Clinical problem solving and social determinants of health: a descriptive study using unannounced standardized patients to directly observe how resident physicians respond to social determinants of health
-
Jeffrey A. Wilhite
,
Khemraj Hardowar
Corrigendum to: Jeffrey A. Wilhite*, Khemraj Hardowar, Harriet Fisher, Barbara Porter, Andrew B. Wallach, Lisa Altshuler, Kathleen Hanley, Sondra R. Zabar and Colleen C. Gillespie. Clinical problem solving and social determinants of health: a descriptive study using unannounced standardized patients to directly observe how resident physicians respond to social determinants of health. Diagnosis 2020, Volume 7, Issue 3, pages 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2020-0002.
Unfortunately, a typographic error in the results portion of the abstract was missed during final stages of proofing and editing. The count of full elicitors should read as 38/68 rather than 28/68, and the % of negative elicitors is 23%. The corrected results read as follows: Residents fell into three groups when it came to clinical problem-solving around a housing trigger for asthma: those who failed to ask about housing and therefore did not uncover mold as a potential trigger (neglectors – 21%; 14/68); those who asked about housing in negative ways that prevented disclosure and response (negative elicitors – 23%, 16/68); and those who elicited and explored the mold issue (full elicitors – 56%; 38/68).
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Driving on a highway to hell I found the stairway to heaven. A mentorship lecture intermixed with rock music and a quiz
- Review
- Updated overview on the interplay between obesity and COVID-19
- Mini Review
- Challenges and opportunities for integrating genetic testing into a diagnostic workflow: heritable long QT syndrome as a model
- Opinion Papers
- Making sense of rapid antigen testing in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnostics
- Interpreting clinical and laboratory tests: importance and implications of context
- Predicting mortality with cardiac troponins: recent insights from meta-analyses
- Guidelines and Recommendations
- Operational measurement of diagnostic safety: state of the science
- Original Articles
- Rate of diagnostic errors and serious misdiagnosis-related harms for major vascular events, infections, and cancers: toward a national incidence estimate using the “Big Three”
- Pyoderma gangrenosum underrepresentation in non-dermatological literature
- Assessing the utility of a differential diagnostic generator in UK general practice: a feasibility study
- Assessing physical examination skills using direct observation and volunteer patients
- Clinicians’ and laboratory medicine specialists’ views on laboratory demand management: a survey in nine European countries
- Letters to the Editor
- Frequency of repetitive laboratory testing in patients transferred from the Emergency Department to hospital wards: a 3-month observational study
- Letter in response to Vanstone paper on diagnostic intuition
- Corrigenda
- Corrigendum to: Serious misdiagnosis-related harms in malpractice claims: The “Big Three” – vascular events, infections, and cancers
- Clinical problem solving and social determinants of health: a descriptive study using unannounced standardized patients to directly observe how resident physicians respond to social determinants of health
- Acknowledgment
- Acknowledgment
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Driving on a highway to hell I found the stairway to heaven. A mentorship lecture intermixed with rock music and a quiz
- Review
- Updated overview on the interplay between obesity and COVID-19
- Mini Review
- Challenges and opportunities for integrating genetic testing into a diagnostic workflow: heritable long QT syndrome as a model
- Opinion Papers
- Making sense of rapid antigen testing in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnostics
- Interpreting clinical and laboratory tests: importance and implications of context
- Predicting mortality with cardiac troponins: recent insights from meta-analyses
- Guidelines and Recommendations
- Operational measurement of diagnostic safety: state of the science
- Original Articles
- Rate of diagnostic errors and serious misdiagnosis-related harms for major vascular events, infections, and cancers: toward a national incidence estimate using the “Big Three”
- Pyoderma gangrenosum underrepresentation in non-dermatological literature
- Assessing the utility of a differential diagnostic generator in UK general practice: a feasibility study
- Assessing physical examination skills using direct observation and volunteer patients
- Clinicians’ and laboratory medicine specialists’ views on laboratory demand management: a survey in nine European countries
- Letters to the Editor
- Frequency of repetitive laboratory testing in patients transferred from the Emergency Department to hospital wards: a 3-month observational study
- Letter in response to Vanstone paper on diagnostic intuition
- Corrigenda
- Corrigendum to: Serious misdiagnosis-related harms in malpractice claims: The “Big Three” – vascular events, infections, and cancers
- Clinical problem solving and social determinants of health: a descriptive study using unannounced standardized patients to directly observe how resident physicians respond to social determinants of health
- Acknowledgment
- Acknowledgment
