Home The challenge of clinical reasoning in chronic multimorbidity: time and interactions in the Health Issues Network model
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The challenge of clinical reasoning in chronic multimorbidity: time and interactions in the Health Issues Network model

  • Fabrizio Consorti ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Dario Torre , Daniela Luzi , Fabrizio Pecoraro , Fabrizio Ricci and Oscar Tamburis
Published/Copyright: May 15, 2023

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of multimorbidity requires new theoretical models and educational approaches to develop physicians’ ability to manage multimorbidity patients. The Health Issues Network (HIN) is an educational approach based on a graphical depiction of the evolutions over time of the concurrent health issues of a patient and of their interactions. From a theoretical point of view, the HIN approach is rooted in Prigogine’s vision of the “becoming” of the events and in the concept of knowledge organization, intended as the process of storing and structuring of information in a learner’s mind. The HIN approach allows to design clinical exercises to foster learners’ ability to detect evolutionary paths and interactions among health issues. Recent findings of neuroscience support the expectation that interpreting, completing, and creating diagrams depicting complex clinical cases improves the “sense of time”, as a fundamental competence in the management of multimorbidity. The application of the HIN approach is expected to decrease the risk of errors in the management of multimorbidity patients. The approach is still under validation, both for undergraduate students and for the continuous professional development of physicians.


Corresponding author: Fabrizio Consorti, MD, Associate Professor of Surgery, University of Rome “La Sapienza” Medical School, Rome, Italy, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

References

1. Young, M, Thomas, A, Gordon, D, Gruppen, L, Lubarsky, S, Rencic, J, et al.. The terminology of clinical reasoning in health professions education: implications and considerations. Med Teach 2019;41:1277–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2019.1635686.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Norman, GR, Monteiro, SD, Sherbino, J, Ilgen, JS, Schmidt, HG, Mamede, S. The causes of errors in clinical reasoning: cognitive biases, knowledge deficits, and dual process thinking. Acad Med 2017;92:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001421.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Kudesia, P, Salimarouny, B, Stanley, M, Fortin, M, Terry, SM, Terry, A, et al.. The incidence of multimorbidity and patterns in accumulation of chronic conditions: a systematic review. J Comorbidity 2021;11:26335565211032880. https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565211032880.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Soh, M, Konopasky, A, Durning, SJ, Ramani, D, McBee, E, Ratcliffe, T, et al.. Sequence matters: patterns in task-based clinical reasoning. Diagnosis 2020;7:281–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2019-0095.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Ho, VP, Schiltz, NK, Reimer, AP, Madigan, EA, Koroukian, SM. High-risk comorbidity combinations in older patients undergoing emergency general surgery. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019;67:503–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15682.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Bogetz, JF, Rassbach, CE, Bereknye, S, Mendoza, FS, Sanders, LM, Braddock, CH. Training health care professionals for 21st-century practice: a systematic review of educational interventions on chronic care. Acad Med 2015;90:1561–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000773.Search in Google Scholar

7. Cairo Notari, S, Sader, J, Caire Fon, N, Sommer, JM, Pereira Miozzari, AC, Janjic, D, et al.. Understanding GPs’ clinical reasoning processes involved in managing patients suffering from multimorbidity: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative research. Int J Clin Pract 2021;75:e14187. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14187.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Vetrano, DL, Roso-Llorach, A, Fernández, S, Guisado-Clavero, M, Violán, C, Onder, G, et al.. Twelve-year clinical trajectories of multimorbidity in a population of older adults. Nat Commun 2020;11:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16780-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Braithwaite, J. Changing how we think about healthcare improvement. Brit Med J 2018;361. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Plsek, PE, Greenhalgh, T. Complexity science: the challenge of complexity in health care. Brit Med J 2001;323:625–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7313.625.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Prigogine, Y. From being to becoming: time and complexity in the physical sciences. New York: Freeman and Co; 1980.Search in Google Scholar

12. Bordage, G, Lemieux, M. Semantic structures and diagnostic thinking of experts and novices. Acad Med 1991;66:S70–2. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199109001-00025.Search in Google Scholar

13. Longo, PJ, Orcutt, VL, James, K, Kane, J, Coleman, V. Clinical reasoning and knowledge organization: bridging the gap between medical education and neurocognitive science. J Physician Assist Educ 2018;29:230–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/jpa.0000000000000224.Search in Google Scholar

14. Arnheim, R. Visual thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1969.Search in Google Scholar

15. Longo, PJ. What happens to student learning when color is added to a new knowledge representation strategy? Implications from visual thinking networking. In: Combined annual meetings of the national science teachers association and the national association for research in science teaching. St. Louis, MO: 2001. Available from: http://www.umassd.edu/cas/biology.Search in Google Scholar

16. Ricci, FL, Consorti, F, Pecoraro, F, Luzi, D, Mingarelli, V, Tamburis, O. HIN – health issue network as means to improve case-based learning in health sciences education. Stud Health Technol Inf 2018;255:262–6.Search in Google Scholar

17. Ricci, FL, Consorti, F, Pecoraro, F, Luzi, D, Tamburis, O. A petri-net-based approach for enhancing clinical reasoning in medical education. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 2022;15:167–78. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2022.3157391.Search in Google Scholar

18. Pecoraro, F, Ricci, FL, Consorti, F, Luzi, D, Tamburis, O. The friendly health issue network to support computer-assisted education for clinical reasoning in multimorbidity patients. Electronics 2021;10:2075. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10172075.Search in Google Scholar

19. Shipp, AJ, Aeon, B. Temporal focus: thinking about the past, present, and future. Curr Opin Psychol 2019;26:37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.04.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Ancona, DG, Okhuysen, GA, Perlow, LA. Taking time to integrate temporal research. Acad Manag Rev 2001;26:512–29. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.5393887.Search in Google Scholar

21. Stolarski, MG, Matthews, G. Time perspectives predict mood states and satisfaction with life over and above personality. Curr Psychol 2016;35:516–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9515-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Moser, MB, Rowland, DC, Moser, EI. Place cells, grid cells, and memory. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol 2015;7:a021808. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a021808.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Suddendorf, T, Corballis, MC. The evolution of foresight: what is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behav Brain Sci 2007;30:299–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x07001975.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Tamburis, O, Ricci, FL, Consorti, F, Pecoraro, F, Luzi, D. Innovative learning technologies as support to clinical reasoning in medical sciences: the case of the “FEDERICO II” university. In: Abraham, A, Gandhi, N, Hanne, T, Hong, TP, Nogueira Rios, T, Ding, W, editors. Intelligent systems design and applications. ISDA 2021. Lecture notes in networks and systems, Cham: Springer; 2021, vol 418.10.1007/978-3-030-96308-8_57Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-04-12
Accepted: 2023-04-24
Published Online: 2023-05-15

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Diagnostic errors in uncommon conditions: a systematic review of case reports of diagnostic errors
  4. Routine blood test markers for predicting liver disease post HBV infection: precision pathology and pattern recognition
  5. Opinion Papers
  6. The challenge of clinical reasoning in chronic multimorbidity: time and interactions in the Health Issues Network model
  7. The first diagnostic excellence conference in Japan
  8. Clouds across the new dawn for clinical, diagnostic and biological data: accelerating the development, delivery and uptake of personalized medicine
  9. Original Articles
  10. Towards diagnostic excellence on academic ward teams: building a conceptual model of team dynamics in the diagnostic process
  11. Error codes at autopsy to study potential biases in diagnostic error
  12. Multicenter evaluation of a method to identify delayed diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis and sepsis in administrative data
  13. Detection of fake papers in the era of artificial intelligence
  14. Is language an issue? Accuracy of the German computerized diagnostic decision support system ISABEL and cross-validation with the English counterpart
  15. The feasibility of a mystery case curriculum to enhance diagnostic reasoning skills among medical students: a process evaluation
  16. Internal medicine intern performance on the gastrointestinal physical exam
  17. Scaling up a diagnostic pause at the ICU-to-ward transition: an exploration of barriers and facilitators to implementation of the ICU-PAUSE handoff tool
  18. Learned cautions regarding antibody testing in mast cell activation syndrome
  19. Diagnostic properties of natriuretic peptides and opportunities for personalized thresholds for detecting heart failure in primary care
  20. Incomplete filling of spray-dried K2EDTA evacuated blood tubes: impact on measuring routine hematological parameters on Sysmex XN-10
  21. Letters to the Editor
  22. The diagnostic accuracy of AI-based predatory journal detectors: an analogy to diagnosis
  23. Explainable AI for gut microbiome-based diagnostics: colorectal cancer as a case study
  24. Restless X syndrome: a new diagnostic family of nocturnal, restless, abnormal sensations of various body parts
  25. Erratum
  26. Retraction of: Establishing a stable platform for the measurement of blood endotoxin levels in the dialysis population
Downloaded on 26.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2023-0041/html
Scroll to top button