Home How common is r-Epenthesis?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

How common is r-Epenthesis?

  • T. A. Hall EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 11, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Recent work on consonant epenthesis has argued that the insertion of [r] as a hiatus breaker is phonologically natural (De Lacy 2006, Uffmann 2007). This claim is argued to derive support from the high cross-linguistic frequency of (intervocalic) r-Epenthesis. The goal of the present article is to investigate the original sources for the languages which are assumed to have a regular synchronic r-Epenthesis rule. It is concluded - on the basis of these sources - that there is very little solid crosslinguistic support for that process. If correct, this finding means that r-Epenthesis in many varieties of English cannot be argued to be phonologically natural on the basis of non-related languages with that process.

Published Online: 2013-04-11
Published in Print: 2013-04

© 2013 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.

Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/flin.2013.004/html
Scroll to top button