The metamorphosis of ʤaaj in Rural Jordanian Arabic
-
Basem Ibrahim Malawi Al-Raba’a
and
Mohammad Alhailawani
Abstract
This paper reports on the syntactic and semantic properties of grammaticalized uses of the motion active participle ʤaaj ‘coming’ in Rural Jordanian Arabic (RJA). We show that ʤaaj has undergone grammaticalization, resulting in the emergence of three markers with distinct semantics and syntactic behaviors. In particular, we show that ʤaaj has three functions in RJA: (i) a volitional act marker, signifying a purposive or deliberate action, (ii) a marker of inceptive aspect, indicating the initiation of an action, and (iii) a directive mood marker, encoding imperative mood. From a syntactic perspective, we argue that the three markers occupy distinct functional head positions in the clause in line with Cinque, Guglielmo. (2006). Restructuring and functional heads: The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press. The volitional and inceptive ʤaaj respectively head their own functional projections, Volition Phrase and Aspectinceptive Phrase, both located below Tense Phrase. On the other hand, the directive ʤaaj heads an imperative Mood Phrase above Tense Phrase. We support this division by showing that the first two makers exhibit full agreement in phi-features with the thematic subject, whereas the latter does not agree with the subject at all due to its high position above Tense Phrase. The findings of this paper align with the crosslinguistic observation that motion verbs like come can be grammaticalized into varying functional elements (Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; Dragomirescu, Adina & Alexandru Nicolae. 2014. The multiple grammaticalization of Romanian veni ‘come’. Focusing on the passive construction. In Maud Devos & Jenneke van der Wal (eds.), Come and go off the beaten grammaticalization path, 69–100. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter; Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Kuteva, Tania, et al. 2019. World lexicon of grammaticalization, 2nd edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Lumien van Klinken, Catherine. 1999. A grammar of the Fehan dialect of Tetun. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics).
Acknowledgments
We sincerely thank the reviewers and editors for their valuable feedback and support, which greatly improved the quality of this paper. All remaining errors are our own.
References
Al-Raba’a, Basem I. M. 2023. On the linguistic functions of the particle ʕaad in Jordanian Arabic. The Linguistic Review 40(4). 583–612. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2023-2012.Search in Google Scholar
Alshboul, Sabri, Yousef Al-Shaboul & Sahail M. Asassfeh. 2009. Grammaticalization of the future markers in Jordanian Arabic. Language. Text. Society 3(1). 26–37.Search in Google Scholar
Altamimi, Mansour Ibrahim. 2021. The grammaticalization of lexical verbs into progressive and future markers in Saudi Najdi Arabic. Doctoral dissertation. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.Search in Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. 2008. Aspect and modality in Ewe: A survey. In Felix K. Ameka & Mary E. Kropp Dakubu (eds.), Aspect and modality in Kwa languages, 135–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.100.07ameSearch in Google Scholar
Benmamoun, Elabbas. 2008. Clause structure and the syntax of verbless sentences. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 105–131. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
Benmamoun, Elabbas. 2017. VSO word order, primarily in Arabic languages. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 1–30. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom060Search in Google Scholar
Bourdin, Philippe. 2014. When come and go go necessive. In Maud Devos & Jenneke van der Wal (eds.), Come and go off the beaten grammaticalization path, 103–164. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110335989.103Search in Google Scholar
Botne, Robert. 2006. Motion, time, and tense: On the grammaticalization of come and go to future markers in Bantu. Studies In African Linguistics 35(2). 127–188. https://doi.org/10.32473/sal.v35i2.107307.Search in Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & William Pagliuca. 1985. Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. In Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba & Giuliano Bernini (eds.), Papers from the VIIth international conference on historical linguistics, 59–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Carstens, Vicki. 2000. Concord in minimalist theory. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2). 319–355. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554370.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step-by-step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–156. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2006. Restructuring and functional heads: The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195179545.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Daniels, Kelsey. 2014. On the grammaticalization of venga ‘come’ as a discourse marker in Peninsular Spanish. In Maud Devos & Jenneke van der Wal (eds.), Come and go off the beaten grammaticalization path, 219–247. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110335989.219Search in Google Scholar
Dragomirescu, Adina & Alexandru Nicolae. 2014. The multiple grammaticalization of Romanian veni ‘come’. Focusing on the passive construction. In Maud Devos & Jenneke van der Wal (eds.), Come and go off the beaten grammaticalization path, 69–100. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110335989.69Search in Google Scholar
Esseesy, Mohssen. 2021. Grammaticalization in Arabic. In Karin Ryding & David Wilmsen (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of Arabic linguistics, 277–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108277327.013Search in Google Scholar
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 1993. Issues in the structure of Arabic clauses and words. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-017-1986-5Search in Google Scholar
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 2012. Key features and parameters in Arabic grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.182Search in Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1991. Serial verbs and the mental reality of ‘event’: Grammatical vs. cognitive packaging. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1, 81–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.19.1.06givSearch in Google Scholar
Glinert, Lewis. 1989. The grammar of modern Hebrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Godé, Victor. 2008. Le Dadjriwalé: Langue Kru de la Côte d’Ivoire. Paris: L’Harmattan.Search in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511581908Search in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613463Search in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2007. The genesis of grammar: A reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199227761.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Traugott Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Search in Google Scholar
Huber, Juliette. 2011. Makalero: A Papuan language of East Timor. Utrecht: LOT-Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Jarad, Najib Ismail. 2014. The grammaticalization of the motion verb “raħ” as a prospective aspect marker in Syrian Arabic. Al-Arabiyya 47. 101–118.Search in Google Scholar
Kocher, Anna. 2023. A sentence mood account for Spanish verum. Glossa 8(1). 1–47. https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.8784.Search in Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog, & Seongha Rhee. 2019. World lexicon of grammaticalization, 2nd edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316479704Search in Google Scholar
Leddy-Cecere, Thomas. 2020. Contact-induced grammaticalization between Arabic dialects. In Christopher Lucas & Stefano Manfredi (eds.), Arabic and contact-induced change, 603–623. Berlin: Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.2.152.Search in Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2004. Theory and method in grammaticalization. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 32(2). 152–187. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.2.152.Search in Google Scholar
Lumien van Klinken, Catherine. 1999. A grammar of the Fehan dialect of Tetun. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Macaulay, Monica. 1996. A grammar of Chalcatongo Mixtec. Berkeley: The University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Marchese, Lynell. 1986. Tense/aspect and the development of auxiliaries in Kru languages. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Search in Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1991. Areal and universal dimensions of grammaticalization in Lahu. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. II, 383–453. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.19.2.19matSearch in Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sansò. 2011. How directive constructions emerge: Grammaticalization, constructionalization, cooptation. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 3489–3521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.001.Search in Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sansò. 2014. Go and come as sources of directive constructions. In Maud Devos & Jenneke van der Wal (eds.), Come and go off the beaten grammaticalization path, 165–184. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110335989.165Search in Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The languages of native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Nakao, Shuichiro. 2014. Grammaticalization of já ‘come’ and rúwa ‘go’ in Juba Arabic. Studies in Nilotic Linguistics (Recent Advances in Nilotic Linguistics) 8. 33–49.Search in Google Scholar
Ouali, Hamid & Juman Al Bukhari. 2016. The syntax of motion light verbs in Jordanian and Moroccan Arabic. In Youssef A. Haddad & Eric Potsdam (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics XXVIII, 173–191. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sal.4.08ouaSearch in Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins (eds.), Clausal and phrasal architecture: syntactic derivation and interpretation, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.101.14pesSearch in Google Scholar
Ramat, Anna Giacalone & Andrea Sansò. 2014. Venire (‘come’) as a passive auxiliary in Italian. In Maud Devos & Jenneke van der Wal (eds.), Come and go off the beaten grammaticalization path, 21–44. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110335989.21Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rubin, Aaron. D. 2005. Studies in Semitic grammaticalization. Indiana: Eisenbrauns.10.1163/9789004370029Search in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (ICHL XII), Manchester, UK.Search in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Ekkehard König. 1991. The Semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, 189–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.19.1.10cloSearch in Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa deMena. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Search in Google Scholar
van Engelenhoven, Aone & Catherine Williams-van Klinken. 2005. Tetun and leti. In Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.),The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar,735–768. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Woidich, Manfred. 1996. Some cases of grammaticalization in Egyptian Arabic. In Joe Cremona, Clive, Holes, & Geoffrey, Khan (eds.), Proceedngs of the second international conference of L’association internationale de dialectologie Arabe, 259–268. Cambridge: Association Internationale de Dialectologie Arabe.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
