Home Cobalt and nickel nanoparticles fabricated p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgels for catalytic applications
Article Publicly Available

Cobalt and nickel nanoparticles fabricated p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgels for catalytic applications

  • Zahoor H. Farooqi EMAIL logo , Sadia Iqbal , Shanza Rauf Khan , Farah Kanwal and Robina Begum
Published/Copyright: August 14, 2014
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this research work, multi-responsive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-methacrylic acid) copolymer microgels were synthesized via emulsion polymerization in aqueous medium. Then, nickel and cobalt nanoparticles were fabricated within these microgels by in situ reduction of metal ions using sodium borohydride (NaBH4) as a reducing agent. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was used to characterize these microgels. The pH sensitivity of these copolymer microgels was studied using dynamic light scattering technique (DLS). DLS studies revealed that the hydrodynamic radius of these microgels increased with the increase in pH of the medium at 25°C. The catalytic activity of hybrid microgels for the reduction of p-nitrophenol (4-NP) to p-aminophenol (4-AP) was investigated by UV-visible spectrophotometery. The value of apparent rate constant of reaction was found to change linearly with catalyst dosage. The nickel-based hybrid system was found to be five times more efficient as a catalyst compared to the cobalt-based hybrid system for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP in aqueous medium.

1 Introduction

Metal nanoparticles have been the subject of much research in recent years. They are enormously used in the field of catalysis (1–5), magnetic resonance imaging (6), environmental remediation (7), medicine (8, 9), cosmetics (10) and biosensing (11) due to their quantum size-related properties. The catalytic applications of nanoparticles of expensive metals such as gold (1, 12), silver (2, 3, 13), platinum (14–16) and palladium (17–20) are mostly studied because they are stable under different environmental conditions and do not oxidize to their oxides easily. Contrary to this, there are some coinage metal-based nanoparticles [such as zinc (21), copper (22, 23), nickel (Ni) (24) and cobalt (Co) (25) whose catalytic applications have not been enormously studied so far, because they are less stable. These metals and their salts are less expensive than silver and gold; thus we are going to report on the catalytic applications of the nanoparticles of these metals. Nanoparticles of Ni and Co are mostly synthesized by hydrothermal (26), water-in-oil micro-emulsion (27), gas evaporation (28), sputtering (29), co-precipitation, sol-gel and chemical reduction methods (30). The chemical reduction method is the cheapest, least time consuming, and most feasible, and gives good yield; thus it is the best method for the synthesis of nanoparticles. Naked nanoparticles aggregate rapidly; thus they are mostly fabricated within some stabilizing agents such as micelles (31–33), dendrimers (34–37), core-shell network (18), yolk-shell network (5, 38) and microgels (2, 3, 39, 40). These polymers not only act as stabilizers, but are also used as a template for the controlled synthesis of nanoparticles and as a micro-reactor for the catalytic applications of nanoparticles. Among all these stabilizers, microgels are the best candidate for the synthesis, stability and applications of nanoparticles. Microgels are cross-linked responsive materials. Their sieve size and shape can easily control the shape and size of in vivo synthesized nanoparticles. Pendant groups of monomers [e.g., N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM), acrylic acid (AAc), methacrylic acid (MAA), etc.] easily fix the nanoparticles within microgels. Hybrid microgels are extensively used as catalysts for the reduction of nitroarenes (4, 25, 41), nitriles (aliphatic and aromatic) (42) and coupling reactions (43). To the best of our knowledge, no researcher has yet studied the catalysis of p-nitrophenol (4-NP) by using Co and Ni nanoparticles fabricated in poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-methacrylic acid) [p(NIPAM-co-MAA)] hybrid microgels. Nabid et al. (42) used nickel-iron oxide-(3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane-poly(4-vinylpyridine) [Ni-Fe3 O4-SiO2-P4VP] hybrid microgels for the catalytic reduction of nitriles. Sahiner et al. (25, 41) studied the catalytic reduction of ortho-nitrophenol (2-NP) and 4-NP by using nickel-poly(2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propansulfonic acid) [Ni-p(AMPS)] and cobalt-poly(2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propansulfonic acid) [Co-p(AMPS)] hybrid microgels. Nickel-poly(acrylic acid) hybrid spherical polyelectrolyte brushes were used by Zhu et al. (44) for the catalytic reduction of 4-NP. Ni and Co nanoparticles fabricated in p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgels have not been reported yet.

In this work, we synthesized p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgels in aqueous medium. Ni and Co nanoparticles were fabricated inside p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgels by in situ reduction of metallic salts (NiSO4·6H2 O, CoCl2·6H2 O) in aqueous medium. FTIR analysis and DLS studies were used for the structural and responsiveness characterization of p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgels, respectively. UV-Visible spectrophotometry was used to investigate the catalytic activity of hybrid microgels for the reduction of 4-NP. We also studied the effect of catalyst dosages on the value of the apparent rate constant (kapp) of 4-NP. The catalytic activity of Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) and Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) hybrid microgels was compared with each other.

2 Results and discussion

2.1 FTIR spectra of p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgels

The FTIR spectra of p(NIPAM-co-MAA) copolymer microgels shown in Figure 1 were used to confirm the chemical structure of p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgels. The monomers NIPAM and MAA have a C=C bond; copolymerization occurred at this double bond. So the product of copolymer microgels should not possess the C=C absorption band. During synthesis, sulfate radicals changed the double bond to a single bond (C-C). Thus the FTIR spectra of microgels shown in Figure 1 shows no absorption band at 1600–1650 cm-1. Wang et al. (45) explained that NIPAM and AAc both have a characteristic absorption band of vibration of the C=C bond, but it was absent in the FTIR spectra of microgels. The distinct bands observed around 1554.83 and 1658.78 cm-1 represent the –CH2 (bending) and C=O functional group of MAA. The broad and intense band appearing near 3311.78 cm-1 is a characteristic band of N-H (stretching) of NIPAM and BIS. The broadness in band (around 3311.78 cm-1) was due to the presence of bonded water molecules within microgels (3, 13). So the FTIR spectra in Figure 1 show that polymerization had occurred and that all components had been incorporated into the polymer network.

Figure 1 FTIR spectra of the p(NIPAM-co-MAA) copolymer microgels.
Figure 1

FTIR spectra of the p(NIPAM-co-MAA) copolymer microgels.

2.2 pH sensitivity of p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgels

A plot of the hydrodynamic radius (Rh) of the p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgels at different pH values at 22°C is shown in Figure 2. This plot revealed that the pH of the surrounding medium has a significant effect on the Rh of the microgels (Figure 2). The variation in Rh with pH was due to the ionization of the carboxyl groups present within the microgel network. When the pH value was <4.86 (i.e., pka of MAA) (3), the carboxyl groups of MAA were in the protonated state (COOH). With the gradual increase in pH around 4.86, the value of Rh abruptly increased. This was due to the deprotonation of the carboxyl groups. Electrostatic repulsions between the ionized carboxylate groups (COO-) pushed the polymer network apart, water moved into the microgel network and the value of Rh increased (46). When the pH value was >8, the hydrodynamic radius of the microgels did not increase with the increase in pH because most of the carboxyl groups had ionized at this pH value.

Figure 2 Hydrodynamic radius of the p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgels as a function of pH at 25°C.
Figure 2

Hydrodynamic radius of the p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgels as a function of pH at 25°C.

DLS results indicated that the p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgels were fully swollen at high pH. Thus catalytic studies, described in later sections of this article, were carried out at high pH. In the swollen state, reactants can easily diffuse towards the catalyst surface through a permeable network of microgels.

2.3 Catalytic activity of hybrid microgels

The reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP was chosen as a model reaction to investigate the catalytic activity of synthesized Ni and Co nanoparticles fabricated in p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgels. This reaction was selected owing to the ease of monitoring of 4-NP and in its toxic effects on the environment. This reaction gives only one product; therefore the extent of reaction at different time intervals can be easily followed by measuring the absorbance at wavelengths of 300 nm (λmax of 4-AP) and 400 nm (λmax of 4-NP). The absorbance at 400 nm gradually decreased with the passage of time, along with a concomitant gradual increase in absorbance at 300 nm, as shown in Figures 3 and 4.

Figure 3 UV-Visible spectra for the reduction of 4-NP at different time intervals [conditions: 0.5 ml of 40 mmol/l NaBH4, 0.3 ml of the Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) catalyst and 1.8 ml of 0.111 mmol/l 4-NP; temperature 18°C].
Figure 3

UV-Visible spectra for the reduction of 4-NP at different time intervals [conditions: 0.5 ml of 40 mmol/l NaBH4, 0.3 ml of the Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) catalyst and 1.8 ml of 0.111 mmol/l 4-NP; temperature 18°C].

Figure 4 UV-Visible spectra for the reduction of 4-NP at different time intervals [conditions: 0.5 ml of 40 mmol/l NaBH4, 0.3 ml of the Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) catalyst and 1.8 ml of 0.111 mmol/l 4-NP; temperature 18°C].
Figure 4

UV-Visible spectra for the reduction of 4-NP at different time intervals [conditions: 0.5 ml of 40 mmol/l NaBH4, 0.3 ml of the Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) catalyst and 1.8 ml of 0.111 mmol/l 4-NP; temperature 18°C].

The gradual decrease in the characteristic peak of 4-NP was due to the decrease in concentration of 4-NP as a result of the conversion of 4-NP to 4-AP on the surface of Ni and Co nanoparticles inside the microgels. This catalytic effect is due to the electron relay from electron donor BH4 to acceptor 4-NP via the nanoparticles and proceeds the reduction; thus the color of the reaction mixture changed from bright yellow to colorless (47). Although the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP in the presence of aqueous solution of NaBH4 is thermodynamically favorable, the presence of a large kinetic barrier due to the large potential difference between electron donor and acceptor species suppresses the feasibility of this reaction. This large kinetic barrier does not permit the reduction of 4-NP to proceed over time even in excess of aqueous NaBH4 solution (48). Thus the nickel and cobalt nanoparticles overcome the kinetic barrier and catalyze the reduction of 4-NP (25, 41).

Plots of ln(At/Ao) vs. time (minutes) are shown in Figures 5 and 6 for the Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA)- and Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA)-catalyzed reduction of 4-NP, respectively. Initially, the value of ln(At/Ao) remained constant with the passage of time, showing that no reaction was taking place. Later on, the value of ln(At/Ao) decreased with the passage of time, showing that reaction was taking place. The time duration when no reaction is occurring is called the induction time (to). Diffusion of reactants towards the catalyst surface and regeneration of the catalyst surface occurs during this time interval. As nanoparticles of Ni and Co, Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) and Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) react with atmospheric oxygen and produce their respective oxides on their surfaces. Thus, first, the catalyst gets activated and then starts to catalyze the reaction (14, 49). Figures 5 and 6 show that 8 min of induction time was observed in the case of Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) hybrid microgels and that 1–2 min was observed in the case of Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) hybrid microgels. This time delay was due to the regeneration of nickel and cobalt nanoparticles by the reduction of oxide layer on their surfaces. It means that Ni nanoparticles got activated within a shorter period of time as compared to Co nanoparticles.

Figure 5 Plots of ln(At/Ao) vs. time (min) for the reduction of 4-NP for Co-0.1 (♦), Co-0.2 (■) and Co-0.3 (▲) samples.
Figure 5

Plots of ln(At/Ao) vs. time (min) for the reduction of 4-NP for Co-0.1 (♦), Co-0.2 (■) and Co-0.3 (▲) samples.

Figure 6 Plots of ln(At/Ao) vs. time (min) for the reduction of 4-NP for Ni-0.1 (♦), Ni-0.2 (■) and Ni-0.3 (▲) samples.
Figure 6

Plots of ln(At/Ao) vs. time (min) for the reduction of 4-NP for Ni-0.1 (♦), Ni-0.2 (■) and Ni-0.3 (▲) samples.

Linear regions of plots of ln(At/Ao) vs. time (Figures 5 and 6) were used to calculate the value of kapp. It is clear from Figures 5 and 6 that the value of ln(At/Ao) linearly decreased with time, which shows that the reaction was obeying a pseudo first-order kinetics. The slope of all plots of Figures 5 and 6 is different from each other. Plots of the reduction of 4-NP obtained using 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 ml of the Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) catalyst are shown in Figure 5. kapp values of 0.022, 0.064 and 0.074 min-1 were calculated for the reduction of 4-NP for 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 ml of the Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) catalyst, respectively. Similarly, plots of the reduction of 4-NP using 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 ml of the Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) catalyst are shown in Figure 6. kapp values of 0.102, 0.331, 0.385 min-1 were calculated for 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 ml of the Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) catalyst, respectively.

2.4 Effect of catalyst dosage on the value of kapp

Figure 7 and the values given in Tables 1 and 2 indicate that the value of kapp increases by increasing the amount of hybrid microgels at a constant temperature. Catalysis is a surface phenomenon, and the surface area increases by increasing the amount of the catalyst. By increasing the amount of the catalyst, the number of available active sites for catalysis gets increased. Thus more catalytic pockets are available now for the conversion of 4-NP to 4-AP. Therefore reduction occurs more rapidly; hence the value of kapp increases by increasing the catalyst dosage. Zhu et al. (44) observed a linear increase in the value of kapp for the reduction of 4-NP by increasing the amount of Ni-poly(acrylic acid) hybrid polyectrolyte brushes. Wu et al. (5) also observed a similar trend between catalyst dosage and kapp value for the reduction of 4-NP using Au-p(NIPAM) yolk-shell structures (5).

Figure 7 Effect of catalyst dosage on the value of kapp for the reduction of 4-NP using (♦) Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) and (▲) Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) hybrid microgels as catalysts.
Figure 7

Effect of catalyst dosage on the value of kapp for the reduction of 4-NP using (♦) Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) and (▲) Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) hybrid microgels as catalysts.

Table 1

Values of kapp calculated for the catalytic reduction of 4-NP using different amounts of the Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) catalyst at the time of synthesis and after 30 days of synthesis of the catalyst.

SampleVolume of Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAAc) (ml)Value of kapp at the time of synthesis of the catalyst (min-1)Value of kapp after 30 days of synthesis of the catalyst (min-1)
Ni-0.10.10.1020.100
Ni-0.20.20.3310.329
Ni-0.30.30.3850.381

Conditions: 1.8 ml of 0.111 mmol/l 4-NP and 0.5 ml of 40 mmol/l NaBH4; temperature 18°C.

Table 2

Values of kapp calculated for the catalytic reduction of 4-NP using different amounts of the Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) catalyst at the time of synthesis and after 30 days of synthesis of the catalyst.

SampleVolume of Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAAc) (ml)Value of kapp at the time of synthesis of the catalyst (min-1)Value of kapp after 30 days of synthesis of the catalyst (min-1)
Co-0.10.10.0220.021
Co-0.20.20.0640.062
Co-0.30.30.0740.073

Conditions: 1.8 ml of 0.111 mmol/l 4-NP and 0.5 ml of 40 mmol/l NaBH4; temperature 18°C.

2.5 Comparison of the catalytic activity of Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) and Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) hybrid microgels

Figure 7 and the values in Tables 1 and 2 confirm that Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) hybrid microgels are a more efficient catalyst for the reduction of 4-NP as compared to Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) hybrid microgels. It was found that the value of kapp obtained using Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) hybrid microgels as the catalyst for the reduction of 4-NP is five times greater as compared to that of Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) hybrid microgels at different dosages of the catalyst. This is due to the rapid transfer of electrons via the surface of Ni nanoparticles as compared to the surface of Co nanoparticles. Rapid electron transfer depends on the electronic configuration of the atoms. The number of unpaired electrons is greater in the case of Co atoms as compared to Ni atoms. Thus the nuclear electrostatic attractive forces for valence electrons are less shielded in the case of Co as compared to Ni. Thus electron transfer gets more hindered by these electrostatic forces in the case of Co as compared to Ni. Therefore Ni nanoparticles show a rapid reduction of 4-NP as compared to Co nanoparticles. Sahiner et al. (25, 41) synthesized Co-p(AMPS) and Ni-p(AMPS) catalysts and used them for the reduction of 2-NP and 4-NP. They observed that Ni nanoparticles fabricated in hydrogels are a more efficient catalyst for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol as compared to Co nanoparticles fabricated in hydrogels. So our results have good agreement with previously reported results.

2.6 Stability of Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) and Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) hybrid microgels

Ni and Co nanoparticles were found to be stable before and after the reduction process. The long-term stability of metal nanoparticles inside the microgels was checked in two ways. The hybrid systems were used as catalysts at different times of synthesis of metal nanoparticles. The catalytic activity after 30 days was found to be the same as on the day of synthesis. The calculated values of apparent rate constants for the reduction of 4-NP in aqueous medium using Ni-P(NIPAM-co-MAA) and Co-P(NIPAM-co-MAA) hybrid microgels as catalysts are given in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. The values are almost the same, which indicates the stability of the catalysts. After the completion of the reduction process, the hybrid microgels were separated from the reaction mixture by centrifugation. The hybrid microgels were reused as catalysts for the reduction of 4-NP in aqueous medium to check the stability and poisoning of metal nanoparticles. The same reaction time was observed during the first and second use of the hybrid microgels as catalysts. So the metal nanoparticles were found to be stable due to the presence of a cross-linked polymeric network around them. The stability of the metal nanoparticles inside the microgels can also be explained on the basis of the donor-acceptor concept as reported previously (50). The metal nanoparticles act as electron acceptors, and the carbonyl groups (C=O) present in the network of the p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgels act as the electron donor. Metal nanoparticles get stabilized in the microgels owing to this specific interaction. Therefore the contents of Ni and Co may be expected to be the same before and after the reduction process.

3 Conclusions

A comparison of the catalytic activity of novel Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) and Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) hybrid microgels for the reduction of 4-NP was performed in this article. For this purpose, p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgels were synthesized initially by emulsion polymerization. Then these microgels were used as a template for the synthesis of Ni and Co nanoparticles. Fabrication of p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgels was confirmed by the absence of the band of C=C at 1600 cm-1 in the FTIR spectra. The pH sensitivity of the microgels was studied by DLS. Synthesized Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) and Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) hybrid microgels were used as catalysts for the reduction of 4-NP in the presence of excess of NaBH4. The apparent rate constant (kapp) of 4-NP reduction was determined for various amounts of the catalysts. The kapp value of 4-NP reduction was found to be 0.102, 0.331 and 0.385 min-1 at 18°C for 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 ml of the Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) catalyst, respectively. Similarly, the kapp value of 4-NP reduction was found to be 0.022, 0.064 and 0.074 min-1 at 18°C for 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 ml of the Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) catalyst, respectively. Ni nanoparticle-based hybrid microgels were found to be five times more efficient as a catalyst for the reduction of 4-NP as compared to Co nanoparticle-based hybrid microgels.

4 Experimental part

4.1 Materials

The chemicals N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM), methacrylic acid (MAA), N,N-methylene bisacrylamide (BIS), p-nitrophenol (4-NP) and sodium dodecylsulphate (SDS) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Germany, whereas nickel sulfate (NiSO4·6H2 O) and cobalt chloride (CoCl2·6H2 O) were obtained from Fluka Chemika, Switzerland. Sodium borohydride (NaBH4) was purchased from Scharlau Company, Australia. Hydroquinone inhibitor was removed from MAA before use by passing it through alumina. The water used for all solution preparation, synthesis and microgel purification was distilled.

4.2 Synthesis of p(NIPAM-co-MAA) copolymer microgels

Multi-responsive p(NIPAM-co-MAA) copolymer microgels were synthesized by free-radical emulsion polymerization using NIPAM (monomer), MAA (co-monomers), BIS (cross-linker), APS (initiator) and SDS (emulsifying agent), as reported by our group previously (51–54). The amounts of NIPAM, BIS, SDS and MAA used in the synthesis of microgels are given in Table 3. NIPAM, BIS, SDS and MAA and 95 ml of water were put into a 250-ml, three-necked, round-bottom flask, which was equipped with a condenser and a nitrogen gas inlet. Then the reaction mixture was heated up to 70°C under continuous nitrogen purge. Five milliliters of 0.05 mol/l APS aqueous solution was added to the reaction mixture, and the reaction was continued for 4 h at 70°C under nitrogen purge. The microgels were cooled and dialyzed for 5–6 days against a frequent exchange of distilled water at room temperature using molecular porous membrane tubing (Fisher Scientific, UK) having a molecular-weight cut-off of 12–14,000.

Table 3

Feed composition of the p(NIPAM-co-MAA) copolymer microgels.

NIPAM (g)MAA (μl)SDS (g)BIS (g)APS (0.05 mol/l) (ml)H2 O (ml)Total no. of moles
0.92400.050.075950.009

4.3 Fabrication of nickel and cobalt nanoparticles in p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgels

An in situ chemical reduction technique was used for the synthesis of Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) hybrid microgels. 12.5 ml of the p(NIPAM-co-MAA) microgel dispersion and 9.9 ml of distilled water were put in a three-necked, round-bottom flask (250 ml) fitted with a condenser, stirrer and nitrogen gas inlet. Then 0.1 ml of 0.1 mol/l NiSO4·6H2 O was added to the reaction mixture. Then the reaction mixture was further stirred for 30 min under nitrogen purge at room temperature. After 30 min, 2.5 ml of an aqueous solution of NaBH4 (0.11 mol/l) was added dropwise to the reaction mixture. The color of the solution changed from colorless to black with the addition of NaBH4. The reaction was further run for an hour under nitrogen purge. Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) hybrid microgels were dialyzed against distilled water for an hour using a macromolecular porous membrane. Similarly, Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) hybrid microgels were synthesized using CoCl2·6H2 O salt.

4.4 Catalytic activity of Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) and Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA)

The reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP was monitored by a UV-visible Spectrophotometer. A total of 0.5 ml of 40 mmol/l NaBH4 and 1.8 ml of 0.111 mmol/l 4-NP and the catalysts were added to the cuvette, and the spectra were scanned at constant time intervals within a range of 200–500 nm using a UVD3500 (Labomed Inc., USA) spectrophotometer until the absorbance at 400 nm became constant. The catalytic reduction of 4-NP was carried out using various amounts of the Ni-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) and Co-p(NIPAM-co-MAA) catalysts as given in Tables 1 and 2, respectively hybrid microgels.

4.5 Characterization techniques

FTIR spectra were recorded on a Prestige-21 FTIR (Schimadzu Scientific Instruments, USA) spectrometer having a range of 650–4000 cm-1. DLS measurements were carried out using a commercial laser light spectrometer (B1-200SM, Brookhaven Instruments Corporation, USA) with a motor-driven goniometer equipped with a digital autocorrelator (BI-9000AT). A 22-mW cylindrical uniphase He-Ne laser having a wavelength of 637 nm was used as a light source.


Corresponding author: Zahoor H. Farooqi, Institute of Chemistry, University of the Punjab, New Campus, Lahore 54590, Pakistan, Tel.: +92-42-9230463, Ext. 817, Fax: +92-42-9231269, e-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan, for financial support under a research project grant for the fiscal year 2012–2013.

References

1. Agrawal G, Schürings MP, van Rijn P, Pich A. Formation of catalytically active gold–polymer microgel hybrids via a controlled in situ reductive process. J Mater Chem A. 2013;1:13244–51.10.1039/c3ta12370gSearch in Google Scholar

2. Ajmal M, Farooqi ZH, Siddiq M. Silver nanoparticles containing hybrid polymer microgels with tunable surface plasmon resonance and catalytic activity. Korean J. Chem Eng. 2013;30(11):2030–6.Search in Google Scholar

3. Khan SR, Farooqi ZH, Ajmal M, Siddiq M, Khan A. Synthesis, characterization, and silver nanoparticles fabrication in N-isopropylacrylamide-based polymer microgels for rapid degradation of p-nitrophenol. J Disp Sci Technol. 2013;34(10):1324–33.10.1080/01932691.2012.744690Search in Google Scholar

4. Sahiner N. Soft and flexible hydrogel templates of different sizes and various functionalities for metal nanoparticle preparation and their use in catalysis. Prog Polym Sci. 2013;38(9):1329–56.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.06.004Search in Google Scholar

5. Wu S, Dzubiella J, Kaiser J, Drechsler M, Guo X, Ballauff M, Lu Y. Thermosensitive Au-PNIPA yolk–shell nanoparticles with tunable selectivity for catalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51(9):2229–33.10.1002/anie.201106515Search in Google Scholar

6. Mornet S, Vasseur S, Grasset F, Veverka P, Goglio G, Demourgues A, Portier J, Pollert E, Duguet E. Magnetic nanoparticle design for medical applications. Prog Solid State Chem. 2006;34(2–4):237–47.10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2005.11.010Search in Google Scholar

7. Elliott DW, Zhang WX. Field Assessment of nanoscale bimetallic particles for groundwater treatment. Environ Sci Technol. 2001;35(24):4922–6.10.1021/es0108584Search in Google Scholar

8. Dionigi C, Lungaro L, Goranov V, Riminucci A, Piñeiro-Redondo Y, Bañobre-López M, Rivas J, Dediu V. Smart magnetic poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) to control the release of bio-active molecules. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014, DOI: 10.1007/s10856-014-5159-7.10.1007/s10856-014-5159-7Search in Google Scholar

9. Zhang K, Wu W, Guo K, Chen J, Zhang P. Synthesis of temperature-responsive poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide)/poly(methyl methacrylate)/silica hybrid capsules from inverse pickering emulsion polymerization and their application in controlled drug release. Langmuir 2010;26(11):7971–80.10.1021/la904841mSearch in Google Scholar

10. Demir E, Akça H, Kaya B, Burgucu D, Tokgün O, Turna F, Aksakal S, Vales G, Creus A, Marcos R. Zinc oxide nanoparticles: genotoxicity, interactions with UV-light and cell-transforming potential. J Hazard Mater. 2014;264:420–9.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.11.043Search in Google Scholar

11. Wang ZL. Characterizing the structure and properties of individual wire-like nanoentities. Adv Mater. 2000;12(17):1295–8.10.1002/1521-4095(200009)12:17<1295::AID-ADMA1295>3.0.CO;2-BSearch in Google Scholar

12. Daniel MC, Astruc D. Gold nanoparticles: assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology. Chem Rev. 2004;104(1):293–346.10.1021/cr030698+Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Naeem H, Farooqi ZH, Shah LA, Siddiq M. Synthesis and characterization of p(NIPAM-AA-AAm) microgels for tuning of optical properties of silver nanoparticles. J Polym Res. 2012;19(9):9950.10.1007/s10965-012-9950-1Search in Google Scholar

14. Mei Y, Sharma G, Lu Y, Ballauff M, Drechsler M, Irrgang T, Kempe R. High catalytic activity of platinum nanoparticles immobilized on spherical polyelectrolyte brushes. Langmuir 2005;21(6):12229–34.10.1021/la052120wSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Sharma G, Mei Y, Lu Y, Ballauff M, Irrgang T, Proch S, Kempe R. Spherical polyelectrolyte brushes as carriers for platinum nanoparticles in heterogeneous hydrogenation reactions. J Catal. 2007;246(1):10–4.10.1016/j.jcat.2006.11.016Search in Google Scholar

16. Wu S, Kaiser J, Guo X, Li L, Lu Y, Ballauff M. Recoverable platinum nanocatalysts immobilized on magnetic spherical polyelectrolyte brushes. Indus Eng Chem Res. 2012;51(15):5608–14.10.1021/ie2025147Search in Google Scholar

17. Heck R, Nolley Jr J. Palladium-catalyzed vinylic hydrogen substitution reactions with aryl, benzyl, and styryl halides. J Org Chem. 1972;37(14):2320–22.10.1021/jo00979a024Search in Google Scholar

18. Mei Y, Lu Y, Polzer F, Ballauff M, Drechsler M. Catalytic activity of palladium nanoparticles encapsulated in spherical polyelectrolyte brushes and core-shell microgels. Chem Mater. 2007;19(5):1062–9.10.1021/cm062554sSearch in Google Scholar

19. Miyaura N, Suzuki A. Palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of organoboron compounds. Chem Rev. 1995;95(7):2457–83.10.1021/cr00039a007Search in Google Scholar

20. Narayanan R, El-Sayed MA. Effect of catalysis on the stability of metallic nanoparticles: Suzuki reaction catalyzed by PVP-palladium nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125(27):8340–47.10.1021/ja035044xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Tokumoto MS, Pulcinelli SH, Santilli CV, Briois V. Catalysis and temperature dependence on the formation of ZnO nanoparticles and of zinc acetate derivatives prepared by the sol-gel route. J Phys Chem B. 2003;107(2):568–74.10.1021/jp0217381Search in Google Scholar

22. Alonso F, Moglie Y, Radivoy G, Yus M. Copper nanoparticles in click chemistry: an alternative catalytic system for the cycloaddition of terminal alkynes and azides. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50(20):2358–62.10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.02.220Search in Google Scholar

23. Sharghi H, Khalifeh R, Doroodmand MM. Copper nanoparticles on charcoal for multicomponent catalytic synthesis of 1,2,3-triazole derivatives from benzyl halides or alkyl halides, terminal alkynes and sodium azide in water as a “green” solvent. Adv Synth Catal. 2009;351(1-2):207–18.10.1002/adsc.200800612Search in Google Scholar

24. Metin O, Mazumder V, Ozkar S, Sun S. Monodisperse nickel nanoparticles and their catalysis in hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(5):1468–9.10.1021/ja909243zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Sahiner N, Ozay H, Ozay O, Aktas N. A soft hydrogel reactor for cobalt nanoparticle preparation and use in the reduction of nitrophenols. Appl Catal, B. 2010;101(1-2):137–43.10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.09.022Search in Google Scholar

26. Kim M, Son WS, Ahn KH, Kim DS, Lee HS, Lee YW. Hydrothermal synthesis of metal nanoparticles using glycerol as a reducing agent. J Supercrit Fluids. 2014;90:53–9.10.1016/j.supflu.2014.02.022Search in Google Scholar

27. Chen DH, Wu SH. Synthesis of nickel nanoparticles in water-in-oil microemulsions. Chem Mater. 2000;12(5):1354–60.10.1021/cm991167ySearch in Google Scholar

28. Siegel R, Ramasamy S, Hahn H, Zongquan L, Ting L, Gronsky R. Synthesis, characterization, and properties of nanophase TiO2. J Mater Res. 1988;3(6):1367–72.10.1557/JMR.1988.1367Search in Google Scholar

29. Fayet P, Wöste L. Experiments on size-selected metal cluster ions in a triple quadrupole arrangement. Zeitschrift für Physik D Atoms, Molecules and Clusters 1986;3(2):177–82.10.1007/BF01384804Search in Google Scholar

30. Li Y, Li L, Liao H, Wang H. Preparation of pure nickel, cobalt, nickel–cobalt and nickel–copper alloys by hydrothermal reduction. J Mater Chem. 1999;9(10):2675.10.1039/a904686kSearch in Google Scholar

31. Filali M, Meier MA, Schubert US, Gohy JF. Star-block copolymers as templates for the preparation of stable gold nanoparticles. Langmuir 2005;21(17):7995–8000.10.1021/la050377oSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Lipshutz BH, Ghorai S, Leong WW, Taft BR, Krogstad DV. Manipulating micellar environments for enhancing transition metal-catalyzed cross-couplings in water at room temperature. J Org Chem. 2011;76(12):5061–73.10.1021/jo200746ySearch in Google Scholar

33. Minkler SR, Lipshutz BH, Krause N. Gold catalysis in micellar systems. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;123(34):7966–9.10.1002/ange.201101396Search in Google Scholar

34. Myers VS, Weir MG, Carino EV, Yancey DF, Pande S, Crooks RM. Dendrimer-encapsulated nanoparticles: new synthetic and characterization methods and catalytic applications. Chem Sci. 2011;2:1632–46.10.1039/c1sc00256bSearch in Google Scholar

35. Dang G, Shi Y, Fu Z, Yang W. Polymer nanoparticles with dendrimer-Ag shell and its application in catalysis. Particuology 2013;11(3):346–52.10.1016/j.partic.2011.06.012Search in Google Scholar

36. Peng X, Pan Q, Rempel GL. Bimetallic dendrimer-encapsulated nanoparticles as catalysts: a review of the research advances. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37:1619–28.10.1039/b716441fSearch in Google Scholar

37. Reek JN, Arevalo S, van Heerbeek R, Kamer PC, Van Leeuwen PW. Dendrimers in catalysis. Adv Catal. 2006;49:71–151.10.1016/S0360-0564(05)49002-1Search in Google Scholar

38. Lee J, Park JC, Song H. A Nanoreactor framework of a Au@SiO2 yolk/shell structure for catalytic reduction of p-nitrophenol. Adv Mater. 2008;20(8):1523–8.10.1002/adma.200702338Search in Google Scholar

39. Liu YY, Liu XY, Yang JM, Lin DL, Chen X, Zha LS. Investigation of Ag nanoparticles loading temperature responsive hybrid microgels and their temperature controlled catalytic activity. Colloids Surf A. 2012;393(5):105–10.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.11.007Search in Google Scholar

40. Zhang J, Xu S, Kumacheva E. Polymer microgels: reactors for semiconductor, metal, and magnetic nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126(25):7908–14.10.1021/ja031523kSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Sahiner N, Ozay H, Ozay O, Aktas N. New catalytic route: Hydrogels as templates and reactors for in situ Ni nanoparticle synthesis and usage in the reduction of 2- and 4-nitrophenols. Appl Catal A. 2010;385(1-2):201–7.10.1016/j.apcata.2010.07.004Search in Google Scholar

42. Nabid MR, Bide Y, Niknezhad M. Fe3 O4–SiO2–P4VP pH‐sensitive microgel for immobilization of nickel nanoparticles: An efficient heterogeneous catalyst for nitrile reduction in water. Chem Cat Chem. 2014;6(2):538–46.Search in Google Scholar

43. Contin A, Biffis A, Sterchele S, Dörmbach K, Schipmann S, Pich A. Metal nanoparticles inside microgel/clay nanohybrids: Synthesis, characterization and catalytic efficiency in cross-coupling reactions. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2014;414(15):41–5.10.1016/j.jcis.2013.09.048Search in Google Scholar

44. Zhu Z, Guo X, Wu S, Zhang R, Wang J, Li L. Preparation of nickel nanoparticles in spherical polyelectrolyte brush nanoreactor and their catalytic activity. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2011;50(24):13848–53.10.1021/ie2017306Search in Google Scholar

45. Wang SQ, Liu QL, Zhu AM. Preparation of multisensitive poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylic acid)/TiO2 composites for degradation of methyl orange. Eur Polym J. 2011;47(5): 1168–75.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.01.011Search in Google Scholar

46. Kratz K, Hellweg T, Eimer W. Influence of charge density on the swelling of colloidal poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylic acid) microgels. Colloids Surf A. 2000;170(2-3):137–49.10.1016/S0927-7757(00)00490-8Search in Google Scholar

47. Du X, He J, Zhu J, Sun L, An S. Ag-deposited silica-coated Fe3 O4 magnetic nanoparticles catalyzed reduction of p-nitrophenol. Appl Surf Sci. 2012;258(7):2717–23.10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.10.122Search in Google Scholar

48. Jana S, Ghosh SK, Nath S, Pande S, Praharaj S, Panigrahi S, Basu S, Endo T, Pal T. Synthesis of silver nanoshell-coated cationic polystyrene beads: a solid phase catalyst for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol. Appl Catal A. 2006;313(1):41–8.10.1016/j.apcata.2006.07.007Search in Google Scholar

49. Praharaj S, Nath S, Ghosh SK, Kundu S, Pal T. Immobilization and recovery of Au nanoparticles from anion exchange resin: resin-bound nanoparticle matrix as a catalyst for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol. Langmuir 2004;20(23):9889–92.10.1021/la0486281Search in Google Scholar PubMed

50. Dong Y, Ma Y, Zhai T, Shen F, Zeng Y, Fu H, Yao J. Silver nanoparticles stabilized by thermoresponsive microgel particles: synthesis and evidence of an electron donor-acceptor effect. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2007;28(24):2339–45.10.1002/marc.200700483Search in Google Scholar

51. Farooqi ZH, Khan A, Siddiq M. Temperature-induced volume change and glucose sensitivity of poly[(N-isopropylacry- lamide)-co-acrylamide-co-(phenylboronic acid)] microgels. Polym Int. 2011;60(10):1481–6.10.1002/pi.3106Search in Google Scholar

52. Farooqi ZH, Khan HU, Shah SM, Siddiq M. Stability of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylic acid) polymer microgels under various conditions of temperature, pH and salt concentration. Arabian J Chem. 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.07.031.10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.07.031Search in Google Scholar

53. Farooqi ZH, Siddiq M. Temperature responsive poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-acrylamide-phenylboronic acid) microgels for stabilization of silver nanoparticles. J Disp Sci Technol. 2014. doi: 10.1080/01932691.2014.911106.10.1080/01932691.2014.911106Search in Google Scholar

54. Farooqi ZH, Wu W, Zhou S, Siddiq M. Engineering of phenylboronic acid based glucose-sensitive microgels with 4-vinylpyridine for working at physiological pH and temperature. Macromol Chem Phys. 2011;212(14):1510–4.10.1002/macp.201000768Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-6-3
Accepted: 2014-7-10
Published Online: 2014-8-14
Published in Print: 2014-9-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/epoly-2014-0111/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button