Home Mitgefühl in Kants Ethik
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Mitgefühl in Kants Ethik

Die Kultivierung emotionaler Dispositionen
  • Anna Wehofsits EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 13, 2017

Abstract

According to Kant, building moral character is not limited to developing rational capacities but also includes developing emotional capacities as well as responsibly managing and deliberately cultivating emotional dispositions. Kant assigns central importance specifically to the cultivation of sympathy. This paper first distinguishes three levels on which sympathy is significant in Kant’s ethics. Referring to recent philosophical and psychological research, it then aims to reconstruct the process of cultivating sympathy in a way that is persuasive both as an interpretation of Kant and as a systematic account. Contrary to what Kant’s brief comments on this process seem to suggest, cultivating sympathy does not consist in a mere stimulation of a natural emotional mechanism – this, I argue, would be inconsistent with central concerns of Kantian ethics. Rather, it consists in a morally motivated, reflexive transformation of a natural disposition that aims to make us responsive to the needs of others.

Einzelliteratur

Allison, H. E. (1990), Kant’s Theory of Freedom, Cambridge u. New York.10.1017/CBO9781139172295Search in Google Scholar

Arasse, D. (1987), La guillotine et l’imaginaire de la Terreur, Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Baron, M. (1995), Kantian ethics almost without apology, Ithaca, N. Y.Search in Google Scholar

Baxley, A. M. (2010), Kant’s Theory of Virtue. The Value of Autocracy, Cambridge u. New York.10.1017/CBO9780511779466Search in Google Scholar

Brandt, R. (1999), Kritischer Kommentar zu Kants Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht, Hamburg.10.28937/978-3-7873-2796-6Search in Google Scholar

Coplan, A. (2011), Understanding Empathy: Its Features and Effects, in: dies./Goldie (2011a), 3–18.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539956.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Coplan, A., u. Goldie, P. (Hg.) (2011a), Empathy. Philosophical and psychological perspectives, New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539956.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Coplan, A., u. Goldie, P. (2011b), Introduction, in: dies. (2011a), IX–XLVII.Search in Google Scholar

Darwall, S. (1998), Empathy, Sympathy, Care, in: Philosophical Studies 89, 261–268.10.1023/A:1004289113917Search in Google Scholar

Denis, L. (2000), Kant’s Cold Sage and the Sublimity of Apathy, in: Kantian Review 4, 48–73.10.1017/S1369415400000509Search in Google Scholar

Döring, S. (2009), Kann Willensschwäche rational sein?, in: Fürst, M., Gombocz, W. L., u.Search in Google Scholar

Hiebaum, C. (Hg.), Gehirne und Personen. Beiträge zum 8. Internationalen Kongress der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Philosophie in Graz, Heusenstamm, 55–70.Search in Google Scholar

Esser, A. M. (2014), Die Bedeutung von Gefühlen in Kants Moralphilosophie und die Möglichkeit ihrer phänomenologischen Erweiterung, in: Römer, I. (Hg.), Affektivität und Ethik bei Kant und in der Phänomenologie, Berlin u. Boston, 145–171.10.1515/9783110345162.145Search in Google Scholar

Frierson, P. R. (2014), Affects and Passions, in: Cohen, A. (Hg.), Kant’s lectures on anthropology.10.1017/CBO9781139176170.008Search in Google Scholar

A critical guide, Cambridge u. New York, 94–113.Search in Google Scholar

Goldie, P. (2009), The emotions. A philosophical exploration, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Guyer, P. (1993), Kant and the Experience of Freedom. Essays on Aesthetics and Morality, Cambridge u. New York.10.1017/CBO9781139172516Search in Google Scholar

Guyer, P. (2010), Moral Feelings in the Metaphysics of Morals, in: Lara Denis (Hg.), Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, Cambridge u. New York.10.1017/CBO9780511763250.008Search in Google Scholar

Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., u. Rapson, R. L. (1994), Emotional Contagion, Cambridge u. New York.10.1017/CBO9781139174138Search in Google Scholar

Herman, B. (1993), The practice of moral judgment, Cambridge, Mass., u. a.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, M. L. (1984), Interaction of Affect and Cognition in Empathy, in: Izard, C. E., Kagan, J., u. Zajonc, R. B. (Hg.), Emotions, Cognition, and Behavior, Cambridge u. New York, 103–131.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, M. L. (2011), Empathy, Justice, and the Law, in: Coplan/Goldie (2011a), 230–254.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539956.003.0015Search in Google Scholar

Kleingeld, P. (1995), Fortschritt und Vernunft: Zur Geschichtsphilosophie Kants, Würzburg.Search in Google Scholar

Leiberg, S., u. Singer, T. (2013), Empathie, in: Schröger, E., u. Kölsch, S. (Hg.), Affektive und kognitive Neurowissenschaft, Göttingen u. a., 119–154.Search in Google Scholar

Lipps, T. (1903–1906), Ästhetik. Psychologie des Schönen und der Kunst, 2 Bde., Hamburg.Search in Google Scholar

Mikkola, M. (2011), Kant On Moral Agency and Women’s Nature, in: Kantian Review 16.1, 89–111.10.1017/S1369415410000014Search in Google Scholar

Olbrich, E. (2009), Bausteine einer Theorie einer Mensch-Tier-Beziehung, in: Otterstedt, C., u. Rosenberger, M. (Hg.), Gefährten, Konkurrenten, Verwandte. Die Mensch-Tier-Beziehung im wissenschaftlichen Diskurs, Göttingen, 111–132.Search in Google Scholar

Recki, B. (2001), Ästhetik der Sitten: Die Affinität von ästhetischem Gefühl und praktischer Vernunft bei Kant, Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar

Schadow, S. (2012), Achtung für das Gesetz: Moral und Motivation bei Kant, Berlin u. New York.10.1515/9783110299618Search in Google Scholar

Scheler, M. (2016), Wesen und Formen der Sympathie, hg. v. Hand, A., u. Bermes, C., Hamburg.Search in Google Scholar

Schiller, F. v. (1962), Gewissensskrupel, in: ders., Sämtliche Werke 1, hg. v. Fricke, G., u.Göpfert, H. G., unter Mitarbeit v. Stubenrauch, H., München, 299.Search in Google Scholar

Schönecker, D. (2010), Kant über Menschenliebe als moralische Gemütsanlage, in: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92.2, 133–175.10.1515/agph.2010.007Search in Google Scholar

Schott, R. M. (2008), Feminism and the History of Philosophy, in: Kittay, E. F., u. Alcoff, L. M. (Hg.), The Blackwell Guide to Feminist Philosophy, Hoboken, N. J., 43–63.10.1002/9780470696132.ch2Search in Google Scholar

Seymour Fahmy, M. (2009), Active Sympathetic Participation: Reconsidering Kant’s Duty of Sympathy, in: Kantian Review 14.1, 31–52.10.1017/S1369415400001333Search in Google Scholar

Sherman, N. (1997), Making a Necessity of Virtue. Aristotle and Kant on Virtue, Cambridge u. New York.10.1017/CBO9780511624865Search in Google Scholar

Singer, T., u. Lamm, C. (2009), The Social Neuroscience of Empathy, in: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 81–96.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195342161.013.0037Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Sousa, R. de (2014), Emotion, in: Zalta, E. N. (Hg.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/emotion (20.7.2017).Search in Google Scholar

Stueber, K. R. (2006), Rediscovering Empathy: Agency, Folk Psychology, and the Human Sciences, Cambridge, Mass.10.7551/mitpress/5833.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Timmermann, J. (2016), Kant über Mitleidenschaft, in: Kant-Studien 107.4, 729–732.10.1515/kant-2016-0055Search in Google Scholar

Wehofsits, A. (2016), Anthropologie und Moral. Affekte, Leidenschaften und Mitgefühl in Kants Ethik, Berlin u. Boston.10.1515/9783110456462Search in Google Scholar

Wood, A. W. (1999), Kant’s Ethical Thought, Cambridge u. New York.10.1017/CBO9781139173254Search in Google Scholar

Verwendete Siglen

Anth

Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht

GMS

Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten

KpV

Kritik der praktischen Vernunft

KU

Kritik der Urteilskraft

MS

Die Metaphysik der Sitten

Refl

Reflexion

RGV

Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft

Published Online: 2017-12-13
Published in Print: 2017-10-26

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dzph-2017-0057/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button