Home Freiheit als Praxisform
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Freiheit als Praxisform

Deweys pragmatistische Naturalisierung des Geistes
  • Jörg Volbers EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 11, 2015

Abstract

Dewey’s pragmatism and John McDowell’s philosophy of language share central concerns. They defend a naturalistic vision of the mind (“second nature”) and rely on the concept of experience in order to articulate the contact between mind and world. They differ, though, in their understanding of how the human mind can relate spontaneously to itself and to the world. McDowell links this freedom exclusively to language with the consequence of detaching it from any reflexive determination, turning it into an abstract given. Dewey, by contrast, develops a practice-oriented understanding of freedom and understanding as an essentially precarious cultural form. This allows him to incorporate the reflexive dimension of mental operatiwons, of which McDowell takes no account: It makes a practical difference how the human being conceives its own nature and its own mind.

Online erschienen: 2015-12-11
Erschienen im Druck: 2015-12-1

© 2015 Akademie Verlag GmbH, Markgrafenstr. 12-14, 10969 Berlin.

Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dzph-2015-0077/pdf
Scroll to top button