Home Conceptions of literary authorship in modern literary theories: history, issues, approaches
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Conceptions of literary authorship in modern literary theories: history, issues, approaches

  • Mengchen Lang EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 18, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The last three decades have seen a flourishing of theoretical discussions about the concept of literary authorship. This article is an attempt to scrutinise and engage with this thriving scene. Through a systematic review of conceptions of authorship in modern literary theories, I will outline historical shifts, disentangle current debates, and identify a range of approaches, with the aim of informing future studies of this concept. This article is divided into three parts. The first part offers a brief history of ideas of authorship in modern literary theories (ca. 1900 to the present). I trouble the narrative of the ‘death and resurrection of the author’ by showing that the concept of authorship has remained a constant concern, and by highlighting continuities between different theories. The second part identifies three main issues about the concept – agency/creativity, intention/authority, and self-presentation/self-construction. I illustrate how each of them has been addressed in recent discussions, focusing mainly on the last three decades, and point to potential directions for future research within each strand of debate. Finally, I provide a non-exhaustive typology of methodological approaches to the study of authorship. I will conclude with a brief consideration of the value of this concept for literary criticism.

Acknowledgements

My gratitude goes to Prof. Richard Walsh for his kind supervision of my PhD project, out of which this article arises, and to the editors of Frontiers of Narrative Studies. This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (Grant Number: 17ZDA281).

References

Ahearne, Jeremy & John Speller (eds.). 2012. Bourdieu and the literary field. [special issue]. Paragraph 35(1).10.3366/para.2012.0038Search in Google Scholar

Alber, Jan & Monika Fludernik. 2010. Introduction. In Jan Alber & Monika Fludernik (eds.), Postclassical narratology: Approaches and analyses, 1–31. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Altes, Liesbeth Korthals. 2010. Slippery author figures, ethos, and value regimes. Houelle-becq, a case. In Gillis J. Dorleijn, Ralf Grüttemeier & Liesbeth Korthals Altes (eds.), Authorship revisited: Conceptions of authorship around 1900 and 2000, 95–118. Leuven: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1975 [1973]. The Pleasure of the text. Trans. Richard Miller. New York: Hill and Wang.Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1977 [1966]. Introduction to the structural analysis of narratives. In Roland Barthes, Image-Music-Text. Trans. Stephen Heath, 79–124. Glasgow: Fontana Press.10.1007/978-1-349-03518-2Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1977 [1967]. The death of the author. In Roland Barthes, Image-Music-Text. Trans. Stephen Heath, 142–148. Glasgow: Fontana Press.10.1007/978-1-349-03518-2Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1977 [1971]. From work to text. In Roland Barthes, Image-Music-Text. Trans. Stephen Heath, 155–164. Glasgow: Fonana Press.10.1007/978-1-349-03518-2Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew. 2004. The author. London/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203003312Search in Google Scholar

Blostein, David & Pia Kleber (eds.). 2003. Mirror or Mask? Self-Representation in the Modern Age. Berlin: VISTAS Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Booth, Wayne C. 1961. The rhetoric of fiction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1996 [1992]. The rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field. Trans. Susan Emanuel. Stanford: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503615861Search in Google Scholar

Bremond, Claude. 1980 [1966]. The logic of narrative possibilities. Trans. Elaine D. Cancalon. New Literary History 11(3). 387–411.10.2307/468934Search in Google Scholar

Brockmeier, Jens & Donal Carbaugh (eds.). 2001. Narrative and identity: Studies in autobiography, self and culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sin.1Search in Google Scholar

Burke, Seán (ed.). 1995. Authorship: From Plato to the postmodern: A reader. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Burke, Seán. 2008 [1992]. The death and return of the author: Criticism and subjectivity in Barthes, Foucault and Derrida (3rd edn.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9781474482172Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Samuel. 2021. Good lives: Autobiography, self-knowledge, narrative, and self-realization. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.10.1093/oso/9780198865384.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Darnton, Robert. 1982. What is the history of books? Daedalus 111(3). 65–83.Search in Google Scholar

Dawson, Paul. 2013. The return of the omniscient narrator: Authorship and authority in twenty-first century fiction. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dix, Hywel. 2017. Autofiction: The forgotten face of French theory. Word and Text: A Journal of Literary Studies and Linguistics 7. 69–85.Search in Google Scholar

Dix, Hywel. 2018. Introduction: Autofiction in English: The story so far. In Hywel Dix (ed.), Autofiction in English, 1–23. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-89902-2Search in Google Scholar

Dorleijn, Gillis J., Ralf Grüttemeier & Liesbeth Korthals Altes (eds.). 2010. Authorship revisited: Conceptions of authorship around 1900 and 2000. Leuven: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Dubbelboer, Marieke. 2010. The author is dead? Long live the author? Alfred Jarry, media, and authorship around 1900. In Gillis J. Dorleijn, Ralf Grüttemeier & Liesbeth Korthals Altes (eds.), Authorship revisited: Conceptions of authorship around 1900 and 2000, 137–153. Leuven: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Eliot, T. S. 1957 [1919]. Tradition and the individual talent. In T. S. Eliot, The sacred wood: Essays on poetry and criticism (7th edn.), 47–59. London: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1996 [1969]. What is an author? In Michel Foucault, Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews. Trans. Donald F. Bouchard & Sherry Simon, 113–138. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, Mark. 2016 [1993]. Rewriting the self: History, memory, narrative. London/New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315674599Search in Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Ruth & Shlomith Rimmon-Kenan. Is there a life after death? Theorizing authors and reading Jazz. In David Herman (ed.), Narratologies: New perspectives on narrative analysis, 66–87. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1987 [1973]. Actants, actors and figures. In Algirdas Julien Greimas, On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory. Trans. Paul J. Perron & Frank H. Collins, 106–120. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Helle, Sophus. 2019. What is an author? Old answers to a new question. Modern Language Quarterly 80(2). 113–139.10.1215/00267929-7368183Search in Google Scholar

Helle, Sophus. 2020. The birth of the author: Co-creating authorship in Enheduana’s Exaltation. Orbis Litterarum 75(2). 55–72.10.1111/oli.12250Search in Google Scholar

Herman, David. 2008. Narrative theory and the intentional stance. Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas 6(2). 233–260.10.1353/pan.0.0019Search in Google Scholar

Holt, Jason. 2002. The marginal life of the author. In William Irwin (ed.), The death and resurrection of the author? 65–78. Westport & London: Greenwood.Search in Google Scholar

Irwin, William (ed.). 2002. The death and resurrection of the author? Westport & London: Greenwood.Search in Google Scholar

Josselson, Ruthellen & Amia Lieblich (eds.). 1993–1999. The narrative study of lives. 6 vols. Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: SAGE Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Kindt, Tom & Hans-Harald Müller. 2006. The implied author: Concept and controversy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110201727Search in Google Scholar

Kindt, Tom & Tilmann Köppe. 2010. Conceptions of authorship and authorial intention. In Gillis J. Dorleijn, Ralf Grüttemeier & Liesbeth Korthals Altes (eds.), Authorship revisited: Conceptions of authorship around 1900 and 2000, 213–227. Leuven: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Kjerkegaard, Stefan. 2016. Getting people right, getting fiction right: Self-fashioning, fictionality, and the ethics in the Roth books. Journal of Narrative Theory 46(1). 121–148.10.1353/jnt.2016.0010Search in Google Scholar

Kohler, Gun-Britt. 2010. National disposition and the author’s trajectory: Reflections on Polish and Croatian literature. In Gillis J. Dorleijn, Ralf Grüttemeier & Liesbeth Korthals Altes (eds.), Authorship revisited: Conceptions of authorship around 1900 and 2000, 11–38. Leuven: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Mallarmé, Stéphane. 2007 [1896]. Crisis of verse. In Stéphane Mallarmé, Divagations. Trans. Barbara Johnson, 201–211. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mascuch, Michael. 1997. Origins of the individualist self: Autobiography and self-identity in England, 1591-1791. Oxford: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

McAdams, Dan P. 2015. The art and science of personality development. New York/London: The Guilford Press.Search in Google Scholar

Meister, Jan Christoph. 2014. Narratology. In Peter Hühn, Jan Christoph Meister, John Pier & Wolf Schmid (eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/narratology (accessed 3 April 2022).10.1515/9783110316469Search in Google Scholar

Meizoz, Jérôme. 2010. Modern posterities of posture: Jean-Jacques Rousseau. In Gillis J. Dorleijn, Ralf Grüttemeier & Liesbeth Korthals Altes (eds.), Authorship revisited: Conceptions of authorship around 1900 and 2000, 81–93. Leuven: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Pappas, Nickolas. 2002. Authorship and authority. In William Irwin (ed.), The death and resurrection of the author? 117–128. Westport/London: Greenwood.Search in Google Scholar

Phelan, James. 2007. Experiencing fiction: Judgments, progressions, and the rhetorical theory of narrative. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Phelan, James. 2011. The implied author, deficient narration, and nonfiction narrative: Or, what’s off-kilter in The year of magical thinking and The diving bell and the butterfly? Style 45(1). 119–137.Search in Google Scholar

Phelan, James. 2015. The Chicago School: From neo-Aristotelian poetics to the rhetorical theory of narrative. In Maria Grishakova & Silvi Salupere (eds.), Theoretical schools and circles in the twentieth-century humanities: Literary theory, history, philosophy, 133–151. New York/London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315752914-8Search in Google Scholar

Phelan, James, Peter J. Rabinowitz, Robyn Warhol, David Herman & Brian Richardson. 2012. Authors, narrators, narration. In David Herman, James Phelan, Peter J. Rabinowitz, Brian Richardson & Robyn Warhol (eds.), Narrative theory: Core concepts and critical debates, 29–56. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, Brian (ed.). 2011. Implied author: Back from the grave or simply dead again. [special issue]. Style 45(1).Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2011. Meaning, intent, and the implied author. Style 45(1). 29–47.Search in Google Scholar

Sapiro, Gisèle. 2010. Authorship and responsibility: The case of Emile Zola’s commitment in the Dreyfus affair. In Gillis J. Dorleijn, Ralf Grüttemeier & Liesbeth Korthals Altes (eds.), Authorship revisited: Conceptions of authorship around 1900 and 2000, 1–10. Leuven: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Sapiro, Gisèle. 2012. Autonomy revisited: The question of mediations and its methodological implications. Paragraph 35(1). 30–38.10.3366/para.2012.0040Search in Google Scholar

Shen, Dan. 2011. What is the implied author? Style 45(1). 80–98.Search in Google Scholar

Speller, John R.W. 2011. Bourdieu and literature. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.10.11647/OBP.0027Search in Google Scholar

Stecker, Robert. 2002. Apparent, implied, and postulated authors. In William Irwin (ed.), The death and resurrection of the author? 129–140. Westport/London: Greenwood.Search in Google Scholar

Todorov, Tzvetan. 1969. Structural analysis of narrative. Trans. Arnold Weinstein. NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction 3(1). 70–76.10.2307/1345003Search in Google Scholar

Tomaševskij, Boris. 1995 [1923]. Literature and biography. In Burke Seán (ed.), Authorship: From Plato to the postmodern: A reader, 81–89. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9781474465519-012Search in Google Scholar

Vilain, Philippe. 2011. Autofiction. In Villa Gillet & Le Monde (eds.), The novelist’s lexicon: Writers on the words that define their work, 5–7. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/vill15080-006Search in Google Scholar

Walker, Cheryl. 2002. Feminist literary criticism and the author. In William Irwin (ed.), The death and resurrection of the author? 141–160. Westport/London: Greenwood.Search in Google Scholar

Walsh, Richard. 2007. The rhetoric of fictionality: Narrative theory and the idea of fiction. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 2012. Meaning and relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139028370Search in Google Scholar

Wimsatt, W. K., Jr. & Monroe C. Beardsley. 1946. The intentional fallacy. The Sewanee Review 54(3). 468–488.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-08-18
Published in Print: 2022-08-05

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/fns-2022-2015/html
Scroll to top button