Home Secondary Types of Pitch Accents of the Northern Aukštaitian Dialect of Panevėžys of the Lithuanian Language
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Secondary Types of Pitch Accents of the Northern Aukštaitian Dialect of Panevėžys of the Lithuanian Language

  • Genovaitė Kačiuškienė EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 17, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The Baltic languages remain of special interest for linguists because they contain many archaic features essential for the comparative research of Indo-European languages and reconstruction of the Proto-Indo-European (Mikić 2014: 39). The Lithuanian prosodic system is characterized by free accent and two types of syllable accents (or tones) in the long stressed syllables. The stress is inherited from Indo-European and can fall on any syllable of a word, i. e. last, penultimate, antepenultimate etc. (Stundžia 2014: 12).

In the Northern Aukštaitian dialect of Panevėžys of the Lithuanian Language, four types of syllable accents are possible in the long stressed syllables (more clearly heard in the diphthongs, less in the monophthongs): acute, circumflex, neoacute, neocircumflex (Garšva 1982: 65 ff.). These accents are positional allotones of two types of syllable accents: acute and circumflex. Two more types of accents are possible in strong syllables consisting of two central sounds: typical and atypical. Typical acute and circumflex accents are characteristic of verbs of non-iterative action and of “barytone” denominative words, atypical accents, with an emphasis on the second part of the stressed component, are characteristic of verbs of iterative action and of “oxytonic” denominative words (Kačiuškienė 2009: 34).

The article focuses on results of the auditory and instrumental experiment and demonstrates different auditory and acoustic properties of the secondary types of pitch accents of the Northern Aukštaitian Dialect of Panevėžys of the Lithuanian Language.

References

Дыбо Владимир 1997. Балто-славянская акцентологическая реконструкция и индоевропейская акцентология (Studia Linguarum: De omnibus linguae scilibus et quibusdam aliis). Москва: Российский государственный гуманитарный университет.Search in Google Scholar

Garšva Kazimieras. 1982. Svarbesnės šiaurės vakarų panevėžiškių fonologijos ypatybės. Baltistica 18: 65−85.10.15388/baltistica.18.1.1542Search in Google Scholar

Girdenis Aleksas. 2000. Kalbotyros darbai II. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos institutas.Search in Google Scholar

Гирденис Алексас, Качюшкене Геновайте. 2000 (1987). Вторичные типы слоговых интонаций в литовских диалектах. Kalbotyros darbai II. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos institutas.Search in Google Scholar

Kačiuškienė Genovaitė. 2006. Šiaurės panevėžiškių tarmės fonologijos bruožai. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.Search in Google Scholar

Kačiuškienė Genovaitė. 2009. Some features of prosodic elements and vowel phonemes of the Northern Aukštaitian dialect of Panevėžys of Lithuania. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 17: 32−37.10.1515/DIG.2009.003Search in Google Scholar

Kruopis Julius. 1971. Matematinė statistika. Vilnius: Mokslas.Search in Google Scholar

Labov William. 1978. On the use of the present to explain the past. Readings in historical phonology. London: University Park-London.Search in Google Scholar

Meiliūnaitė Violeta. 2008. Netvirtapradžių žodžio galo dvibalsių vienbalsinimo tendencijos pietų panevėžiškių patarmėje. Lituanistica 54: 51–59.Search in Google Scholar

Mikić Aleksandar. 2014. A note on the words in the Baltic languages for some of the most ancient European grain legume crops. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 22: 39−45.10.1515/dialect-2014-0003Search in Google Scholar

Pakerys Antanas. 1978. Lietuvių bendrinės kalbos fonetikos pratybos. Vilnius: Mokslas.Search in Google Scholar

Pakerys Antanas. 1982. Lietuvių bendrinės kalbos prozodija. Vilnius: Mokslas.Search in Google Scholar

Ručinskaitė Irena. 1984. Trys šiaurės panevėžiškių fonetikos etiudai. Vilnius: VU.Search in Google Scholar

Stundžia Bonifacas. 2014. The Lithuanian language: Distinctive features, past and present. Vilnius: Science & Encyclopaedia Publishing Centre.Search in Google Scholar

Švageris Evaldas. 2015. Akustinių požymių koreliacijos svarba lietuvių kalbos priegaidžių skyrimui. Baltistica 50: 91–113.10.15388/baltistica.50.1.2244Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-11-17
Published in Print: 2016-11-1

© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dialect-2016-0005/html
Scroll to top button