Home Integrating Patient Incentives with Episode-Based Payment
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Integrating Patient Incentives with Episode-Based Payment

  • Lorens A. Helmchen EMAIL logo , William E. Encinosa , Michael E. Chernew and Richard A. Hirth
Published/Copyright: May 15, 2013

Abstract

To rein in cost, payers are exploring bundled payment, which aggregates fees for a range of services into a single prospective payment. While under bundled payment providers would have incentives to reduce cost, they might also withhold more expensive care that patients prefer. We explore how bundled payment could be aligned with a benefit design that would encourage patients’ consideration of cost without jeopardizing access to the most expensive treatments. Least-costly-alternative approaches allow patient choice but might deter patients from choosing more expensive care by exposing them to potentially large out-of-pocket payments. A novel “shared-savings supplement” would reward patients for choosing the least costly alternative with a supplemental cash disbursement and thus allow them to share in any cost savings. This cash incentive for the least-costly-alternative allows a reduction of the out-of-pocket payment for the expensive alternative. Thus, patients would still have the option of the more expensive therapy while facing only a modest out-of-pocket cost. Such benefit modifications could be aligned with bundled payment by splitting the responsibility for the incremental cost of more expensive care between patients and their providers.


Corresponding author: Lorens A. Helmchen, Associate Professor, Department of Health Administration and Policy, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive – M/S 1J3, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA, e-mail:

References

Bach, P. B. (2009) “Limits on Medicare’s Ability to Control Rising Spending on Cancer Drugs,” New England Journal of Medicine, 360:626–633.10.1056/NEJMhpr0807774Search in Google Scholar

Bach, P. B., J. N. Mirkin and J. J. Luke (2011) “Episode-Based Payment For Cancer Care: A Proposed Pilot For Medicare,” Health Affairs, 30:3500–3509.10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0752Search in Google Scholar

Baicker, Katherine and Dana Goldman (2011) “Patient Cost-Sharing and Healthcare Spending Growth,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(2):47–68.10.1257/jep.25.2.47Search in Google Scholar

Cassidy, A. (2011) “Health Policy Brief: Putting Limits on ‘Medigap’,” Health Affairs, September 13, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2011). “Medicare Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations (CMS-1345-P).” Accessed at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-04-07/pdf/2011-7880.pdf (accessed April 29, 2013).Search in Google Scholar

Chernew, M. E., L. Sabik, A. Chandra and J. P. Newhouse (2010) “Ensuring the Fiscal Sustainability of Health Care Reform,” New England Journal of Medicine, 362:1–3.10.1056/NEJMp0910194Search in Google Scholar

Chernew, M., W. Encinosa and R. Hirth (2000) “Optimal Health Insurance: The Case of Observable, Severe Illness,” Journal of Health Economics, 19(5):585–609.10.1016/S0167-6296(00)00061-8Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, R. P. and T. G. McGuire (1990) “Optimal Payment Systems for Health Services,” Journal of Health Economics, 9:375–396.10.1016/0167-6296(90)90001-JSearch in Google Scholar

Feigenbaum, Susan (1992) “‘Body Shop’ Economics: What’s Good for Our Cars May be Good for Our Health,” CATO Regulation: The Review of Business & Government 15(4). http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv15n4/reg15n4b.html (accessed May 2, 2010).Search in Google Scholar

Feldman, Roger (2008) How to Fix Medicare: Let’s Pay Patients, not Physicians. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Search in Google Scholar

Gianfrancesco, Frank G. (1983) “A Proposal for Improving the Efficiency of Medical Insurance,” Journal of Health Economics 2(2):176–184.10.1016/0167-6296(83)90007-3Search in Google Scholar

Hussey, P. S., M. S. Ridgely and M. B. Rosenthal (2011) “The PROMETHEUS Bundled Payment Experiment: Slow Start Shows Problems In Implementing New Payment Models,” Health Affairs, 30:112116–112124.10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0784Search in Google Scholar

Kaiser Family Foundation (2010) Medicare: A Primer. Available at: http://www.kff.org/medicare/upload/7615-03.pdf (accessed April 29, 2013).Search in Google Scholar

Kaiser Family Foundation (2011). Projecting income and assets. Publication #8172. Available at: http://www.kff.org/medicare/upload/8172.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (2010) Report to the Congress: Aligning Incentives in Medicare. Available at: http://www.medpac.gov/documents/jun10_entirereport.pdf (accessed April 29, 2013).Search in Google Scholar

Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (2011) Report to the Congress: Medicare and the Health Care Delivery System. Available at: http://www.medpac.gov/documents/Jun11_EntireReport.pdf (accessed April 29, 2013).Search in Google Scholar

Neumann, P. J., J. A. Palmer, E. Nadler, C. Fang and P. Ubel (2010) “Cancer Therapy Costs Influence Treatment: A National Survey of Oncologists,” Health Affairs, 29:196–202.10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0077Search in Google Scholar

Pauly, Mark V. (1971) “Indemnity Insurance for Health Care Efficiency,” Economic and Business Bulletin, 24(1):53–59.Search in Google Scholar

Pearson, S. D. and P. B. Bach (2010) “How Medicare Could Use Comparative Effectiveness Research in Deciding on New Coverage and Reimbursement,” Health Affairs, 29(10): 1796–1804.10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0623Search in Google Scholar

Perlroth, D. J., D. P. Goldman and A. M. Garber (2010) “The Potential Impact of Comparative Effectiveness Research on U.S. Health Care Expenditures,” Demography, 47:S173–S190.Search in Google Scholar

Schrag, D. and M. Hanger (2007) “Medical Oncologists’ Views on Communicating with Patients About Chemotherapy Costs: A Pilot Survey,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25:233–237.10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2437Search in Google Scholar

Streeter, S. B., L. Schwartzberg, N. Husain and M. Johnsrud (2011) “Patient and Plan Characteristics Affecting Abandonment of Oral Oncolytic Prescriptions,” Journal of Oncology Practice, 46s–51s.10.1200/JOP.2011.000316Search in Google Scholar

United States Congress (2010) Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, January 5, 2010, Public law 111–148, section 3210. Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ148/pdf/PLAW-111publ148.pdf (accessed April 29, 2013).Search in Google Scholar

Van Eenwyk, J., J. S. Campo and E. M. Ossiander (2002) “Socioeconomic and Demographic Disparities in Treatment for Carcinomas of the Colon and Rectum,” Cancer, 95:39–46.10.1002/cncr.10645Search in Google Scholar

Zeckhauser, Richard (1970) “Medical Insurance: A Case Study of the Tradeoff Between Risk Spreading and Appropriate Incentives,” Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, 2(1):10–26.10.1016/0022-0531(70)90010-4Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-05-15
Published in Print: 2013-01-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/fhep-2012-0002/html
Scroll to top button