Abstract
With regard to research and development (R&D), corporate finance tends to be too broad, whereas marketing tends to be too specific. Using the marketing–finance interface, new R&D expenditure variables are constructed to reflect industry rivalry by incorporating industry-year median and standard deviation. Market competition and customer satisfaction are also included in the regression. Dynamic generalized-method-of-moments regressions based on US data provide subversive results. Sales and cash flow, which are reported in prior literature to be associated with R&D investment, were insignificant. Leverage, known as detrimental to investment in intangible assets, such as R&D, contributed to rivalrous and strategic R&D investments. Of course, high market-to-book ratios encourage such R&D investments. However, in high-tech industries, market competition absorbs all other influences on R&D, though the impact of market competition on R&D is negative. We also expect that while high customer satisfaction in the product markets could broadly serve as a suppressor to R&D, it can also serve as a driver for young and high-tech firms.
References
Aghion, P., N. Bloom, R. Blundell, R. Griffith, and P. Howitt. 2005. “Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (2): 701–728. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/120.2.701Search in Google Scholar
Aghion, P., R. Blundell, R. Griffith, P. Howitt, and S. Prantl. 2009. “The Effects of Entry on Incumbent Innovation and Productivity” Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (1): 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.1.20Search in Google Scholar
Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. 1998. “Market Structure and the Growth Process” Review of Economic Dynamics 1 (1): 276–305. https://doi.org/10.1006/redy.1997.0007Search in Google Scholar
Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. 2006. “Joseph Schumpeter Lecture–Appropriate Growth Policy: A Unifying Framework” Journal of the European Economic Association 4 (2–3): 269–314. https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2006.4.2-3.269Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, E. W., C. Fornell, and D. R. Lehmann. 1994. “Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings from Sweden” Journal of Marketing 58 (3): 53–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252310Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, E. W., C. Fornell, and S. K. Mazvancheryl. 2004. “Customer Satisfaction and Shareholder Value” Journal of Marketing 68 (4): 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.172.42723Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, E. W., and M. W. Sullivan. 1993. “The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms” Marketing Science 12 (2): 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.12.2.125Search in Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. 1962. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.” In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Ed. R.R. Nelson. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400879762-024Search in Google Scholar
Balkin, D. B., and L. R. Gomez‐Mejia. 1987. “Toward a Contingency Theory of Compensation Strategy” Strategic Management Journal 8 (2): 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250080207Search in Google Scholar
Benmelech, E., and N. K. Bergman. 2009. “Collateral Pricing” Journal of Financial Economics 91 (3): 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.03.00310.1016/j.jfineco.2008.03.003Search in Google Scholar
Berger, A. N., and G. F. Udell. 1990. “Collateral, Loan Quality, and Bank Risk” Journal Monetary Economics 25 (1): 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(90)90042-3Search in Google Scholar
Bernstein, S. 2015. “Does Going Public Affect Innovation?” Journal of Finance 70 (4): 1365–1403. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12275Search in Google Scholar
Blundell, R., R. Griffith, and J. V. Reenen. 1999. “Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms” Review of Economic Studies 66 (3): 529–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00097Search in Google Scholar
Bond, S., J. A. Elston, J. Mairesse, and B. Mulkay. 2003. “Financial Factors and Investment in Belgium, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom: A Comparison Using Company Panel Data” Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (1): 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303762687776Search in Google Scholar
Bond, S., and C. Meghir. 1994. “Dynamic Investment Models and the Firm's Financial Policy” Review of Economic Studies 61 (2): 197–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297978Search in Google Scholar
Brown, J. R., S. M. Fazzari, and B. C. Petersen. 2009. “Financing Innovation and Growth: Cash Flow, External Equity, and the 1990s R&D Boom” Journal of Finance 64 (1): 151–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01431.xSearch in Google Scholar
Brown, J. R., G. Martinsson, and B. C. Petersen. 2013. “Law, Stock Markets, and Innovation” Journal of Finance 68 (4): 1517–1549. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12040Search in Google Scholar
Carlin, W., M. Schaffer, and P. Seabright. 2004. “A Minimum of Rivalry: Evidence from Transition Economies on the Importance of Competition for Innovation and Growth” Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy 3 (1): 1–43. https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0645.1284Search in Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. E., and B. C. Petersen. 2002. “Capital Market Imperfections, High-Tech Investment, and New Equity Financing” Economic Journal 112 (February): 54–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00683Search in Google Scholar
Coad, A., and R. Rao. 2010. “Firm Growth and R&D Expenditure” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 19 (2): 127–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10438590802472531Search in Google Scholar
Diamond, D. W. 1991. “Monitoring and Reputation: The Choice between Bank Loans and Directly Placed Debt” Journal of Political Economy 99 (4): 689–721. https://doi.org/10.1086/261775Search in Google Scholar
Drucker, P. 1973. Management: Tasks, Responsibilities and Practices. New York: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar
Fang, V. W., X. Tian, and S. Tice. 2014. “Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?” Journal of Finance 69 (5): 2085–2125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12187Search in Google Scholar
Fornell, C., M. D. Johnson, E. W. Anderson, J. Cha, and B. E. Bryant. 1996. “The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings” Journal of Marketing 60 (4): 7–18. http://www.jstor.org/stable/125189810.2307/1251898Search in Google Scholar
Fornell, C., S. Mithas, F. V. Morgeson III, and M. S. Krishnan. 2006. “Customer Satisfaction and Stock Prices: High Returns, Low Risk” Journal of Marketing 70 (1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2006.70.1.3Search in Google Scholar
Fresard, L. 2010. “Financial Strength and Product Market Behavior: The Real Effects of Corporate Cash Holdings” Journal of Finance 65 (3): 1097–1122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01562.xSearch in Google Scholar
Geroski, P. 1990. “Innovation, Technological Opportunity, and Market Structure” Oxford Economic Papers 42 (3): 586–602. http://www.jstor.org/stable/266306310.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041965Search in Google Scholar
Griliches, Z. 1998. R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226308906.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Gruca, T. S., and L. L. Rego. 2005. “Customer Satisfaction, Cash Flow, and Shareholder Value” Journal of Marketing 69 (3): 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.3.115.66364Search in Google Scholar
Gustafsson, A., M. D. Johnson, and I. Roos. 2005. “The Effects of Customer Satisfaction, Relationship Commitment Dimensions, and Triggers on Customer Retention” Journal of Marketing 69 (4): 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.210Search in Google Scholar
Hadlock, C. J., and J. R. Pierce. 2010. “New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving beyond the KZ Index” Review of Financial Studies 23 (5): 1909–1940. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhq009Search in Google Scholar
Hall, B. H. 1992. “Investment and Research and Development at the Firm Level: Does the Source of Financing Matter?” NBER No. w4096. https://doi.org/10.3386/w4096Search in Google Scholar
Hall, B. H. 2002. “The Financing of Research and Development” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18 (1): 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/18.1.35Search in Google Scholar
Heide, J. B., and A. M. Weiss. 1995. “Vendor Consideration and Switching Behavior for Buyers in High-Technology Markets” Journal of Marketing 59 (3): 30–43. http://www.jstor.org/stable/125211710.1177/002224299505900303Search in Google Scholar
Himmelberg, C. P., and B. C. Petersen. 1994. “R&D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-Tech Industries” Review of Economics and Statistics 76 (1): 38–51. http://www.jstor.org/stable/210982410.2307/2109824Search in Google Scholar
Hirshleifer, D., A. Low, and S. H. Teoh. 2012. “Are Overconfident CEOs Better Innovators?” Journal of Finance 67 (4): 1457–1498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01753.xSearch in Google Scholar
Hoberg, G., G. Phillips, and N. Prabhala. 2014. “Product Market Threats, Payouts, and Financial Flexibility” Journal of Finance 69 (1): 293–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12050Search in Google Scholar
Hovakimian, A., T. Opler, and S. Titman. 2001. “The Debt-Equity Choice” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 36 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2676195Search in Google Scholar
Ittner, C. D., and D. F. Larcker. 1998. “Are Nonfinancial Measures Leading Indicators of Financial Performance? An Analysis of Customer Satisfaction.” Journal of Accounting Research 36: 1–35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2491304.10.2307/2491304Search in Google Scholar
Jordan, J., J. Lowe, and P. Taylor. 1998. “Strategy and Financial Policy in UK Small Firms” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 25 (1–2): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00176Search in Google Scholar
Kim, H., J. Kim, and K.-S. Choi. 2017. “Ambivalent Impact of Customer Satisfaction on Firm Value in Emerging Markets: The Case of Korea” Journal of Business Economics and Management 18 (2): 258–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2016.1272068Search in Google Scholar
Lam, S. Y., V. Shankar, M. K. Erramilli, and B. Murthy. 2004. “Customer Value, Satisfaction, Loyalty, and Switching Costs: An Illustration from a Business-to-Business Service Context” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 32 (3): 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304263330Search in Google Scholar
Long, M., and I. Malitz. 1985. “The Investment-Financing Nexus: Some Empirical Evidence.” Midland Corporate Finance Journal 3: 53–59.Search in Google Scholar
Malshe, A., and M. K. Agarwal. 2015. “From Finance to Marketing: The Impact of Financial Leverage on Customer Satisfaction” Journal of Marketing 79 (5): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.13.0312Search in Google Scholar
Nunes, P. M., Z. Serrasqueiro, and J. Leitão. 2012. “Is There a Linear Relationship between R&D Intensity and Growth? Empirical Evidence of Non-High-Tech Vs. High-Tech SMEs” Research Policy 41 (1): 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.011Search in Google Scholar
O'Brien, J. P. 2003. “The Capital Structure Implications of Pursuing a Strategy of Innovation” Strategic Management Journal 24 (5): 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.308Search in Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, D., and J. McCallig. 2012. “Customer Satisfaction, Earnings and Firm Value” European Journal of Marketing 46 (6): 827–843. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561211214627Search in Google Scholar
Ravenscraft, D., and F. M. Scherer. 1982. “The Lag Structure of Returns to Research and Development” Applied Economics 14 (6): 603–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036848200000036Search in Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1943. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Allan and Unwin.Search in Google Scholar
Slovin, M. B., M. E. Sushka, and C. D. Hudson. 1990. “External Monitoring and Its Effect on Seasoned Common Stock Issues” Journal of Accounting and Economics 12 (4): 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(90)90023-WSearch in Google Scholar
Symeonidis, G. 2001. “Price Competition, Innovation and Profitability: Theory and UK Evidence.” Working Paper. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=271705Search in Google Scholar
Uchida, Y., and P. Cook. 2005. “The Effects of Competition on Technological and Trade Competitiveness” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 45 (2–3): 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2004.12.003Search in Google Scholar
Whited, T. M. 2001. “Is It Inefficient Investment that Causes the Diversification Discount?” Journal of Finance 56 (5): 1667–1691. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00385Search in Google Scholar
Wintoki, M. B., J. S. Linck, and J. M. Netter. 2012. “Endogeneity and the Dynamics of Internal Corporate Governance” Journal of Financial Economics 105 (3): 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Technological Innovation and Product Market Conditions: R&D Rivalry, Market Competition, and Customer Satisfaction
- How Do Institutions Relate to Entrepreneurship: an Integrative Model
- Online or Not? What Factors Affect Equity Crowdfunding Platforms to Launch Projects Online in the Pre-Investment Stage?
- Does the Environment Matter? Mapping Academic Knowledge on Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in GEM
Articles in the same Issue
- Technological Innovation and Product Market Conditions: R&D Rivalry, Market Competition, and Customer Satisfaction
- How Do Institutions Relate to Entrepreneurship: an Integrative Model
- Online or Not? What Factors Affect Equity Crowdfunding Platforms to Launch Projects Online in the Pre-Investment Stage?
- Does the Environment Matter? Mapping Academic Knowledge on Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in GEM