Home Law Culpa in Contrahendo and Due Diligence in M&A Transactions
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Culpa in Contrahendo and Due Diligence in M&A Transactions

Remarks on the Judgment of the Federal Supreme Court of Germany in the Case BGHZ 238, 179
  • Georgios Papachristou EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 14, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In the context of mergers & acquisitions (M&A) the seller and the buyer are engaging in a process called due diligence, during which information regarding the acquired company is disclosed. Usually this takes place through the creation of a data room by the seller and the uploading of documents there. A critical question here is how this process interacts with the seller’s duty of disclosure, namely the duty to disclose to the buyer material facts and issues related to the subject matter of the negotiated contract. Recently, this matter was addressed by the Federal Supreme Court of Germany (BGH). In its judgment the BGH takes the view that the extent to which the seller is performing his duty of disclosure through due diligence must be assessed by taking account of the individual facts of each case. This paper is analyzing the BGH’s judgment and provides a critical approach on certain positions adopted by the court. Finally, it examines some open issues that were not addressed by the BGH and proposes their solution in light of the BGH’s judgment.


Corresponding author: Dr. Georgios Papachristou, Legal Counselor, Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund, Athens, Greece, E-mail:

Published Online: 2025-04-14
Published in Print: 2025-04-28

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ercl-2025-2002/pdf
Scroll to top button