Home Benefit Corporations and Corporate Social Intrapreneurship
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Benefit Corporations and Corporate Social Intrapreneurship

  • Salvatore Esposito De Falco and Antonio Renzi EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 10, 2020

Abstract

The present Special Issue focuses benefit corporation and social intrapreneurship as two topics which in the last decades have taken on a growing role in studies about both management and economics. This growing interest comes from globalization and digitization phenomena that have determined a change in firms’ stakeholders expectations. In this regard, social pressures about the behavior of companies have determined a new way of conceiving profit seen not only as shareholder remuneration but also as a direct or indirect tool to foster greater interdependence between economic activities and social objectives. For instance, the relationship between profit and sustainability no longer follows dichotomous logic. The firms are moving towards a path of socialization essential for their survival. The issue of sustainability, which previously appeared secondary in business economics studies, today is a pure necessity; the current competitive dimensions are based on intense and continuous engagement actions towards all stakeholders. This perspective is reflected in new theoretical strands such as the Social Emotional Wealth Theory, in which profit in the short run assumes secondary positions with respect to the survival not only of the company, but also of its founder, who tends to link its “immortality” to his/her firm. Thus, issues related to the sustainability are entering more and more the DNA of the firms on the one hand and economic policies are increasingly interested in the global aspects of sustainability (social, economic, environmental and governance) on the other hand. These trends have favored the development of new types of businesses, such as benefit corporation and start-ups related to the social entrepreneurship logic, committed to combining long-term profitability with certain standards and optimizing their positive impact on employees, the community in which they operate and the environment as well. The current economic crisis caused by Covid-19 seems to have accelerated this tendency to combine economic and social benefits.


Corresponding author: Antonio Renzi, Statistical Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy, E-mail:

References

Commissione Europea. 2000. Libro Verde sugli scambi dei diritti di emissione dei gas a effetto serra nell’UE. Bruxelles.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, K. 1973. “The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities.” Academy of Management Journal 16 (2): 312–22, https://doi.org/10.2307/255331.Search in Google Scholar

D’Orazio, E. 2003. “Responsabilità sociale ed etica d’impresa.” Notizie di Politeia 19 (72): 3–27.Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. 2009. “Can Stakeholder Theorists Seize the Moment?.” Journal of Corporate Citizenship 36 (Winter): 4–21, https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.4700.2009.wi.00004.Search in Google Scholar

Pielke, R., G. Prins, S. Rayner, and D. Sarewitz. 2007. “Lifting the Taboo on Adaptation.” Nature 445 (7128): 8–597, https://doi.org/10.1038/445597a.Search in Google Scholar

Quinto, I., G. Scandurra, and A. Thomas, 2019. “Internal Resources and Stakeholders Engagement Affecting Environmental Innovations: An Exploratory Research.” Corporate Governance and Research & Development Studies, 1/2019.10.3280/cgrds1-2019oa8609Search in Google Scholar

Tsao, F. C., and C. Laszlo. 2019. Quantum Leadership: New Consciousness in Business. California, USA: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503609167Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-08-03
Accepted: 2020-08-03
Published Online: 2020-09-10

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/erj-2020-0382/html
Scroll to top button