Abstract
The security offering literature shows that firms offering their shares for sale to the public generally manage their earnings upwards around the offering to raise investor demand for the firm’s shares and increase their sale price. In addition, the literature demonstrates that earnings management around the offering increases the information asymmetry between the issuers and outside investors, thereby increasing the issue flotation costs. Markedly increased flotation costs imply, inter alia, a reduced demand for, and pricing of, the new shares offered – the opposite result of that sought by the issuing management. To date, mechanisms to prevent issuing firms from managing earnings opportunistically are non-existent. I address this current gap in the literature by proposing a disclosure-based framework for issuing firms aimed at reducing the extent of information asymmetry between them, outside investors and underwriters. Specifically, I present a mechanism where firms add a voluntary “honest disclosure” section in their issue prospectuses, in which they provide information that reduces uncertainty about their financial reports. I demonstrate that such voluntary disclosures by firms create a reality that encourages truthful reporting around the offering and results in a more effective capital market. The proposed framework does not require a change in current institutional mechanisms. Furthermore, as an integral part of the prospectus, the SEC will scrutinize the disclosure. Last but not least, the new section should not add significant cost to the issuer.
References
Ariely, D. 2012. The Honest Truth about Dishonesty. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Ball, R., and L. Shivakumar. 2008. “Earnings Quality at Initial Public Offerings.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 45 (2/3): 324–349.10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.12.001Search in Google Scholar
DuCharme, L. L., P. H. Malatesta, and S. E. Sefcik. 2004. “Earnings Management, Stock Issues, and Shareholder Lawsuits.” Journal of Financial Economics 71: 27–49.10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00182-XSearch in Google Scholar
Eckbo, B. E., R. W. Masulis, and O. Norli. 2007. “Security Offerings.” In: Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance, edited by Eckbo. Elsevier, North-Holland, Amsterdam (Chapter 13).10.1016/B978-0-444-53265-7.50026-3Search in Google Scholar
Gavious, I. 2007. “Alternative Perspectives to Deal with Auditors’ Agency Problem.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 18 (4): 451–467.10.1016/j.cpa.2006.01.011Search in Google Scholar
Lee, G., and R. W. Masulis. 2009. “Seasoned Equity Offerings: Quality of Accounting Information and Expected Floatation Costs.” Journal of Financial Economics 92: 443–469.10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.04.010Search in Google Scholar
Milgrom, P. R., and R. J. Weber. 1981. “A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding.” Econometrica 50 (5): 1089–1122.10.2307/1911865Search in Google Scholar
Zhou, J. and R. Elder. 2004. “Audit Quality and Earnings Management by Seasoned Equity Offering Firms.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics 11 (2): 95–120.10.1080/16081625.2004.10510638Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Growing Apart: The Evolution of Income vs. Wealth Inequality
- The Political Economy of Net Neutrality Regulation
- Hurry or Wait – The Pros and Cons of Going Fast or Slow on Climate Change
- Climate Change Adaptation Will Offer a Sharp Test of the Claims of Behavioral Economics
- A Proposed Framework to Reduce Asymmetric Information in Equity Offerings
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Growing Apart: The Evolution of Income vs. Wealth Inequality
- The Political Economy of Net Neutrality Regulation
- Hurry or Wait – The Pros and Cons of Going Fast or Slow on Climate Change
- Climate Change Adaptation Will Offer a Sharp Test of the Claims of Behavioral Economics
- A Proposed Framework to Reduce Asymmetric Information in Equity Offerings