Home The Superstable Marker as an Indicator of Categorial Weakness?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Superstable Marker as an Indicator of Categorial Weakness?

  • Antje Dammel EMAIL logo and Damaris Nübling
Published/Copyright: October 27, 2008
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Folia Linguistica
From the journal Volume 40 Issue 1-2

Abstract

In this article we examine and “exapt” Wurzel's concept of superstable markers in an innovative manner. We develop an extended view of superstability through a critical discussion of Wurzel's original definition and the status of marker-superstability versus allomorphy in Natural Morphology: As we understand it, superstability is – above and beyond a step towards uniformity – mainly a symptom for the weakening of the category affected (cf. 1., 2. and 4.). This view is exemplified in four short case studies on superstability in different grammatical categories of four Germanic languages: genitive case in Mainland Scandinavian and English (3.1), plural formation in Dutch (3.2), second person singular ending -st in German (3.3), and ablaut generalisation in Luxembourgish (3.4).

Published Online: 2008-10-27
Published in Print: 2006-07-01

© Walter de Gruyter

Downloaded on 17.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/flin.40.1-2.97/html
Scroll to top button