Home Medicine Population dynamic study of two prey one predator system with disease in first prey using fuzzy impulsive control
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Population dynamic study of two prey one predator system with disease in first prey using fuzzy impulsive control

  • and EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 1, 2024
Epidemiologic Methods
From the journal Epidemiologic Methods Volume 13 Issue 1

Abstract

Objectives

The prey-predator model provides a mathematical framework for understanding the population dynamics of interacting species, highlighting the delicate balance between predator and prey populations in ecological systems. The four-species predator-prey model extends the Lotka-Volterra framework to explore the dynamics of ecosystems with multiple interacting species. It provides a theoretical foundation for understanding how the populations of multiple prey and predator species influence each other over time. Apart from the traditional methods like direct approach for solving the non-linear system of equations, recent Fuzzy method approaches have been developed. The solution of non-linear systems using classical methods is not easy due to its non-linearity, analytical complexity, chaotic behavior, etc. and the T-S method is very much effective to analyze the non-linear models.

Methods

In this study, we considered an eco-epidemic model with two populations of prey and one population of predator, with the only infectious disease infecting the first prey population. The four-dimensional Lotka-Volterra predator-prey system’s model stability has been examined using the Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) impulsive control model and the Fuzzy impulsive control model. Following the formulation of the model, the global stability and the Fuzzy solution are carried out through numerical simulations and graphical representations with appropriate discussion for a better understanding the dynamics of our proposed model.

Results

The Takagi-Sugeno method has diverse applications in modeling, control, pattern recognition, and decision-making in systems where uncertainty and non-linearity play a significant role. Its ability to combine fuzzy logic with traditional mathematical models provides a powerful tool for addressing complex real-world problems.

Conclusions

The impulse control approach, what is considered within the foundation of fuzzy systems established on T-S model, is found to be suitable for extremely complex and non-linear systems with impulse effects.

Keywords: Takagi-Sugeno model; stability; Lotka-Volterra predator-prey system; ecology; epidemiology
Corresponding author: Kaladhar Kolla, Department of Mathematics, National Institute of Technology, Warangal 506004, India, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: None declared.

  6. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Khajanchi, S. Modeling the dynamics of stage-structure predator-prey system with monod–haldane type response function. Appl Math Comput 2017;302:122–43.10.1016/j.amc.2017.01.019Search in Google Scholar

2. Khajanchi, S, Banerjee, S. Role of constant prey refuge on stage structure predator–prey model with ratio dependent functional response. Appl Math Comput 2017;314:193–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2017.07.017.Search in Google Scholar

3. Sarkar, K, Khajanchi, S, Mali, PC, Nieto, JJ. Rich dynamics of a predator-prey system with different kinds of functional responses. Complexity 2020;2020:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4285294.Search in Google Scholar

4. Chakraborty, B, Bairagi, N. Complexity in a prey-predator model with prey refuge and diffusion. Ecol Complex 2019;37:11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2018.10.004.Search in Google Scholar

5. Holling, CS. The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Mem Entomol Soc Can 1965;97:5–60. https://doi.org/10.4039/entm9745fv.Search in Google Scholar

6. Kot, M. Elements of mathematical ecology. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2001.10.1017/CBO9780511608520Search in Google Scholar

7. Li, H, Tian, Y. Dynamic behavior analysis of a feedback control predator-prey model with exponential fear effect and hassell-varley functional response. J Franklin Inst 2023;360:3479–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2022.11.030.Search in Google Scholar

8. Murray, JD. Models for interacting populations. New York, NY: Springer; 1993.10.1007/978-3-662-08542-4_3Search in Google Scholar

9. Sarkar, K, S Khajanchi. Spatiotemporal dynamics of a predator-prey system with fear effect. J Franklin Inst 2023;360:7380–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2023.05.034.Search in Google Scholar

10. Beretta, E, Capasso, V. On the general structure of epidemic systems. Global asymptotic stability. Comput Math Appl 1986;12:677–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221(86)90054-4.Search in Google Scholar

11. Castillo-Chavez, C, Feng, Z. Global stability of an age-structure model for tb and its applications to optimal vaccination strategies. Math Biosci 1998;151:135–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-5564(98)10016-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Li, J, Yang, Y, Zhou, Y. Global stability of an epidemic model with latent stage and vaccination. Nonlinear Anal R World Appl 2011;12:2163–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2010.12.030.Search in Google Scholar

13. Wang, W. Backward bifurcation of an epidemic model with treatment. Math Biosci 2006;201:58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2005.12.022.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Bera, S, Khajanchi, S, Roy, TK. Stability analysis of fuzzy htlv-i infection model: a dynamic approach. J Appl Math Comput 2023;69:171–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-022-01741-y.Search in Google Scholar

15. Ikram, R, Khan, A, Zahri, M, Saeed, A, Yavuz, M, Kumam, P. Extinction and stationary distribution of a stochastic covid-19 epidemic model with time-delay. Comput Biol Med 2022;141:105115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105115.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Khajanchi, S. Dynamic behavior of a beddington–deangelis type stage structured predator–prey model. Appl Math Comput 2014;244:344–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.06.109.Search in Google Scholar

17. Li, MY, Shu, H. Joint effects of mitosis and intracellular delay on viral dynamics: two-parameter bifurcation analysis. J Math Biol 2012;64:1005–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-011-0436-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Sarkar, K, Khajanchi, S, Mali, PC. A delayed eco-epidemiological model with weak allee effect and disease in prey. Int J Bifurcat Chaos 2022;32:2250122. https://doi.org/10.1142/s021812742250122x.Search in Google Scholar

19. Bandyopadhyay, M, Bhattacharyya, R, Mukhopadhyay, B. Dynamics of an autotroph–herbivore ecosystem with nutrient recycling. Ecol Model 2004;176:201–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.10.030.Search in Google Scholar

20. Bandyopadhyay, M, Chakrabarti, CG. Deterministic and stochastic analysis of a nonlinear prey-predator system. J Biol Syst 2003;11:161–72. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218339003000816.Search in Google Scholar

21. Das, A, D Sahoo, G Samanta, JJ Nieto. Deterministic and stochastic analysis of a two-prey–one-predator system with fear effect and switching behaviour in predation. Int J Dyn Control 2022;11:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-022-01028-x.Search in Google Scholar

22. Freedman, HI, Waltman, P. Mathematical analysis of some three-species food-chain models. Math Biosci 1977;33:257–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(77)90142-0.Search in Google Scholar

23. Freedman, HI, Waltman, P. Persistence in models of three interacting predator-prey populations. Math Biosci 1984;68:213–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(84)90032-4.Search in Google Scholar

24. Freedman, HI, Waltman, P. Persistence in a model of three competitive populations. Math Biosci 1985;73:89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(85)90078-1.Search in Google Scholar

25. Hsu, SB, Hwang, TW. Hopf bifurcation analysis for a predator-prey system of holling and leslie type. Taiwan J Math 1999;3:35–53. https://doi.org/10.11650/twjm/1500407053.Search in Google Scholar

26. Li, B, Kuang, Y. Simple food chain in a chemostat with distinct removal rates. J Math Anal Appl 2000;242:75–92. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1999.6655.Search in Google Scholar

27. Sharma, S, Samanta, GP. Dynamical behaviour of a two prey and one predator system. Diff Eq Dyn Syst 2014;22:125–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12591-012-0158-y.Search in Google Scholar

28. Anderson, RM, May, RM. The invasion, persistence and spread of infectious diseases within animal and plant communities. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1986;314:533–70. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1986.0072.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Hadeler, KP, Freedman, HI. Predator-prey populations with parasitic infection. J Math Biol 1989;27:609–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00276947.Search in Google Scholar

30. Hudson, PJ, AP Dobson, D Newborn. Do parasites make prey vulnerable to predation. red grouse and parasites. J Anim Ecol 1992;61:681–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/5623.Search in Google Scholar

31. Venturino, E. The influence of diseases on lotka-volterra systems. Rocky Mt J Math 1994;24:381–402.10.1216/rmjm/1181072471Search in Google Scholar

32. Xiao, Y, Chen, L. Analysis of a three species eco-epidemiological model. J Math Anal Appl 2001;258:733–54. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.2001.7514.Search in Google Scholar

33. Xiao, Y, Chen, L. Modeling and analysis of a predator–prey model with disease in the prey. Math Biosci 2001;171:59–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-5564(01)00049-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Venturino, E. Epidemics in predator–prey models: disease in the predators. Math Med Biol 2002;19:185–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/imammb19.3.185.Search in Google Scholar

35. Hethcote, HW, Wang, W, Han, L, Ma, Z. A predator–prey model with infected prey. Theor Popul Biol 2004;66:259–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2004.06.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Hsieh, YH, Hsiao, CK. Predator–prey model with disease infection in both populations. Math Med Biol J IMA 2008;25:247–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/imammb/dqn017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37. Haque, M, Venturino, E. Mathematical models of diseases spreading in symbiotic communities, Wildlife: Destruction, Conservation and Biodiversity. New York, USA: NOVA Science Publisher, Inc.; 2009:135–179 pp. In this issue.Search in Google Scholar

38. Zhou, X, Shi, X, Song, X. Analysis of a delay prey-predator model with disease in the prey species only. J Kor Math Soc 2009;46:713–31. https://doi.org/10.4134/jkms.2009.46.4.713.Search in Google Scholar

39. Haque, M. A predator–prey model with disease in the predator species only. Nonlinear Anal R World Appl 2010;11:2224–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2009.06.012.Search in Google Scholar

40. Haque, M, Greenhalgh, D. When a predator avoids infected prey: a model-based theoretical study. Math Med Biol A J IMA 2010;27:75–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/imammb/dqp007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Haque, M, Sarwardi, S, Preston, S, Venturino, E. Effect of delay in a lotka–volterra type predator–prey model with a transmissible disease in the predator species. Math Biosci 2011;234:47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2011.06.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Tewa, JJ, Djeumen, VY, Bowong, S. Predator–prey model with holling response function of type ii and sis infectious disease. Appl Math Model 2013;37:4825–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.10.003.Search in Google Scholar

43. Sharma, S, Samanta, GP. Analysis of a two prey one predator system with disease in the first prey population. Int J Dyn Control 2015;3:210–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-014-0107-4.Search in Google Scholar

44. Sharma, S, Samanta, GP. A leslie–gower predator–prey model with disease in prey incorporating a prey refuge. Chaos, Solit Fractals 2015;70:69–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2014.11.010.Search in Google Scholar

45. Mondal, A, Pal, AK, Samanta, GP. On the dynamics of evolutionary leslie-gower predator-prey eco-epidemiological model with disease in predator. Ecol Genet Genom 2019;10:100034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egg.2018.11.002.Search in Google Scholar

46. Saha, S, Maiti, A, Samanta, GP. A michaelis–menten predator–prey model with strong allee effect and disease in prey incorporating prey refuge. Int J Bifurcat Chaos 2018;28:1850073. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218127418500736.Search in Google Scholar

47. Sarkar, K, Khajanchi, S. Impact of fear effect on the growth of prey in a predator-prey interaction model. Ecol Complex 2020;42:100826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2020.100826.Search in Google Scholar

48. Saha, S, Samanta, GP. A prey–predator system with disease in prey and cooperative hunting strategy in predator. J Phys Math Theor 2020;53:485601. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/abbc7b.Search in Google Scholar

49. Saha, S, Samanta, GP. Analysis of a predator–prey model with herd behavior and disease in prey incorporating prey refuge. Int J Biomath (IJB) 2019;12:1950007. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793524519500074.Search in Google Scholar

50. Huang, C. Bifurcation behaviors of a fractional-order predator–prey network with two delays. Fractals 2021;29:2150153. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218348x2150153x.Search in Google Scholar

51. Mallak, S, Farekh, D, Attili, B. Numerical investigation of fuzzy predator-prey model with a functional response of the form arctan (ax). Mathematics 2021;9:1919. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9161919.Search in Google Scholar

52. Wang, Y. Stability analysis of predator-prey system with fuzzy impulsive control. J Appl Math 2012;2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/715497.Search in Google Scholar

53. Tong, S, Wang, W, Qu, L. Decentralized robust control for uncertain ts fuzzy large-scale systems with time-delay. Int J Innov Comput Inf Control 2007;3:657–72.10.1109/ICMLC.2007.4370221Search in Google Scholar

54. Tseng, CS, Chen, BS, Uang, HJ. Fuzzy tracking control design for nonlinear dynamic systems via ts fuzzy model. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2001;9:381–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/91.928735.Search in Google Scholar

55. Zheng, Y, Chen, G. Fuzzy impulsive control of chaotic systems based on ts fuzzy model. Chaos, Solit Fractals 2009;39:2002–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2007.06.061.Search in Google Scholar

56. Wang, X, Yu, J, Li, C, Wang, H, Huang, T, Huang, J. Robust stability of stochastic fuzzy delayed neural networks with impulsive time window. Neural Network 2015;67:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2015.03.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

57. Wu, L, Su, X, Shi, P. Model approximation of continuous-time TS fuzzy stochastic systems. Switzerland: Springer; 2015.10.1007/978-3-319-11316-6_12Search in Google Scholar

58. Xiao, Y, Chen, L. A ratio-dependent predator–prey model with disease in the prey. Appl Math Comput 2002;131:397–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0096-3003(01)00156-4.Search in Google Scholar

59. Wang, HO, Tanaka, K. Fuzzy control systems design and analysis: a linear matrix inequality approach. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.Search in Google Scholar

60. Singh, K, Kaladhar, K. A mathematical study for the stability of two predator and one prey with infection in first predator using fuzzy impulsive control. Ann Appl Math 2023;39:29–48. https://doi.org/10.4208/aam.oa-2023-0003.Search in Google Scholar
Received: 2023-09-29
Accepted: 2024-01-10
Published Online: 2024-02-01

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Using specific, validated vs. non-specific, non-validated tools to measure a subjective concept: application on COVID-19 burnout scales in a working population
  3. Linked shrinkage to improve estimation of interaction effects in regression models
  4. A study of a deterministic model for meningitis epidemic
  5. Population dynamic study of two prey one predator system with disease in first prey using fuzzy impulsive control
  6. Leveraging data from multiple sources in epidemiologic research: transportability, dynamic borrowing, external controls, and beyond
  7. Temporal discontinuity trials and randomization: success rates versus design strength
  8. Effect of designations of index date in externally controlled trials: an empirical example
https://doi.org/10.1515/em-2023-0037
Keywords for this article
Takagi-Sugeno model; stability; Lotka-Volterra predator-prey system; ecology; epidemiology

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Using specific, validated vs. non-specific, non-validated tools to measure a subjective concept: application on COVID-19 burnout scales in a working population
  3. Linked shrinkage to improve estimation of interaction effects in regression models
  4. A study of a deterministic model for meningitis epidemic
  5. Population dynamic study of two prey one predator system with disease in first prey using fuzzy impulsive control
  6. Leveraging data from multiple sources in epidemiologic research: transportability, dynamic borrowing, external controls, and beyond
  7. Temporal discontinuity trials and randomization: success rates versus design strength
  8. Effect of designations of index date in externally controlled trials: an empirical example
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Winner of the OpenAthens UX Award 2026
Winner of the OpenAthens UX Award 2026
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2026 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 20.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/em-2023-0037/html
Scroll to top button