Home “The old boys’ network”: Medical space, gendered memory, and prejudices in Sidney Sheldon’s Nothing Last Forever
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

“The old boys’ network”: Medical space, gendered memory, and prejudices in Sidney Sheldon’s Nothing Last Forever

  • Manali Karmakar EMAIL logo and Bhuvaneswari G.
Published/Copyright: January 26, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Sidney Sheldon’s Nothing Last Forever unfolds a mosaic of experiences encountered by medical professionals that normatively remains unheard in the cycle of diagnosing, treating, and caring for patients. The novel brings to light the human within the doctor that is consciously kept at bay to cope with professional demands. With the rise of narrative medicine, scholars such as Rita Charon have emphasized the importance of narratology to understand patients’ crises. However, narrative medicine has largely ignored the phenomenological crises and anxieties of medical professionals. Thus, the paper investigates how on the one hand the female agencies problematize the medical space, and on the other, how the agency embodied by the female doctor is constantly threatened and demeaned by the male gaze that primarily categorizes women as sexual objects and caregivers. This paper primarily inquires how the politics of gendered memory is dramatized and contested in Sidney Sheldon’s medical crime thriller Nothing Last Forever.

References

Acker, Joan. 1990. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies. Gender & Society 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002 (accessed 4 May 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Moberly. 2021. Storming the Citadel: The rise of the woman doctor. London: Constable.Search in Google Scholar

Bhabha, Homi. 1994. The location of culture (Routledge Classics) (Vol. 55). New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Bhatt, Wasudha. 2013. The little brown woman: Gender discrimination in American medicine. Gender & Society 27(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213491140 (accessed 10 April 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Blackwell, Elizabeth. 2015. Pioneer work in opening the medical profession to women: Autobiographical sketches – scholar’s choice edition. United States: Scholar’s Choice. Search in Google Scholar

Belmonte, A. 2021. ‘A very well-kept secret’: Women doctors detail widespread sexism in medicine. Yahoo. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/culture-of-silence-women-in-medicine-detail-crushing-effects-of-sexism-150036336.html (accessed 22 November 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Bryson, Valerie. 2007. Gender and the politics of time: Feminist theory and contemporary debates. Bristol: Policy Press. 10.2307/j.ctt9qgwcrSearch in Google Scholar

Boni-Le Goff, Isabel & Nicky Le Feuvre. 2017. Profession from a gendered perspective. Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Business and Management. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.89 (accessed 1 April 2021). 10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.89Search in Google Scholar

Carastathis, Anna. 2015. The concept of intersectionality in feminist theory. Philosophy Compass. 9(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12129 (accessed January 10 2021).10.1111/phc3.12129Search in Google Scholar

Cassell, Joan. 1998. The woman in the surgeon’s body. Harvard: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674029279Search in Google Scholar

Charon, Rita, Sayantani Dasgupta, Nellie Hermann, Craig Irvine, Eric R. Marcus, Edgar Rivera Colon, Danielle Spencer & Maura Spiegel. 2017. The principles and practice of narrative medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/med/9780199360192.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cockburn, Cynthia. 1991. In the way of women: Men’s resistance to sex equality in organizations (Cornell international industrial and labor relations reports). New York: Cornell University Press. 10.1007/978-1-349-21571-3Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Patricia Hill. 1991. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (Revised 10th Anniv 2nd Edition). Revised, 10th Anniv., 2nd. London & New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039(accessed 15 January 2021).10.2307/1229039Search in Google Scholar

Crompton, Rosemary & Nicola Le Feuvre. 1991. Gender and bureaucracy: Women in finance in Britain and France. The Sociological Review.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1991.tb03357.x (accessed March 21 2021).10.1111/j.1467-954X.1991.tb03357.xSearch in Google Scholar

Davies, Emily. 2018. Medicine as a profession for women. United States: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. Search in Google Scholar

Dill, Bonnie Thornton & Ruth Enid Zambrana. 2009. Critical thinking about inequality: An emerging lens. In Bonnie Thornton Dill and Ruth Enid Zambrana (eds.), Emerging intersections: Race, class, and gender in theory, policy and practice, 1–21. New Brunswick & New Jersey: Rutgers University Press. 10.36019/9780813546513Search in Google Scholar

Eke O, Otugo O. & Isom J. 2021. Black women in medicine-rising above invisibility. Lancet. 397(10274). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00302-0 (accessed 2 February 2021).Search in Google Scholar

FitzGerald, Chloë & Samia Hurst. 2017. Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: A systematic review. BMC Medical Ethics 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8 (accessed 2 February 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Hall, W. J., Chapman, M. V., Lee, K. M., Merino, Y. M., Thomas, T. W., Payne, B. K., Eng, E., Day, S. H. & Coyne-Beasley, T. 2015. Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: A systematic review. American Journal of Public Health 105(12). https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302903 (accessed 3 February 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Hoff, T. 2019. The challenges of being a female doctor. Medical Economics. https://www.medicaleconomics.com/view/challenges-being-female-doctor (accessed 1 April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1993. Men and women of the corporation: New edition. New York: Basic Books. Search in Google Scholar

King, Diane E. & Linda Stone. 2010. Lineal masculinity: Gendered memory within patriliny. American Ethnologist 37(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548–1425.2010.01258.x (accessed 5 March 2021). 10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01258.xSearch in Google Scholar

McGarty, Craig, Vincent Y. Yzerbyt, and Russell Spears. 2002. Stereotypes as explanations: The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups. Illustrated. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511489877Search in Google Scholar

Moyangh, M. & Forestall, N. (Eds). 2011. Documenting first wave feminisms: Transnational collaborations and crosscurrents (Vol. 1). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 10.3138/9781442664098Search in Google Scholar

Nirappil, Fenit. 2020. A black doctor alleged racist treatment before dying of Covid-19: “This is how black people get killed.” Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/12/24/covid-susan-moore-medical-racism/ (accessed 1 April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Pringle, Rosemary. 1998. Sex and medicine: Gender, power, and authority in the medical profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Shirley. 2014. Sophia Jex-Blake: A woman pioneer in nineteenth-century medical reform. New York & London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Sauter, Michael J. 2007. Clockwatchers and stargazers: Time discipline in early modern Berlin. The American Historical Review 112(3). https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr.112.3.685 (accessed 2 February 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Sheldon, Sidney. 1995. Nothing lasts forever. United States: Grand Central Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

Solnick, R. E., Peyton, K., Kraft-Todd, G. & Safdar, B. 2020. Effect of physician gender and race on simulated patients’ ratings and confidence in their physicians. JAMA Network Open 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20511 (accessed 1 April 2021) 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20511Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, B. 2021. Gender discrimination is still alive and well in the workplace. In Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryanrobinson/2021/02/15/gender-discrimination-is-still-alive-and-well-in-the-workplace-in-2021/?sh=71bf18417f1c (accessed 25 November 2021)Search in Google Scholar

Terralon Knight. 2020. A physician, not a stereotype: The role of gender and racial implicit bias in the workplace. Becker’s Hospital Review. www.beckershospitalreview.com/care-coordination/a-physician-not-a-stereotype-the-role-of-gender-and-racial-implicit-bias-in-the-workplace.html (accessed 1 April 2021)Search in Google Scholar

Wrede, Theda. 2015. Introduction to the special issue “Theorizing space and gender in the 21st century”. Rocky Mountain Review 69. 10–17. 10.1353/rmr.2015.a580801Search in Google Scholar

West, Candance & Don H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender and Society 1(2). 125–151. https://www.jstor.org/stable/189945 (accessed 1 April 2021)10.1177/0891243287001002002Search in Google Scholar

Wellek, Rene & Austin Warren. 1956. Theory of literature. California: Harcourt, Brace & World. Search in Google Scholar

Witz, Anne. 1991. Patriarchy and professions: The gendered politics of occupational closure. Sociology 24(4). 675–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038590024004007 (accessed 4 February 2021). 10.1177/0038038590024004007Search in Google Scholar

Yzerbyt, Vincent & Steve Rocher. 2002. Subjective essentialism and the emergence of stereotype. In Craig McGarty, Vincent Y. Yzerbyt and Russell Spears (eds.), Stereotypes as explanations: The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups, 38–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511489877Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-01-26
Published in Print: 2022-01-21

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/fns-2021-0012/pdf
Scroll to top button