Rescuing grammaticalization from construction hegemony: the evolution of the modal better
-
Carmelo Alessandro Basile
and
Debra Ziegeler
Abstract
The present paper examines the relationship between grammaticalization and constructionalization in the context of recent studies on Diachronic Construction Grammar. Building on the concept of “Event Schemas” in language change, it explores the diachronic evolution of the English modal construction BETTER (in the forms had better, ’d better, and plain better + v) since Old English times. The proposed study demonstrates that although this could be regarded as a typical case of ordinary grammatical constructionalization it is better explained as grammaticalization through Event Schemas, where the conceptual source elements of possession and evaluation remain evident throughout the construction’s entire diachronic journey. In this way, the possessive Event Schema known as the “Goal Schema”, likely grammaticalized into an “Action Schema” (explaining the introduction of the copula have found in present-day English), with the meanings of evaluation associated with the predicate adjective, better, co-existing as an Evaluative Schema. Thus, grammaticalization is manifested in the observed continuity of both possessive and evaluative semantic coordinates in the evolution of had better, which would not be permitted under typical constructionalization accounts that require parallel changes in both form and meaning.
References
Allen, Cynthia L. 1995. Case marking and reanalysis: Grammatical relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198240969.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Auwera, Johan van der & Astrid De Wit. 2010. The English comparative modals. A pilot study. In Bert Cappelle & Naoaki Wada (eds.), Distinctions in English grammar, offered to Renaat Declerck, 127–147. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Search in Google Scholar
Auwera, Johan van der & Vladimir Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2. 79–124. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79.Search in Google Scholar
Basile, Carmelo Alessandro. 2024. Modality in contact: Necessity and obligation in New Englishes. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783111488752Search in Google Scholar
Basile, Carmelo Alessandro. 2025. Modal better: A corpus-based investigation in world Englishes. World Englishes 44. 318–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12685.Search in Google Scholar
Basile, Carmelo Alessandro & Cameron Morin. Forthcoming. Constructional change. In Xu Wen & Chris Sinha (eds.), The Cambridge encyclopaedia of cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bergs, Alexander & Gabriele Diewald. 2008. Introduction: Constructions and language change. In Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and language change, 1–21. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110211757.1Search in Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1981. Roots of language. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cappelle, Bert. 2006. Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions 7. 1–28.Search in Google Scholar
Cappelle, Bert. 2024. Can Construction Grammar be proven wrong? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009343213Search in Google Scholar
Collins, Peter. 2009. Modals and quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789042029095Search in Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Daugs, Robert. 2021. Contractions, constructions and constructional change: Investigating the constructionhood of English modal contractions from a diachronic perspective. In Martin Hilpert, Bert Capelle & Ilse Depraetere (eds.), Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar, 13–52. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.32.02dauSearch in Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2004. British National Corpus (from Oxford University Press). https://www.english-corpora.org/bnc/ (accessed 13 March 2025).Search in Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA). https://www.english-corpora.org/coha/ (accessed 13 March 2025).Search in Google Scholar
Denison, David & Alison Cort. 2010. Better as a verb. In Hubert Cuyckens, Kristin Davidse & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 349–384. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226102.4.349Search in Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele, Volodymyr Dekalo & Daniel Czicza. 2021. Grammaticalization of verdienen into an auxiliary marker of deontic modality: An item-driven usage-based approach. In Martin Hilpert, Bert Cappelle & Ilse Depraetere (eds.), Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar, 81–122. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.32.04dieSearch in Google Scholar
Diller, Hans-Jürgen, Hendrik De Smet & Jukka Tyrkkö. 2011. A European database of descriptors of English electronic texts. European English Messenger 19. 21–35.Search in Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, Gerrit Jan. 1983. The Turkana language. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.10.1515/9783110869149Search in Google Scholar
Flach, Susanne. 2020. Constructionalization and the sorites paradox. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 45–67. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.27.01flaSearch in Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1995. Imperfective and irrealis. In Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 519–551. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.32.23fleSearch in Google Scholar
Gaaf, Willem van der. 1904. The transition from the impersonal to the personal construction: In Middle English (Anglistische Forschungen 14). Heidelberg: Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung.Search in Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike & Johanna Barðdal. 2023. From grammaticalization to Diachronic Construction Grammar. A natural evolution of the paradigm. Studies in Language 47. 743–788. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20079.gil.Search in Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1984. Syntax. A functional typological introduction, vol. 1. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.17Search in Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1994. Irrealis and the subjunctive. Studies in Language 18. 265–337. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18.2.02giv.Search in Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 2018 [1979]. On understanding grammar, 2nd edn. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.213Search in Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7. 219–224.10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9Search in Google Scholar
Gregersen, Sune. 2018. Some (critical) questions for Diachronic Construction Grammar. Folia Linguistica Historica 39. 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2018-0012.Search in Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude. 1993. The language builder. An essay on the human signature in linguistic morphogenesis. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.94Search in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1992. Grammaticalization chains. Studies in Language 16(2). 335–368. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16.2.05hei.Search in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive sources and grammaticalization. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195083873.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession. Sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511581908Search in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2003. Grammaticalization. In Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9781405127479.2004.00020.xSearch in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Mechthild Reh. 1984. Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Search in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Heiko Narrog & Haiping Long. 2016. Constructional change vs. grammaticalization. From compounding to derivation. Studies in Language 40. 137–175. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.1.05hei.Search in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long. 2021. The rise of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108982856Search in Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2018. Three open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In Evie Coussé, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson (eds.), Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar, 21–39. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.21.c2Search in Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197440.1.21Search in Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1, 17–35. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Search in Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred. 2000. Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110820980Search in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald Wayne. 1978. The form and meaning of the English auxiliary. Language 54. 853–882. https://doi.org/10.2307/413237.Search in Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2015 [1995]. Thoughts on grammaticalization, 3rd edn. Berlin: Language Science Press.10.26530/OAPEN_603353Search in Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1915. Le renouvellement des conjonctions. In Annuaire de l’École Pratique des Hautes Études 1915–6, 9–28. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.10.3406/ephe.1915.9215Search in Google Scholar
Mitchell, Keith. 2003. Had better and might as well: On the margins of modality? In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank R. Palmer (eds.), Modality in contemporary English, 129–149. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110895339.129Search in Google Scholar
Molencki, Rafael. 1999. A history of English counterfactuals. Katowice: Wydawnictowo Universytetu Slaskiego.Search in Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk. 2007. Diachronic Construction Grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14(2). 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.14.2.04noe.Search in Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk. 2013. Grammaticalization in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In Maria Angélica Furtado da Cunha, Edvaldo Balduíno Bispo & José Romerito Silva (eds.), Anais do IV Seminário Internacional do Grupo de Estudos Discurso & Gramática e XVII Seminário Nacional do Grupo de Estudos Discurso & Gramática: Teoria da gramaticalização e gramática de construções, 5–12. Natal, RN, Brazil: UFRN.Search in Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk & Timothy Colleman. 2021. Diachronic Construction Grammar. In Wen Xu & John R. Taylor (eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics, 662–675. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781351034708-44Search in Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1990. Modality and the English modals, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph & Charles Leslie Wrenn. 1957. An Old English grammar. London: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar
The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts 1991. Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki. Compiled by Matti Rissanen (Project leader), Merja Kytö (Project secretary); Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, Matti Kilpiö (Old English); Saara Nevanlinna, Irma Taavitsainen (Middle English); Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (Early Modern English).Search in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Constructions in grammaticalization. In Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 624–647. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756393.ch20Search in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2008. “All that he endeavoured to prove was…”: On the emergence of grammatical constructions in dialogic contexts. In Robin Cooper & Ruth Kempson (eds.), Language in flux: Dialogue coordination, language variation, change and evolution, 143–177. London: Kings College Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2015. Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 51–79. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.18.02traSearch in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2016. Do semantic modal maps have a role in a constructionalization approach to modals? Constructions and Frames 8. 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.8.1.07tra.Search in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2019. Are comparative modals converging or diverging in English? Different answers from the perspectives of grammaticalisation and constructionalisation. In Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen & Willem B. Hollmann (eds.), Categories, constructions, and change in English syntax, 105–129. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108303576.005Search in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2022. Discourse structuring markers in English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.33Search in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme. 2008. Words and constructions in grammaticalizations: The end of the English impersonal construction. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice & Donka Minkova (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language IV: Empirical and analytical advances in the study of English language change, 301–326. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110211801.301Search in Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter & Jean Hannah. 1986. International English: A guide to varieties of standard English. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar
Van linden, An. 2015. Comparative modals: (Dis)similar diachronic tendencies. Functions of Language 22. 192–231. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22.2.02lin.Search in Google Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra. 2003. On the generic origins of modality in English. In David Hart (ed.), English modality in context, 33–69. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra. 2004. Reanalysis in the history of do: A view from Construction Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 15. 529–574. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.15.4.529.Search in Google Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra. 2014. Are constructions dialect-proof? The challenge of English variational data for Construction Grammar research. In Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola & Devyani Sharma (eds.), The Oxford handbook of world Englishes, 715–734. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199777716.013.31Search in Google Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra. 2015. Converging grammars: Constructions in Singapore English. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614514091Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
