“Why Polarized Trust Matters”

References

Abramowitz, Alan. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bafumi, Joseph, and Michael Herron. 2010. “Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members of Congress.” American Political Science Review 104 (3): 519–542.10.1017/S0003055410000316Search in Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior 24 (2): 117–150.10.1023/A:1021226224601Search in Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Binder, Sarah A. 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brady, David W., and Harie C. Han. 2006. “Polarization Then and Now: A Historical Perspective.” In Red and Blue Nation, edited by Pietro Nivola and David W. Brady, 119–151. Baltimore: Brookings/Hoover Press.Search in Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S., Michael B. MacKuen, and James A. Stimson. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139086912Search in Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris, Samuel J. Abrams, and Jeremy C. Pope. 2005. Culture War? The Myth of Polarized America. 1st ed. New York: Pearson Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400844821Search in Google Scholar

Hetherington, Marc J., and Thomas J. Rudolph. 2015. Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226299358.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto, G. Sood, and Y. Lelkes. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 405–431.10.1093/poq/nfs038Search in Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2006. A Divider, Not a Uniter: George W. Bush and the American Public. New York: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Kernell, Samuel. 1986. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lauderdale, Benjamin E. 2013. “Does Inattention to Political Debate Explain the Polarization Gap Between the U.S. Congress and Public?” Public Opinion Quarterly 77 (S): 2–23.10.1093/poq/nfs065Search in Google Scholar

Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226473673.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lodge, Milton, and Charles Taber. 2000. “Three Steps toward a Theory of Motivated Reasoning.” In Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, edited by Arthur Lupia, Mathew D. McCubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805813.009Search in Google Scholar

McClosky, Herbert. 1964. “Consensus and Ideology in American Politics.” AmericanPolitical Science Review 58 (2): 361–382.10.2307/1952868Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Arthur H. 1974. “Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964-1970.” American Political Science Review 68 (3): 951–972.10.2307/1959140Search in Google Scholar

Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1983. “Effects of Public Opinion on Policy.” American Political Science Review 77 (1): 175–190.10.2307/1956018Search in Google Scholar

Shattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Thomsen, Danielle M. 2014. “Ideological Moderates Won’t Run: How Party Fit Matters for Partisan Polarization in Congress.” Journal of Politics 76 (3): 786–797.10.1017/S0022381614000243Search in Google Scholar

Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511818691Search in Google Scholar