Abstract
The importance of external environmental uncertainty and the size of the organization has long been a topic of much debate, but the findings remain mixed. In addition, few studies have investigated the effects of the fit between factors on an organizational innovation activity. The present study aims to examine the effects of the fit between SMEs’ size and environmental uncertainty on their innovation activity. Building on literature of organizational innovation and environments, a research model is developed and tested with 232 samples. Results indicate that only firm size affects SMEs’ innovation activity and the fit between firm size and environmental uncertainty has a positive effect on the innovation activity. The findings imply that SMEs should place particular emphasis on practices that can strengthen the fit between size and environmental turbulence so as to facilitate their innovation activity. Limitations and suggestions for future studies are presented.
References
Abdullah, N. H., E. Wahab, and A. Shamsuddin. (2010)."Human Resource Management Practices as Predictors of Innovation among Johor SMEs," 2010 International Conference on Science and Social Research, Malaysia.10.1109/CSSR.2010.5773910Search in Google Scholar
Abrahamson, E. 1991. “Managerial Fad and Fashion: the Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations.” Academy of Management Review 16 (3): 586–612.10.2307/258919Search in Google Scholar
Acs, Z. J., R. Morck, J. M. Shaver, and B. Yeung. 2003. “The Internationalization of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: A Policy Perspective.” In SMEs in the Age of Globalization, Ed. D. V. Audretch, Northampton, MA: Elgar Reference Collection.Search in Google Scholar
Aldrich, H., and E. Auster. 1986. “Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications.” In Research in Organizational Behavior, edited by L. L. Cummings, and B. M. Staw, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Search in Google Scholar
Alexander, J. W., and A. Randolph. 1985. “The Fit between Technology and Structure as a Predictor of Performance in Nursing Subunits.” Academy of Management Journal 28 (4): 844–59.10.2307/256240Search in Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. 1988. “A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations.” Research in Organizational Behavior 10: 123–67.Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, J., and D. Gerbing. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-step Approach.” Psychological Bulletin 103 (3): 411–23.10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411Search in Google Scholar
Andrews, K. 1971. The Concept of Corporate Strategy, Irwin.Search in Google Scholar
Ayygari, M., A. Demirguc-Kunt, and V. Maksimovic. 2007. “Firm Innovation in Emerging Markets.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 4157.Search in Google Scholar
Bagozzi, R., and Y. Yi. 1988. “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (1): 74–94.10.1007/BF02723327Search in Google Scholar
Baldridge, J. V., and R. Burnham. 1975. “Organizational Innovation: Industrial, Organizational, and Environmental Impact.” Administrative Science Quarterly 20: 165–76.10.2307/2391692Search in Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. R., and W. Gu. 2004. “Innovation, Survival and Performance of Canadian Manufacturing Plants.” EA Research Paper Series, Statistics Canada, SSRN eLibrary.10.2139/ssrn.1384502Search in Google Scholar
Birkinshaw, J., G. Hamel, and M.J. Mol. 2008. “Management Innovation.” Academy of Management Review 33 (4): 825–45.10.5465/amr.2008.34421969Search in Google Scholar
Buddelmeyer, H., P. H. Jensen, and E. Webster. 2010. “Innovation and the Determinants of Company Survival.” Oxford Economic Paper 62 (2): 251–85.10.1093/oep/gpp012Search in Google Scholar
Camison-Zornoza, C., R. Lapiedra-Alcami, M. Segarra-Cipres, and M. Boronat-Navarro. 2004. “A Meta-analysis of Innovation and Organizational Size.” Organization Studies 25: 331–61.10.1177/0170840604040039Search in Google Scholar
Chatman, J. A. 1989. “Improving Interactional Organizational Research: A Model of Person-organization Fit.” Academy of Management Review 14 (3): 333–49.10.2307/258171Search in Google Scholar
Choi, M. K., and J. W. Lee (1997. “Investigation into an Integrated Model on Organizational Innovation.” Book Chapter, Change and Innovation in Korean Firms. 9–81: Dasan Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO. 2016. The Global Innovation Index 2016.Search in Google Scholar
Daft, R. L. 1978. “A Dual-core Model of Organizational Innovation.” Academy of Management Journal 21: 193–210.10.2307/255754Search in Google Scholar
Damanpour, F. 1987. “The Adoption of Technological, Administrative, and Ancillary Innovations: Impact of Organizational Factors.” Journal of Management 113 (4): 675–88.10.1177/014920638701300408Search in Google Scholar
Damanpour, F. 1991. “Organizational Innovation: A Meta-analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators.” Academy of Management Journal 34: 555–90.10.5465/256406Search in Google Scholar
Damanpour, F. 1996. “Organizational Complexity and Innovation: Developing and Testing Multiple Contingency Models.” Management Science 42 (5): 693–716.10.1287/mnsc.42.5.693Search in Google Scholar
Damanpour, F. 2009. “An Integration of Research Findings of Effects of Firm Size and Market Competition on Product and Process Innovations.” British Journal of Management 21: 996–1010.10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00628.xSearch in Google Scholar
Damanpour, F., and S. Gopalakrishnan. 1998. “Theories of Organizational Structure and Innovation: the Role of Environmental Change.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 15: 1–24.10.1016/S0923-4748(97)00029-5Search in Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. 2001. The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781452229249Search in Google Scholar
Downs, G. W., and L. B. Mohr. 1976. “Conceptual Issues in the Study of Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21: 700–14.10.2307/2391725Search in Google Scholar
Drucker, P. 1985. Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. London: Heinemam.Search in Google Scholar
Duncan, R. B. 1976. “The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation.” In The Management of Organization: Strategy and Implementation, edited by R. H. Kilmann, L. R. Pondy, and D. P. Slevin, 167–88. New York: North-Holland.Search in Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R. 1994. “The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed Alternative.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 58: 51–100.10.1006/obhd.1994.1029Search in Google Scholar
Fagerberg, J., D. C. Mowery, and R. R. Nelson. 2005. The Oxford Handbook on Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50.10.1177/002224378101800104Search in Google Scholar
Frambach, R. T., and N. Schillewaert. 2002. “Organizational Innovation: A Multi-level Framework of Determinants and Opportunities for Future Research.” Journal of Business Research 55: 163–76.10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00152-1Search in Google Scholar
Fry, L. W., and D. A. Smith. 1987. “Congruence, Contingency, and Theory Building.” Academy of Management Review 12 (1): 117–32.10.2307/257998Search in Google Scholar
Garud, R., C. Hardy, and S. Maguire. 2007. “Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency: an Introduction to the Special Issue.” Organization Studies 28 (7): 957–69.10.1177/0170840607078958Search in Google Scholar
George, L. K. 1998. “Rational Choice Theories: Contributions and Limitations.” Journal of the American Society of CLU & ChFC 52 (5): 32–39.Search in Google Scholar
Hitt, M. A., R. E. Hoskisson, and R. D. Ireland. 1990. “Mergers and Acquisitions and Managerial Commitment to Innovation in M-form Firms.” Strategic Management Journal 11: 29–47.Search in Google Scholar
Hofer, C. W, and D Schendel. 1978. Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts, St. Paul.Search in Google Scholar
Holmstrom, B. 1989. “Agency Costs and Innovation.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 12: 305–27.10.1016/0167-2681(89)90025-5Search in Google Scholar
Jaworski, B. J., and A. K Kohli. 1993. “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences.” Journal of Marketing 57 (3): 53–70.10.4135/9781452231426.n5Search in Google Scholar
Keskin, H. 2006. “Market Orientation, Learning Orientation, and Innovation Capabilities in SMEs.” European Journal of Innovation Management 9 (4): 396–417.10.1108/14601060610707849Search in Google Scholar
Kimberly, J. R., and M. Evanisko. 1981. “Organizational Innovation: the Influence of Individual, Organizational, and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations.” Academy of Management Journal 24: 689–713.10.5465/256170Search in Google Scholar
KOSTAT. 2015. Statistical Yearbook 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Kristina, J. 2013. “Does Size Really Matter?: Organizational Size and Innovations in Nonprofit Organizations.” Nonprofit Management & Leadership 24 (2): 229–47.10.1002/nml.21087Search in Google Scholar
Kristof, A. 1996. “Person-organization Fit: an Integrative Review of Its Conceptualizations, Measurement, and Implications.” Personnel Psychology 49: 1–49.10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.xSearch in Google Scholar
Lewin, A. Y., and H. W. Volberda. 1999. “Prolegomena on Coevolution: A Framework for Research on Strategy and New Organizational Forms.” Organization Science 10 (5): 519–34.10.1287/orsc.10.5.519Search in Google Scholar
Meyer, A. D., and J. B. Goes. 1988. “Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multilevel Contextual Analysis.” Academy of Management Journal 31 (4): 897–923.10.5465/256344Search in Google Scholar
Miller, D., and P.H. Friesen. 1982. “Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum.” Strategic ManagementJournal 3 (1): 1–25.10.1002/smj.4250030102Search in Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. 1979. The Structuring of Organizations. Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar
Moorman, C., and A. Miner. 1997. “The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity.” Journal of Marketing Research 34: 91–106.10.1177/002224379703400108Search in Google Scholar
Morton, N. A., and Q. Hu. 2008. “Implications of the Fit between Organizational Structure and ERP: A Structural Contingency Theory Perspective.” International Journal of Information Management 28: 391–402.10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.01.008Search in Google Scholar
Myers, S., and D. G. Marquis. 1969. “Successful Industrial Innovation: A Study of Factors Underlying the Innovation in Selected Firms.” Paper No. NSF 69-17. Washington DC: National Science Foundation.Search in Google Scholar
Nath, D., and D. Sudharshan. 1994. “Measuring Strategy Coherence Through Pattern of Strategic Choices.” Strategic Management Journal 15: 43–61.10.1002/smj.4250150104Search in Google Scholar
Nord, W. R., and S. Tucker. 1987. Implementing Routine and Radical Innovations. Lexington: Lexington Books.Search in Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory, 2nd ed. New York.: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar
Osterman, P 1994. “How Common Is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts It?” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 47 (2): 173–88.10.1177/001979399404700202Search in Google Scholar
Pertusa-Ortega, E. M., E. Claver-Cortes, and J. F. Molina-Azorin. 2008. “Strategy, Structure, Environment and Performance in Spanish Firms.” EuroMed Journal of Business 3 (2): 223–39.10.1108/14502190810891245Search in Google Scholar
Pierce, J. L., and A. L. Delbecq. 1977. “Organization structure, Individual Attitudes and Innovation.” Academy of Management Review 2: 27–37.10.2307/257602Search in Google Scholar
Powell, W. W., and P. DiMaggio. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226185941.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Rhee, J., T. Park, and D. H. Lee. 2010. “Drivers of Innovativeness and Performance for Innovative SMEs in South Korea: Mediation of Learning Orientation.” Technovation 30: 65–75.10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.008Search in Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovation, 4th ed. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar
Roure, J. B., and R. H. Keeley. 1990. “Predictors of Success in New Technology Based Ventures.” Journal of Business Venturing 5 (4): 201–20.10.1016/0883-9026(90)90017-NSearch in Google Scholar
Schoonhoven, C. B. 1981. “‘problems with Contingency Theory: Testing Assumptions Hidden within the Language of Contingency Theory.” Administrative Science Quarterly 26: 349–77.10.2307/2392512Search in Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar
Scott, R. W. 2008. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests, 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Scozzi, B., C. Garavelli, and K. Crowston. 2005. “Methods for Modeling and Supporting Innovation Processes in SMEs.” European Journal of Innovation Management 8 (1): 120–37.10.1108/14601060510578619Search in Google Scholar
Staw, B. M. 1990. “An Evolutionary Approach to Creativity and Innovation.” In Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies, edited by M.W. West, and J. L. Farr, 287–308. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar
Su, Z., E. Xie, and Y. Li. 2009. “Organizational Slack and Firm Performance during Institutional Transitions.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 26: 75–91.10.1007/s10490-008-9101-8Search in Google Scholar
Subrahmanya, M. H. B. 2013. “Why Do Only Some SMEs Achieve External Support for Better Innovation Performance: Empirical Evidence from Bangalore, India.” Asian Journal of Technology Innovation 21 (1): 21–33.10.1080/19761597.2013.810953Search in Google Scholar
Suchman, M. C. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 571–610.10.2307/258788Search in Google Scholar
Tidd, J., J. Bessant, and K. Pavitt. 2005. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, 3rd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar
Tolbert, P. S., and L. G. Zucker. 1983. “Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure or Organizations: the Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935.” Administrative Science Quarterly 28: 22–39.10.2307/2392383Search in Google Scholar
Thompson, A. A., and A. J. Strickland. 1993. Strategic Management: Concepts & Cases. Irwin.Search in Google Scholar
Tushman, M. L. 1977. “Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process.” Administrative Science Quarterly 22: 439–65.10.2307/2392402Search in Google Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H., and R. Drazin. 1985. “The Concept of Fit in Contingency Theory.” In Research in Organizational Behavior, edited by B. M. Staw, L. L. Cummings, 333–65.Search in Google Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H. 1993. “Managing the Process of Organizational Innovation.” In Organizational Change and Redesign: Ideas and Insights for Improving Performance, edited by G. P. Huber, and W. H. Glick, New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Venkatraman, N. 1989. “The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence.” Academy of Management Review 14 (3): 423–44.10.2307/258177Search in Google Scholar
Venkatraman, N. 1990. “Performance Implications of Strategic Coalignment: A Methodological Perspective.” Journal of Management Studies 27 (1): 19–41.10.1111/j.1467-6486.1990.tb00751.xSearch in Google Scholar
Venkatraman, N., and J. E. Prescott. 1990. “Environment-strategy Coalignment: an Empirical Test of Its Performance Implication.” Strategic Management Journal 11: 1–23.10.1002/smj.4250110102Search in Google Scholar
West, M. A., and J. L. Farr. 1989. “Innovation at Work: Psychological Perspectives.” Social Behavior 4: 15–30.Search in Google Scholar
West, M. A., and J. L. Farr. 1990. Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar
World Bank. 2009. “Malaysia Productivity and Investment Climate Assessment Update.” Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Sector Unit, East Asia and Pacific Region, Report No. 49137-MY.Search in Google Scholar
Zailani, S., M. Iranmanesh, D. Nikbin, and H. B. Jumadi. 2014. “Determinants and Environmental Outcome of Green Technology Innovation in the Transportation Industry in Malaysia.” Asian Journal of Technology Innovation 22 (2): 286–301.10.1080/19761597.2014.973167Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Competitive Research Articles
- Does Entrepreneurship Matter for Inclusive Growth? The Role of Social Progress Orientation
- Crowdfunding Under Market Feedback, Asymmetric Information And Overconfident Entrepreneur
- When Do Start-ups Patent Their Inventions? Evidence from a Broad Approach
- Personality Traits, Demographic Factors and Entrepreneurial Intentions: Improved Understanding from a Moderated Mediation Study
- Effects of the Fit between Size and Environmental Uncertainty on Manufacturing SMEs’ Innovation Activity
- Opportunity Recognition Behavior and Readiness of Youth for Social Entrepreneurship
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Competitive Research Articles
- Does Entrepreneurship Matter for Inclusive Growth? The Role of Social Progress Orientation
- Crowdfunding Under Market Feedback, Asymmetric Information And Overconfident Entrepreneur
- When Do Start-ups Patent Their Inventions? Evidence from a Broad Approach
- Personality Traits, Demographic Factors and Entrepreneurial Intentions: Improved Understanding from a Moderated Mediation Study
- Effects of the Fit between Size and Environmental Uncertainty on Manufacturing SMEs’ Innovation Activity
- Opportunity Recognition Behavior and Readiness of Youth for Social Entrepreneurship