Home Medicine Spurious test results as a diagnostic clue – pseudohyponatremia revealing multiple myeloma
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Spurious test results as a diagnostic clue – pseudohyponatremia revealing multiple myeloma

  • Francesca Pons-Vidal EMAIL logo , Macarena Calvente de Rávena and María Ortiz-Espejo
Published/Copyright: January 13, 2026
Diagnosis
From the journal Diagnosis

Abstract

Objectives

To describe a case of a pseudohyponatremia secondary to hyperproteinemia in multiple myeloma and to emphasize the importance of analytical verification and laboratory-clinical collaboration to prevent diagnostic errors.

Case presentation

A 55 year-old male presented with severe hyponatremia (119 mmol/L) but paradoxically elevated serum osmolarity, suggesting that the hyponatremia might represent a laboratory artifact. Repeat serum sodium measurement by direct potentiometry with ion-specific electrodes yielded a normal value of 137 mmol/L, confirming artifactual hyponatremia. Additional tests revealed marked hyperproteinemia due to an IgG-kappa monoclonal component, leading to the diagnosis of multiple myeloma.

Conclusions

This case highlights the importance of artifacts in laboratory measurement, in this case recognizing analytical interferences when discordant hyponatremia is found. Confirmatory testing by direct potentiometry ion-specific electrodes prevents misdiagnosis and inappropriate therapy. Early identification of pseudohyponatremia further emphasizes the crucial role of the laboratory in ensuring accurate interpretation and optimizing patient management.


Corresponding author: Francesca Pons-Vidal, Clinical Analysis and Clinical Biochemistry Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Torre B -1, Av. Valdecilla, 25, 39008, Santander, Spain; and Residents and Young Specialists Commission, Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEMEDLAB), Madrid, Spain, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable. This paper focuses on a patient who comes to the emergency department, where a blood sample is taken for a basic emergency profile, and who arrives without a diagnosis. A series of further tests are carried out in the laboratory in order to clarify the cause of false hyponatremia and assist in the patient’s final diagnosis. The patient was not asked to participate in any study; this is a description of a clinical case in which an interference was observed and its cause was identified, leading to the diagnosis of an unknown pathology in the patient.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and have approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Spasovski, G, Vanholder, R, Allolio, B, Annane, D, Ball, S, Bichet, D, et al.. Hyponatraemia diagnosis and treatment clinical practice guidelines. Nefrologia 2017;37:370–380 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nefro.2017.03.021.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Lindner, G, Schwarz, C, Haidinger, M, Ravioli, S. Hyponatraemia in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med 2022;60:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AJEM.2022.07.023.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Matthew, RP, NZ AbrahamJr., Martin bluth. Interpretation of laboratory results - ClinicalKey. In: McPherson, RA, Pincus, MR, editors. Henry. Clinical diagnosis and laboratory techniques. 24 Elsevier, Spain, 2022, p. 100–18.Search in Google Scholar

4. Adrogué, HJ, Tucker, BM, Madias, NE. Diagnosis and management of Hyponatraemia: a review. JAMA 2022;328:280–91. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.2022.11176.Search in Google Scholar

5. Aziz, F, Sam, R, Lew, SQ, Massie, L, Misra, M, Roumelioti, M-E, et al.. Pseudohyponatraemia: mechanism, diagnosis, clinical associations and management. J Clin Med 2023;12:4076. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124076.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Hussain, I, Ahmad, Z, Garg, A. Extreme hypercholesterolaemia presenting with pseudohyponatraemia—a case report and review of the literature. J Clin Lipidol 2015;9:260–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2014.11.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. McCarron, EP, Murray, E, McKeeman, GC, Coward, SM, Hamilton, P, Connolly, G, et al.. Investigating the effects of endogenous lipaemia on the measurement of sodium by indirect ion specific electrode potentiometry. Ann Clin Biochem 2022;59:324–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632221098628.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Kellogg, M, Benco, J, Cervinski, MA. Electrolytes and blood gases. In: Rifai, N, editor; 2022:415– p.Tietz Textbook of Laboratory MedicineSearch in Google Scholar

9. Dimopoulos, MA, Merlini, G, Bridoux, F, Leung, N, Mikhael, J, Harrison, SJ, et al.. Management of multiple myeloma-related renal impairment: recommendations from the international myeloma working group. Lancet Oncol 2023;24:e293–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00223-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Cárdenas, MC, García-Sanz, R, Puig, N, Pérez-Surribas, D, Flores-Montero, J, Ortiz-Espejo, M, et al.. Recommendations for the study of monoclonal gammopathies in the clinical laboratory. A consensus of the Spanish society of laboratory medicine and the Spanish society of Haematology and Haemotherapy. Part II: methodological and clinical recommendations for the diagnosis and follow-up of monoclonal gammopathies. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023;61:2131–42. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM-2023-0325.Search in Google Scholar

11. Spasovski, G, Vanholder, R, Allolio, B, Annane, D, Ball, S, Bichet, D, et al.. Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia. Eur J Endocrinol 2014;170:1–47. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-13-1020.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Simundic, A-M, Dukic, LD, Radisic Biljak, V. Preanalytical variation and pre-examination processes. In: Rifai, N, editor. Tietz textbook of laboratory medicine, 7th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier-Saunders; 2022:80–128 pp.Search in Google Scholar

13. Schlüter, K, Cadamuro, J. Erroneous potassium results: preanalytical causes, detection, and corrective actions. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2023;60:442–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2023.2195936.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Rajkumar, SV, Dimopoulos, MA, Palumbo, A, Blade, J, Merlini, G, Mateos, MV, et al.. International myeloma working group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:e538–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Palumbo, A, Avet-Loiseau, H, Oliva, S, Lokhorst, HM, Goldschmidt, H, Rosinol, L, et al.. Revised international staging system for multiple myeloma: a report from international myeloma working group. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:2863–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2267.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Valentine, RM, Barkhuizen, A, Roberts, R, Ford, C, Gama, R. Pseudohyperkalemia—not always benign. J Appl Lab Med 2019;3:1049–53. https://doi.org/10.1373/JALM.2018.026336.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Dietzen, DJ, Jackups, R, Zaydman, MA. Clinical implications of inaccurate potassium determination in hemolyzed pediatric blood specimens. Clin Chim Acta 2024;557:117862. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CCA.2024.117862.Search in Google Scholar

18. Hashem, N, Abid, A, Sola, SC, Lewis, A. Triglycerides and sodium: unmasking pseudohyponatremia in a clinical case. Cureus 2024;16:e74220. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.74220.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2025-10-18
Accepted: 2025-11-18
Published Online: 2026-01-13

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2025-0150/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button