Abstract
This article looks at descriptions of ideophones in Kiranti (Sino-Tibetan, Eastern Nepal) languages. It will do so by first providing a description of the ideophones of Thulung, for which four distinct ideophone types are identified, on the basis of a 10 h narrative corpus. Next, the results of this analysis will be compared to descriptions of ideophonic lexemes in sources on other Kiranti languages. In order to place these topics within an areal perspective, descriptions of the same phenomena in Nepali, the contact language for the linguistic area in question, will also be looked at. The goal of the article is to present data on the ideophonic patterns found in the Kiranti linguistic area and to consider the question of borrowing for ideophones in the Himalayas.
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank the following colleagues for very helpful and insightful feedback on earlier drafts of this article: Yvonne Treis, Julie Marsault, members of the Labex EFL working group on ideophones and interjections, Bonnie McLean, an anonymous reviewer, and the journal’s editors. The seeds for this work were presented at a workshop on ideophones and interjections at the SLE meeting in Leipzig in 2019. This work was supported by a public grant overseen by the French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the program “Investissements d’Avenir” (reference: ANR-10-LABX-0083). It contributes to the IdEx Université Paris Cité – ANR-18-IDEX-0001.
Non-Leipzig abbreviations
- conj
-
conjunction
- ideo
-
ideophone
- int
-
intensifier
- hab
-
habitual
- hs
-
hearsay
- com
-
comitative
- temp
-
temporal marker
References
Abbi, Anvita. 2021. Expressives as a semantically complex categories in South Asian languages. In Jeffrey Williams (ed.), Expressive morphology in the languages of South Asia, 11–31. Oxford: Routledge.10.4324/9781315265629-2Search in Google Scholar
Akita, Kimi & Prashant Pardeshi (eds.). 2019. Ideophones, mimetics and expressives (Iconicity in Language and Literature 16). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ill.16Search in Google Scholar
Allen, Nicholas J. 1975. Sketch of Thulung grammar (Cornell East Asia Papers). Ithaca, NY: China-Japan Program, Cornell University.Search in Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 1996. Aspect, mood, and time in Belhare (Arbeiten des Seminars für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 15). Zürich: Universität Zürich.Search in Google Scholar
Chelliah, Shobhanna. 2001. The role of text collection and elicitation in linguistic fieldwork. In Paul Newman & Martha Ratliff (eds.), Linguistic fieldwork, 152–165. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810206.008Search in Google Scholar
Choksi, Nishant & Nathan Badenoch. 2021. Introduction. In Nathan Badenoch & Nishant Choksi (eds.), Expressives in the South Asian linguistic area (Brill’s Studies in South and Southwest Asian Languages 13), 1–14. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004439153_002Search in Google Scholar
Dahal, Ballabh Mani. 1999. Phonesthetic elements in Nepali. In Yogendra P. Yadava & Warren W. Glover (eds.), Topics in Nepalese linguistics, 90–102. Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.Search in Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. 2012. Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(10). 654–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.361.Search in Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. 2017. Expressiveness and system integration. On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 70(2). 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2017-0018.Search in Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. 2019. “Ideophone” as a comparative concept. In Kimi Akita & Prashant Pardeshi (eds.), Ideophones, mimetics and expressives (Iconicity in Language and Literature 16), 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ill.16.02dinSearch in Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. In press. Ideophones. In Eva van Lier (ed.), Oxford handbook of word classes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark & Kimi Akita. 2017. An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics 53(3). 501–532. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222671600030X.Search in Google Scholar
Doornenbal, Marius. 2009. A grammar of Bantawa: Grammar, paradigm tables, glossary and texts of a Rai language of Eastern Nepal. Utrecht: LOT.Search in Google Scholar
Driem, George van. 1987. A grammar of Limbu (Mouton Grammar Library 4). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110846812Search in Google Scholar
Driem, George van. 1993. A grammar of Dumi (Mouton Grammar Library 10). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110880915Search in Google Scholar
Driem, George van. 2021. Nepali expressive morphology. In Jeffrey Williams (ed.), Expressive morphology in the languages of South Asia, 58–131. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9781315265629-4Search in Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen. 1997a. A grammar of Athpare (Lincom Studies in Asian Linguistics 1). Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen. 1997b. Camling (Chamling) (Languages of the World/Materials 103). Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen. 2000. Camling texts and glossary. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar
Emeneau, Murray. 1969. Onomatopoetics in the Indian linguistic area. Language 45(2.1). 274–299. https://doi.org/10.2307/411660.Search in Google Scholar
Gardani, Francesco. 2020. Borrowing matter and pattern in morphology. An overview. Morphology 30. 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-020-09371-5.Search in Google Scholar
Guitang, Guillaume. 2021. Frozen reduplication in Gizey: Insights into analogical reduplication, phonological and morphological doubling in Masa. Morphology 32. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-021-09389-3.Search in Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume, Aimée Lahaussois & Shuya Zhang. 2021. Associated motion in Sino-Tibetan, with a focus on Gyalrongic and Kiranti. In Antoine Guillaume & Harold Koch (eds.), Associated motion as a grammatical category in linguistic typology (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 64), 819–853. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110692099-021Search in Google Scholar
Kelly, Barbara & Aimée Lahaussois. 2021. Chains of influence in Himalayan grammars: Models and interrelations shaping descriptions of Tibeto-Burman languages of Nepal. Linguistics 59(1). 207–245. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0255.Search in Google Scholar
Lahaussois, Aimée. 2003. Ergativity in Thulung Rai: A shift in the position of pronominal split. In David Bradley, Randy LaPolla, Boyd Michailovsky & Graham Thurgood (eds.), Language variation: Papers on variation and change in the Sinosphere and in the Indosphere in honour of James A. Matisoff, 101–112. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Lahaussois, Aimée. 2016. Reflexive derivations in Thulung. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 39(1). 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.39.1.03lah.Search in Google Scholar
Lahaussois, Aimée. 2017. Ideophones in Khaling Rai. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 40(2). 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.17005.lah.Search in Google Scholar
Lahaussois, Aimée. 2020. Predicate derivations in Thulung. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 7(1). 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2021-2024.Search in Google Scholar
Lahaussois, Aimée. Forthcoming. Reflexive constructions in Thulung. In Katarzyna Janic, Nicoletta Puddu & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Reflexive constructions (Studies in Diversity Linguistics). Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar
Masica, Colin. 1991. The Indo-Aryan languages (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron & Jeanette Sakel. 2007a. Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence. Studies in Language 31(4). 829–865. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.4.05mat.Search in Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron & Jeanette Sakel. 2007b. Introduction. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 38), 1–13. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199192Search in Google Scholar
McLean, Bonnie. 2021. Revising an implicational hierarchy for the meanings of ideophones, with special reference to Japonic. Linguistic Typology 25(3). 507–549. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2063.Search in Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd. 1988. La langue hayu (Sciences du Langage). Paris: Editions du CNRS.Search in Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd. 2017. Kiranti languages. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages (Routledge Language Family Series 3), 2nd edn., 646–679. Oxford: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Modi, Yankee & Mark W. Post. 2021. The functional value of formal exuberance: Isomorphosm and expressive intensification in Adi and Milang. In Jeffrey Williams (ed.), Expressive morphology in the languages of South Asia, 187–212. Oxford: Routledge.10.4324/9781315265629-8Search in Google Scholar
Msimang, Christian T. & George Poulos. 2001. The ideophone in Zulu: A re-examination of conceptual and descriptive notions. In F. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones, 235–249. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.44.19msiSearch in Google Scholar
Opgenort, Jean Robert. 2004. A grammar of Wambule: Grammar, lexicon, texts and cultural survey of a Kiranti tribe of Eastern Nepal (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 5/2). Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047414131Search in Google Scholar
Paudyal, Netra Prasad. 2015. Aspects of Chintang syntax. Zurich: University of Zurich.Search in Google Scholar
Pokharel, Madav P. 1993. The grammar of onomatopoeia in Nepali. Nepalese Linguistics 10. 10–34.Search in Google Scholar
Rai, Netra Mani. 2016. A grammar of Dumi. Kathmandu: Tribhuvan University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Rai, Novel Kishore. 1984. A descriptive study of Bantawa. Deccan College: Poona.Search in Google Scholar
Rai, Novel Kishore, Balthasar Bickel, Martin Gaenszle, Elena Lieven, Netra Prasad Paudyal, Ichchha Purna Rai, Manoj Rai & Sabine Stoll. 2005. Triplication and ideophones in Chintang. In Yogendra P. Yadava (ed.), Current issues in Nepalese linguistics, 205–209. Kirtipur: Linguistic Society of Nepal.Search in Google Scholar
Rai, Novel Kishore & Werner Winter. 1997. Triplicated verbal adjuncts in Bantawa. In David Bradley (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas, 119–134. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Rutgers, Roland. 1998. Yamphu: Grammar, texts, lexicon (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 2). Leiden: Research School CNWS.Search in Google Scholar
Sakel, Jeanette. 2007. Types of loan: Matter and pattern. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 38), 15–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199192.15Search in Google Scholar
Schackow, Diana. 2015. A grammar of Yakkha (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 7). Berlin: Language Science Press.10.26530/OAPEN_603340Search in Google Scholar
Schlemmer, Grégoire. 2021. Rai: Following the ancestors and managing the otherness. In Marine Carrin (ed.), Encyclopedia of the religions of indigenous people of South Asia, 785–792. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Sharma, Narayan Prasad. 2014. Morphosyntax of Puma, a Tibeto-Burman language of Nepal. London: SOAS, University of London.Search in Google Scholar
Turner, Ralph Lilley Sir. 1931. A comparative and etymological dictionary of the Nepali language. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Available at: http://dsal.uchicago.edu/dictionaries/turner/.Search in Google Scholar
Voeltz, F. K. Erhard & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.). 2001a. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.44Search in Google Scholar
Voeltz, F. K. Erhard & Christa Kilian-Hatz. 2001b. Introduction. In F. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones, 1–8. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.44.02voeSearch in Google Scholar
Williams, Jeffrey (ed.). 2021a. Expressive morphology in the languages of South Asia. Oxford: Routledge.10.4324/9781315265629Search in Google Scholar
Williams, Jeffrey. 2021b. Introduction. In Jeffrey Williams (ed.), Expressive morphology in the languages of South Asia, 1–10. Oxford: Routledge.10.4324/9781315265629-1Search in Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1987. Plain morphology and expressive morphology. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 13. 330–340. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v13i0.1817.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Ideophonic patterns in Kiranti languages and beyond
- ‘Without V-ing’ clauses: clausal negative concomitance in typological perspective
- Tune-text accommodation in Optimality Theory: an account of Southern Valencian Catalan yes-no questions
- Unbounded repetition, habituality, and aspect from a comparative perspective
- Returning a maverick creole to the fold: the Berbice Dutch enigma revisited
- Discussion
- Exceptionalizing genetic creolistics: a rejoinder to Mikael Parkvall and Bart Jacobs on the emergence of Berbice Dutch
- Why Haitian is a creole, Michif an intertwiner, and Irish English neither: a reply to Mufwene
- Book Reviews
- Virginia Hill and Alexandru Mardale: The diachrony of Differential Object Marking in Romanian
- John M. Anderson: A grammar of English: The consequences of a substance-based view of language
- R. M. W. Dixon: The essence of linguistic analysis: An integrated approach
- Martin Hilpert: Ten lectures on Diachronic Construction Grammar
- Kevin McManus: Crosslinguistic influence and second language learning
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Ideophonic patterns in Kiranti languages and beyond
- ‘Without V-ing’ clauses: clausal negative concomitance in typological perspective
- Tune-text accommodation in Optimality Theory: an account of Southern Valencian Catalan yes-no questions
- Unbounded repetition, habituality, and aspect from a comparative perspective
- Returning a maverick creole to the fold: the Berbice Dutch enigma revisited
- Discussion
- Exceptionalizing genetic creolistics: a rejoinder to Mikael Parkvall and Bart Jacobs on the emergence of Berbice Dutch
- Why Haitian is a creole, Michif an intertwiner, and Irish English neither: a reply to Mufwene
- Book Reviews
- Virginia Hill and Alexandru Mardale: The diachrony of Differential Object Marking in Romanian
- John M. Anderson: A grammar of English: The consequences of a substance-based view of language
- R. M. W. Dixon: The essence of linguistic analysis: An integrated approach
- Martin Hilpert: Ten lectures on Diachronic Construction Grammar
- Kevin McManus: Crosslinguistic influence and second language learning