Abstract
The global recession of 2008 has created lingering economic uncertainty and the necessity for innovative thinking and action. Workforce development, with its focus on massification and replication needs to incorporate entrepreneurial innovation and development to scale while disruptive innovation provides the stimulus that animates and drives the model. Education at the university level, entrepreneurship education in particular, needs to examine both new models and new types of students, because acting entrepreneurially is not just for entrepreneurs but for everybody. The model presented in this commentary is an attempt to focus on the processes and linkages between the various “actors” that define the disparate relationships and opportunities described in this commentary.
Historically, entrepreneurship and workforce development have been viewed as separate, often conflicting priorities, frequently competing for scarce resources in the landscape of economic development. Although both entrepreneurship and workforce development bring resources and add value to the community economy and share common roots in education and training, there has been little current research that examines how they can be leveraged together to provide new models for economic development and innovation that accelerate growth, while providing for a vibrant economic future for our communities and nation via well-educated, nascent entrepreneurs.
References
AAARI.2005. “Conference on Global Entrepreneurship.” Session 2B. Global Entrepreneurship and Workforce Development, 1–18.Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, R., J. M.Quigley, and M.Wilhelmson. 2004. “University Decentralization as Regional Policy: The Swedish Experiment.” Journal of Economic Geography4(4):371–88.10.1093/jnlecg/lbh031Search in Google Scholar
Audretsch, D. B., M. A.Carree, and A. R.Thurik. 2001. “Does Entrepreneurship Reduce Unemployment?” Institute for Development Strategies, Indiana University, 3, 2.Search in Google Scholar
Blakely, E., and N. G.Leigh. 2010. Planning Local Economic Development. New York: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Bloom, H. S., and J. A.Riccio. 2005. “Using Place-Based Random Assignment and Comparative Interrupted Time-Series Analysis to Evaluate Jobs-Plus Employment Program for Public Housing Residents.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science599(1):19–51.10.1177/0002716205274824Search in Google Scholar
Casson, M. C.1982. “The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory.” University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Reference in Entrepreneurship. http://ss.com/abstract=496173Search in Google Scholar
Conway, M., A. K.Blair, S. L.Dawson, and L.Dworak-Munoz. 2007. “Sectoral Strategies for Low-Income Workers.” http://www.aspenwsi.org/publications/07-014.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Dixon, S. E. A., and A.Clifford. 2007. “Ecopreneurship-a New Approach to Managing the Triple Bottom Line.” Journal of Organizational Change Management20(3):326–45.10.1108/09534810710740164Search in Google Scholar
Drucker, P. F.1985. Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principle. New York: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar
Gartner, W., and T.Baker. 2010. “A Plausible History & Exploration of Stevenson’s Definition of Entrepreneurship.” Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research30(4):2.Search in Google Scholar
Giloth, R. P.2000. “Learning From the Field: Economic Growth and Workforce Development in the 1990’s.” Economic Development Quarterly4(14):340–59.10.1177/089124240001400402Search in Google Scholar
Glaeser, E. L., and D. C.Mare. 2001. “Cities and Skills.” Journal of Labor Economics19(2):316–42.10.1086/319563Search in Google Scholar
Glaeser, E. L., S. S.Rosenthal, and W. C.Strange. 2009. “Urban Economics and Entrepreneurship.” National Bureau of Economic Research67(1):1–14.10.3386/w15536Search in Google Scholar
Henderson, J. V.2003. “Marshall’s Scale Economies.” Journal of Urban Economics53(1):1–28.10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00505-3Search in Google Scholar
Henderson, J. V., A.Kuncoro, and M.Turner. 1995. “Industrial Development in Cities.” Journal of Political Economy5(10):1067–90.10.1086/262013Search in Google Scholar
Herbert, R. F., and A.Link. 1989. “In Search of the Meaning of Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Small Business Economics1(1):39–49.10.1007/BF00389915Search in Google Scholar
Katz, L. F., and A. B.Kreuger. 1999. “The High Pressure U.S. Labor Market of the 1990’s.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity1:1–87.Search in Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, G. A., and T. S.Lyons. 2001. “The Entrepreneurial Development System: Transforming Business Talent and Community Economies.” Economic Development Quarterly15(1):3–20.10.1177/089124240101500101Search in Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, G. A., and T. S.Lyons. 2010. Investing in Entrepreneurs: A Strategic Approach for Strengthening Your Regional and Community Economy. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger/ABC-CLIO.Search in Google Scholar
Malecki, E. J.2011. “Connecting Local Entrepreneurial Ecosystems to Global Innovation Networks: Open Innovation, Double Networks, and Knowledge Integration.” International Journal of Entrepreneurship14(1):36–59.10.1504/IJEIM.2011.040821Search in Google Scholar
Mayer, H.2012. Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Second Tier Regions. Cheltenham: EdwardElgar.10.4337/9780857938695Search in Google Scholar
Microsoft.2011a. “Employability, Entrepreneurship and Workforce Development,” 1–6.Search in Google Scholar
Porter, M. E.1998. “Clusters and the New Economics of Competition.” Harvard Business Review76:98609.Search in Google Scholar
Rosenthal, S. S., and W. C.Strange. 2003. “Geography, Industrial Organization and Agglomeration.” Review of Economics and Statistics85(2):377–93.10.1162/003465303765299882Search in Google Scholar
Rosenthal, S. S., and W. C.Strange. 2005. “The Geography of Entrepreneurship in the New York Metropolitan Area.” FBNY Economic Policy Review11(2):29–60.Search in Google Scholar
Ruhe, T.2013. “Workforce Development Redefined.” http://www.entrepreneurship.org/blogs/e360-blog/2013/march/workforce-development-redefined.aspxSearch in Google Scholar
Shane, S. A.2003. A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual Opportunity Nexus. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.1007/0-387-24519-7_8Search in Google Scholar
Wadhwa, V.2010. “A Better Formula for Economic Growth; Connecting Smart Risk Takers.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, November 18. http://chronicle.com/article/A-Better-Formula-for-Economic/125441/Search in Google Scholar
©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editor’s Corner
- The Challenges of Infusing Entrepreneurship within Non-Business Disciplines and Measuring Outcomes
- Perspectives on the Development of Cross Campus Entrepreneurship Education
- Building Blocks for the Development of University-Wide Entrepreneurship
- Competitive Research Articles
- Toward a Dynamic Understanding of Entrepreneurship Education Research across the Campus – Social Cognition and Action Research
- A Model of Cross Campus Entrepreneurship and Assessment
- Ownership, Failure, and Experience: Goals and Evaluation Metrics of University-Based Arts Venture Incubators
- Commentaries
- New Frontiers of the Innovation Economy and Education
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editor’s Corner
- The Challenges of Infusing Entrepreneurship within Non-Business Disciplines and Measuring Outcomes
- Perspectives on the Development of Cross Campus Entrepreneurship Education
- Building Blocks for the Development of University-Wide Entrepreneurship
- Competitive Research Articles
- Toward a Dynamic Understanding of Entrepreneurship Education Research across the Campus – Social Cognition and Action Research
- A Model of Cross Campus Entrepreneurship and Assessment
- Ownership, Failure, and Experience: Goals and Evaluation Metrics of University-Based Arts Venture Incubators
- Commentaries
- New Frontiers of the Innovation Economy and Education