Encoding indefinite human reference without indefinite pronouns: the case of Chinese presentationals

References

Arslangul, Arnaud & Marzena Watorek. 2021. Locative phrase and descriptive discourse in L2 Chinese. Chinese as a Second Language Research 10(2). 155–182. https://doi.org/10.1515/caslar-2021-2001.Search in Google Scholar

Beaver, David, Itamar Francez & Dmitry Levinson. 2006. Bad subject: (Non-)canonicality and NP distribution in existentials. In Efthymia Georgala & Jonathan Howell (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th semantics and linguistic theory conference. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.10.3765/salt.v15i0.2920Search in Google Scholar

Bentley, Delia. 2013. Subject canonicality and definiteness effects in Romance there-sentences. Language 89(4). 675–712. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0062.Search in Google Scholar

Bentley, Delia, Francesco Maria Ciconte & Silvio Cruschina. 2015. Existentials and locatives in Romance dialects of Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745266.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Berretta, Monica. 1995. Come inseriamo elementi nuovi nel discorso/1: ‘C’è il gatto che ha fame’. Italiano e Oltre 10. 212–217.Search in Google Scholar

Berruto, Gaetano. 1986. Un tratto sintattico dell’italiano parlato: il c’è presentativo. In Klaus Lichem, Edith Mara & Susanne Knaller (eds.), Parallela 2. Aspetti della sintassi dell’italiano contemporaneo, 61–73. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Cai, Wei-Tian (Tsai, Wei-Tian Dylan). 2003. Three types of existential quantification in Chinese. In Yen-Hui Audrey Li & Andrew Simpson (eds.), Functional structure(s), form and interpretation: Perspectives from Asian languages, 161–179. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Cai, Wei-Tian. 2004. Tan “you ren”, “you de ren” he “you xie ren’ [About “you ren” (有人), “you de ren” (有的人) and “you xie ren” (有些人)]. Hanyu Xuebao [Chinese Linguistics] 2. 16–25.Search in Google Scholar

Carlier, Anne & Karen Lahousse. 2023. Presentational clefts, existentials and information structure: A comparative perspective on French and Italian. In Laure Sarda & Ludovica Lena (eds.), Existential constructions across languages: Forms, meanings and functions, 139–180. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.76.05carSearch in Google Scholar

Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. Amherst: University of Massachusetts PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Jung-hsing. 2001. The syntax of event structure in Chinese. Manoa: University of Hawaii PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chappell, Hilary & Denis Creissels. 2019. Topicality and the typology of predicative possession. Linguistic Typology 23(3). 467–532. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2019-0016.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Ping. 2004. Identifiability and definiteness in Chinese. Linguistics 42(6). 1129–1184. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2004.42.6.1129.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Rint Sybesma. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4). 509–542. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554192.Search in Google Scholar

Choi-Jonin, Injoo & Véronique Lagae. 2005. Il y a des gens ils ont mauvais caractère. A propos du rôle de il y a. In Adolfo Murguía (ed.), Sens et références. Mélanges Georges Kleiber, 39–66. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Peter C. 1992. Cleft existentials in English. Language Sciences 14(4). 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(92)90024-9.Search in Google Scholar

Creissels, Denis. 2018. La typologie générale des constructions impersonnelles et les constructions impersonnelles du français. Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française – CMLF 2018. SHS Web of Conferences 46. 15001. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184615001.Search in Google Scholar

Creissels, Denis. 2019. Inverse-locational predication in typological perspective. Italian Journal of Linguistics 31(2). 37–106.Search in Google Scholar

Creissels, Denis. 2023. Existential predication and have-possessive constructions in the languages of the world. In Laure Sarda & Ludovica Lena (eds.), Existential constructions across languages: Forms, meanings and functions (Human Cognitive Processing 76), 34–67. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.76.02creSearch in Google Scholar

Cruschina, Silvio. 2012. Focus in existential sentences. In Bianchi Valentina & Chesi Cristiano (eds.), Enjoy Linguistics! Papers offered to Luigi Rizzi on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 77–107. Siena: CSCL Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cruschina, Silvio. 2015. Patterns of variation in existential constructions. Isogloss 1(1). 33–65. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.5.Search in Google Scholar

Cruschina, Silvio. 2018. Setting the boundaries: Presentational ci-sentences in Italian. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32(1). 53–85. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00016.cru.Search in Google Scholar

Davidse, Kristin, Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende & Gerard O’Grady. 2023. Specificational and presentational there-clefts: Redefining the field of clefts. Amsterdam: Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-031-32270-9Search in Google Scholar

De Cesare, Anna-Maria. 2007. Sul cosidetto ‘c’è presentativo’. Forme e funzioni. In Anna-Maria De Cesare & Angela Ferrari (eds.), Lessico, grammatica e testualità, tra italiano scritto e parlato, 127–153. Basel: University of Basel.Search in Google Scholar

Duffield, Cecily Jill, Jena D. Hwang & Laura A. Michaelis. 2010. Identifying assertions in text and discourse: The presentational relative clause construction. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT workshop on extracting and using constructions in computational linguistics, 17–24. Los Angeles, CA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Duffield, Cecily Jill & Laura A. Michaelis. 2011. Why subject relatives prevail: Constraints versus constructional licensing. Language and Cognition 3(2). 171–208.10.1515/LANGCOG.2011.007Search in Google Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2007. Information structure: The syntax-discourse interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199262588.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Escandell-Vidal, Victoria & Manuel Leonetti. 2002. Coercion and the stage/individual distinction. In Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.), From words to discourse. Trends in Spanish semantics and pragmatics, 159–179. New York & Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1163/9780585475295_011Search in Google Scholar

Francez, Itamar. 2007. Existential propositions. Stanford: Stanford University PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Geeraerts, Dirk. 2006. Prototype theory. Prospects and problems of prototype theory. In Dirk Geeraerts (ed.), Cognitive linguistics. Basic readings, 141–166. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199901.141Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1976. Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 151–188. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax. An introduction, vol. 1. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.syn1Search in Google Scholar

Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2). 274–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/416535.Search in Google Scholar

Guz, Wojciech. 2023. Presentational relative clauses introduced by że in Polish. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 68(2). 304–334. https://doi.org/10.1515/slaw-2023-0015.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite pronouns (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hickmann, Maya, Henriëtte Hendriks, Françoise Roland & James Liang. 1996. The marking of new information in children’s narratives: A comparison of English, French, German and Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language 23(3). 591–619. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000900008965.Search in Google Scholar

Hole, Daniel. 2012. The information structure of Chinese. In Manfred Krifka & Renate Musan (eds.), The expression of information structure, 45–70. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Hu, Jianhua & Haihua Pan. 2007. Focus and the basic function of Chinese existential you-sentences. In Ileana Comorovski & Klaus von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: Semantics and syntax, 133–145. Heidelberg: Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-1-4020-6197-4_5Search in Google Scholar

Huang, James C.-T. 1987. Existential sentences in Chinese and (in)definiteness. In Eric J. Reuland & Alice G. B. Ter Meulen (eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness, 226–253. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Iljic, Robert. 1994. Quantification in Mandarin Chinese: Two markers of plurality. Linguistics 32(1). 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1994.32.1.91.Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, Zhaoyu. 2016. Xiandai Hanyu cunzaiju A duan de lunyuan yu fei lunyuan shuxing [The argumental and non-argumental properties of A segments in modern Chinese existential sentences]. Jinan: Shandong University PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Karssenberg, Lena. 2018. Non-prototypical clefts in French: A corpus Analysis of “il y a” clefts. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110586435Search in Google Scholar

Karssenberg, Lena, Stefania Marzo, Karen Lahousse & Daniela Guglielmo. 2017. There’s more to Italian c’è clefts than expressing all-focus. Italian Journal of Linguistics 29(2). 57–86.Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1988. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In Manfred Krifka (ed.), Genericity in natural language, 247–284. Tubingen: University of Tubingen.Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage level and individual level predicates. In Gregory N. Carlson & Francis J. Pelletier (eds.), The generic book, 125–175. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred. 1995. Common nouns: A contrastive analysis of Chinese and English. In Gregory N. Carlson & Francis J. Pelletier (eds.), The generic book, 398–411. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kuo, Jenny Yi-chun. 2008. A pragmatic approach to the interpretations of Mandarin bare nouns. Journal of Pragmatics 40(6). 1082–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.004.Search in Google Scholar

Lagae, Véronique & Christine Rouget. 1988. Quelques réflexions sur les relatives prédicatives. In Mirielle Bilger, Karel Van den Eynde & Françoise Gadet (eds.), Analyse linguistique et approches de l’oral. Recueil d’études offert en hommage à Claire Blanche-Benveniste, 313–325. Leuven and Paris: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 1986. Pragmatically motivated syntax. Presentational cleft constructions in spoken French. In Anne M. Farley, Peter T. Farley & Karl-Erik McCullough (eds.), 22nd conference of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Papers from the parasession on pragmatics and grammatical theory, 115–126. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 1987. On the status of SVO sentences in French discourse. In Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse, 217–261. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.11.12lamSearch in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 1988. Presentational cleft constructions in spoken French. In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 135–179. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.18.08lamSearch in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607Search in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 2000. When subjects behave like objects: An analysis of the merging of S and O in sentence-focus constructions across languages. Studies in Language 24(3). 611–682. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.24.3.06lam.Search in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 2001. A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 39(3). 463–516. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.021.Search in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 2002. Topic, focus and secondary predication. The French presentational relative construction. In Claire Beyssade, Reineke Bok-Bennema, Frank Drijkoningen & Paola Monachesi (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2000, 171–212. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.232.11lamSearch in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 2010. Constraints on subject-focus mapping in French and English: A contrastive analysis. In Carsten Breul & Edward Göbbel (eds.), Comparative and contrastive studies of information structure, 77–100. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.165.04lamSearch in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud & Maria Polinsky. 1997. Typological variation in sentence-focus constructions. In Kora Singer, Eggert Randall & Gregory Anderson (eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-third annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 189–206. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

LaPolla, Randy J. 1995. Pragmatic relations and word order in Chinese. In Pamela A. Dowing & Michael Noonan (eds.), Word order in discourse (Typological Studies in Language 30), 297–329. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.30.11lapSearch in Google Scholar

Léard, Jean-Michel. 1992. Les gallicismes. Étude syntaxique et sémantique. Paris & Leuven: Duculot.10.3917/dbu.leard.1992.01Search in Google Scholar

Lena, Ludovica. 2020a. Presentational sentences: A study on the information structure of Path verbs in spoken discourse. In Dongyan Chen & Daniel Bell (eds.), Explorations of Chinese theoretical and applied linguistics, 45–81. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Search in Google Scholar

Lena, Ludovica. 2020b. Referent introducing strategies in advanced L2 usage: A bi-directional study on French learners of Chinese and Chinese learners of French. In Jonathon Ryan & Peter Crosthwaite (eds.), Referring in a second language: Studies on reference to person in a multilingual world, 164–183. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429263972-9Search in Google Scholar

Lena, Ludovica. 2020c. L’introduction des entités dans le récit en français et en chinois : des usages natifs aux variétés d’apprenants. Paris & Rome: Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales & La Sapienza University PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Lena, Ludovica. 2022. An unbridgeable gap? The treatment of definiteness restrictions in French and Chinese presentational constructions. Discours 31. 1–46. https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.12249.Search in Google Scholar

Lena, Ludovica. 2023. Partition and existence: The case of you ren ‘there’s someone, there are people’ in Chinese. In Laure Sarda & Ludovica Lena (eds.), Existential constructions across languages: Forms, meanings and functions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/hcp.76.08lenSearch in Google Scholar

Lena, Ludovica. Accepted. Looking for someone: The encoding of indefinite human reference in Chinese/English aligned translation. Lingua.Search in Google Scholar

Lena, Ludovica. Under review. Negative existentials and presentationals in Chinese: A parallel corpus investigation. Languages in Contrast.Search in Google Scholar

Lena, Ludovica. Submitted. The dynamics of part-whole relationship in spoken Chinese discourse. Revue roumaine de linguistique.Search in Google Scholar

Lena, Ludovica & Buqian Li. 2022. In favor of the analysis of you biclausal constructions as “presentational clefts”. Paper presented at the 34th Paris Meetings on East Asian Linguistics (JLAO34), CRLAO, Paris, 7 July.Search in Google Scholar

Lena, Ludovica & Yue Liu. Accepted. When number is not neutral: Translating Chinese bare nouns into English. Sintagma.Search in Google Scholar

Leonetti, Manuel. 1998. A relevance-theoretic account of the property predication restriction. In Villy Rouchota & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Current issues in relevance theory, 141–167. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.58.08leoSearch in Google Scholar

Leonetti, Manuel. 2008. Definiteness effects and the role of the coda in existential constructions. In Henrik Høeg Müller & Alex Klinge (eds.), Essays on nominal determination. From morphology to discourse management, 131–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.99.09leoSearch in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. & David P. Wilkins (eds.). 2006. Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486753Search in Google Scholar

Li, Jinxi. 1924 [2007]. Xinzhu guoyu wenfa [New Chinese grammar]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 1996. Definite and indefinite existential constructions. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 26(1/2). 175–191.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Jie. 1997. Predicate type and the semantics of bare nouns in Chinese. In Liejiong Xu (ed.), The referential properties of Chinese noun phrases, 99–115. Paris: Ecole des hautes études en Sciences sociales, Centre de recherches linguistiques sur l’Asie orientale.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Wendan. 2000. The pragmatic function of numeral-classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 32(8). 1113–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00086-7.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520352858Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Anchun & Bojiang Zhang. 2004. The discourse function of the sentence with an indefinite NP subject. Special Issue of Journal of Chinese Language and Computing 14(2). 97–105.Search in Google Scholar

Lü, Shuxiang. 1942 [1982/1985]. Zhongguo wenfa yaolüe [Essentials of Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Search in Google Scholar

McNally, Louise. 2016. Existential sentences crosslinguistically: Variations in form and meaning. Annual Review of Linguistics 2. 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040837.Search in Google Scholar

Michaelis, Laura A. 2011. Stative by construction. Linguistics 49(6). 1359–1399. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.038.Search in Google Scholar

Murelli, Adriano. 2011. Relative constructions in European non-standard varieties. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110238792Search in Google Scholar

Paul, Waltraud. 2021. Nobody there? On the non-existence of nobody in Mandarin Chinese and related issues. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 66(3). 279–316. https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2021.21.Search in Google Scholar

Piantadosi, Steven T., Harry Tily & Edward Gibson. 2012. The communicative function of ambiguity in language. Cognition 122(3). 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.004.Search in Google Scholar

Sarda, Laure. 2019. French motion verbs: Insights into the status of locative PPs. In Michel Aurnague & Dejan Stosic (eds.), The semantics of dynamic space in French. Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression, 68–107. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.66.02sarSearch in Google Scholar

Sarda, Laure & Ludovica Lena. 2023. Existential constructions: In search of a definition. In Laure Sarda & Ludovica Lena (eds.), Existential constructions across languages: Forms, meanings and functions (Human Cognitive Processing 76), 1–32. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.76.01sarSearch in Google Scholar

Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1987. The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 25(3). 511–580. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.3.511.Search in Google Scholar

Sornicola, Rosanna. 2010. La rappresentazione delle strutture locativo-esistenziali in un corpus di italiano. Uno studio sull’analizzabilità strutturale del discorso parlato. Vox Romanica 69(1). 111–140.Search in Google Scholar

Sun, Chaofen. 1988. The discourse function of numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 16(2). 298–323.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 1995. Linguistic categorization. Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Teng, Shou-hsin. 1978. Modification and the structures of existential sentences. In Robert L. Cheng, Ying-che Li & Ting-chi Tang (eds.), Proceedings of symposium on Chinese linguistics, 197–210. Taipei: Student Book.Search in Google Scholar

Van der Auwera, Johan, Quan Nguyen Hai, Vipas Pothipath & Stefanie Siebenhütter. 2022. Existential indefinite constructions, in the world and in Mainland Southeast Asia. Journal of Linguistics 59. 1–34.10.1017/S0022226722000196Search in Google Scholar

Villalba, Xavier. 2013. Eventive existentials in Catalan and the topic-focus articulation. Italian Journal of Linguistics 25(1). 147–173.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Hongqi. 2014. Hanyu zhuyu, binyu de youding yu wuding [Definiteness and indefiniteness of Chinese subjects and objects]. Yuyanxue Luncong 2. 73–95.Search in Google Scholar

Xiao, Richard, Paul Rayson & Tony McEnery. 2009. A frequency dictionary of Mandarin Chinese. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Liejiong. 1995. Definiteness effects on Chinese word order. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 24(1). 29–48. https://doi.org/10.3406/clao.1995.1465.Search in Google Scholar

Yan, Yufei & Wei He. 2022. The Chinese character you (有): A functional approach. Lingua 278. 103398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2022.103398.Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, Shihong & Li Shen. 2016. Hanyu zhong de “wuding NP zhuyu ju” ji xiangguan de “you” zi chengxian ju [Sentences with an indefinite subject and the corresponding presentational you sentences in Chinese]. Liyun yuyanxue kan 3. 105–120.Search in Google Scholar