republican Party grappling with issues that drive African American voting.
About the authors
Charles S. Bullock III is University Professor of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia.
Mark J. Rozell is dean of the School of Policy, Government, and International Affairs at George Mason University in Virginia. They are co-editors of The New Politics of the Old South (Rowman & Littlefield, 5th edition, 2014).
References
Ansolabehere, Stephen. 2009. “Effects of Identification Requirements on Voting: Evidence From the Experiences of Voters on Election Day.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42: 127–130.10.1017/S1049096509090313Search in Google Scholar
Bass, Jack, and Walter DeVries. 1977. The Transformation of Southern Politics. New York: Meridian.Search in Google Scholar
Bullock, Charles S., III. 1981. “Congressional Voting and Immobilization of a Black Electorate in the South.” Journal of Politics 43: 662–682.10.2307/2130631Search in Google Scholar
Bullock, Charles S., III. 2014. “Georgia: Republicans at the High Water Mark?” In The New Politics of the Old South, 5th ed., edited by Charles S., Bullock III, and Mark J. Rozell, 49–70. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar
Bullock, Charles S., III, and Ronald Keith Gaddie. 2009. The Triumph of Voting Rights in the South. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bullock, Charles S., III, Donna R. Hoffman, and Ronald Keith Gaddie. 2006. “Regional Variations in the Realignment of American Politics, 1944–2004.” Social Science Quarterly 87: 494–518.10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00393.xSearch in Google Scholar
Bullock, Charles S., III, Scott E., Buchanan, and Ronald Keith Gaddie. 2015. The Three Governors’ Controversy: Skullduggery, Machinations and the Decline of Progressive Politics in the Peach State. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Search in Google Scholar
Button, James W. 1989. Blacks and Social Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Search in Google Scholar
Greene, Melissa Faye. 1991. Praying for Sheetrock. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Search in Google Scholar
Hood, M.V., III, and Charles S. Bullock, III. 2012. “Much Ado About Nothing: An Empirical Assessment of the Georgia Voter Identification Statute.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 12: 394–414.10.1177/1532440012452279Search in Google Scholar
Hood, M.V., III, Quentin Kidd, and Irwin L., Morris. 2012. The Rational Southerner. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199873821.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Keech, William R. 1968. The Impact of Negro Voting: The Role of the Vote in the Quest for Equality. Chicago, Illinois: Rand McNally.Search in Google Scholar
Key, V.O., Jr. 1949. Southern Politics. New York: Knopf.Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, John. 2002. Affidavit Provided in Georgia v. Ashcroft, 195F. Supp. 2v25 (D.D.C.).Search in Google Scholar
Lublin, David. 1997. The Paradox of Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691221397Search in Google Scholar
Petrocik, John R., and Scott W. Desposato. 1998. “The Partisan Consequences of Majority-Minority Redistricting in the South, 1992 and 1994.” Journal of Politics 60: 613–633.10.2307/2647641Search in Google Scholar
Rodgers, Harrell, Jr., and Charles S. Bullock, III. 1972. Law and Social Change. New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar
Rozell, Mark J., and Mark Caleb Smith. 2012. “Religious Conservatives and the Transformation of Southern Politics,” In The Oxford Handbook of Southern Politics, edited by Charles S. Bullock, III, and Mark J., Rozell, 133–152. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381948.013.0006Search in Google Scholar
Skelley, Geoffrey. 2015. “Republicans 2016: White Evangelicals Dominate the Early Calender.” Sabato’s Crystal Ball (November 12).Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction Spring 2016 Issue
- After Obama
- Obama and Race in America
- White Populism and the Transformation of the Silent Majority
- Race, Party, and American Voting Rights
- African Americans and Contemporary Southern Politics
- Race, Class, Religion and the Southern Party System: A Field Report from Dixie
- Reflections on the Achievements of Sidney Verba
- Book reviews
- Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism & Wrecked the Middle Class
- Legislating in the Dark: Information and Power in the House of Representatives
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction Spring 2016 Issue
- After Obama
- Obama and Race in America
- White Populism and the Transformation of the Silent Majority
- Race, Party, and American Voting Rights
- African Americans and Contemporary Southern Politics
- Race, Class, Religion and the Southern Party System: A Field Report from Dixie
- Reflections on the Achievements of Sidney Verba
- Book reviews
- Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism & Wrecked the Middle Class
- Legislating in the Dark: Information and Power in the House of Representatives