Home Letter in response to Vanstone paper on diagnostic intuition
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Letter in response to Vanstone paper on diagnostic intuition

  • Bimal Jain EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 24, 2020

Received: 2019-09-18
Accepted: 2020-03-23
Published Online: 2020-04-24
Published in Print: 2021-02-23

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Driving on a highway to hell I found the stairway to heaven. A mentorship lecture intermixed with rock music and a quiz
  4. Review
  5. Updated overview on the interplay between obesity and COVID-19
  6. Mini Review
  7. Challenges and opportunities for integrating genetic testing into a diagnostic workflow: heritable long QT syndrome as a model
  8. Opinion Papers
  9. Making sense of rapid antigen testing in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnostics
  10. Interpreting clinical and laboratory tests: importance and implications of context
  11. Predicting mortality with cardiac troponins: recent insights from meta-analyses
  12. Guidelines and Recommendations
  13. Operational measurement of diagnostic safety: state of the science
  14. Original Articles
  15. Rate of diagnostic errors and serious misdiagnosis-related harms for major vascular events, infections, and cancers: toward a national incidence estimate using the “Big Three”
  16. Pyoderma gangrenosum underrepresentation in non-dermatological literature
  17. Assessing the utility of a differential diagnostic generator in UK general practice: a feasibility study
  18. Assessing physical examination skills using direct observation and volunteer patients
  19. Clinicians’ and laboratory medicine specialists’ views on laboratory demand management: a survey in nine European countries
  20. Letters to the Editor
  21. Frequency of repetitive laboratory testing in patients transferred from the Emergency Department to hospital wards: a 3-month observational study
  22. Letter in response to Vanstone paper on diagnostic intuition
  23. Corrigenda
  24. Corrigendum to: Serious misdiagnosis-related harms in malpractice claims: The “Big Three” – vascular events, infections, and cancers
  25. Clinical problem solving and social determinants of health: a descriptive study using unannounced standardized patients to directly observe how resident physicians respond to social determinants of health
  26. Acknowledgment
  27. Acknowledgment
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2019-0068/html
Scroll to top button