Startseite Choice for an Entrepreneurial Career: Do Cognitive Styles Matter?
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Choice for an Entrepreneurial Career: Do Cognitive Styles Matter?

  • Jana Deprez EMAIL logo , Eva Cools , Wouter Robijn und Martin Euwema
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 27. August 2019

Abstract

Upon graduation, students make the decision to either become an entrepreneur or an employee. Numerous studies have thus investigated personal and environmental factors that impact this decision. As cognitive styles have become more and more important in determining individual and organisational behaviour, and as they are presumed to provide new valuable insights over and above other personal factors, they provide the ideal focus to further explore this career choice. In this article, we aim to explore how creating, planning, and knowing cognitive style relate to entrepreneurial attitudes, intentions, and career choices. Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour, in a first sample, we investigate the direct and indirect impact that cognitive styles have on entrepreneurial intention through attitudes. In our second sample, we look at how career preferences for entrepreneurship or a more traditional career as an employee are affected by cognitive styles. Using structural equation modelling analysis, this study finds evidence for the importance of creating cognitive style on entrepreneurial outcomes. Additionally, we find evidence for the relationship between planning cognitive style and wanting to be an employee. Knowing style does not lead to either preference. This paper extends the current knowledge on cognitive styles and entrepreneurship by analysing the impact of other cognitive styles than the predominantly used innovative styles and by also exploring its impact on important antecedents of entrepreneurial intentions, such as entrepreneurial attitude and career preferences.

Appendix

A Measurement Items

StudyItemsStandardised loadings (λ)*
Cognitive Styles
Knowing style

(AVE = 0.67)
1 and 2I study each problem until I understand the underlying logic.0.80
I want to have a full understanding of all problems.0.67
I like to analyse problems.0.72
I make detailed analyses.0.49
Planning style

(AVE = 0.60)
1 and 2I prefer well-prepared meetings with a clear agenda and strict time management.0.53
Developing a clear plan is very important to me.0.61
I always want to know what should be done when.0.65
I prefer clear structures to do my job.0.49
I make definite engagements, and I follow up meticulously.0.51
A good task is a well-prepared task.0.70
I like detailed action plans.0.72
Creative style1 and 2I like much variety in my life.0.71
(AVE = 0.70)New ideas attract me more than existing solutions.0.68
I prefer to look for creative solutions0.75
I am motivated by ongoing innovation.0.54
I like to contribute to innovative solutions.0.68
I try to avoid routine.0.67
I like to extend boundaries.0.85
Entrepreneurial attitude
Organisationally1Job security0.82
EmployedJob stability0.83
SecurityNot having to work long hours0.82
(AVE = 0.83)To have leisure0.52
WorkloadTo have fixed working hours0.52
(AVE = 0.63)Not to have a stressful job0.79
Social environmentHave a simple, not complicated job0.49
(AVE = 0.75)Participate in a social environment0.83
Avoiding responsibilityTo be a member of a social ‘milieu’0.67
(AVE = 0.79)Avoid responsibility0.87
CareerNot taking on too much responsibility0.75
(AVE = 0.90)Avoid commitment0.74
Have opportunity for career progress0.92
Promotion0.87
Self-Employed
Economic opportunity

(AVE = 0.72)
Economic opportunity0.80
ChallengeTo receive compensation based on merit0.66
(AVE = 0.80)To keep a large proportion of the result0.70
AutonomyTo have a challenging job0.81
(AVE = 0.68)To have an exciting job0.76
AuthorityTo have an interesting job0.83
(AVE = 0.72)To have a motivating job0.80
Self-realisationFreedom0.49
(AVE = 0.70)Independence0.63
Participation in the whole processTo be your own boss0.81
(AVE = 0.74)Be able to choose your own work tasks0.79
Have power to make decisions0.93
Have authority0.88
Self-realisation0.56
Realise one’s dreams0.66
To create something0.77
To take advantage of your creative needs0.67
To participate in the whole process0.98
To follow work tasks from a to z0.50
Parent’s entrepreneurial status1What is the longest type of employment status of your mother? What is the longest type of employment status of your father? (employee – self-employed – unemployed)
Entrepreneurial Intention

(AVE = 0.80)
1If you could choose between running your own business and being employed by someone, what would you prefer? (1 = would prefer to be employed by someone; 7 = would prefer to be self-employed)0.91
How likely is it that you will someday pursue a career as self-employed? (unlikely – likely)0.87
How likely is it that you will own your own business one day? (unlikely – likely)0.63
Career Anchors
Technical competence

(AVE = 0.60)
2I dream of being so good at what I do that my expert advice will be sought continually.0.50
I will feel successful in my career only if I can develop my technical or functional skills to a very high level of competence.0.64
Becoming a functional manager in my area of expertise is more attractive to me than becoming a general manager.0.50
I would rather leave my organisation than accept a rotational assignment that would take me out of my area of expertise.0.60
I am most fulfilled in my work when I have been able to use my special skills and talents.0.72
General management competence2I am most fulfilled in my work when I have been able to integrate and manage the efforts of others.0.49
(AVE = 0.68)I dream of being in charge of a complex organisation and making decisions that affect many people.0.58
I will feel successful in my career only if I become a general manager in some organisation.0.83
Becoming a general manager is more attractive to me than becoming a functional manager in my current area of expertise.0.83
I would rather leave my organisation than accept a job that would take me away from the general managerial track.0.65
Autonomy/independence2I dream of having a career that will allow me the freedom to do a job my own way and on my own schedule.0.55
(AVE = 0.60)I am most fulfilled in my work when I am completely free to define my own tasks, schedules and procedures.0.57
I will feel successful in my career only if I achieve complete autonomy and freedom.0.66
The chance to do a job my own way, free of rules and constraints is more important to me than security.0.65
I would rather leave my organisation than accept a job that would reduce my autonomy and freedom.0.55
Security/stability

(AVE = 0.69)
2Security and stability are more important to me than freedom and autonomy.0.67
I would rather leave my organisation altogether than accept an assignment that would jeopardise my security in that organisation.0.52
I seek jobs in organisations that will give me a sense of security and stability.0.82
I am most fulfilled in my work when I feel that I have complete financial and employment security.0.68
I dream of having a career that will allow me to feel a sense of security and stability.0.75
Entrepreneurial creativity2I am always on the lookout for ideas that would permit me to start my own enterprise.0.82
(AVE = 0.78)Building my own business is more important to me than achieving a high-level managerial position in someone else’s organisation.0.82
I am most fulfilled in my career when I have been able to build something that is entirely the result of my own ideas and efforts.0.73
I will feel successful in my career only if I have succeeded in creating or building something that is entirely my own product or idea.0.65
I dream of starting up and running my own business.0.91
Service/dedication

(AVE = 0.65)
2I will feel successful in my career only if I have a feeling of having made a real contribution to the welfare of society.0.72
I am most fulfilled in my career when I have been able to use my talents in the service of others.0.50
Using my skills to make the world a better place to live and work is more important to me than achieving a high-level managerial position.0.70
I dream of having a career that makes a real contribution to humanity and society.0.81
I would rather leave my organisation than accept an assignment that would undermine my ability to be of service to others.0.54
Pure challenge

(AVE = 0.66)
2I dream of a career in which I can solve problems or win out in situations that are extremely challenging.0.74
I will feel successful in my career when I have been able to use my talents in the service of others.0.73
I have been most fulfilled in my career with I have solved seemingly unsolvable problems or won out over seemingly impossible odds.0.64
I seek out work opportunities that strongly challenge my problem solving and/or competitive skills.0.72
Working on problems that are almost unsolvable is more important to me than achieving a high-level managerial position.0.49
Lifestyle

(AVE = 0.68)
2I would rather leave my organisation than to be put into a job that would compromise my ability to pursue personal and family concerns.0.57
I dream of a career that will permit me to integrate my personal, family and work needs.0.69
I feel successful in life only if I have been able to balance my personal, family and career requirements.0.71
Balancing the demands of personal and professional life is more important to me than achieving a high-level managerial position.0.74
I have always sought out work opportunities that would minimise interference with home or family concerns.0.70

References

Ajzen, I. 1985. “From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior,” in Action Control, edited by J. Kuhl, and J. Beckmann, 11–39. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2Suche in Google Scholar

Ajzen, Icek. 1996. “Behavioral Interventions Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211.10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-TSuche in Google Scholar

Allinson, Christopher W., Elizabeth Chell, and John Hayes. 2000. “Intuition and Entrepreneurial Behaviour.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 9 (1): 31–43.10.1080/135943200398049Suche in Google Scholar

Amabile, Teresa M., Regina Conti, Heather Coon, Jeffrey Lazenby, and Michael Herron. 1996. “Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity.” Academy of Management Journal 39 (5): 1154–84.10.2307/256995Suche in Google Scholar

Armitage, Christopher J., and Mark Conner. 2001. “Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Meta-Analytic Review.” British Journal of Social Psychology 40 (4): 471–99.10.1348/014466601164939Suche in Google Scholar

Armstrong, Steven J., Eva Cools, and Eugene Sadler-Smith. 2012. “Role of Cognitive Styles in Business and Management: Reviewing 40 Years of Research.” International Journal of Management Reviews 14 (3): 238–62.10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00315.xSuche in Google Scholar

Armstrong, Steven J., and Andrew Hird. 2009. “Cognitive Style and Entrepreneurial Drive of New and Mature Business Owner-Managers.” Journal of Business and Psychology 24 (4): 419–30.10.1007/s10869-009-9114-4Suche in Google Scholar

Arthur Jr., Winfred, Suzanne T. Bell, Anton J. Villado, and Dennis Doverspike. 2006. “The Use of Person-Organization Fit in Employment Decision Making: An Assessment of Its Criterion-Related Validity.” Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (4): 786–801.10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.786Suche in Google Scholar

Becker, T. E. 2005. “Potential Problems in the Statistical Control of Variables in Organizational Research: A Qualitative Analysis with Recommendations.” Organizational Research Methods 8 (3): 274–89.10.1177/1094428105278021Suche in Google Scholar

Bentler, P. M. 1990. “Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models.” Psychological Bulletin 107: 238–46.10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238Suche in Google Scholar

Bentler, P. M. 1995. EQS: Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.Suche in Google Scholar

Bird, B. 1988. “Implementing Entrepreneurial Ideas: The Case for Intentions.” Academy of Management Review 13: 442–54.10.5465/amr.1988.4306970Suche in Google Scholar

Brandstätter, Hermann. 2011. “Personality Aspects of Entrepreneurship: A Look at Five Meta-Analyses.” Personality and Individual Differences 51 (3): 222–30.10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.007Suche in Google Scholar

Buttner, E. H., and N. Gryskiewicz. 1993. “Entrepreneurs’ Problem-Solving Styles: An Empirical Study Using the Kirton Adaption/Innovation Theory.” Journal of Small Business Management 31 (1): 22.Suche in Google Scholar

Camacho-Miñano, M. D. M., and C. del Campo. 2017. “The Role of Creativity in Entrepreneurship: An Empirical Study on Business Undergraduates.” Education+ Training 59 (7/8): 672–88.10.1108/ET-08-2016-0132Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Ming-Huei, Yu-Yu Chang, and Yin-Chen Lin. 2018. “Exploring Creative Entrepreneurs’ Happiness: Cognitive Style, Guanxi and Creativity.” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 14 (4): 1089–1110.10.1007/s11365-017-0490-3Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Ming-Huei, Yu-Yu Chang, and Ya-Hsun Lo. 2015. “Creativity Cognitive Style, Conflict, and Career Success for Creative Entrepreneurs.” Journal of Business Research 68 (4): 906–10.10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.050Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Y. F., and M. C. Lai. 2010. “Factors Influencing the Entrepreneurial Attitude of Taiwanese Tertiary-Level Business Students.” Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 38 (1): 1–12.10.2224/sbp.2010.38.1.1Suche in Google Scholar

Coetzee, Melinde, and Dries AMG Schreuder. 2014. “Career Anchors as a Meta-Capacity in Organizational Career Development.” In Psycho-Social Career Meta-Capacities, edited by Melinde Coetzee, 139–54. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-00645-1_8Suche in Google Scholar

Colombier, Nathalie, and David Masclet. 2008. “Intergenerational Correlation in Self Employment: Some Further Evidence from French ECHP Data.” Small Business Economics 30 (4): 423–37.10.1007/s11187-007-9059-9Suche in Google Scholar

Cools, Eva, and Herman Van Den Broeck. 2008a. “The Hunt for the Heffalump Continues: Can Trait and Cognitive Characteristics Predict Entrepreneurial Orientation?” Journal of Small Business Strategy 18: 23–41.Suche in Google Scholar

Cools, Eva, Steven J. Armstrong, and Jasmijn Verbrigghe. 2014. “Methodological Practices in Cognitive Style Research: Insights and Recommendations from the Field of Business and Psychology.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 23 (4): 627–41.10.1080/1359432X.2013.788245Suche in Google Scholar

Cools, Eva, and Herman Van Den Broeck. 2007. “Development and Validation of the Cognitive Style Indicator.” The Journal of Psychology 141 (4): 359–87.10.3200/JRLP.141.4.359-388Suche in Google Scholar

Cools, Eva, and Herman Van Den Broeck. 2008b. “Cognitive Styles and Managerial Behaviour: A Qualitative Study.” Edited by Carol Evans. Education + Training 50 (2): 103–14.10.1108/00400910810862092Suche in Google Scholar

Edwards, Jeffrey R., and Daniel M. Cable. 2009. “The Value of Value Congruence.” The Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (3): 654–77.10.1037/a0014891Suche in Google Scholar

Erikson, Truls. 2002. “Entrepreneurial Capital: The Emerging Venture’s Most Important Asset and Competitive Advantage.” Journal of Business Venturing 17: 275–90.10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00062-8Suche in Google Scholar

Fayolle, Alain, and Francisco Liñán. 2014. “The Future of Research on Entrepreneurial Intentions.” Journal of Business Research 67 (5): 663–66.10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.024Suche in Google Scholar

Florin, Juan, Ranjan Karri, and Nancy Rossiter. 2007. “Fostering Entrepreneurial Drive in Business Education: An Attitudinal Approach.” Journal of Management Education 31 (1): 17–42.10.1177/1052562905282023Suche in Google Scholar

Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research 18 (3): 39–50.10.1177/002224378101800104Suche in Google Scholar

Fouad, Nadya A. 2007. “Work and Vocational Psychology: Theory, Research, and Applications.” Annual Review of Psychology 58 (1): 543–64. Annual Reviews.10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085713Suche in Google Scholar

Furnham, A. 2007. Personality and Intelligence at Work: Exploring and Explaining Individual Differences at Work. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Hayes, Andrew F. 2009. “Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium.” Communication Monographs 76 (4): 408–20.10.1080/03637750903310360Suche in Google Scholar

Hayes, John, and Christopher W. Allinson. 1998. “Cognitive Style and the Theory and Practice of Individual and Collective Learning in Organizations.” Human Relations 51 (7): 847–71.10.1177/001872679805100701Suche in Google Scholar

Hernaus, T., M. Bach Pejić, and V. Bosilj Vukšić. 2012. “Influence of Strategic Approach to BPM on Financial and Non-Financial Performance.” Baltic Journal of Management 7 (4): 376–96.10.1108/17465261211272148Suche in Google Scholar

Hodgkinson, G. P. 2003. “The Interface of Cognitive and Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology.” Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology 76: 1–26.10.1348/096317903321208862Suche in Google Scholar

Hodgkinson, G. P., and P. R. Sparrow. 2002. The Competent Organization: A Psychological Analysis of the Strategic Management Process. Buckingham: Open University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Anders, Martin Junge, and Nikolaj Malchow-Møller. 2015. “Running in the Family: Parental Role Models in Entrepreneurship.” Small Business Economics 44 (1): 79–104.10.1007/s11187-014-9586-0Suche in Google Scholar

Hornaday, J. A., and J. Aboud. 1971. “Characteristics of Successful Entrepreneurs.” Personnel Psychology 24 (2): 141–53.10.1111/j.1744-6570.1971.tb02469.xSuche in Google Scholar

Hu, Li-tze, and Peter M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1): 1–55.10.1080/10705519909540118Suche in Google Scholar

Kacperczyk, Aleksandra J. 2012. “Opportunity Structures in Established Firms Entrepreneurship versus Intrapreneurship in Mutual Funds.” Administrative Science Quarterly 57 (3): 484–521.10.1177/0001839212462675Suche in Google Scholar

Katz, J., and W. Gartner. 1988. “Properties of Emerging Organizations.” Academy of Management Review 13: 429–41.10.4337/9781783476947.00010Suche in Google Scholar

Kautonen, Teemu, Marco van Gelderen, and Matthias Fink. 2015. “Robustness of the Theory of Planned Behavior in Predicting Entrepreneurial Intentions and Actions.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 39 (3): 655–74.10.1111/etap.12056Suche in Google Scholar

Kickul, Jill, Lisa K. Gundry, Saulo D. Barbosa, and Laney Whitcanack. 2009. “Intuition versus Analysis? Testing Differential Models of Cognitive Style on Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy and the New Venture Creation Process.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 33 (2): 439–53.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00298.xSuche in Google Scholar

Kim, S., and L. S. Feldt. 2008. “A Comparison of Tests for Equality of Two or More Independent Alpha Coefficients.” Journal of Educational Measurement 45 (2): 179–93.10.1111/j.1745-3984.2008.00059.xSuche in Google Scholar

Kirton, M. 1976. “Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure.” Journal of Applied Psychology 61 (5): 622.10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622Suche in Google Scholar

Kirton, M. J. 2003. Adaption-Innovation in the Context of Diversity and Change. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203695005Suche in Google Scholar

Kline, R. B. 2005. Methodology in the Social Sciences. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd ed. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kolvereid, Lars 1996. “Prediction of Employment Status Choice Intentions.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 21 (1): 47– 58.10.1177/104225879602100104Suche in Google Scholar

Kozhevnikov, Maria, Carol Evans, and Stephen M. Kosslyn. 2014. “Cognitive Style as Environmentally Sensitive Individual Differences in Cognition.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 15 (1): 3–33.10.1177/1529100614525555Suche in Google Scholar

Kristof-brown, Amy L., Ryan D. Zimmerman, and Erin C. Johnson. 2005. “Consequences of Individuals’ Fit at Work: A Meta-Analysis of Person-Job, Person-Organization, Person-Group, and Person-Supervisor Fit.” Personnel Psychology 58 (2): 281–342.10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.xSuche in Google Scholar

Krueger, Norris F., Michael D. Reilly, and Alan L. Carsrud. 2000. “Competing Models of Entrepreneurial Intentions.” Journal of Business Venturing 15 (5–6): 411–32.10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0Suche in Google Scholar

Liñán, F., and Y. Chen. 2009. “Development and Cross-Cultural Application of a Specific Instrument to Measure Entrepreneurial Intentions.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 33 (3): 593–617.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00318.xSuche in Google Scholar

Liñán, Francisco, and Alain Fayolle. 2015. “A Systematic Literature Review on Entrepreneurial Intentions : Citation, Thematic Analyses, and Research Agenda.” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 11: 907–33.10.1007/s11365-015-0356-5Suche in Google Scholar

Luthje, Christian, and Nikolaus Franke. 2003. “The ‘Making’ of an Entrepreneur: Testing a Model of Entrepreneurial Intent among Engineering Students at MIT.” R and D Management 33 (2): 135–47. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111).10.1111/1467-9310.00288Suche in Google Scholar

Maes, Johan, Hannes Leroy, and Luc Sels. 2014. “Gender Differences in Entrepreneurial Intentions: A TPB Multi-Group Analysis at Factor and Indicator Level.” European Management Journal 32 (5): 784–94.10.1016/j.emj.2014.01.001Suche in Google Scholar

Mcmullen, Jeffery S., and Dean A. Shepherd. 2006. “Entrepreneurial Action and the Role of Uncertainty in the Theory of the Entrepreneur.” Academy of Management Review 31 (1): 132–52.10.4337/9781783479801.00007Suche in Google Scholar

Miron, E., M. Erez, and E. Naveh. 2004. “Do Personal Characteristics and Cultural Values that Promote Innovation, Quality, and Efficiency Compete or Complement Each Other?” Journal of Organizational Behavior 25 (2): 175–199.10.1002/job.237Suche in Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., L. Busenitz, T. Lant, P. P. McDougall, E. A. Morse, and J. B. Smith. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Entrepreneurial Cognition: Rethinking the People Side of Entrepreneurship Research.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 27 (2): 93–104.10.1111/1540-8520.00001Suche in Google Scholar

Nicolaou, Nicos, Scott Shane, Lynn Cherkas, Janice Hunkin, and Tim D. Spector. 2008. “Is the Tendency to Engage in Entrepreneurship Genetic ?” Management Science 54 (1): 167–79.10.1287/mnsc.1070.0761Suche in Google Scholar

Parker, S. 2009. The Economics of Entrepreneurship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511817441Suche in Google Scholar

Pearce, John A., Tracy Robertson Kramer, and D. Keith Robbins. 1997. “Effects of Managers’ Entrepreneurial Behavior on Subordinates.” Journal of Business Venturing 12 (2): 147–60.10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00066-3Suche in Google Scholar

Pejic Bach, M., A. Aleksic, and M. Merkac-Skok. 2018. “Examinig the Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intentions in Slovenia: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior and an Innovative Cognitive Style.” Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 31 (1): 1453–71.10.1080/1331677X.2018.1478321Suche in Google Scholar

Peterson, Elizabeth R., Stephen G. Rayner, and Steven J. Armstrong. 2009. “Researching the Psychology of Cognitive Style and Learning Style: Is There Really a Future?” Learning and Individual Differences 19 (4): 518–23.10.1016/j.lindif.2009.06.003Suche in Google Scholar

Riding, R., and S. Rayner. 1998. Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies: Understanding Style Differences in Learning and Behavior. London: David Fulton.Suche in Google Scholar

Rosseel, Y. 2012. “Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of Statistical Software 48 (2): 1–3.10.18637/jss.v048.i02Suche in Google Scholar

Rucker, Derek D., Kristopher J. Preacher, Zakary L. Tormala, and Richard E. Petty. 2011. “Mediation Analysis in Social Psychology : Current Practices and New Recommendations.” Social and Personality Psychology Compas 5/6: 359–71.10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.xSuche in Google Scholar

Schein, E. H. 1974. Career Anchors and Careerpaths. Industrial Liaison Program. May. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts lnstitute of Technology.Suche in Google Scholar

Schein, E. H. 1978. Career Dynamics: Matching Individual and Organizational Needs, vol. 6834. MA: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Schein, E. H. 1996. “Career Anchors Revisited: Implications for Career Development in the 21st Century.” Academy of Management Executive 10 (4): 80–88.10.5465/ame.1996.3145321Suche in Google Scholar

Sexton, Donald L., and Nancy Bowman. 1983. “Determining Entrepreneurial Potential of Students.” Academy of Management Proceedings 1983 (1): 408–12.10.5465/ambpp.1983.4976385Suche in Google Scholar

Shane, Scott, and Sankaran Venkataraman. 2007. “The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research.” Entrepreneurship: Concepts, Theory and Perspective 25 (1): 171–84.Suche in Google Scholar

Shapero, Albert 1975 (November). “The Displaced, Uncomfort- Able Entrepreneur.” Psychology Today 9 (6): 83–88.Suche in Google Scholar

Shapero, Albert, and L. Sokol. 1982. “The Social Dimensions of Entrepreneurship.” In Encylclopedia of Entrepreneurship, edited by C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton, and K. H. Vesper, 72–90. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Suche in Google Scholar

Shinnar, R. S., O. Giacomin, and F. Janssen. 2012. “Entrepreneurial Perceptions and Intentions: The Role of Gender and Culture.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36 (3): 465–93.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00509.xSuche in Google Scholar

Shrout, P. E., and N. Bolger. 2002. “Mediation in Experimental and Nonexperimental Studies: New Procedures and Recommendations.” Psychological Methods 7: 422–45.10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422Suche in Google Scholar

Singer, Slavica, Mike Herrington, and Ehud Menipaz. 2018. “Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Global Report 2017/18.”Suche in Google Scholar

Sørensen, J. B. 2007. “Bureaucracy and Entrepreneurship: Workplace Effects on Entrepreneurial Entry.” Administrative Science Quarterly 52 (3): 387–412.10.2189/asqu.52.3.387Suche in Google Scholar

Souitaris, Vangelis, Stefania Zerbinati, and Andreas Al-Laham. 2007. “Do Entrepreneurship Programmes Raise Entrepreneurial Intention of Science and Engineering Students? the Effect of Learning, Inspiration and Resources.” Journal of Business Venturing 22 (4): 566–91.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.05.002Suche in Google Scholar

Steenkamp, J. B. E., and H. C. Van Trijp. 1991. “The Use of LISREL in Validating Marketing Constructs.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 8 (4): 283–99.10.1016/0167-8116(91)90027-5Suche in Google Scholar

Steiger, J. H., and J. C. Lind. 1980. “Statistically Based Tests for the Number of Common Factors.” In Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society. Iowa City, IA.Suche in Google Scholar

Stewart, Wayne H., Warren E. Watson, Joann C. Carland, and James W. Carland. 1999. “A Proclivity for Entrepreneurship: A Comparison of Entrepreneurs, Small Business Owners, and Corporate Managers.” Journal of Business Venturing 14 (2): 189–214.10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00070-0Suche in Google Scholar

Watchravesringkan, K., N. N. Hodges, J. Yurchisin, J. Hegland, E. Karpova, S. Marcketti, and R. N. Yan. 2013. “Modeling Entrepreneurial Career Intentions among Undergraduates: An Examination of the Moderating Role of Entrepreneurial Knowledge and Skills.” Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal 41 (3): 352–342.10.1111/fcsr.12014Suche in Google Scholar

Wils, L., T. Wils, and M. Tremblay. 2010. “Toward a Career Anchor Structure: An Empirical Investigation of Engineers.” Industrial Relations 65 (2): 236–56.10.7202/044301arSuche in Google Scholar

Zhang, L. F., and R. J. Sternberg, eds. 2009. Perspectives on the Nature of International Styles. New York: Springer.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-08-27

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 21.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/erj-2019-0003/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen